• No results found

Development of customer oriented supply chains and service level agreements

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Development of customer oriented supply chains and service level agreements"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Development of

customer

oriented supply

chains and

service level

agreements

Development of

customer

oriented supply

chains and

service level

agreements

José Armando Costa Krukoski 55-11-3040-6200 [email protected]

Presentation to

APLA

Presentation to

APLA

Viñas del Mar, June 2007

(2)

2

Market recognition

Over 300 logistics projects per year

More than 700 projects in Supply Chain in the

last 5 years

Work with 40 of the 50 largest global transport

companies in the world

Contribution to policy definition

Active role in the first USA government study

for development of a national intermodal

network

Development of a intermodal system in Europe

Acted as a facilitator to the National

Commission of Intermodal Transportation, USA

Over 500 professionals with

long experience in logistics

and supply chain

One of the first consulting

firms to structure a logistics

service offering

Dedicated organization

Examples

Council of Logistics

Mana-gement (CLM) — USA

European Logistic Assoc.

(ELA) — Europe

Canadian Assoc. of

Logistics Management

(CALM) — Canada

Joint work with dedicated

organizations

Strategy definition (marketing,

M&A, business

development…)

Organization (restructuring,

privatization, IT…)

Operations strategy

(optimization, cost reduction,

sourcing...)

Wide range of

competencies

A. T. Kearney qualifications in logistics and Supply Chain

A.T. Kearney is a leading consulting firm with strong

experience in logistics and Supply Chain strategy

(3)

3

We have a local presence in Latin America with 2 offices

fully integrated to our global network

Global integration

• Regional and cross-regional

integration across industry

(process industries, oil and gas, etc)

and consulting practices

(operations, strategy, etc)

• Participation of senior

consultants with relevant

experience from other regions in

local projects

• Participation in global initiatives

for development of intellectual

capital (e.g., Assessment of

Excellence in Procurement,

Global Excellence in

Operations, etc)

• Start in 1994

• 4 Vice-Presidents

• 65 Consultants

São Paulo

• Start in 1995

• 1 Vice-President

• 14 Consultants

Mexico

City

(4)

4

A.T. Kearney 10/10.2006/25319d

This presentation is based on A.T. Kearney’s supply chain

assessment for a leading player in the petrochemical

industry



The objective of the project was to create a supply chain solution customized to the specific

needs of each market segment



The solution was based on supply chain “building blocks” that could be assembled according

to each customer segment needs



The starting point was the development of a value curve for each market segment identifying

the service level elements of greater impact on the client’s operations



Service level indicators were divided into structural performance indicators and service

differentiators



A series of standardized questions and scoring grids were developed in order to structure

and determine the best supply chain building block element that would deliver the desired

service level

(5)

5

A.T. Kearney 10/10.2006/25319d

In the last years, most companies started to look at supply

chain as a strategic element that could enhance value

Traditional

Managed through costs, but still

responsible for inefficiencies created

by other areas

Informed of changes in commercial,

logistics and market strategies without

power to influence or evaluate

inconsistencies

Nevertheless responsible for the

client’s perception and satisfaction on

service levels

New strategic vision

In cooperation with the commercial

area understands customers’

perceived value

Helps in the development of customer

product and service offerings

Helps assessing the profitability,

competitiveness and perceived value

in relation to logistics policies

(6)

6 Price paid by segment 3 for

agreed service level Price paid by segment 2 for

agreed service level Price paid by segment 1 for

agreed service level

• Lead time • Regularity

• Delivery frequency • Minimum order size • Product portfolio offering • Order fill rate

Supply chain costs

• Inventory

• Freight

• Handling and storage

• Other fixed costs

Optimization

Therefore in order to optimize profitability, service levels

must be customized to different market segments

(7)

7

Such customization is possible through the differentiation

of supply chain building blocks to best fit each customer

segments’ specific characteristics

... to differentiated supply chains

Type 1: Focus

efficiency DistriDistri-

-bute bute Make Make Pro Pro- -cure cure Plan Plan Store Store

Manage & Control

OrderLeanEfficientMake dominated Type 2: Focus

integration DistriDistri-

-bute bute Store Store Make Make

Plan & Procure

Plan & Procure

Manage & Control

OrderComplex productCollaborativePlan dominated Type 3: Focus flexibility Dis Dis- -tri tri- -bute bute Make Make Pro Pro- -cure cure Plan Plan Make Make Store Store

Manage & Control

OrderFlexibleEffectiveDemand dominated

From uniform ....

