RGDV peptide selectively inhibits
platelet-dependent thrombus formation in vivo. Studies
using a baboon model.
Y Cadroy, … , R A Houghten, S R Hanson
J Clin Invest.
1989;
84(3)
:939-944.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114256
.
Since platelet hemostatic functions are mediated in part through the binding of adhesive
proteins containing an RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) recognition sequence, and since platelet
reactions may be inhibited in vitro by RGD-containing peptides, we assessed in vivo the
antithrombotic activity of RGDV (Arg-Gly-Asp-Val) tetrapeptide using a baboon thrombosis
model. Thrombus formation was induced by a device consisting of a tubular segment
coated with type I collagen, followed by two regions of expanded diameter exhibiting
disturbed flow and stasis. The thrombogenic device was incorporated into femoral
arteriovenous shunts under conditions of intermediate wall shear rate (100 s-1). Thrombus
formation was measured by scintillation camera imaging of 111In-platelets and by counting
of 125I-fibrinogen/fibrin. Thrombus that formed on the collagen substrate was rich in
platelets, while thrombus formed in the disturbed flow regions was rich in fibrin and red
cells. RGDV peptide was infused proximal to the thrombogenic device to maintain local
plasma concentrations of 25, 50, and 100 microM. Infused RGDV decreased the
accumulation of both platelets and fibrin on the collagen substrate in a dose-response
manner. At the highest dose platelet and fibrin deposition after 40 min was reduced by
greater than 80% (P less than 0.01). In the region of disturbed flow, RGDV (100 microM)
reduced platelet deposition by 85% (P less than 0.01) but did not reduce the accumulation
of […]
Research Article
RGDV Peptide
Selectively
Inhibits
Platelet-dependent
Thrombus Formation
In
Vivo
Studies Using
a
Baboon Model
YvesCadroy,Richard A. Houghten,* and Stephen R. Hanson
*Departments ofBasicand Clinical Research andMolecular Biology, Research Institute ofScripps Clinic, La Jolla, California 92037
Abstract
Introduction
Since platelet hemostatic functions are mediated in part through the
binding of adhesive proteins containing
anRGD
(Arg-Gly-Asp)
recognition
sequence, and since platelet reac-tions may beinhibited
invitro byRGD-containing
peptides,
weassessed in vivo the antithrombotic activity of RGDV
(Arg-Gly-Asp-Val) tetrapeptide using
a baboonthrombosis model. Thrombus formation was induced by a device consistingof
a tubular segment coated with type Icollagen,
followed by tworegions of expanded diameter exhibiting disturbed flow and
stasis.
Thethrombogenic
devicewasincorporated
intofemoral
arteriovenous
shunts underconditions
of intermediate wall shear rate(100
s-').
Thrombusformation
was measured byscintillation
cameraimaging
of"'In-platelets
andby
counting
of
'25I-fibrinogen/fibrin.
Thrombus thatformed
on the colla-gen substratewasrich
inplatelets, while
thrombusformed
in thedisturbed flow
regions
wasrich
infibrin and red cells.RGDV
peptide
wasinfused
proximal
tothethrombogenic
device
tomaintain
localplasma
concentrations of25, 50,
and 100 ,uM. InfusedRGDV
decreased theaccumulation
of both platelets and fibrin on the collagen substrate in a dose-re-sponsemanner.Atthehighest
doseplatelet
andfibrin
deposi-tion after40 min was reduced by >80%
(P
<0.01).
In the region of disturbedflow, RGDV (100 AM)
reduced plateletdeposition
by85% (P
<0.01)
butdidnotreduce the accumula-tionof
fibrin (P
<0.3). Similarly,
thepeptide
inhibited the releaseof
granularproteins
from platelets associated with thrombus(platelet factor 4,
,8-thromboglobulin;
P<0.01),
butdid
notprevent the appearanceof
fibrinopeptide
Aincirculat-ing blood
(P
>0.1).
Nosystemic
alterations in blood pressure,bleeding time,
orplatelet
aggregation
exvivowereproduced by
locally
infused RGDV.
Theantithrombotic
effects of RGDV
peptide disappeared
within 5 min afterdiscontinuing
the infu-sion.Incontrolstudies infused RGEV(Arg-Gly-Glu-Val,
100,uM)
showed no antithromboticactivity. Thus,
RGDVselec-tively
blocksplatelet-dependent
thrombusformation in vivo.Dr. Cadroy's present address isLaboratoire Central
d'Hematologie-Hemostase,Hopital Purpan, 31052 ToulouseCedex,France. Addressreprintrequests to Dr. Stephen R. Hanson, Division of
Oncology-Hematology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA30322.
Receivedfor publication 6 February 1989 and in revisedform 11
April1989.
