• No results found

Motivation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Motivation"

Copied!
37
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Foundations of

Employee

Motivation

1

(2)

Employee Motivation and

Engagement at Rackspace

Rackspace hosting has a

highly motivated and engaged workforce by rewarding

performance, fulfilling personal needs, and providing

strengths-based feedback.

(3)

Motivation Defined

 The forces within a person that affect the direction,

intensity, and persistence of voluntary behavior

 Exerting particular effort level (intensity), for a certain

amount of time (persistence), toward a particular goal

(direction).

(4)

Employee Engagement

Emotional and cognitive motivation, self-efficacy to perform the job, a clear

understanding of one’s role in the organization’s vision and a belief that one has the resources to perform the job

(5)

Drives and Needs

 Drives (aka-primary needs, fundamental needs, innate motives)

• Neural states that energize individuals to correct deficiencies or maintain an internal equilibrium

• Prime movers of behavior by activating emotions

Self-concept, social norms, and past experience

Drives

(primary needs) Needs

Decisions and Behavior

5 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(6)

Drives and Needs

 Needs

• Goal-directed forces that people experience.

• Drive-generated emotions directed toward goals

• Goals formed by self-concept, social norms, and experience

Self-concept, social norms, and past experience

Drives

(primary needs) Needs

Decisions and Behavior

6 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(7)

Self- actual-ization Physiological Safety Belongingness Esteem Seven categories capture most needs

Five categories placed in a hierarchy

Need to know Need for

beauty

Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy

Theory

7 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(8)

Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy

Theory

 Lowest unmet need has strongest effect

 When lower need is

satisfied, next higher need becomes the primary

motivator

 Self-actualization -- a growth need because

people desire more rather than less of it when satisfied

Self- actual-ization Physiological Safety Belongingness Esteem Need to know Need for beauty

8 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(9)

Evaluating Maslow’s Theory

 Lack of support for theory

 People have different

hierarchies – don’t progress through needs in the same order

 Needs change more rapidly than Maslow stated

Self- actual-ization Physiological Safety Belongingness Esteem Need to know Need for beauty

9 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(10)

What Maslow Contributed to

Motivation Theory

 More holistic

• Integrative view of needs

 More humanistic

• Influence of social

dynamics, not just instinct

 More positivistic

• Pay attention to strengths, not just deficiencies

(11)

What’s Wrong with Needs

Hierarchy Models?

 Wrongly assume that everyone has the same needs hierarchy (i.e. universal)

 Instead, likely that each

person has a unique needs hierarchy

• Shaped by our self-concept -- values and social identity

(12)

Learned Needs Theory

Needs are amplified or suppressed through

self-concept, social norms, and past

experience

Therefore, needs can be “learned” (i.e.

strengthened or weakened through training)

12 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(13)

Three Learned Needs

Need for achievement

• Need to reach goals, take responsibility

• Want reasonably challenging goals

Need for affiliation

• Desire to seek approval, conform to others wishes, avoid conflict

• Effective executives have lower need for social approval

Need for power

• Desire to control one’s environment

• Personalized versus socialized power

13 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(14)

Four-Drive Theory

Drive to Bond

Drive to Learn

• Drive to form relationships and social commitments

• Basis of social identity

• Drive to satisfy curiosity and resolve conflicting information

Drive to Defend

• Need to protect ourselves • Reactive (not proactive) drive • Basis of fight or flight

Drive to Acquire

• Drive to take/keep objects and experiences

• Basis of hierarchy and status

14 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(15)

Features of Four Drives

Innate and hardwired

• everyone has them

Independent of each other

• no hierarchy of drives

Complete set

• no drives are excluded from the model

15 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(16)

How Four Drives Affect

Motivation

1.

Four drives determine which emotions are

automatically tagged to incoming information

2.

Drives generate independent and often

competing emotions that demand our

attention

3.

Mental skill set relies on social norms,

personal values, and experience to

transform drive-based emotions into

goal-directed choice and effort

16 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(17)

Four Drive Theory of

Motivation

Social norms, personal values, and

experience transform drive-based emotions into goal-directed choice and effort

Drive to Acquire Social norms Drive to Bond Drive to Learn Drive to Defend Personal values Past experience

Mental skill set resolves competing drive demands

Goal-directed choice and effort

17 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(18)

Implications of Four Drive Theory

Provide a balanced opportunity for employees

to fulfil all four drives

• employees continually seek fulfilment of drives

• avoid having conditions support one drive more than others

18 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(19)

E-to-P Expectancy P-to-O Expectancy Outcomes & Valences Outcome 1 + or - Effort Performance Outcome 3 + or - Outcome 2 + or -