Manage & Control

Dis Dis- -tri tri- -bute bute Make Make Pro Pro- -cure cure Plan

(8)

8

The differentiation of supply chains must be grounded on

market requirements for supply chain services

Logistic typical buying criteria

Logistic Segmentation

Supply Chain Service Level Agreement by Segment

Specialty

3. Noise-Maker

Specialty

2. Filler

Commodity

1. Runner

Supply Chain

Segment

99%

5 Weeks

97%

2 Weeks

95%

Delivery

Reliability

1 Week

Lead time

1 Week to

5 Weeks

2. Lead Times

(depending on

product)

90-99%

1. Delivery Reliability

2.000 8.000 14.000 20.000 20.000 50.000 80.000 110.000 0 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% 600% 700% X Y A b sa tz [ J a to ] Absatzschwankung A C Z B 2.000 8.000 14.000 20.000 20.000 50.000 80.000 110.000 0 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% 600% 700% X Y A b sa tz [ J a to ] Absatzschwankung A C Z B

D

e

m

a

n

d

Demand Variation

Filler

Runner

Noise-Maker

Clien

t Exa

mple

Make-to-order (MTO)

Make-to-stock (MTS)

Make-to-stock (MTS)

Supply Chain

Strategy

(9)

9

A.T. Kearney 10/10.2006/25319d

Example of supply chain structure and service level elements

Source: SC model project team, A.T. Kearney

F

o

re

-c

a

s

ti

n

g

R

e

tu

rn

/

D

is

p

o

s

a

l

L

o

g

is

ti

c

s

Structural performance is generated by

the overall supply chain setup

Therefore, it is similar for all customers

7 structural supply chain service level

elements were identified as most relevant

to the petrochemical industry:

Delivery CapabilityDelivery ReliabilityDelivery FlexibilityOrder CommunicationComplaint ReactionPhysical ExecutionSafety

Structural Performance

Service Differentiators

Special supply chain services tend to be

customer specific

Therefore, good knowledge of costs is

required for cost-to-serve analyses and

pricing

The most prominent industry specific

services were identified. examples

include:

VMIBulk offeringsCustomer tankConsignment stockEtc

The first step is to identify the relevant service level

elements that make up these requirements

Manage & Control

Distribute Distribute Make Make Procure Procure Plan

(10)

10

A.T. Kearney 10/10.2006/25319d

Each service level element affects different supply chain

levers and cost drivers

Service level elements and corresponding levers and cost drivers

•Non Conformance Management:

System

•Systematic problem solving & process

improvement

•Complaint reaction: Time to confirmation of complaint, time to presentation of

solution, adequateness of proposed solution, manpower (quality and quantity) and process dedicated to the solution of complaints

Complaint Reaction

•Quality and environmental

management (sustainability)

•Product attributes: Undamaged package on delivery, inclusion all relevant

information (e.g. handling and safety information)

•Carrier Performance: Integrity of transport equipment, knowledge and training

of drivers and handlers

Safety

•Integrated systems

•Collaboration

•Order reception: media for placement of orders, confirmation response time,

information necessary for order placement, reliability and accuracy

•Order information: media for communicating order and shipping confirmation,

advanced shipping notice

Order

Transparency

•Internal Order Handling

•Quality management

•Carrier management

•Packaging requirements

•Reliable execution of the physical transport (meets agreed requirements

availability of special equipment, qualification of drivers, etc.)

•Product attributes: Percent of undamaged packages on delivery, availability

of special packaging requirements,

•Documentation: Percent of deliveries including all necessary documents

Quality of execution

•Planned overcapacity

•Manufacturing technology and

management

•Inventory management

•Delivery Flexibility (date): ability to change confirmed delivery dates (mainly

to earlier date)

•Delivery Flexibility (volume): accepted changes to order quantity without

change in delivery date

Delivery Flexibility

•Supply management

•Internal order handling

•Inventory management

•Carrier management

•Maintenance management

•Delivery reliability (date): difference between actual and first confirmed

delivery date of customer in % of confirmed arrivals

•Delivery reliability (volume): difference between actual and first confirmed

delivery amount Delivery Reliability •Demand management •Manufacturing scale •Supply management

•Inventory management (safety stock)

•S&OP process

•Ability to deliver at desired date: minimum order lead time

•Ability to deliver desired volume: minimum and maximum order size

Delivery Capability

Supply chain lever Definition

Service level element

(11)

11

A.T. Kearney 10/10.2006/25319d

The next step is to understand how different customer

segments value these elements and what is the current

performance level and that of competitors

Structural Performance & Special Services

Total Chemical Management Collaboration

Tracking information Special CoA

Pre-sampling Cust. sp. WH

Cust. sp. Tr. e.g. intermodal Spec. Distr. Concept (e.g. JIT) Tank/ Silo Consulting/ Financ. Bulk offerings

Packaging recovery/ disposal Special Packaging

RFID Barcode

Consignment Stock VMI

World Account, IOP1)