After activation
byphysiologic agonists, platelets
maybind
adhesive
glycoproteins,
including
fibrinogen, fibronectin,
andvWf,
throughinteractions with the platelet glycoprotein
(GP)'
IIb-IIIa
receptor(1,
2).
Fibrinogen
binding mediates platelet
aggregation
(3, 4), which
canalso besupported by
vWfbinding
to GPlb-Illa
(5). Fibronectin
and vWfare also present insubendothelial
tissues, and
may be involved inplatelet
GPlb-Illa-mediated adhesion
andspreading
atsitesof
vesselin-jury (6, 7).
Theimportance
of these mechanisms for normalhemostasis
in man has been shownby
theobservation
thathereditary abnormalities of GP
lIb-IlIa,
or the presenceof
autoantibodies
against this
receptor, mayproduce
a severebleeding tendency (8, 9).
Inaddition,
MAbsagainst
GPIIb-Illa
have provento be potentantithrombotic
andantihemo-static
agents inanimal
modelsof arterial disease
(10-12),
and have thus beenproposed for clinical
applications (13-15).
Because many
adhesive proteins interact with
plateletGP
Ilb-IIIa through
acommon RGD(Arg-Gly-Asp)
peptide
rec-ognition
sequence,which is
alsofound
in otheradhesive
mole-cules(e.g.,
collagen,
laminin, thrombospondin,
andvitronec-tin; 16-21),
synthetic RGD-containing peptide analogues of
the
cell-binding domains of adhesive proteins
may alsorepre-sent an
important therapeutic
strategy. Invitro
suchpeptides
have been shown toblock
adhesive protein binding
toplatelets(18, 21-23)
andinhibit
bothplatelet adhesion
andaggregation
(18, 20-26).
However,their effectiveness
for antithrombotic
therapy
invivo remains undefined.
We havetherefore
evalu-ated thecapacity
of infused RGDV
(Arg-Gly-Asp-Val) peptide
to block both
platelet
andfibrin
componentsof
forming
thrombus
invivo
using
arecently
described baboon
model(27). RGDV
wasevaluated
becauseof its
affinity for platelet
GP
Ilb-IIIa (22).
Ababoon
model was chosenbecause
this
species
ishemostatically
similartoman(28).
Methods
Animals studies. 11 normalmalebaboons(Papio
anubis/cynocepha-lus)wereused. Theanimals received either isotonic saline(controls),
RGDV peptide, or RGEV peptide,all administered by continuous infusion as described below. Platelet counts (mean, 347±15
X
103hdl),
hematocrits (32.6±0.7%), and fibrinogen levels(3.7±0.2 mg/ml)weredeterminedasreported elsewhere (27),and wereequiva-lent between thedifferent study groups. All animals had a chronic exteriorized siliconerubberarteriovenousshuntsurgically placed
be-tweenthefemoralartery andvein(12,27).Theseshuntsdo not shorten
platelet survival detectablyorproducemeasurableplatelet activation
1.Abbreviations used in thispaper: FPA, fibrinopeptide A; GP, glyco-protein; PF4, platelet factor 4;,6TG, f,-thromboglobulin.
J. Clin. Invest.
C)The AmericanSocietyforClinicalInvestigation,Inc.
0021-9738/89/09/0939/06 $2.00
(12). In each experiment a thrombogenic device was inserted into the shunt system as an extension segment and exposed to non-anticoagu-lated blood for 40 min. The device consisted of a tubing segment (2 cm length, 3.2 mm i.d.) coated with covalently bound type I collagen, followed by two regions of expanded diameter (2 cm length, 9.3 mm i.d.) exhibiting flow recirculation and stasis. Blood flow was main-tainedat20ml/min usingaroller pump (Cole-Parmer Instrument Co., Chicago, IL). The wall shear rate in the collagen tubing segment was 100s-'. As discussed elsewhere (27), this device generates a complex thrombusinvivohavingaproximal region rich in platelets (collagen segment) simulating arterial thrombus formation, and a distal compo-nent (disturbed flow region) enriched in fibrin and red cells as observed in venousthrombosis.
Autologous baboon blood platelets were labeled withI mCi "
'In-oxine accordingto amethod described previously (27). After allowing
atleast 1hfor the reinfused cells to distribute within the vasculature, thethrombogenic device was incorporated into the shunt system and exposed to native blood for 40 min. The accumulation of" 'In-plate-lets within each device region was measured in real time using a gamma scintillation camera (model 4/11; Picker Corp., Highland Heights, OH). Data were analyzed using a computer-assisted image processing system (Medical Data Systems A3; Medtronic Inc., Min-neapolis, MN) interfaced with the camera (27). Images were acquired
at5-min intervals. The total number of deposited platelets (labeled plus unlabeled cells) was calculated by dividing the deposited platelet activity (counts per minute) by the whole blood platelet "'In-activity (counts perminute/milliliter)and multiplying by the circulating plate-let count (plateplate-lets/milliliter) (12, 27).
