Volume 6, Issue 03, March 2020 (ISSN: 2394 – 6598)
38
©IJETIE 2020
Security and Privacy in Fog Computing Based on Multiparty Computation Using Smart Grid for
Privacy Protection
Selvamohan Thangavel1, P.Menaka2
1M.Phil Student, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College Covai, tselvamohan@gmail .com
2Academic guide, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science,Covai, [email protected]
Abstract
A smart grid is the electrical grid of the future, adding a communication network to the traditional electrical grid infrastructure.
This allows bidirectional communication between the different entities and components of the grid, facilitating automated grid management. The overall aim is to make the electrical grid more reliable and efficient. This paper design a secure and privacy- preserving protocol for collecting operational metering data, which is required for calculating distribution, transmission, and imbalance fees. Our protocol uses Multiparty Computations (MPC) as the underlying cryptographic primitive and supports three different privacy-friendly data aggregation algorithms. Additionally, it supports realistic system models (with multiple data recipients of aggregates of various subsets of users' metering data); it is fault-tolerant; it is applicable to existing liberalized market models, and it also supports electricity production data generated by users. In this paper, the cloud-fog based system model is proposed to tackle delayed responses and permanent storage of consumers' data for energy demands. In the system model, the requests of energy are received on HPF to get processed and responded back in near-real-time instead of processing on the Cloud.
Keywords: Fog computing, Smart grid, Privacy, Security, and Multiparty Computations.
I. INTRODUCTION
Fog computing is, for the most part, a virtualization innovation that offers stockpiling, computing, and correspondence services between end devices and Cloud information trot. A lot of IoT devices and sensors, for example, green gas IoT and modern IoT actuators, are associated with Message. This engineering permits checking, sifting, investigating, totaling, and trading information, bringing about sparing time and calculation assets for sending and running bigdata examination and digital security applications. Since Fog devices are associated with the Cloud and IoT frameworks, IoT systems could be misused utilizing diverse digital dangers [1]. This is on the grounds that the devices are conveyed at unbound areas which are not precisely checked and secured. The framework utilizes and blockchain to verify and control the appropriated Fog engineering. Fog services have been permitted at the edge of the entrance organize by the appropriated Fog nodes. The framework accomplishes higher inertness and security effectiveness since bringing
computing assets at the edge of the IoT system could verify the center system traffic and limit the start to finish dormancy between IoT devices and the computing unit. Since fog computing is proposed with regards to the Internet of Things (IoT) and began from cloud computing, security and protection issues of Cloud are acquired in fog computing.
While a few issues can be tended to utilizing existing plans, there are different issues confronting new difficulties, because of the particular attributes of fog computing, for example, heterogeneity in fog hub and fog organize, a prerequisite of portability support, enormous scale geo-dispersed hubs, area mindfulness, and low dormancy.
The framework presents a novel security technique that enables the framework to adjust to the risk landscape, consequently. This enables framework executives to run the same number of proposals at the system edge varying. The framework was assessed for various security situations and
39
©IJETIE 2020 assaults. The fundamental focal point of this work is security
issues, while our proposed system is, for the most part, worried about the start to finish inactivity execution and assets use.
Moreover, our created organize totally contrasts from the arrange utilized in this work since we utilize a disseminated controller with conveyed asset fuelled of switches. Fog computing is a layer between the fundamental system and cloud computing. In fact, Fog computing expands cloud computing. These devices are called fog nodes. Fog computing is a stage, which gives calculation, stockpiling, and systems administration abilities between the end devices and conventional cloud computing. Since the number of associated devices is expanding, customary cloud computing isn't intended for the volume, assortment, and speed of information that the IoT devices create. Investigation of enormous information created by IoT devices, for the most part, should be ongoing or close to constant. So as to achieve this, information transmission, information stockpiling, and information preparing must be performed in exceptionally brief time interims. In the proposed framework model, six geographic areas with gatherings of structures are considered for reproduction. Fog computing utilizes similar assets with cloud computing. Computing, putting away, and organizing are the structure obstructs in both computing frameworks.
