• No results found

oa Agrochemophysica - A comparison of buffer methods for determining lime requirement of acid soils of the Highveld region*

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "oa Agrochemophysica - A comparison of buffer methods for determining lime requirement of acid soils of the Highveld region*"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

A grochem ophysi a 13, 37-41 (1981)

A COMPARISON OF BUFFER METHODS FOR DETERMINING LIME

REQUIREMENT OF ACID SOILS OF THE HIGHVELD REGION*

P. E. H A U M A N N , Highveld R egion, D ep artm en t o f A griculture and Fisheries, Private Bag X804, P otchefstroom 2520

Ab s t r a c t Key w ords: Soil acidity; lim e req u irem en t; buffer m ethods.

Lime requirem ents o f 90 top- a n d subsoil sam ples o f the H u tto n , A valon a n d Clovelly form s were determ ined using the follow ing buffer m eth o d s: the W o o d ru ff (1948) m eth o d ; the 1961 SM P m ethod (S hoem aker, M cL ean & P ra tt, 1961); tw o m odifications o f the 1961 S M P m eth o d viz., the H ighveld Region S M P m ethod (H V R S M P m eth o d — H a u m a n n & Volschenk, 1979) an d the 1966 S M P m ethod (M cL ean, D u m fo rd & C oronel, 1966); the A dam s & E vans (1962) m eth o d and the 1978 S M P m ethod (M cL ean, E ckert, R eddy & Trierw eiler, 1978) w hich is a newly developed double buffer m eth o d . T h e lime requirem ents o b tain ed by these m ethods were c o m p ared w ith th e lime requirem ent indicated by C a C 0 3 incubation.

A ll the m ethods were highly significantly correlated w ith the incubation m ethod. T he 1966 SM P m ethod gave the highest correlatio n (r= 0 ,9 2 1 9 ) closely follow ed by the H V R S M P m eth o d (r = 0,9 1 8 9 ) and the W o o d ru ff m ethod gave the lowest correlatio n (r= 0 ,7 6 9 0 ).

R egression e q u atio n s a n d g raphs revealed th at the 1978 S M P m ethod gave the m ost accurate direct ap p ro x im atio n o f incu b atio n lime requirem ent o f all the m ethods. T he conclusion, how ever, w as th a t th e 1966 a n d H V R S M P m ethods being twice as rapid as the 1978 S M P m eth o d , w ould be preferable for ro u tin e lab o ra to ry analysis after adjustm ent w ith the ap p ro p ria te regression e q u atio n .

U ittreksel

'N V E R G E L Y K IN G V A N B U F F E R M E T O D E S O M K A L K B E H O E F T E V IR S U U R G R O N D E V A N D IE H O E V E L D S T R E E K T E B E P A A L

K alkbehoeftes van 90 bo- en ondergrondmonsters van die H utton-, Avalon- en Clovellyvorms is m et die volgende bufferm etodes bepaal: die W oodruff (1948)-m etode; die 1961 S M P -m eto d e (Shoe­ m aker, M cL ea n & Pratt, 1961); twee modifikasies van die 1961 SM P -m eto d e naam /ik die H oeve/d-streek S M P -m eto d e (H V S S M P -m eto d e — H aum ann (6 Volschenk, 1979) en die 1966 SM P -m eto d e (M cL ea n , D u m ford & Coronet, 1966); die A dam s & Evans (1962)-m etode en die 1978 SM P -m eto d e (M cL ean, E ckert, R eddy & Trierweiler, 1978) wat ’n nuutontw ikkelde dubbelbuffer-metode is. Die kalkbehoeftes wat m et hierdie m etodes verkry is, is vergelyk m et die kalkbehoefte wat m et behulp van inkubasie van die gronde m et C aC O3 (A R ) verkry is.