Homologous baboon fibrinogen was purified and labeled with '25I
asdescribed (27). The labeled fibrinogen preparation was > 90% clot-table by thrombin. 10 min before initiating thrombus formation 5 MCi of'25I-fibrinogenwasinjected intravenously. After blood exposure for 40min the device was thoroughly rinsed with isotonic saline and cut into regions corresponding to the collagen segment and expanded flow regions (27). After allowing at least 30 d for the".'Into decay
(t,12,
2.8 d) the device componentswerecountedfor'25I-fibrinogen radioactiv-ity usingagamma counter. Total fibrin accumulation was calculated by dividing the deposited'25I-radioactivity(counts per minute) by the clottable fibrinogen radioactivity (counts per minute/milliliter) and multiplying by the plasma fibrinogen concentration (milligrams/milli-liter)asmeasured ineachexperiment.Blood pressurewascontinuously measured usingamonitor(model 2101; Honeywell Inc., Denver, CO) and pressure transducer connected directlytothearterial inlet of the arteriovenous shunt. Bleeding times were performed on the shaved volar surface of the forearm of the baboonusingthestandardtemplatemethod(29).Allprocedureswere
approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with federal guidelines (Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 1985).
Peptidepreparations. Peptides were prepared by the method of simultaneousmultiplepeptide synthesis,andcharacterized byHPLC
asdescribed (30). Both RGDV and RGEV peptideswerediluted in saline beforeuse.RGDVpeptidewasinfusedproximaltothedeviceat ratessufficient to maintain local plasma concentrations of 25, 50, and
100MgM.
Theinfusionrates were0.35±0.01,0.68±0.02, and 1.31±0.06Mmol/minatthe threeplasmaconcentrations, respectively,andwere
calculatedonthebasisofacontrolled blood flowrate(20 ml/min)and
hematocrit measurements in each animal. RGEV peptidewasinfused
at a rateof 1.39±0.03
gmol/min
toachievealocalconcentration of 100MM
within the extracorporeal circuit. Thesedoses were chosen because in vitro studies showedthat 100MMRGDVpeptidewasthe minimumconcentration requiredtoeffectively abolish plateletaggre-gationinresponseto ADP andcollagen. Under thesameconditions,
RGEVpeptide (upto 1 mM)had noeffectonplateletaggregation.
Theduration of the antithrombotic effects of infused RGDV pep-tidewasdeterminedin aseparategroup ofthreeanimals.Inthis study RGDV peptide was infused proximalto the thrombogenic device
(1.33±0.03M,mol/min)to provide a local peptide concentration of 100
uM. After 40 min the RGDV infusionwasdiscontinued and saline alonewasinfused foranadditional 40-min interval. "'IIn-Platelet
imagingwasperformed throughout the 80-min exposureperiod. In
separate control studiesperformedin thesameanimals,saline alone was infused for a period of 40 min.
Laboratoryprocedures.RIAsfor,-thromboglobulin
(f3TG),
plate-let factor 4 (PF4), and fibrinopeptide A(FPA) were performed aspreviously described (27) on blood samples drawn before andatthe endofeachexperiment.The lattersamplesweredrawnimmediately
distaltothe device and therefore reflected the local, rather than sys-temic, concentrations of the markers assayed.
Plateletaggregationstudies were performed using an aggregometer (Chrono-Log Corp., Havertown, PA)asreported elsewhere (29). The
concentration of platelets inplatelet-rich plasmawas adjustedto
250,000/,Ml.
The agonists used wereADP(Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) and collagen (Hormon Chemie, Munich, FRG). Results were expressed as the concentration of agonist required to produce 50% of the maximum achievable increase in light transmission (ED50) through thestirredsuspensions ofplatelet-richplasma (29).Atthe end of eachexperiment bloodwasdrawn from sitesproximal and distaltothesite of thrombus formationtoevaluate both local and systemic effects of the infusedpeptides.
Dataanalysis.Thetwo-tailed t test forpairedorunpairedgroups was used when the datawerenormallydistributed (Wilk-Shapiro test).
Otherwise,theWilcoxonsignranktest waschosen.Alldataaregiven
asmean±ISE.
Results
In
four
animals studied before device
exposure thebaseline
agonist concentrations required
toproduce
ahalf-maximal
platelet
aggregation
response(ED50)
were1.7±0.3
AM
for
ADPand
1.5±0.5
gg/ml
for collagen. After device
exposurefor 40
min
in control studies (saline infusion
only),the ED50 values
determined with blood samples taken distal
tothe
device
wereequivalent
to controlvalues
(ADP, 1.7±0.5 uM; collagen,
1.4±0.5
,ug/ml;
P>0.5), indicating that platelet
aggregation
wasunaffected
bydevice
placement over thestudy
interval.