Additionally, they utilize the same traits, for example, virtualization and multi-occupancy. Despite the fact that fog and cloud computing share a few properties, fog computing has the ability to broaden cloud computing as far as certain viewpoints. Each building has numerous Smart Homes (SHS) or lofts with the Internet of Things (IoT) based machines. Each home has a smart meter with 5G empowered controller to screen, control the IoT based apparatuses, and speak with the controller of the structure. Each building conveys utilizing the controller with fog node in the locale for preparing of vitality solicitations of SHs. Fog is associated with MG and the Cloud.
In the event that demands of SHs are not met by MG, at that point, fog demands the utility by means of the Cloud to satisfy the demand. Fog transmits the information of buyers to cloud for perpetual stockpiling and future utilization. The correspondence happens between home machines and smart meter, building controller and smart meters, fog, and the controllers.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
Liu, Jia-Nan, et al. [7] Compared with the customary grid, the smart grid includes a great deal of trend-setting innovations and applications. Nonetheless, because of quick advancement, it faces a test to adjust protection, security, productivity, and usefulness. In this paper, we manufacture a fog computing based smart grid show and then present an effective and protection saving plan which bolsters collection
correspondence and capacity inquiry dependent on the proposed model. With redistributing the scrambled utilization information to the Cloud, our plan enables the service supplier to dispatch different capacity questions on encoded use information, which is vital for its services (e.g., charging), while at the same time letting clients have control of their own information. Thusly, our plan can be applied to progressively complex smart grid applications contrasted and different arrangements.
Zhang, Yinghui, Jiangfan Zhao, et al. [8] As an expansion of cloud computing, fog computing has gotten more consideration as of late. It can take care of issues, for example, high idleness, absence of help for versatility, and area mindfulness in cloud computing. In the Internet of Things (IoT), a progression of IoT devices can be associated with the fog hubs that help a cloud service focus to store and process a piece of information ahead of time. Not exclusively would it be able to diminish the weight of preparing information, yet in addition, improve the constant and service quality.
Notwithstanding, information handling at fog hubs experiences many testing issues, for example, bogus information infusion assaults, information alteration assaults, and IoT devices' security infringement. In this paper, in light of the Paillier homomorphic encryption conspire, we utilize blinding variables to plan protection saving total information plan in fog computing.
Kulsoom Shahryari et al. [9] The smart grid, as a correspondence organize, permits various associated devices, for example, sensors, transfers, and actuators, to communicate and help out one another. An Internet-based answer for power that gives a bidirectional progression of data and power is the internet of vitality (IoE), which is an augmentation of smart grid idea. Countless associated devices and the enormous measure of information produced by IoE and issues identified with information transmission, procedure, and capacity, power IoE to be coordinated by cloud computing. Besides, so as to upgrade the exhibition and lessen the volume of the transmitted information and procedure data in an adequate time, fog computing is recommended as a layer between the IoE layer and the cloud layer.
Xi Fang [10], Smart Grid, viewed as the cutting-edge control grid, utilizes two-path streams of power and data to make a broadly appropriated mechanized vitality conveyance arrange.
In this article, we overview the writing until 2011 on the empowering innovations for the Smart Grid. We investigate three significant frameworks, to be specific to the smart foundation framework, the smart administration framework, and the smart assurance framework. We likewise propose conceivable future bearings in every framework. In particular,
40
©IJETIE 2020 for the smart foundation framework, we investigate the smart
vitality subsystem, the smart data subsystem, and the smart correspondence subsystem.
Yasir Saleem et al. [11] Traditional power grids are being changed into Smart Grids (SGs) to address the issues in the existing force framework because of the unidirectional data stream, vitality wastage, developing vitality demand, unwavering quality and security. SGs offer bi-directional vitality stream between service suppliers and purchasers, including power age, transmission, dispersion, and usage frameworks. SGs utilize different gadgets for the observing, examination, and control of the grid, conveyed at control plants, dissemination focuses, and in purchasers' premises in a huge number. Thus, an SG requires network, mechanization, and the following of such gadgets. This is accomplished with the assistance of the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT causes SG frameworks to help different system works all through the age, transmission, circulation, and utilization of vitality by consolidating IoT gadgets, (for example, sensors, actuators, and smart meters), just as by giving the availability, mechanization and following for such gadgets.