A ! die metodes het hoogs betekenisvo! m et die inkubasiemetode gekorreleer. D ie 1966 S M P -m etode het die hoogste korrelasie (r =0,9219) getoon gevolg deur die H V S S M P -m eto d e (/■ —=0,9189) en die W oodruff-m etode het die laagste korrelasie (/■=0,7690) getoon. Regressievergelykings- en grafieke het getoon dat die 1978 S M P -m eto d e die akkuraatste direkte beraming van inkubasiekalk-behoefte van a! die m etodes gegee het. D aar is egter tot die slotsom g eko m dat aangesien die 1966 en H V S SM P -m eto d es twee m aal vinniger as die 1978 S M P -m eto d e is, hulle voorkeur behoort te geniet vir roetinelaboratoriumontledings nadat hulle kalkbehoeftes m et behulp van die nodige regressiever­ gelykings aangepas is.

Resum e

U N E C O M P A R A IS O N D E S M E T H O D E S T A M P O N S P O U R L A D E T E R M I N A T I O N D E S N E C E S S I T E S E N C H A U X D E S S O L S A C ID E S D E L A R E G IO N D U H IG H V E L D Les necessites en chaux de 90 echantillons de sot e t sous-sol des fo rm e s H utton, A valon et Clovelly ont e te determ inees en utilisant les m ethodes tampons suivautes: la m ethode W oodruff (1943); la m etliode S M P 1961 (Shoem aker, M cL ea n & P ratt, 1961); deux m odifications de la m ethode S M P 1961 a savoir, la m ethode S M P de !a Region du H ighveld (H V R S M P m ethod— H aum ann & Volschenk, 1979) et la m ethode S M P 1966 (M c L e a n , D um ford (6 Coronel, 1966); ta m ethode A dam s (6 Evans (1962) et la m ethode 1978 (M c L e a n , E ckert, R eddy & Trierweiler, 1978) qui est une m ethode a double tam pon, nouvellement developpee. L e s necessites en chaux obtenues avec ces m ethodes ont e te com-parees avec la necessite de chaux indiquee p ar incubation C aC O s.

Toutes les m ethodes fu re n t hautem ent significatives en correlation avec la methode d ’incubation. L a m ethode S M P 1966 donna la correlation la plus etevee ( r —0,9219) suivie de p res p a r la m ethode H V R S M P (r= 0 ,9 1 8 9 ) et la m ethode W oodruff donna la correlation la p lu s fa ib le (r= 0 ,7 6 9 0 ).

D es equations de regression e t des graphiques revelerent que ta m ethode S M P 1978 donna I'approxi­ mation directe la plus precise de la necessite de chaux d'incubation, de toutes les m ethodes utilisees. Cependant, la conclusion f u t que les m ethodes H V R S M P et 1966 etant deux fo is aussi rapides que la m ethode S M P 1978, seraient preferables pour les analyses routinieres de laboratoire apres ajustage prealable avec I'equation de regression appropriee.

In t r o d u c t i o n

A study com paring different m ethods for determ in­ ing lime requirem ent was conducted by H au m an n & Volschenk (1979). It was a prelim inary investigation, however, and was largely confined to soils w ith a lime requirem ent o f less th a n 2 t C a C 0 3 h a-1, indi­ cating th a t they were n o t strongly acid. It was th ere­

* P art of an M Sc. Agric. thesis subm itted by th e a u th o r to the U niversity o f the O range F ree State, B loem fontein 9301

See Fig. 2 for ex p lan atio n o f the H ighveld Region Received 9 Ja n u a ry 1981; approved 21 A ugust 1981

fore decided to extend this com parison to soils with higher lime requirem ents th a n those used by H au m an n & V olschenk (1979) and m ore representa­ tive o f soils w ith pH (H 20 ) values lower th a n 5,5 . The newly developed double buffer SM P m ethod, claim ed by M cLean, Eckert, R eddy & Trierw eiler (1978) to be an im provem ent on the m ethod o f Shoem aker, M cL ean & P ra tt (1961) especially for soils w ith lime requirem ents lower th an 4 ,0 t C a C 0 3 h a -1, was also evaluated in this study. The C a C 0 3 incubation m ethod (M cL ean, D um ford & C oronel, 1966) was used as stan d ard reference m ethod to com pare several buffer m ethods fo r determ ining

ce

d

by

S

ab

in

et

G

at

ew

ay

u

nd

er

li

ce

nc

e

gr

an

te

d

by

th

e

Pu

bl

is

he

r (

da

te

d

20

12

(2)

lime requirem ent o f soils. The incubation m ethod is regarded as being reliable b u t is not used in routine la b o rato ry analysis because it is too tim e consum ing (M cL ean et al., 1966).