Expectancy Theory of Motivation

19 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(20)

Increasing E-to-P and P-to-O

Expectancies

Increasing E-to-P Expectancies

• Assuring employees they have competencies

• Person-job matching

• Provide role clarification and sufficient resources

• Behavioral modeling

Increasing P-to-O Expectancies

• Measure performance accurately

• More rewards for good performance

• Explain how rewards are linked to performance

20 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(21)

Increasing Outcome Valences

Ensure that rewards are valued

Individualize rewards

Minimize countervalent outcomes

21 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(22)

Making Every Day Count in NYC

New York City mayor Michael

Bloomberg has challenging goals to accomplish, and he doesn’t want any of his remaining tenure wasted. Bloomberg had special clocks installed in a dozen city government offices that count down how many days remain in his mayoral term.

(23)

Goal Setting

The process of motivating

employees and clarifying their role perceptions by establishing

performance objectives

(24)

Effective Goal Setting

Characteristics

Specific -- measureable change within a time frame

Relevant – within employee’s control and responsibilities

Challenging – raise level of effort Accepted (commitment) – motivated to accomplish the goal

Participative (sometimes) – improves acceptance and goal quality

Feedback – information available about progress toward goal

(25)

Characteristics of Effective

Feedback

1.

Specific – connected to goal details

2.

Relevant – Relates to person’s behavior

3.

Timely – to improve link from behavior to

outcomes

4.

Sufficiently frequent

• Employee’s knowledge/experience

• task cycle

5.

Credible – trustworthy source

25 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(26)

Feedback Through

Strengths-Based Coaching

Maximizing the person’s potential by focusing

on their strengths rather than weaknesses

Motivational because:

• people inherently seek feedback about their strengths, not their flaws

• person’s interests, preferences, and competencies stabilize over time

(27)

Multisource Feedback

Received from a full circle of people around

the employee

Provides more complete and accurate

information

Several challenges

27 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(28)

Evaluating Goal Setting and

Feedback

 Goal setting has high validity and usefulness

 Goal setting/feedback limitations:

• Focuses employees on measurable performance

• Motivates employees to set easy goals (when tied to pay)

• Goal setting interferes with learning process in new, complex jobs

28 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(29)

Keeping Pay Equitable at Costco

Costco Wholesale CEO Jim Sinegal (shown in this photo) thinks the large wage gap between many executives and employees is blatantly unfair. “Having an individual who is making 100 or 200 or 300 times more than the average person working on the floor is wrong,” says Sinegal, whose salary and bonus are a much smaller

(30)

Organizational Justice

Distributive justice

• Perceived fairness in

outcomes we receive relative to our contributions and the outcomes and contributions of others

Procedural justice

• Perceived fairness of the

procedures used to decide the distribution of resources

(31)

• Emotions • Attitudes • Behaviors Distribution Principles Distributive Justice Perceptions Procedural Justice Perceptions Structural Rules Social Rules

(32)

Elements of Equity Theory

Outcome/input ratio

• inputs -- what employee contributes (e.g., skill)

• outcomes -- what employee receives (e.g., pay)

Comparison other

• person/people against whom we compare our ratio

• not easily identifiable

Equity evaluation

• compare outcome/input ratio with the comparison other

32 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(33)

Correcting Inequity Feelings

Reduce our inputs Less organizational citizenship Increase our outcomes Ask for pay increase

Increase other’s inputs Ask coworker to work harder

Reduce other’s outputs Ask boss to stop giving other preferred treatment Change our perceptions Start thinking that other’s perks aren’t really so valuable Change comparison other Compare self to someone closer to your situation Leave the field Quit job

Actions to correct inequity Example

33 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(34)

Equity Sensitivity

Outcome/input preferences and reaction to

various outcome/input ratios

Benevolents

• tolerant of being underrewarded

Equity Sensitives

• want ratio to be equal to the comparison other

Entitleds

• prefer proportionately more than others

34 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(35)

Evaluating Equity Theory

Good at predicting situations unfair

distribution of pay/rewards

Difficult to put into practice

• doesn’t identify comparison other

• doesn’t indicate relevant inputs or outcomes

Equity theory explains only some feelings of

fairness

• procedural justice is as important as distributive justice

35 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(36)

Procedural Justice

Perceived fairness of procedures used to

decide the distribution of resources

Higher procedural fairness with:

• Voice

• Unbiased decision maker

• Decision based on all information

• Existing policies consistently

• Decision maker listened to all sides

• Those who complain are treated respectfully

• Those who complain are given full explanation

36 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e

(37)

Foundations of

Employee

Motivation

37

References

Related documents