• No results found

Voided Slab

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Voided Slab"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

GUIDED BY: Prof. V.R.SHAH Mrs. DHARA SHAH Mrs. AANAL SHAH

PREPARED BY: APURV S. BOKIL SD 0210

(2)

 HISTORY OF HOLLOW CORE SLAB  BUBBLE DECK TECHNOLOGY

 SITE INSTALLATION

 COMPOSITION/THEORY

 TYPES OF BUBBLE DECK/COMPONENTS  EXAMPLES

(3)

 A concrete block is one of several precast concrete

products used in construction. The term precast refers to the fact that the blocks are formed and hardened before they are brought to the job site.

 In the 1950s, hollow-core slab were invented. The voided

or hollow core system was created to reduce the weight of the concrete from the system. this concept removes and replaces concrete from center of the slab, where it is less useful with lighter material in order to decreases the dead wt of concrete floor.however,these hollow cavities

significantly decrease the slab resistance to shear and fire, thus reduce its structural integrity.

(4)

 The first hollow concrete block was designed in 1890 by

Harmon S. Palmer in the United States. After 10 years of experimenting, Palmer patented the design in 1900.

Palmer's blocks were 8 in (20.3 cm) by 10 in (25.4 cm) by 30 in (76.2 cm), and they were so heavy they had to be lifted into place with a small crane. By 1905, an estimated 1,500 companies were manufacturing concrete blocks in the United States.

 These early blocks were usually cast by hand, and the

average output was about 10 blocks per person per hour. Today, concrete block manufacturing is a highly automated process that can produce up to 2,000 blocks per hour

(5)
(6)

BUBBLE DECK TECHNOLOGY

 Bubble deck slab is the slab in which some amount of the

concrete is replaced by the plastic bubbles or ellipsoid which are made by the waste plastic material, which reduces the self weight of the structure.

 Design of this type of the slab is based on the euro and

the British codes.

(7)

 In the 1990ies, a new system was invented, eliminating

the some of the problems. It is used in Dutch:German

invented by JORGEN BREUNING. He locks ellipsoids between the top and bottom reinforcement meshes, thereby creating a natural cell structure, acting like a solid slab.

 The slab is created with the same capabilities as a solid

slab, but with considerably less weight due to the elimination of excessive concrete.

(8)

Russia Australia Brazil North America Denmark New Zealand uk

(9)
(10)

 Saves 30 to 50 % weight compared to a corresponding solid slab – equal stiffness.

 20% concrete reduction in other components.

 The reduced weight of the slab will typical result in a

change in design to longer spans and/or reduced deck thickness.

 It is also seismic friendly as it lowers the total weight of the

building.

 Reduced concrete usage – 1 kg recycled plastic replaces 100

kg of concrete.

 The company estimates that building costs are reduced by

(11)

SITE INSTALLATION

( Type A- Filigree Elements)

• Temporary Support – Propping on parallel beams

• Placing Elements – Semi pre-cast elements mechanically

lifted into position

• Joint Reinforcement – Insert loose bottom splice bars

and tie top mesh across joints between elements

• Perimeter shuttering – Fix shuttering to bottom pre-cast

concrete layer & tie to top mesh reinforcement

• Soffit shuttering – Prop plywood across joints

(12)

Preparation – Seal joints between elements, clean and moisten bottom pre-cast concrete layer

• Concreting – Pour, vibrate and aggregate in-situ concrete • Temporary works – Remove, typically after 3 – 5 days,

according to specific site advice

(13)

Typical arrangement of props and propping beams Loaded trailers arriving on site Lifting element into position

(14)

Aligning bubbles between elements

Pouring, Vibrating & Floating Site Concrete

(15)

 Several methods have been introduced during the last

decades, but with very limited success, due to major

problems with shear capacity and fire resistance as well as impractical execution.

 Most attempts have consisted of laying blocks of a less

heavy material like expanded polystyrene between the bottom and top reinforcement.

 But the use will always be very limited due to reduced

resistances towards shear, local punching and fire.

 which is why the use of these systems has never gained

acceptance and they are only used in a limited number of projects

(16)

The voids are positioned in the middle of the cross section, where concrete has limited effect, while maintaining solid sections in top and bottom where high stresses can exist. Hence, the slab is fully functional with regards to both positive and negative bending.

(17)

 In principle, Bubble Deck slabs acts like solid slabs.