M a t e r i a l s a n d p r o c e d u r e

T hirty top- and subsoil sam ples o f each o f the H u tto n , A valon and Clovelly form s (M acV icar, D e Villiers, L oxton, Verster, L am brechts, M erry- w eather, Le R oux, Van Rooyen & H arm se, 1977) w ith pH (H 20 ) values ranging from 4 ,4 to 6 ,3 and clay content from 3 ,0 to 2 9 ,0 % were selected for this study. The samples were taken during July and A ugust o f 1978 in the D elm as, Ficksburg, C locolan and H arrism ith m agisterial districts. A fter sam pling, the soils were dried and passed th ro u g h a 2 mm sieve. T he soils sam pled represent a fairly wide acidity range and any deductions th a t are m ade should be generally applicable to acid soils in the H ighveld R egion (see Fig. 2 for H ighveld R egion). The fol­ low ing soil properties were determ ined:

(i) pH (H 20 and K C 1) in a soil to solution ratio o f 1 :2 ,5 (Jackson, 1958).

(ii) C ation exchange capacity (CEC) and exchange­ able bases at pH 7 ,0 using 1 m ol N H 4OAc dm -3 (Jackson, 1958).

(iii) O rganic m atter according to the m ethod o f W alkley & Black (Jackson, 1958).

(iv) Clay percentage according to the pipette m ethod (D ay, 1965).

(v) Exchangeable A l and M n in 0 ,2 m ol N H 4C1 dm -3 . Percentage A l-sa tu ra tio n was calculated as

C-a + M g + K + A ! ^ 0 * ’ 1 9 ” >

(vi) Percentage base u n satu ratio n was calculated as 100—percentage satu ratio n ( = % B unsat.).

(vii) E xtractable acidity in 0 ,5 m ol K„SO.,+ 5 g C H 3 C O O K d m - 3 (Eksteen, 1969).

(viii) Exchangeable acidity in 1 m ol KC1 d m -3 (K am p rath , 1967).

(ix) R-values (Eksteen, 1969) were also calculated. ( R = 0 ,1 m o l H C l-e x tra c ta b le C a + M g divided by extractable acidity).

T he d a ta are sum m arised in T able 1 in term s of average values (x), coefficient o f variation (CV) and highest and low est values.

T A B L E 1 S tatistical analysis o f soil properties TA B E L 1 S ta tistiese verwerking van grondeienskappe

P ro p erty

Eienskap X

C V /a K V

Lim it Grens

pH (H 20 ) 5 ,4 3 9 ,4 4 , 4 - 6 ,3

pH (K C 1) 4 ,3 2 7 ,8 3 ,8 - 5,1

C E C /K A Vb 4,41 4 2 ,0 1 ,9 2 - 9 ,9 2 S-value/ IVaarde b c 2 ,1 6 61,8 0 ,4 2 - 7 ,3 9

7 „ O M 0 ,9 5 5 4 ,0 0 ,2 2 - 3,08

/ clay /k le i 14,90 3 8 ,9 3 ,0 - 2 9 ,0

E x c h ./Uitr. A lb 0 ,2 3 109,8 0 ,0 2 - 1,03 E x ch.jU itr. Mnb 0 ,0 4 8 9 ,6 0 ,0 0 - 0 ,1 6 % A 1 s&iuraXion/versadiging 14,50 127,3 1 ,0 - 6 5 ,0 % B unsal J B O V 51,55 35,8 2 2 ,0 - 8 8 ,0 Extr. acidity/E kstr. suurheidb 1,17 4 3 ,5 0 ,4 2 - 2 ,3 9 Exch. a cid ity /Uitr. suurheidb 0 ,2 6 100,0 0 ,0 3 - 1,06

R -value/ Waarde 2 ,7 2 6 2 ,6 1 ,0 - 7 ,0

a C V = C o efficien t o f varia tio n _ lOO.s K V = K o e ffisie n t van variasie~ x b me 100 g ' 1

c s-v a lu e= su m o f exchangeable bases per 100 g soil s-w aarde—som van uitruilbare basisse per 100 g grand

D uplicate 500 g sam ples of each soil were treated with precipitated C a C 0 3 (A R ) equivalent to 0; 1; 2; 4; 8 and 16 t/h a 150 m m -1 and thoroughly m ixed. The soils were m oistened to field capacity and kept in the dark at room tem p eratu re fo r fo u r m onths, and then air-dried and crushed. All lim e requirem ents are based on the assum ption th a t 1 h a soil 150 mm deep has a m ass o f 2 400 tons (viz. a bulk density o f 1 600 kg m -3).