Similarly,
the
aggregation
responsein
effluent
blood
wasunchanged in four animals having infused RGDV peptide
atplasma concentrations of 25 and 50
,uM
(P > 0.5 vs. controlresults in both cases).
Inanimals infused with
RGDVpeptide
ata
local
concentration of 100
,M,platelet aggregation
wasinhibited
in response to both ADP(ED50,
3.4±0.5MM;
P<
0.05) and collagen (ED50, 3.0±0.5 ,g/ml;
P <0.01).
Infour
animals
given
the
RGEV
peptide (100
IAM)
the ED50 results
were
unchanged
vs.control values
(P > 0.5for
bothagonists).
The
peptide infusions
werewithout systemic effects.
Thus,for all doses of RGDV and RGEV
peptides,
the
ED50 values
measured in arterial blood sampled proximal
to thesite
of
peptide
infusion
wereequivalent
tobaseline
valuesmeasured
in the same
animals
(P > 0.5in
eachcase). Inaddition,
infu-sion
of RGDV
peptide
atthehighest dose caused
nochange
from
baseline values
ineither the
bleeding time, measured
after
15 minof
peptide infusion (5.1±0.9
vs.4.0±0.5
min;
P>
0.2),
orthe
systolic
blood pressure,monitored throughout
the
study interval (137±16
vs. 135±16mmHg; P>0.5).
The
effects of
peptide infusion
on thrombusformation
as-sociated
with
thecollagen substrate
are shownin
Fig.
1. RGDVpeptide (25-100
MM)
reducedplatelet accumulation
in adose-dependent
manner(Fig.
1A). After 40
minof
blood exposure thehighest
dose reduced plateletdeposition by
to
4-.a
cm
-a
0
E
C 1
U-CD 8 0.5 -a
Time
(min)
B
I **
** C .25 50 looRGDV
(MM)
100
RGEV
(PM)
Figure 1.Effect of RGDV and RGEV peptides on thrombus forma-tiononcollagen.(A) The accumulation of platelets over 40 min of blood exposure was reduced vs. control values (saline infusion) by RGDVpeptide (25-100
MM)
in a dose-response manner. RGEV peptide (100MM)
wasineffective. (B) The accumulation offibrino-gen/fibrinafter 40 min of blood exposure was reduced vs. control values (C) by RGDV peptide (25-100MM),but not by RGEV pep-tide(100 MM). **P<0.01.
onto collagen was reduced significantly by RGDV peptide at all
doses tested
(Fig.
1B).
Atthe highest dose
thecollagen
substrate accumulated only 0.09±0.04
mgof fibrinogen
(vs.0.71±0.11
mgin the control studies;
P <0.01).
TheRGEV
peptide (100 MM) had
noeffect
onthe
accumulation of
eitherplatelets
orfibrinogen (Fig.
1, A and B).Measurements
of thrombus formation in the
annularre-gions of low shear flow
aregiven in Fig.
2. The dose-responseeffects of
infused RGDV peptide
onplateletaccumulation in
the
low shearregions (Fig.
2A)
weresimilar
tothose observed
with
theproximal collagen
segment; i.e., at the highest dose ofpeptide
thedeposition of platelets after 40
min was reduced vs.A
B
15
of platelets Control
10 Col
RGDV peptide(a dos
.~3
gen/fibrin wasnotreducedvs.controlvalues(C)byRGDV(25-1025
0 o*
.4 ~~~~~~~RODVEGso, 1
.4EV100O,
00 10 20 30 40 c 25 50 100 100
Time
(mini)
RGOV
RGEV
(PM)
(JAM)
Figure
2.Effectsof RGDV and RGEVpeptides
onthrombus forma-tion within annularregions
of low fluid shear.(A)
Theaccumulation ofplatelets
wasreducedvs.control values(saline
infusion) by
RGDV
peptide (25-100
MM)
inadose-response
manner.RGEVpeptide (100
MAM)
wasineffective.(B)
Theaccumulation offibrino-gen/fibrin
wasnotreducedvs.control values(C) by
RGDV(25-100
MuM)
orRGEVpeptides
(100;MM).
*P<0.05;
** <0.01.control values
by
85%(1.7±0.5
X108
vs. 11.1±2.9 X108
platelets;
P <0.01).