III. PROBLEM STATEMENT
For constrained end devices in the Internet of Things (IoT), such as smart meters, data transmission is an energy- consuming operation. To address this problem, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving aggregation system with the aid of Fog computing architecture, named PPFA, which enables the intermediate Fog nodes to periodically collect data from nearby smart meters and accurately derive aggregate statistics as the fine-grained Fog level aggregation. The Cloud/utility supplier computes overall aggregate statistics by aggregating Fog level aggregation [12]. To minimize the privacy leakage and mitigate the utility loss, we use a more efficient and concentrated Gaussian mechanism to distribute noise generation among parties, thus offering provable differential privacy guarantees of the aggregate statistic on both Fog level and the Cloud level. In addition, to ensure aggregator obliviousness and system robustness, we put forward a two-layer encryption scheme: the first layer applies OTP to encrypt individual noisy measurement to achieve aggregator obliviousness, while the second layer uses public- key cryptography for authentication purpose. Our scheme is simple, efficient, and practical; it requires only one round of data exchange among a smart meter, its connected Fog node, and the Cloud if there are no node failures. Otherwise, one extra round is needed between a meter, its connected Fog node, and the trusted third party. Customer privacy-protection in the smart grid. In order to so, they introduce two terms that describe important problems that have to be solved concerning
privacy and smart metering: metering for billing and metering for operations. They argue that there is a tradeoff between sampling frequency attribution and exactness on the one hand and privacy on the other hand. Determining sophisticated usage patterns from the smart meter data and the countermeasures.
IV. PROPOSED WORK
A smart grid integrates the traditional power grid with information and communication technologies, to achieve efficient and reliable electricity generation, transmission, distribution, and control. In a smart grid, both electricity and information are exchanged between utilities and users. This two-way mechanism allows the smart grid to collect and analyze the situation of power generation, transmission, and consumption, etc., in real-time; thus, ensuring a reasonable allocation of power, but also to ensure timely response to potential safety and security threats to the grid. The smart grid allows fine-grained smart metering data collection, which can improve the efficiency and reliability of the grid.
Unfortunately, this vast collection of data also imposes risks to users' privacy. In this paper, we propose a novel protocol that allows suppliers and grid operators to collect users' aggregate metering data in a secure and privacy-preserving manner [13]. We use secure multiparty computation to ensure privacy protection. In addition, we propose three different data aggregation algorithms that offer different balances between privacy-protection and performance. Our protocol is designed for a realistic scenario in which the data need to be sent to different parties, such as grid operators and suppliers.
Furthermore, it facilitates an accurate calculation of transmission, distribution, and grid balancing fees in a privacy-preserving manner. Efficient in computation complexity and communication overhead. Smart grid communication architecture, including a trusted authority, a set of servers, a control center, a residential gateway, and a large number of residential users. Solve the demand response problem with both spatially and temporally-coupled constraints in the smart distribution grid with a load-serving entity and multiple users.
a. Fog Receives Requests (FRR)
FRR from the structure controller for vitality demands. Fog lean towards MG, because of less expensive vitality when contrasted with utility and educates to encourage the required SH in the structure. On the off chance that MG has lacking force, at that point, it reacts to the fog as needs are. The fog demands the utility by means of the Cloud to satisfy the vitality need of the structure [63]. SHs create visit vitality asks for and send to individual fog node in the district for vitality demands.
At the point when several SHs produce a huge number of
41
©IJETIE 2020 solicitations for a day, then computational execution gets
testing. Elite Fog (HPFs) are presented among cloud and structures (end clients) [14]. HPF, in contrast to Cloud, has low idleness, lesser PT, and RT with information security. The imparting modules in the framework model are observed and controlled, utilizing IoT based applications over web services.
Fog resembles a little cloud, be that as it may, it has restricted assets when contrasted with the Cloud. It is set near the end gadgets (end clients) and expands the cloud services on the system edge with superior and continuous reactions.
Timestamp TS and σcc = skccH2(IDcc ∥ IDfd ∥ Ts ∥ rccP0 ∥ TS) will be used for verifying by the fog devices. Then, the fog device runs the following steps after receiving the Data_Req packet:
• According to the difference between the current time and the timestamp TS, FD checks the freshness of the Data_Req packet.
