Solved Problem:
Problem #1
The computerized solution of a given problem is given below:
Sensitivity Analysis: Objective function:
Variable Final
Value ReducedCost CoefficientObjective AllowableIncrease AllowableDecrease
M 25 0 90 1E+30 6
B 425 0 84 6 34
R 150 0 70 17 1E+30
D 0 -45 60 45 1E+30
Sensitivity Analysis: Right hand side:
Constraints Final
Value ShadowPrice ConstraintR.H. Side AllowableIncrease AllowableDecrease
1 5000 3 5000 850 50
2 1775 0 1800 1E+30 25
3 600 60 600 3.571428571 85
4 150 -17 150 50 150
Answer the following questions:
a) Should manager increase the capacity of resource 1 by 100 units if the cost of such a change is Tk. 200? Why or why not?
b) What will be the change in objective value if resource 1 is increased by 1000 units? c) If it cost Tk. 300 to increase 1 unit of resource 1 and Tk. 5000 to increase 1 unit of
resource 3, which resource will get the priority, considering enough money is available? Why or why not?
d) The Price of 1 unit of product D is Tk. 90. What should the product sell for in order to be included in the solution?
e) Which constraints are fully utilized? What is the utilization (in percent) of resource 2? f) Whether there will be a change or not in the optimum solution, if the profit of 1 unit of
a) The allowable increase of resource 1 is up to 850 from its current level and shadow price (Unit worth of resource) for per unit increase is 3. So increasing resource 1 by 100 units will contribute 3X100 = Tk. 300 to the profit at a cost of Tk. 200 only. So management should increase the capacity of resource 1 by 100 units.
b) The allowable increase of resource 1 is up to 850 from its current level. So increasing this resource by 1000 units will make the resource abundant. So contribution to profit for such a change will be 850X3= Tk. 2550.
c) If fund is available, then we should go for increasing the resource that will contribute the most to the total profit.
Resource 1: 850X3= Tk. 2550
Resource 2: 3.571428571X60= Tk. 214.29. Here, resource 1 will be the choice.
If fund is not sufficient, then we should go for increasing the resource that will contribute the most on per taka basis. (Contribution/Cost)
Resource 1: 3/300 = .01
Resource 2: 60/1200 = .012. Here, resource 2 will be the choice.
d) The product should sell for Tk.(90 + 45) = Tk. 135 in order to be included in the optimum solution. Product D is a non basic variable in the optimum solution. Its reduce cost -45.00 indicates that it has less contribution to the profit by Tk.45.00. So selling price should be increased by Tk. 45.00.
e) Resource 1, 3 and 4 are fully utilized. (These 3 resources have shadow price other than zero)
The utilization of resource 2 is 1775/1800 = 98.61%.
f) The profit range of M within which current solution will remain optimum is: Upper limit: Infinity to Lower limit: 90-6 = 84.
So, when profit will change to Tk. 110, current solution will remain optimum. But when profit will change to Tk. 80, current solution will change (since it is outside the range).
Problem#2
Tucker Inc. produces high-quality suits and sport coats for men. Each suit
requires 1.2 hours of cutting time and 0.7 hours of sewing time, uses 6 yards of
material, and provides a profit contribution of $190. Each sport coat requires 0.8
hours of cutting time and 0.6 hours of sewing time, uses 4 yards of material, and
provides a profit contribution of $150. For the coming week, 200 hours of cutting
time, 180 hours of sewing time, and 1200 yards of fabric are available.
Additional cutting and sewing time can be obtained by scheduling overtime for
these operations. Each hour of overtime for the cutting operation increases the
hourly cost by $15, and each hour of overtime for the sewing operation
increases the hourly cost by $10. A maximum of 100 hours of overtime can be
scheduled. Marketing requirements specify a minimum production of 100 suits
and 75 sport coats. Let
The computer solution is shown in the following Figure.
a. What is the optimal solution, and what is the total profit? What is the plan for
the use of overtime?
b. A price increase for suits is being considered that would result in a profit
contribution of $210 per suit. If this price increase is undertaken, how will the
optimal solution change?
c. Discuss the need for additional material during the coming week. If a rush
order for material can be placed at the usual price plus an extra $8 per yard for
handling, would you recommend the company consider placing a rush order for
material? What is the maximum price Tucker would be willing to pay for an
additional yard of material? How many additional yards of material should
Tucker consider ordering?
d. Suppose the minimum production requirement for suits is lowered to 75.
Would this change help or hurt profit? Explain.
Sensitivity Analysis: Objective function:
Variable Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
S 100 0 190 35 1E+30
SC 150 0 150 1E+30 23.33333333
D1 40 0 -15 15 172.5
D2 0 -10 -10 10 1E+30
Sensitivity Analysis: Right hand side Sensitivity
Constraints Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable Value Price
R.H.