A fter incubation there was a range o f six levels o f neutralization for each soil. G raphs of p H (H 20 ) versus tons C a C 0 3 h a-1 150 m m -1 were com piled for each soil. These graphs were used to determ ine incubation lime requirem ent fo r p H (H 20 ) 6 ,5 . In ­ cubation lime requirem ent was co m p ared w ith those obtained by the various buffer m ethods.

T he follow ing buffer m ethods were used to d e te r­ m ine lime requirem ent o f the soils: W o o d ru ff (1948) as m odified by “ Iow a State U niversity Soil T esting L ab o ra to ry ” (H aum ann & V olschenk, 1979); Shoe­ m aker et al. (1961-1961 SM P m eth o d ); 1966 SM P m e th o d 1 (M cLean et al., 1966); Highveld R egion SM P m ethod (H V R SM P m e th o d 2) (H aum ann & Volschenk, 1979); A dam s & Evans (1962) and the d o u b le buffer SM P m ethod (1978 SM P m ethod) o f M cLean et al. (1978). All these m ethods were used to d eterm ine lime requirem ent for attain in g a soil p H (H 20 ) o f 6 ,5 .

Re s u l t s a n d d is c u s s io n

Because the soils were selected according to p H , they are all in the acid p H range (Table 1). Lowest soil reaction values were pH 4 ,4 ( H 20 ) and pH 3 ,8 (KC1). Lowest values for exchangeable bases (S-value) and R-value o f 0 ,4 2 me 100 g-1 and 1,0 respectively, and highest value o f 1,06 and 1,03 me 100 g ^1 for exchangeable acidity and A l respectively, indicate the need to lime. A l-sa tu ra tio n values ranging from 1,0 to 6 5 ,0 % w ith an average o f 1 4 ,5 % are an indication o f p ro b ab le severe A 1-toxicity in m ost o f the soils. A n A l-sa tu ra tio n o f greater than 12% is, according to Fox (1979), d e trim en tal to m aize

T A B L E 2 Statistical analysis o f lime requirem ents (t C a C 0 3) h a - 1 150 m i r r 1 for p H (H 20 )6 ,5 determ ined by different m ethods

T A B E L 2 Statistiese verwerking van kalkbehoeftes (t C a C 0 3) h a - 1 150 m m '1 vir p H (H X )) 6 ,5 wat bepaal is m et

verskillende metodes

M e th o d/M eto d e X C V /K V* Lim it/G re«i'

Incubation//«fc«6att'e 2 , 8 6 4 ,0 0 , 4 - 8 , 0

1961 SM P 2 ,9 100,0 0 ,0 - 9 , 9

1966 S M P 4 ,2 7 1 ,0 0 , 0 - 9 , 9

H V RjH V S SM Pb 3 ,7 5 9 ,0 0 , 0 - 9 , 0

1978 SM P 2 ,7 6 3 ,0 0 , 0 - 9 , 9

A d am s & Evans 5 ,2 5 2 ,0 1 ,1 - 9 ,9

W o o d ru ff 3 ,7 5 4 ,0 0 ,0 - 9 , 9

a C V = C o efficien t o f v a ria tio n __ lOO.s K V = K o e ffisie n t van variasie' x

b T his m ethod was referred to by H au m an n & V olschenk (1979) as the SM P-1 m ethod

H ierdie m etode is na verwys as die S M P A -m e to d e deur H aum ann & Volschenk (1979)

1 T he procedure for this m eth o d is the sam e as th a t o f the 1961 S M P m ethod except th a t the buffer p H is adjusted to 7 ,3 instead o f 7 ,5