However,in
contrast tothe
resultsob-served
with thecollagen surface,
RGDV peptide (25-100JM)
had
noeffect
onthe accumulation
of fibrinogen/fibrin in theregions
of low shear flow (P > 0.3 vs. control values; Fig. 2 B). Infused RGEV peptide (100 ,uM) was without effect on thedeposition of either platelets
orfibrinogen (Fig. 2, A and B).Markers
ofplatelet
activation(,3TG
andPF4)
and fibrino-gencleavage by
thrombin (FPA) were assayed ineffluent
bloodsampled distal
tothe site of thrombus
formation(Fig. 3).
In-fused RGDV
peptide (25-100 MM) reduced the plasma levels
of (TG and
PF4 in adose-response
manner (P < 0.01 vs. control values at 100 MM RGDV), consistent with theob-served
reduction in platelet thrombus formation (Figs.
1 Aand
2
A).
However, FPA levels were not reduced significantly by RGDVpeptide (25-100 MM;
P > 0.1), andthis
result was inaccord
with the inability of the peptide
to reducethe
accumu-lation
of fibrin in
theregions of low shear flow (Fig. 2
B).Infusion of RGEV peptide (100
gM)
had
noeffect
oneither
the
markers ofplatelet
activation or thrombin formation(Fig.
3).
To
determine
theduration of antithrombotic
effects afterRGDV
administration, platelet
deposition
oncollagen
wasmeasured
in threeanimals
infused with RGDV
peptide (100
MM)
for 40min,
then with saline for asubsequent
40-min
period (Fig.
4). After 40
minof RGDV
peptide
infusion,
totalplatelet accumulation
onthe collagen
substrateplateaued
at alevel that
wasreduced
by
>85%
vs.the number
of
platelets
deposited
incontrol studies.
Within 5min afterdiscontinuing
the
RGDV
infusion, platelet deposition
ontocollagen rapidly
increased. Over the 40-80-min
period
boththe
rateand
extentof platelet
deposition
on thecollagen
substrate
wereequivalent
to resultsobtained in the control studies
(Fig. 4).
PTG
IT
E20-li?M
PF4Ij
T
30
Fl
E 20
FPA
10
BS c 25 50 100
BAS C
)
RGOV
(AM)
Figure 3. Effects of RGDV and RGEV pep-tidesonthe releaseinto T
plasma
ofplatelet-spe-cific proteins (I3-TG,
PF4) andFPA.All
sam-ples were taken distal to thesite of thrombus formation after 40 min exposuretonative blood.Control values
(C)
for eachmeasure-ment were elevated
sig-nificantly(P<0.01) abovebaseline values
(BAS)
takenbefore de-vice placement. In-creased levelsof ,B-TG TandPF4observed afterdeviceplacementwere
reducedbyRGDV pep-tide(25-100 MM)ina
dose-responsemanner, butnotby RGEV pep-tide(100MuM).FPA
levelswere notreduced
100 significantly by either
RGEV
peptide
atthesedoses.15
x
@1
X-0 10 .C
L
I-
-RGDV (100 AM)
0 10 20 30 40
Time(min)
50 60 70 80
Figure 4. Duration of antithrombotic effects of infused RGDV
pep-tide. Platelet accumulationoncollagen was measured in three ani-mals infused for 40 min with RGDV peptide to achieve a local con-centration of100uM, then infused for the next 40-min interval with saline only(opencircles).Inthreecontrol studies the same animals were also infused with saline alone for 40 min (closed circles). Plate-letdeposition on the collagen surface was reduced by > 85% vs. con-trolstudies after the first 40 min of RGDV infusion. After discontin-uing thepeptide infusion, both the rate and extent of platelet accu-mulation over the 40-80-min period were equivalent to the results obtained in controlexperiments.
Discussion
This
study demonstrates that
theRGDV
peptide
is
apotentantithrombotic
agentin
vivo,
asshown
by
its
ability
toblock
both the
platelet
and fibrin
components of thrombusformed
on a
collagen
substrateunder arterial flow conditions.
Inhibi-tion
of the
capacity
of platelets
toparticipate
inthrombus
formation
wasrapidly reversible;
noantithrombotic effects
could be
demonstrated within
5min
after
discontinuing
the
infusion of
peptide.
Interestingly, the
peptide
alsoblocked
theaccumulation
of platelets,
but
notfibrin,
inthrombus formed
under conditions of low
shearflow
recirculation and stasis.
Specificity
wasdocumented
by
control studies with RGEV
peptide,
whichexhibited
noantithrombotic effects.
The
selective inhibition of platelets by RGDV
peptide
is
consistent with
previous
observations
showing
that adhesive
proteins (e.g.,
fibrinogen, fibronectin,
and
vWf)
mediate in
part
platelet cell-cell
andcell-surface interactions after
bind-ing
to theplatelet
GPIlb-IlIa
receptorthrough
a commonRGD
recognition
sequence(16-21).