Side Increase Decrease
1 200 15 200 40 60 2 160 0 180 1E+30 20 3 1200 34.5 1200 133.3333333 200 4 40 0 100 1E+30 60 5 100 -35 100 50 100 6 150 0 75 75 1E+30
ANSWER
a. The optimal solution calls for the production of 100 suits and 150 sport coats. Forty hours of cutting overtime should be scheduled, and no hours of sewing overtime should be scheduled. The total profit is $40,900. (190X100+150X150-40X15).
b. The objective coefficient range for suits shows and upper limit of $225. Thus, the optimal solution will not change. But, the value of the optimal solution will increase by ($210-$190)100 = $2000. Thus, the total profit becomes $42,990.
c. The slack for the material coefficient is 0. Because this is a binding constraint, Tucker should consider ordering additional material. The dual price of $34.50 is the maximum extra cost per yard that should be paid. Because the additional handling cost is only $8 per yard, Tucker should order additional material. Note that the dual price of $34.50 is valid up to 1333.33 -1200 = 133.33 additional yards.
d. The dual price of -$35 for the minimum suit requirement constraint tells us that lowering the minimum requirement by 25 suits will improve profit by $35(25) = $875.
Problem#3
The computer solution is shown in the following Figure.
a. What is the optimal solution, and what is the value of the objective function?
b. Which constraints are binding?
c. Which constraint shows extra capacity? How much?
d. If the profit for the deluxe model were increased to $150 per unit, would the optimal solution change?
e. Identify the range of optimality for each objective function coefficient.
f. Suppose the profit for the economy model is increased by $6 per unit, the profit for the standard model is decreased by $2 per unit, and the profit for the deluxe model is increased by $4 per unit. What will the new optimal solution be?
FIGURE: THE SOLUTION FOR THE QUALITY AIR CONDITIONING
PROBLEM
Sensitivity Analysis: Objective function:
Varia
ble Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
E 80 0 63 12 15.5
S 120 0 95 31 8
D 0 -24 135 24 1E+30
Sensitivity Analysis: Right hand side Sensitivity
Constraints Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable Val
ue Price SideR.H. Increase Decrease
1 200 31 200 80 40
2 320 32 320 80 120
Solution:
a. E = 80, S = 120, D = 0, Profit = $16,440. b. Fan motors and cooling coils
c. Labor hours; 320 hours available.
d. Objective function coefficient range of optimality: No lower limit to 159 (135+24). Since $150 is in this range, the optimal solution would not change.
e. Range of optimality: E 47.5 to 75 S 87 to 126 D No lower limit to 159. f. g. Range of feasibility Constraint 1 160 to 180 Constraint 2 200 to 400
Constraint 3 2080 to No Upper Limit
Main Text: Anderson sweeney Management science, Page no 131 and onward
Problem no: 14, 15
Problem # 3
The Porsche Club of America sponsors driver education events that provide high performance driving instruction on actual race tracks. Because safety is a primary consideration at such events, many owners elect to install roll bars in their cars. Deegan Industries manufactures two types of roll bars for Porsches. Model DRB is bolted to the car using existing holes in the car’s frame. Model DRW is a heavier roll bar that must be welded to the car’s frame. Model DRB requires 20 pounds of a special high alloy steel, 40 minutes of manufacturing time, and 60 minutes of assembly time. Model DRW requires 25 pounds of the special high alloy steel, 100 minutes of manufacturing time, and 40 minutes of assembly time. Deegan’s steel supplier indicated that at most 40,000 pounds of the high-alloy steel will be available next quarter. In addition, Deegan estimates that 2000 hours of manufacturing time and 1600 hours of assembly time will be available next quarter. The profit contributions are $200 per unit for model DRB and $280 per unit for model DRW. The linear programming model for this problem is as follows:
The computer solution is shown in the following Figure.
a. What are the optimal solution and the total profit contribution?
b. Another supplier offered to provide Deegan Industries with an additional 500 pounds of the steel alloy at $2 per pound. Should Deegan purchase the additional pounds of the steel alloy? Explain.
c. Deegan is considering using overtime to increase the available assembly time. What would you advise Deegan to do regarding this option? Explain.
d. Because of increased competition, Deegan is considering reducing the price of model DRB such that the new contribution to profit is $175 per unit. How would this change in price affect the optimal solution? Explain.
e. If the available manufacturing time is increased by 500 hours, will the dual value for the manufacturing time constraint change? Explain.
FIGURE THE SOLUTION FOR THE DEEGAN INDUSTRIES PROBLEM
Sensitivity Analysis: Objective function:
Variable Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable Name
Valu
e Cost
Coeffici
ent Increase Decrease
DRB 1000 0 200 24 88
DRW 800 0 280 220 30
Sensitivity Analysis: Right hand side Sensitivity
Constrai
nts Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable Valu
e Price R.H.Side Increase Decrease
1 4000 0 8.8 40000 909.0909 091 10000 2 120000 0.6 120000 40000 5714.285714 3 92000 0 96000 1E+30 4000 Problem #4