2 T h is m ethod is referred to by H a u m an n & V olschenk (1979) as the SM P-1 m ethod. T h e SM P-2 m ethod referred to by H a u m an n & V olschenk (1979) was replaced by the 1966 SM P m ethod in this study.

d

by

S

ab

in

et

G

at

ew

ay

u

nd

er

li

ce

nc

e

gr

an

te

d

by

th

e

Pu

bl

is

he

r (

da

te

d

20

12

(3)

P. E. H A U M A N N

production. Values fo r exchangeable acidity and exchangeable A1 are o f the same order and the deduction can be m ade th a t exchangeable acidity represents mostly exchangeable A l.

The lime requirem ents indicated by the different m ethods are sum m arised in T able 2 in term s o f average values (x) coefficient o f variation (CV) and highest and lowest values.

T he soils used in this study have a fairly wide variation in lime requirem ent as evidenced by the coefficient o f variation o f 64% for incubation lime requirem ent. Lime requirem ents determ ined by the o ther m ethods show the sam e trend. The SM P and W oodruff m ethods indicate no lime requirem ent in certain cases where the incubation and other m ethods do indicate lime requirem ent. The interpretation can be m ade th a t the SM P and W oodruff m ethods lack sensitivity for soils o f low lime requirem ent and require adjustm ent to accom m odate these soils. The m ethods are arranged as follows according to average lime requirem ents:

A dam s & E v an s> 1 9 6 6 S M P > W o o d ru ff= H V R S M P > 1961 S M P > In c u b a tio n > 1978 SM P.

C orrelation and regression analyses o f incubation lime requirem ent versus lime requirem ent determ ined by the buffer m ethods were conducted and the results tab u lated in Table 3 in term s o f correlation coefficient (r), standard erro r o f determ ination (sy.x) for the regression equation and regression equations.

T A B L E 3 Sim ple linear correlatio n and regression o f in cu b a ­ tion lim e requirem ent versus lime requirem ents determ ined by o th er m ethods

T A B E L 3 Enkelvoudige lineere korrelasie en regressie van inkubasiekalkbehoefte m et kalkbehoeftes wat m et ander m etodes bepaal is

M ethod

M etode r a Sy.x

R egression e q u atio n /b

Regressievergely-kin g /b

1966 SM P 0,9219 0 ,7 0 y — 0 ,4 9 + 0 ,5 5 8 x

H V R /H V S S M P 0,9189 0,71 y = 0 ,0 6 + 0 ,7 5 0 x

1978 SM P 0,8984 0 ,7 9 y = 0 ,3 0 + 0 ,9 4 2 x

1961 SM P 0,8817 0 ,8 5 y = 1 ,2 5 + 0 ,5 5 5 x

A dam s & E vans 0,8336 0 ,9 9 y = —0 , 7 1 + 0 , 564x

W oodruff 0,7690 1,15 y = 0 ,2 9 + 0 ,6 9 6 x

a r > 0 ,2 0 5 0 and 0,2673 significant a t P = 0 , 0 5 and 0,01 respec­ tively

/■^C-,2050 en 0,2673 betekenisvol by ,P = 0 ,0 5 en 0 ,01, respektiew elik

b y = calculated lime requirem ent (t C a C 0 3 h a ' 1 150 m m - 1) y= b erek en d e kalkbehoefte(t C aC O s ha” 1 150 m m r 1)

x = lime requirem ent (t C a C 0 3 h a ' 1 150 m m '1) o f other m ethods

\= k a lk b e h o e fte ( t C a C 0 3 ha-1 150 m m r 1) van ander m etodes

All the m ethods correlated highly significantly w ith the incubation m ethod. The m ethods are arranged as follows according to correlation w ith the incuba­ tion m ethod: 1966 S M P > H V R S M P > 1 9 7 8 S M P > 1961 S M P > A dam s & E v a n s> W oodruff.