Thus,
synthetic
analogues
of
specific
adhesive
protein
binding
domains, including
thecarboxy-terminal dodecapeptide
of
thefibrinogen a-chain,
have beenshown to
interfere with
GPIb-IlIa
binding
func-tions,
and toinhibit platelet
aggregation
andstatic
platelet
adhesion in vitro (20-24).
Peptide antagonists
of
GPIIblla
havealso been shown toinhibit platelet deposition
onto colla-gen orsubendothelium under flow conditions
invitro,
espe-cially
athigh
shear rates(24-26, 31). Since
theseobservations
suggested
anin
vivo
therapeutic potential for
agentsdirected
against platelet GP lIb-IIIa,
weevaluated the
RGDVtetrapep-tide in
aprimate model involving
exposureof
athrombogenic
device
tonon-anticoagulated blood.
The
device
has been previouslydescribed
(27), andcon-sisted of
atubular
segmentcoated with
type Icollagen,
fol-lowed by two
regions of
expandeddiameter exhibiting
annular vortexformation
and lowfluid
shear. Although this design ishemodynamically
complex,it
waschosen because the compo-nentsof forming
thrombus are both platelet dependent (colla-gensegment) and coagulation dependent (low
shearregions).
The
device
was placedin
an extracorporeal circuit that was nonethelesssubject
to normalsystemic
dilution, filtration, andinactivation mechanisms in
the hostanimal.
Thus, while the collagen segment accumulatedapproximately
the same num-berof platelets
in controlstudies
asthe annularflow region
(Figs.
1 and 2), the annularregion accumulated
nearly fourtimes
as muchfibrin
asthe collagen
substrate. Overall, theratio of deposited
platelets to fibrin was six times higher forthrombus
formed
onthe collagensurface than for thrombus
formed within the
region of low
shearflow.
Theimportance of
coagulation-dependent
mechanisms in the low
shearregion
was also shown
previously
byobservations
thatheparin
sensi-tively
inhibits thrombus formation under these
flow
condi-tions (27).
In
control
studies
this
test systemcaused
therapid
forma-tion
of large platelet thrombi. Thus,
the exposuretime
tona-tive blood
waslimited
to 40min,
asembolization
predictably
occurs at later
times (27). Previous
morphological
observa-tions have also shown
thatforming thrombi quickly obscure
the
underlying
collagen substrate surface (27). Further,
themagnitude of
celldeposition
seenin
thepresent study (- 109platelets/cm2
of collagen surface; Fig. 1)
alsoindicates
thatplatelet thrombus consisted primarily of aggregated cells, with
adherent
platelets contributing relatively little
to thetotal
thrombus
mass.The
concentrations of RGDV peptide achieved
by localinfusion in vivo
weredetermined
onthe
basis of in vitro
mea-surementsshowing
that
platelet
aggregation
wasabolished by
100 ,uM
RGDV. This
plasmaconcentration of infused peptide
also
markedly
reducedplatelet
thrombusformation
invivo,
but
waswithout
systemic
effects
onblood
pressure orbleeding
tendency.
At thehigher
dosesinfused (50-100 uM) RGDV
peptide blocked the accumulation of platelets
on both thecol-lagen
substrateand within
theregions of
lowshearflow. By
comparison
with results of
aprevious
study
(27)
the RGDV
peptide (100
,M)
was moreeffective for
blocking
thrombusformation
inthis
model than the potentplatelet inhibitor
prostacyclin, which
wasinfused
atarelatively high
concentra-tion
(96
nM). While the reduction
by
RGDV
peptide
in
thesmall
amountof fibrin
deposited
oncollagen
may have beensecondary
to thereduction
inplatelet numbers
(Fig. 1),
theselectivity
of
thepeptide
for
blocking
platelet interactions
wasclearly
shownby
theobservation
that theoverallaccumulation
of
fibrin,
which occurred
predominantly
within
theregions
of
flow
expansion,
wasunaffected by
RGDVpeptide
infusion.
Consistent with
thesefindings
were theobservations
thatPrevious
experimental
animal studies with MAbs against plateletGP Ilb-IIIa
haveshown that
blocking
this receptor may produce potentantithrombotic effects
invivo (10-14).
However,such
antibodies
mayalso produce
adose-dependent
bleeding
tendencyof variable
duration andseverity (12).
Our data suggest thatRGD-containing peptides,
due to their ac-tions and rapid clearance in vivo, may be administered in effective high concentrationslocally,
and withoutsystemic
ef-fects.