• FD verifies the signature by computing if ê (σcc, P0)
= ê(H2(IDcc ∥ IDfd ∥ Ts ∥ rccP0 ∥ TS), PKcc) holds.
• If the above Equation holds, FD randomly chooses rfd∈Z∗q, calculates rfdP0, puts rfdP0 in the packet Data_Req, and broadcasts the packet that
contains parameters
{IDfd, IDCC, Ts, rfdP0, rccP0, TS, σcc} in its area. Please note that rfdP0 is used by a hybrid IOT device HIDi
covered by the fog device in establishing a one-time- key shared with the fog device.
b. Smart Grid Two Way Communication
Communications inside a similar area may have comparable necessities and qualities. Areas may contain different spaces.
Streams speak to the progression of data or vitality through the utility grid. The purpose of access between a framework and area is spoken to by interfaces. There exist two correspondences and electrical interfaces. Interchanges interfaces will be bidirectional and speak to the passageway for data to enter and leave a framework or space [15]. They speak to consistent associations instead of physical associations. A smart grid correspondence foundation is an arrangement of frameworks, and it is very unpredictable. As a result, displaying, investigation, and plan an appropriate correspondence foundation address numerous new difficulties.
Algorithm: Two Way Communication
Step 1: Input the requests along with their burst time (bt) Step 2: Find the waiting time (wt) for all requests.
Step 3: The Request comes first, need not wait so, waiting time Step 4: Request 1 will be 0
Step 5: wt[0] = 0
Step 6: Find waiting time for all other requests, i.e., for Request = i + 1 do
Step 7: wt(i) = bt(i − 1) + wt(i − 1)
Step 8: Find turnaround time (Tt) for all requests Step 9: Tt(i) = wt(i) + bt(i)
Step 10: Find the average waiting time Step 11: Total_wt(i)/No.so f Processes
Step 12: Similarly, find average turnaround time Step 13: Total_Tt(i)/No.of Processes
c. Monitoring and Control Component
Observing and control innovation part comprise of gadgets for self-checking, self - recuperating consistency, and flexibility of age, smart, clever system, and gadgets enough to handle dependability issues, insecurity, and blockage. This new adaptable grid needs to oppose stun (unwavering quality and sturdiness) and be trustworthy to give constant changes in its utilization. Smart vitality productive use gadgets and smart disseminated DERs have inbuilt checking and control capacity. Such gadgets are mindful and can make activities autonomously dependent on the situational mindfulness [16].
These choices overall affect the utility burden bend. A standard convention for customer conveyance with two-way data parkway advancements is fundamental. Smart vitality structures and smart homes, attachment and-play, clean air necessities, demand-side meters, and purchaser interfaces for better vitality proficiency will be set up. The meter can likewise get data remotely, e.g., change from credit to prepayment mode or to refresh levy data. It has two key capacities to perform: (I) for giving information on vitality utilization to customers to help power overutilization and cost and (ii) for sending information to the utility for top burden prerequisites, load factor control, and to create evaluating systems based on utilization data. A key component of smart meters is robotized information perusing and two-path correspondence among utilities and shoppers. Smart meters are created to gauge power, gas, and water utilization information. In Smart Grid, smart meters give purchasers information about how and when they use vitality and the amount they pay for a per kilowatt-hour of vitality [17, 18].
This will bring about better-estimating data and increasingly precise bills, and it will ensure quicker blackout location and rebuilding by the utility.
Algorithm: Monitoring and controlling
Step 1: Screening parameters initialization: pheromone, routes, iteration
Step 2: Solution = 0 Step 3: Iteration = 1
Step 4: Probability of allocation of VM computed using Equation 15
Step 5: Random allocation of tasks to VMs
Step 6: The value of VM is inserted into a list of VMs Step 7: Repeat the step until the completion of the tour of ants Step 8: Compute the Solution
Step 9: Calculate the distance between source to destination Step 10: Update the pheromone
Step 11: Again, calculate the distance
Step 12: For every edge update the pheromone locally
42
©IJETIE 2020 Step 13: Optimal solution is replaced by the current solution
Step 14: Continue the process until the best optimal solution Step 15: Display the results
The potential VM is selected by evaluating the availability and capacity of every Request. Hence, before allocating the VM, the probability and suitability of VMs are updated in the list. Thus, iterative update and prioritization increase the time for manipulation.
V. EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
In this section, we evaluate the performance of security and privacy-preserving protocol. In the proposed scheme, we assume it will be a secure transmission for the communications. More specifically, they can legitimately do their assigned tasks, but are also curious about the privacy of IoT devices, such as the control center that can intercept data from a single IoT device to gain private information about the device owner and other financial benefits information. Please note that although the entities are "curious," they cannot collude. Similarly, each IoT device also wants to know the data of other IoT devices to determine if it is profitable. In addition, certain IoT devices may fail and stop to report for some time. Here, we expect that each IoT gadget can just send bundles inside this fog computing inclusion zone. It is likewise conceivable that an aggressor dwells between an IoT gadget and the control focus and attempts to set up two mystery keys to such an extent that the IoT gadget and the control focus appear to correspondence straightforwardly. Likewise, some IoT aggressors and outcasts are additionally intrigued by other delicate data in fog computing. To show and analysis the highlights of the vitality the board over fog computing stage as a service, numerous services are actualized and assessed on the stage.
• Key Generation: Given a safety parameter κ, choose two large primes p and q, where ∣p∣ = ∣q∣ = κ, compute N = pq and λ = lcm(p − 1, q − 1), define the
function L(u)=u−1N, select the
generator g∈Z∗N2 and get the public key pk = (N, g) and the secret key λ.
• Encryption: Given a message M ∈ ZN, a random
number r∈Z∗N and calculate the
ciphertext C = gM · rN mod N2
• Decryption: Given ciphertext C∈Z∗N2, the
corresponding plaintext
is M=L(CλmodN2)/L(gλmodN2) modN.
Fig 1: Node creation
The simulations of the scenarios show that cloud-based systems are very slow as compared to the cloud-fog based systems.
Fig 2: Node Initialization
43
©IJETIE 2020 Chart 1: Time Aggregation
The delayed RT can affect the cost efficiency of energy consumers. For instance, electricity prices are updated at the Cloud, which may be responded to with a longer delay that compromises the total energy consumption cost for a day.
Implementations of Cloud-based and cloud-fog based systems validate the performance of the cloud-fog based system model as well as claim that the SG has time-sensitive applications.
Chart 2: Noisy Aggregation
VMs of HPFs and DT Fog has the least total cost due to being equivalent to the average number of requests being processed during most of the hours of the day.
Delayed responses for the buildings in the regions compromise the efficiency of energy consumption. For instance, if a building is consuming power with some cost that is updated with cheaper rates; however, delayed response keeps the consumers consume expensive energy for the delayed time.
The PT in the Cloud is affected with sub-delays like; allocation of requests due to a huge number of requests, evaluation for allocation of requests due to more number of VMs and creation of too many VMs which compromise the performance of physical resources, etc.
Chart 3: Filtered Aggregation
The smart grid involves various standards in many fields such as power generation, delivery, and control besides communications. A smart grid communication infrastructure is a system of systems, and it is extremely complex. As a consequence, modeling, analysis, and design a suitable communication infrastructure meet many new challenges. The models to be used must be capable of accounting for uncertainty as a way to simulate emerging behavior. The numerical tools to perform the analysis must be capable of solving very large-scale problems.
44
©IJETIE 2020 Chart 4: Fog Aggregation
Chart 5: Energy Consumption
Chart 6: Data Aggregation
Operational cost is added in the user's bill and computed as the cost of VMs, DT, and MG. VMs have fixed or one time and recurring costs. Fixed cost is associated with the physical equipment and its installation. The recurring cost associated with the storage size, temporary memory, size, and a number of requests received or sent and bandwidth of VM. In this paper, the recurring cost is taken as VM cost and calculated as shown in Equation
VM_Cost = Storage_Cost × VM_size + RAM_Cost×
RAMVM + BW_Cost × VM_BW
This two-way instrument enables the smart grid to gather and dissect the circumstance of intensity age, transmission, and utilization, and so forth., progressively; along these lines, guaranteeing a sensible portion of intensity, yet additionally to guarantee opportune reaction to potential wellbeing and security dangers to the grid.