T he regression equations in Table 3 are graphically illustrated in Fig. 1

The 1966 SM P and W o odruff m ethods attained m axim um accuracy a t an in cubation lime requirem ent o f approxim ately 1 ,0 t C a C 0 3 ha-1 . Below this value these m ethods underestim ated incubation lime requirem ent and above this value they overestim ated incubation lime requirem ent. The H V R SM P m ethod slightly underestim ated incubation lime requirem ent below 0 ,2 t C a C 0 3 ha-1 and overestim ated incubation lime requirem ent above this value. The 1961 SM P m ethod attained m axim um accuracy at an incubation lime requirem ent o f approxim ately 3 ,0 t C a C 0 3 ha-1 . Below this value the 1961 SM P m ethod u nder­ estim ated incubation lime requirem ent and above this value overestim ated incubation lime requirem ent. The A dam s & Evans m ethod consistently overesti­ m ated incubation lime requirem ent. The 1978 SM P m ethod slightly underestim ated incubation lime requirem ent below 5 ,0 t C a C 0 3 ha-1 and attained m axim um accuracy between 5 ,0 and 6 ,0 t C a C 0 3 ha-1 . It was the only m ethod investigated, however, th a t gave a regression line nearly parallel to the 1:1 line. This m ethod is therefore the m ost accurate o f all the m ethods fo r direct prediction o f incubation lime requirem ent. Lime requirem ents indicated by the different buffer m ethods a t incubation 1 me require­ m ents o f 0 ,0 ; 1 ,0 ; 2 ,0 ; 3 ,0 ; 4 ,0 ; 5 ,0 and 6 ,0 are given in Table 4.

A lthough the 1966 SM P m ethod does n o t give an accurate direct prediction o f incubation lime require­ m ent it can be used to m ake a relatively accurate calculation of incubation lime requirem ent w ith the aid o f the following regression equation (Table 3). y = 0 ,4 9 + 0 ,5 5 8 x

(r = 0 ,9 2 1 9 ; sy.x= 0 ,7 0 )

W here

y = c a lc u la te d lime requirem ent (t C a C 0 3 h a -1 150 m m -1)

x = 1 9 6 6 SM P lime requirem ent (t C a C 0 3 h a-1 150 m m -1)

As m entioned by H aum ann & Volschenk (1979) the tim e required for determ ination of, am ongst others, lime requirem ent is im p o rtan t fo r routine analysis. The 1978 SM P m ethod is m ore th an twice as long as the single buffer SM P and W oodruff m ethods (Table 5).

TA B L E 4 Lim e requirem ents o f the different m ethods at certain incubation lime requirem ents TA B E L 4 K alkbehoeftes van die onderskeie m etodes b y sekere inkubasiekalkbehoeftes

M e th o d/M eto d e Lim e requirem ent* /K alkbehoefte (t C a C 0 3 h a -1 150 m m '1)1

Incu b atio n/In ku b a s ie... ... 0 ,0 1 ,0 2 ,0 3 ,0 4 ,0 5 ,0 6 ,0

1966 S M P ... 0 ,9 2 ,8 4 ,5 6 ,3 8,1 9 ,9

H V R /tf K S ... 1,2 2 ,6 3 ,9 5 ,2 6 ,6 7 ,9

1978 S M P ... 0 ,8 1,8 2 ,9 3 ,9 5 ,0 6 ,0

1961 S M P ... - 0 , 5 1,3 3,1 5 ,0 6 ,8 8 ,6

A dam s & E v an s... 3 ,0 4 ,8 6 ,6 8 ,4 10,2 11,9

W o o d ru ff... 1 ,0 2 ,4 3 ,9 5 ,3 6 ,7 8 ,2

a All lime requirem ents are aim ed at a ttain in g a soil p H (H .O ) o f 6 ,5

A lle kalkbehoeftes is gebaseer op die verkryging van ’n g r o n d p H ( / f 20 ) van 6 ,5

39

ce

d

by

S

ab

in

et

G

at

ew

ay

u

nd

er

li

ce

nc

e

gr

an

te

d

by

th

e

Pu

bl

is

he

r (

da

te

d

20

12

(4)

F IG . 1 R egression graphs o f incubation lime requirem ent versus lime requirem ents o f other m ethods F IG . 1 Regressiegrafieke van inkubasiekalkbehoefte teen ka lkbehoeftes van ander metodes

d

by

S

ab

in

et

G

at

ew

ay

u

nd

er

li

ce

nc

e

gr

an

te

d

by

th

e

Pu

bl

is

he

r (

da

te

d

20

12

(5)