Inaddition,
discontinuance oftherapy
would result in rapid normalization of hemostasis at sites ofpeptide
adminis-tration. Based
on theseconsiderations,
further efforts to de-veloppeptides
with
greateraffinity
andspecificity
arewar-ranted
(22). Such
agentsmight
betherapeutically
attractive in proceduresrequiring
potent buttransient
inhibition ofplatelet
function,
such asextracorporeal
circulation of theblood,
coro-nary
angioplasty,
orfollowing
coronaryreperfusion
withthrombolytic therapy.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ulla Marzec, Kristi De Burgh, Jill Janik, Paul McFadden, and JohnDietrich for theirexperttechnicalassistance.
This workwassupported bygrantsHL-31469andHL-31950from theNational Institutes of Health,U. S. Public Health Service. Yves
Cadroywastherecipientofafellowshipfrom the Fondation Cino Del
Duca.
References
1.Coller,B.S.,L. E.Scudder,E.I.Peerschke,E. L.Kalomiris,and M.Steinberg. 1986. Plateletphysiologyandplateletmembrane
glyco-proteins. In Biology and Pathology of Platelet-Vessel Wall
Interac-tions.G.Jolles,Y. J.Legrand,and A.Nurden, editors. AcademicPress
Limited,London. 181-200.
2. Plow, E. F., R. P. McEver, B. S. Coller, V. L. Woods, G. A.
Marguerie,and M. H. Ginsberg. 1985. Related binding mechanisms forfibrinogen,fibronectin,vonWillebrandfactor,and thrombospon-dinonthrombin-stimulatedhumanplatelets. Blood. 66:724-727.
3. Peerschke, E. I., M. B. Zucker, R. A. Grant, J. J. Egan, and
M. M. Johnson. 1980. Correlation between fibrinogen bindingto humanplateletsandplateletaggregability. Blood. 55:841-847.
4.Marguerie, G. A., T.S.Edgington, andE. F.Plow. 1980. Inter-action offibrinogen with its platelet receptor as partofamultistep reaction in ADP-induced platelet aggregation. J. Biol. Chem. 255:154-161.
5. DeMarco,L., A.Girolami,T.S.Zimmerman,andZ. M.
Rug-geri. 1986. Von Willebrand factorinteraction with the glycoprotein
lIb/Illacomplex. Itsroleinplatelet functionasdemonstratedin
pa-tients withcongenital afibrinogenemia. J. Clin.Invest. 77:1272-1277. 6.Fressinaud,E.,D.Baruch, J.P.Girma,K.S.Sakariassen,H. R.
Baumgartner,and D. Meyer. 1988. VonWillebrand factor-mediated platelet adhesiontocollagen involves platelet membrane glycoprotein
lb-Illaaswell asglycoprotein lb.J. Lab.Clin.Med. 112:58-67. 7.Houdjik,W. P. M., and J. J.Sixma. 1985.Fibronectin inartery
subendothelium is important for platelet adhesion. Blood. 65:598-604.
8.Nurden,A.T. 1987. Platelet membrane glycoproteins and their
clinical aspects. In Thrombosis and Haemostasis. M. Verstraete, J.
Vermylen,R.Lijnen,and J.Arnout,editors. Leuven University Press, Leuven,Belgium.93-125.
9.Balduini, C.L., G.Grignani,F.Sinigaglia,A.Bisio, L.
Pacchia-rini, D. R. Scalabrini, C. Balduini, C. Mauri, and E. Ascari. 1987.
Severe platelet dysfunction in apatient with autoantibodies against membrane glycoproteinsIlb-IIIa. Haemostasis. 7:98-104.
10.Coller, B.S., J. D. Folts, L. E. Scudder, and S. R. Smith. 1986.
Antithrombotic effect ofamonoclonal antibodytotheplatelet glyco-protein IIb-Illa receptor in an experimental animal model. Blood.
68:783-786.
11.Coller,B.S.,and L. E. Scudder.1985.Inhibition ofdog platelet function by in vivo infusion ofF(ab')2 fragments of a monoclonal antibody to the platelet glycoprotein IIb-Illa receptor. Blood. 66:1456-1459.
12.Hanson,S. R.,F.I.Pareti,Z. M.Ruggeri, U.M.Marzec,T. J.
Kunicki, R. R. Montgomery, T. S.Zimmerman, and L. A. Harker.
1988. Effects of monoclonal antibodies againsttheplatelet
glycopro-teinIIb/Illa complex on thrombosis and hemostasis in the baboon. J.
Clin.Invest.81:149-158.
13.Gold,H.K.,B.S.Coller,T.Yasuda,T.Saito,J. T.Fallon,J. L. Guerrero, R. C.Leinbach,A. A.Ziskind, and D. Collen. 1988. Rapid
and sustained coronary artery recanalization with combined bolus
injection of recombinanttissue-type plasminogen activatorand mono-clonalantiplateletGpIIb-IIIa antibodyinacaninepreparation.