E-Commerce1): Elemica, EDI

Complaint Reaction Safety Order Transparency Physical Execution Delivery Flexibility Delivery Reliability 90% 95% High 95% Delivery Capability Current Performance Competitors’ Performance Importance Customer Requirement Performance/ Services S p e c ia l S e rv ic e s S tr u c tu ra l P e rf o rm a n c e

Template

(12)

12

A.T. Kearney 10/10.2006/25319d

The supply chain value curve can be defined based on the

ranking of these elements against customer requirements

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Supply Chain Principal Factor 1 Supply Chain Principal Factor 2 Supply Chain Principal Factor 3 Supply Chain Principal Factor 4 Supply Chain Principal Factor 5 Supply Chain Principal Factor 6 Supply Chain Principal Factor 7 Supply Chain Principal Factor 8 Supply Chain Principal Factor 9 Supply Chain Principal Factor 10

Structural Performance

Special Services

Value curve for structural performance and special services

Conceptual

Customer

segment

requirement

Competitors’

average

Self

(13)

13

A.T. Kearney X/mm.yyyy/00000

The fulfillment of these requirements must be made in the

light of the segment’s profit to serve

%

a

c

c

u

m

u

la

te

d

% clients

Profit to serve curve

Net sales curve

A

B

C

D

A

Highly profitable

Profitable

B

C

Marginal

Unprofitable

D

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%

(14)

14

A.T. Kearney X/mm.yyyy/00000

Seg 1 Seg 2 Seg 3 Seg 4 Seg 5 Seg 6

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Service level agreements become part of the marketing mix

that should enhance customer segments’ profit to serve

Client perception of the marketing mix in relation to competition

More Less

Comments

Profit to serve estimated gains

Profit to serve

• The expected gain in profit to serve is based

on the market research on supply chain

service level elements

• Segment 6 can be improved by reducing

costly service level elements that are not

valued and implementing a new service level

that is greatly valued

• Segments 1 and 3 are expected to agree to

higher prices and/or if the service level is

brought to the desired level

• These increments (including both cost

reductions and revenue gains) increased

profitability by 5-10%

Size of sphere is related to total profit

(15)

15

A.T. Kearney 10/10.2006/25319d

The key for this is a tailored supply chain solution to each

customer segment

Selected Building Blocks per customer segment

S

C

E

le

m

e

n

ts

Procure Make Store Distribute Plan

Standardized processes with competitive bids

Flexible processes valuing flexibility without commitment

Strategic partnership with SC integration and planning Flexible manufacturing with several

product changes per month Inflexible, single product manufacturing

MTS make to stock MTO make to order OTP order triggered production

Detailed sales forecast Aggregated sales forecast Scheduling only forecast Production volume forecast

!

Capital Cost Service Service levels Costs Inventory

Performance Indicators Availability focus Reliability focus Flexibility focus focusCost Utilization focus Capital focus One warehouse at

production site

One warehouse in customer region Multiple step dist.

network with hub

Direct shipments

ex production Special situation

P e rf o rm a n c e

Example

D e te rm in a n ts

Segment 1

Segment 2

(16)

16

A.T. Kearney 10/10.2006/25319d



In the last years, supply chain management has been viewed more and more as a

strategic element in a company’s positioning

Moving away from the notion of “cost center”…

… and getting closer to “revenue enabler”



The definition of service levels and the corresponding necessary supply chain solution

are made at the same time and should involve both supply chain and commercial

The most valued service elements must be identified for each customer segment

The total supply chain solution should be customized to each customer segment

needs



This exercise, although not focusing on costs, must not be exempt from using it as a

metric for determining profitability of each customer segment and supply chain solution



On the other hand, this approach can lead to significant revenue improvements

(17)

Development of

customer

oriented supply

chains and

service level

agreements

Development of

customer

oriented supply

chains and

service level

agreements

José Armando Costa Krukoski 55-11-3040-6200 [email protected]

Presentation to

APLA

Presentation to

APLA

Viñas del Mar, June 2007

References

Related documents

• No more than 32 hosts in vSphere cluster (per HA) • Protect vCenter with vCenter Heartbeat.. Before failing back, disable

Take the guess work out of how best to assign employees to jobs and put your mind at ease with PeopleHours™ - the fully internet based workforce management system that will help

Participants of the First Foot Forward program highlighted improved confidence in going onto further study (parents, WSU support staff), interest in finding out more about going

Physician orders for life- sustaining treatment form: honoring end-of-life directives for nursing home residents..

Having identified the significance of a disaster resilient built environment, the Roadmap for Disaster Risk Management, which was published by the Disaster

We conclude that quality-assured, source-segregated products applied to land, under UK quality protocols and waste processing standards, pose negligible risks to human,

The leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership is based on the notion that a leader develops relationships of varying quality with each of his or her subordinates

(1) no thalamic or neocortical abnormality was observed in the acute clinical MRI; (2) volume reduction in the thalamus was strongly correlated with that in the hippocampus, and