P. E. H A U M A N N

2 K a ro o 6 T ra n sva a l

3 N a ta l 7 W in te r Ra\nt a\\/Winterreen

F IG . 2 A gricultural regions o f the RSA F IG . 2 Landboustreke van die R S A

T A B L E 5 T im e required fo r lime requirem ent determ in atio n T A B E L 5 T yd benodig vir kalkbehoeftebepaling

M ethod M etode

T im e req u ire d 2 T y d benodiga

In cu b atio n /Inkubasie 4 j m o n th s/m a a n d e 1961, 1966 an d H V R /en H V S SM P 35 min

1978 SM P 80 min

A dam s & E vans 90 min

W oodruff 40 min

a T im e required for the entire procedure T y d benodig vir die hele prosedure

A lthough the 1978 SM P m ethod gives a better direct prediction o f incubation lime requirem ent than the o ther m ethods, the H V R and 1966 SM P m ethods can, w ith the aid o f their regression equations (Table 3), give a better indication o f incubation lime requirem ent than the 1978 SM P m ethod. It is obvious th at a com prom ise between accuracy and speed of determ ination should be made. It is, however, a sim pler o peration to correct an obtained value than to use a m ethod which involves twice the effort to gain a slightly m ore accurate value fo r lime require­ ment.

It is interesting to note th a t the H V R SM P m ethod showed a better correlation w ith incubation lime requirem ent and the m ethods o f A dam s & Evans (1962) and W oodruff (1948) showed w eaker correla­ tion w ith incubation lime requirem ent in this study th an in the study o f H aum ann & V olschenk (1979). The m ethod o f A dam s & Evans was form ulated for soils w ith low lime requirem ents and Shoem aker et al. (1961) found th a t the W oodruff m ethod was suitable for soils low in exchangeable A l. T he 1961 SM P m ethod, on the o ther hand was form ulated for soils w ith “ appreciable” am ounts o f exchangeable A l. The logical deduction th a t can be m ade is th a t the soils in this study are m ore acid than those used by H aum ann & Volschenk (1979) and th a t the claims o f the authors regarding the above-m entioned m ethods are probably valid.

Co n c l u s i o n

A lthough the 1978 SM P m ethod gives a slightly m ore accurate direct prediction o f incubation lime require­ m ent than any o f the o th e r m ethods, it is nevertheless a relatively tim e-consum ing m ethod com pared to the single buffer 1961, 1966 and H V R SM P and W oodruff m ethods. It would therefore be advisable to use a correction factor (regression equation) to adjust the lime requirem ent tables o f either the 1966 or the H V R SM P m ethods rath er th an to use the 1978 SM P m ethod for ro u tin e analysis.

As m entioned by H au m an n & V olschenk (1979) a draw back o f the above-m entioned buffer m ethods is th a t they are aim ed at attain in g a soil pH (H aO) o f 6 ,5 which is not necessarily ideal for all crops (O rchard, 1972). T herefore, an evaluation o f m ethods o f determ ining lime requirem ent based on acid and base saturation and applicable to specific crops rem ains an object for fu rth er investigation.

Lime requirem ent obtained by C a C 0 3 incubation cannot be directly applied to field conditions. A so- called “ lim ing fa c to r” (Russell, 1973) which can vary from 1 to 2 and even higher depending inter alia on the quality o f the agricultural lime used in practice, is used to increase incubation lime requirem ent in order to arrive at a field recom m endation. Lim ing trials conducted in order to verify the findings o f this study and to calibrate the lime requirem ent determ ination m ethods for field conditions and different qualities o f agricultural lime rem ain a priority.

Re f e r e n c e s

A D A M S , F. & E V A N S, C. E., 1962. A rapid m eth o d for m easuring lime requirem ent o f red-yellow podzolic soils. Proc. S o il Sci. Sac. A m . 26, 355-357.

D A Y , P. R ., 1965. Particle fractio n atio n an d particle-size analysis. C h ap te r 43. In: M ethods o f soil analysis (Ed. C. A. Black) M ad iso n : A m . Soc. A gron., 545-567.