Designing is consequently like for solid slabs, just with less load corresponding to the reduced

amount of concrete. Thorough investigations

according to Euro codes are made at universities in Germany, Netherlands and Denmark, concluding

(18)

 Only top compressive portion and bottom

reinforcing steel of a solid concrete slab contribute to flexure stiffness in bending.

 Bubble deck removes concrete from the center of

the flexural slab and replaces with hollow HDPE

spheres. It is having equal bending stiffness as solid slab.

 But technical university of Denmark also carried

out test on stiffness of bubble deck slab. they verified the result and they found out, for same strength, bubble deck has 87% of bending stiffness of similar solid slab but only 66% concrete volume due to HDPE spheres.

(19)

 As a result, deflection was higher in bubble deck.

 However, significant lower dead weight

compensated for the slightly reduced stiffness and therefore bubble deck gave higher carrying

capacity.

 As, reduced permanent load positively affects long

term response in the serviceability limit state design, which governs crack propagation.

 It has been concluded that adding a minimum

amount of extra reinforcing steel would satisfy the criteria.

(20)

 The main difference between a solid slab and a

voided, voided slab refers to shear resistance. Due to the reduced concrete volume, the shear

resistance will also be reduced.

 For a BubbleDeck slab the shear resistance is

proportional to the amount of concrete, as the special geometry shaped by the ellipsoidal voids acts like ,hence enabling all concrete to be

effective.

 The reduced shear resistance will not lead to

problems, as balls are simply left out where the shear is high, at columns and walls

(21)

 In calculations, a reduction factor of 0.6 is

used on the shear capacity for all bubble deck slab.

 This guarantees a large safety margin. Areas

with high shear loads need therefore a

special attention, e.g. around columns. That is solved by omitting a few balls in the

critical area around the columns, therefore giving full shear capacity.

(22)

The simple Bubble Deck is cast

over the pre-fabricated “bubble lattice” on traditional formwork.(cast in situ)

In the filigree-element Bubble Deck the bottom side of the

„bubble-lattice‟ unit is furnished with a pre-cast concrete

layer which on the building site replaces the horizontal part of the formwork.(semi pre cast)

(23)

The simple Bubble Deck may also

be delivered to the building site as

(24)
(25)

-

Grade of steel: Generally Fe

500,550.

-Rebar size depends on the

thickness of the slab and span.

-spacing: Max 1 m. or maximum

3 balls between two girder.

Two types:

(a). Self supporting

(b). Trussed type.

(26)

- Main bar 10mm minimum –

for 200 to 300 mm slab thickness.

(27)

 Plastic balls or ellipsoids are made up of the plastic

waste.

 Diameter: always 0.9 of the slab size.

 Material of balls:

1.polyethin.

2.pvp- poly vinyl propylene. 3.pvc- poly vinyl chloride.

(28)

Concrete

Type: self compacting concrete

Grade: Any grade of concrete can be used, generally M 20, 30 grade is use.

(29)

The largest Bubble Deck

structure so far erected in

Great Britain. The structure

comprises 7,800 m

2

of Bubble

Deck floor slabs between 3

and 6 stories high supported

on in-situ reinforced concrete

columns. Over £400,000 of

savings were realized as a

direct result of incorporating

Bubble Deck into this project,

amounting to a 3% saving off

the total project cost.

(30)
(31)
(32)

City Hall and Offices, in Denmark

(33)

Bubble deck-advanced structure engineering by Paul harding,managing director bubble deck C.I.ltd.

Bubble deck structure solution (UNITED KINGDOM) Structural Behavior of bubble deck slab by

(34)

References

Related documents

Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during vaginal childbirth: A Western Australian retrospective cohort study.. Women

• We build an analytical framework for a firm making joint operational and marketing deci- sions (viz. pricing, production quantity and sourcing strategy), when selling to a market

The physiological parameters (relative water content, membrane stability index, apparent translocation rate), yield determinants (number of panicles/plant, panicle length,

If the target has an entry for this destination node in its route cache, then it may forward the route response packet utilizing this route in the same manner as is

Within the common field of cluster theory each of the three specific lines of investigation briefly introduced in Section 3 has a distinct perspective on the cluster phenomenon and

To save the current settings of screen division and camera display for future use, click the Configure button, select Video List Setup, and select Export.. You can also select

Simplifying the impact metric to represent only the number of potentially impacted work prod- ucts or the effort and complexity of potentially impacted work products, produced

These spanwise distributions are much smoother than that of the 3D smooth case, similar to the difference in the streamwise velocity deficit data (Fig. There is a