Circu-lation. 77:670-677.
14. Yasuda, T., H. K. Gold,J. T. Fallon, R. C. Leinbach,J. L.
Guerrero,L. E.Scudder,M.Kanke,D.Shealy,M.J.Ross,D.Collen, andB.S.Coller. 1988. Monoclonalantibody against the platelet gly-coprotein (Gp) IIb-IlIareceptor prevents coronary artery reocclusion
afterreperfusion with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in dogs.J.Clin. Invest. 81:1284-1291.
15.Coller, B.S.,L. E.Scudder,H. J.Berger, andJ. D.lulicci. 1988. Inhibition of human platelet function in vivo withamonoclonal anti-body: with observationsonthenewly dead asexperimentalsubject.
Ann.Intern.Med. 109:635-638.
16. Kloczewiak, M., S. Timmons, T.J. Lukas, andJ. Hawiger. 1984.Platelet receptorrecognitionsiteonhumanfibrinogen:synthesis
and strucurefunction relationship of peptides corresponding tothe carboxy-terminal segment ofthe gamma chain. Biochemistry. 23:1767-1774.
17.Hawiger,J. 1987. Adhesiveinteractions of bloodcells and the vessel wall. InHemostasisandThrombosis: Basic Principlesand Clin-ical Practice.R. W.Coleman,J.Hirsh,V. J.Marder,and E. W.
Salz-man,editors.J. B.Lippincott Co., Philadelphia. 182-208.
18.Gartner,T.K.,and J.S.Bennett. 1985. Thetetrapeptide
ana-logue of thecellattachmentsite offibronectin inhibits platelet
aggre-gation andfibrinogen binding toactivated platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 260:11891-11894.
19. Pytela, R., M. D.Pierschbacher,M. H.Ginsberg,E. F.Plow, and E. Ruoslahti. 1986. Platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb-Illa:
member ofa family of Arg-Gly-Asp-specific adhesionreceptors. Science(Wash.DC). 231:1559-1562.
20. Haverstick, D. M., J. F. Cowan, K. M. Yamada,and S. A.
Santoro. 1985.Inhibition of platelet adhesiontofibronectin,
fibrino-genandvonWillebrand factor substrates byasynthetictetrapeptide derived fromthecell-bindingdoman of fibronectin. Blood. 66:946-952.
21. Plow,E.F., M.D.Pierschbacher,E.Ruoslahti, G.Marguerie, andM. H.Ginsberg. 1985. The effect ofArg-Gly-Asp-containing
pep-tides onfibrinogen and von Willebrand factorbindingto platelets.
Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:8057-8061.
22. Ruggeri, Z. M., R. A. Houghten, S. R. Russell, and T. S.
Zimmerman. 1986.Inhibition of platelet function with synthetic
pep-tidesdesignedtobehigh-affinityantagonists of fibrinogenbindingto
platelets.Proc.Natl. Acad.Sci. USA.83:5708-5712.
23.Harfenist,E.J.,M.A.Packam,and J. F. Mustard. 1988.Effects ofthe celladhesion peptide, Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser,onresponseofwashed
25.Fressinaud, E., J. E. Sadler, J. P. Girma, H. R. Baumgartner, and D. Meyer. 1987. Synthetic RGD-containing peptides of von Wil-lebrand factor inhibit platelet adhesion to collagen. Thromb. Haemo-stasis.58:792. (Abstr.)
26. Weiss, H. J., J. Hawiger, Z. M. Ruggeri, V. T. Turitto, P. Thiagarajan, and T. Hoffmann. 1989. Fibrinogen-independent plate-letadhesion and thrombus formation on subendothelium mediated by glycoprotein IIb-Illa complex at high shear rate. J. Clin. Invest. 83:288-297.
27.Cadroy, Y., T. A. Horbett, and S. R. Hanson. 1989. Discrimi-nation between platelet-mediated and coagulation-mediated mecha-nisms inamodel ofcomplex thrombus formation in vivo. J. Lab. Clin.
Med. 113:436-449.
28. Todd, M. E.,E.L.McDevitt, andE.I.Goldsmith. 1972. Blood clotting mechanisms of non-humanprimates: choice of the baboon modeltosimulate human.J.Med.Primatol. 1:132-141.
29. Malpass, T. W., S.R.Hanson, B. Savage, E.A.HesselII,and
L.A. Harker. 1981. Prevention of acquired transient platelet dysfunc-tion by infusedprostacyclin. Blood.57:736-740.
30. Houghten, R. A. 1985.General method for the rapid solid-phasesynthesis of large numbers of peptides: specificity of antigen-antibody interaction at the level of individual aminoacids.Proc.Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA. 82:5131-5135.