E K S T E E N , L. L., 1969. T he determ ination o f lim e require­ m ents o f soils for various crops in the W inter R ainfall Region. Fert. Soc. S. Afr. J. 2, 13-14.

F O X , R. H ., 1979. Soil pH , alum inium satu ratio n a n d corn grain yield. Soil Sci. 127, 330-334.

H A U M A N N , P. E. & V O L S C H E N K , J. E., 1979. K alk- behoeftes van gronde in die H oeveldstreek. 1. ’n Vergelyking van verskillende m etodes om k alk b eh o efte te bepaal. Agro-chemophysica. 11, 33-36.

JA C K S O N , M. L., 1958. Soil chem ical analysis. L o n d o n : C onstable & Co. Ltd.

K A M P R A T H , E. J., 1967. Soil acidity a n d response to liming. In tern atio n al soil testing. T echnical bulletin N o. 4. M A C V IC A R , C. N ., D E V IL L IE R S , J. M ., L O X T O N , R. F.,

V E R S T E R , E., L A M B R E C H T S , J. J. N ., M E R R Y - W E A T H E R , F. R „ LE R O U X , J., V A N R O O Y E N , T. H., & H A R M S E , H. i . VON M „ 1977. Soil classification. A B inom ial system for S outh A frica. Sci. Bull. 390. P reto ria : D ep artm en t o f A gricultural T echnical Services.

M C L E A N , E. O., D U M F O R D , S. W. & C O R O N E L , F. A., 1966. C om parison o f several m ethods o f determ ining lime requirem ents o f soils. Proc. S o il Sci. Soc. A m . 30, 26-30. M C L E A N , E. O., E C K E R T , D . J., R E D D Y , G . Y. & T R IE R -

W E1LER , J. F ., 1978. A n im proved SM P soil requirem ent m ethod in co rp o ratin g double-buffer an d quick test features. J. Soil. Sci. Soc. A m . 42, 311-316.

O R C H A R D , E. R ., 1972. Som e thoughts on soil acidity a n d lim ing Fert. Soc. S. A fr. J. 1, 5-9.

R U S S E L L , E. W ., 1973. Soil con d itio n s a n d plant grow th. 10th E dition. L o n d o n : L ongm an.

S H O E M A K E R , H. E., M C L E A N , E. O. & P R A T T , P. F., 1961. Buffer m ethods for d eterm ining lim e requirem ent o f soils with appreciable a m o u n ts o f extractable alum inium . Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. A m . 25, 274-277.

W O O D R U F F , C. M ., 1948. Testing soils fo r lime requirem ent by m eans o f a buffered solution an d the glass electrode. Soil. Sci. 66, 53-63.

41

ce

d

by

S

ab

in

et

G

at

ew

ay

u

nd

er

li

ce

nc

e

gr

an

te

d

by

th

e

Pu

bl

is

he

r (

da

te

d

20

12

Figure

TABLE 1 Statistical analysis of soil properties TABEL 1 Statistiese verwerking van grondeienskappe
TABLE 4 Lime requirements of the different methods at certain incubation lime requirements TABEL 4 Kalkbehoeftes van die onderskeie metodes by sekere inkubasiekalkbehoeftes
FIG . 1 Regression graphs of incubation lime requirement versus lime requirements of other methods FIG
TABEL 5 TABLE 5 Time required for lime requirement determination Tyd benodig vir kalkbehoeftebepaling

References

Related documents

(1984): Comparative development of vascular tissue patterns on the shoot apex of

2003 Cross Campus Cancer Research Grant, “Identification of Downstream Targets of the Caenorhabditis elegans lin-1 Gene Using Microarray Analysis.” Wake Forest School of

This article is a review of the monogenic disorders are caused by mutation of single gene and referred to as single gene disorders and polygenic alterations at multiple areas of

Although there is an existing certification (the Q Graders Program) and classes for developing cupping skills for specialty green coffee evaluation, there has not been a

To use the potential modifications to reduce sitting time in pre-schoolers formulated by childcare educators to examine the acute effects of a ‘sit less, stand and move

[r]