VI CONCLUSION
The proposed model is geologically conveyed and expands the abilities of Cloud-based smart grids as far as protection and security for information interchanges. This paper plans a safe and security safeguarding convention for gathering operational metering information, which is required for computing circulation, transmission, and lop-sidedness charges. Our convention utilizes Multiparty Computations (MPC) as the basic cryptographic crude and supports three diverse security agreeable information conglomeration calculations. Moreover, it underpins reasonable framework
45
©IJETIE 2020 models (with different information beneficiaries of totals of
different subsets of clients' metering information); it is flaw tolerant; it is material to existing changed market models, and it likewise bolsters power creation information produced by clients. In this paper, the cloud-fog based framework model is proposed to handle deferred reactions and perpetual stockpiling of shoppers' information for vitality demands. In the framework model, the solicitations of vitality are gotten on HPF to get handled and reacted back in close continuous as opposed to preparing on the Cloud.
REFERENCES
[1]. F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu, and S. Addepalli, “Fog Computing and its Role in the Internet of Things,” in Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing. ACM, 2012, pp. 13–16.
[2]. F. Jalali, A. Vishwanath, J. de Hoog, and F. Suits,
“Interconnecting Fog Computing and Microgrids for Greening IoT,” in IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT-Asia), 2016, pp. 693–698.
[3]. V. K. Sehgal, A. Patrick, A. Soni, and L. Rajput, "Smart human security framework using the internet of things, cloud and fog computing," in Intelligent distributed computing. Springer, 2015, pp. 251–263.
[4]. R. Sandhu, A. S. Sohal, and S. K. Sood, “Identification of malicious edge devices in fog computing environments,” Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, pp. 1–16, 2017.
[5]. Y. Guan, J. Shao, G. Wei, and M. Xie, “Data security and privacy in fog computing,” IEEE Network, 2018.
[6]. S. Khan, S. Parkinson, and Y. Qin, “Fog computing security: a review of current applications and security solutions,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 6, no. 1, p.
19, 2017.
[7]. Liu, Jia-Nan, Jian Weng, Anjia Yang, Yizhao Chen, and Xiaodong Lin. "Enabling Efficient and Privacy- Preserving Aggregation Communication and Function Query for Fog Computing based Smart Grid." IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (2019).
[8]. Zhang, Yinghui, Jiangfan Zhao, Dong Zheng, Kaixin Deng, Fangyuan Ren, Xiaokun Zheng, and Jiangang Shu.
"Privacy-preserving data aggregation against false data injection attacks in fog computing." Sensors 18, no. 8 (2018): 2659.
[9]. Shahryari, Kolsoom, and Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam.
"Demand-side management using the internet of energy based on fog and cloud computing." In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE.
[10]. Fang, Xi, Satyajayant Misra, Guoliang Xue, and Dejun Yang. "Smart grid—The new and improved power grid:
A survey." IEEE communications surveys &
tutorials 14, no. 4 (2011): 944-980.
[11]. Saleem, Yasir, Noel Crespi, Mubashir Husain Rehmani, and Rebecca Copeland. "Internet of things-aided Smart Grid: technologies, architectures, applications, prototypes, and future research directions." IEEE Access 7 (2019): 62962-63003.
[12]. M. Aazam and E.-N. Huh, “Fog computing and smart gateway based communication for a cloud of things," in Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), 2014 International Conference on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 464– 470.
[13]. M. Chiang, S. Ha, I. Chih-Lin, F. Risso, and T. Zhang,
“Clarifying fog computing and networking: 10 questions and answers,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 18–20, 2017.
[14]. Y. Guan, J. Shao, G. Wei, and M. Xie, “Data security and privacy in fog computing,” IEEE Network, 2018.
[15]. A. Alrawais, A. Alhothaily, C. Hu, and X. Cheng, “Fog computing for the internet of things: Security and privacy issues,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 34–
42, 2017.
[16]. F. Y. Okay and S. Ozdemir, "A fog computing based smart grid model," in Networks, Computers, and Communications (ISNCC), 2016 International Symposium on. IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–6.
[17]. Q. Yaseen, F. AlBalas, Y. Jararweh, and M. Al-Ayyoub,
"A fog computing-based system for selective forwarding detection in mobile wireless sensor networks," in Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems, IEEE International Workshops on. IEEE, 2016, pp. 256–262.