• No results found

Performance Optimization 3G LUCKNOW

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Performance Optimization 3G LUCKNOW"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Performance Optimization_3G

-Generic Steps & Procedure

0 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

~Saptarshi Laskar

(2)

Measurement data collection

- Reporting Suite/EOSFLEX

Various Available Reports give details information (root causes) for bad KPI analysis (daily, hourly) as briefly mentioned

below.

Apart from the readily available reports, customized reports can be prepared from the report builder using different

counters

Item 3G RAN Reports Report Name Object Type Object Aggregation Time Aggregation Measurement Period

1 System Program RSRAN000 PLMN PLMN Daily 4 Weeks

2 System Program RSRAN000 PLMN RNC Daily 4 Weeks

3 System Program RSRAN000 PLMN WCEL Daily 4 Weeks

4 Capactiy RSRAN066, RSRAN067 PLMN WCEL Daily 4 Weeks

5 Capactiy RSRAN066, RSRAN068 PLMN WCEL Hourly 4 Weeks

6 Service Level RSRAN073, RSRAN079 PLMN WCEL Daily 4 Weeks 7 ServiceLevel RSRAN073, RSRAN079 PLMN WCEL Hourly 4 Weeks

8 Traffic

RSRAN070, RSRAN077

PLMN WCEL Daily 4 Weeks

9 Traffic

RSRAN070, RSRAN077

PLMN WCEL Hourly 4 Weeks

10 Mobility & Handover

RSRAN033 , RSRAN018, RSRAN019, RSRAN023 RSRAN044, RSRAN045

RSRAN046 PLMN WCEL Daily 4 Weeks

11 Mobility & Handover

RSRAN033 , RSRAN018, RSRAN019, RSRAN023 RSRAN044, RSRAN045

RSRAN046 PLMN WCEL Hourly 4 Weeks

12 HSPA RSRAN051, RSRAN039 PLMN WCEL Daily 4 Weeks

13 HSPA RSRAN051, RSRAN039 PLMN WCEL Hourly 4 Weeks

14 Signalling RSRAN027, RSRAN0238 PLMN WCEL Daily 4 Weeks

(3)

Perform data analysis and assessment

1. Assess weekly average PLMN/RNC KPI performance to identify KPIs below targets



Start from bigger picture assessment (PLNM -> RNC -> Cluster -> WCEL )



Weekly average will smooth the performance and gives better accuracy of performance assessment as

daily performance varies a lot (especially in unloaded network)

2. Assess network performance at RNC/Area level to check if bad performance happens

across network or only particular RNC/Area



Compare different RNC/Regions performance

3. Apply drill down approach to assess bad performing KPIs in WCEL level



Identify the failures in call phases (refer call flow)

2 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks



Identify the failures in call phases (refer call flow)



Categorizing failure ratio or distribution of each counters (radio, AC, transmission, BTS, RNC)



Identify main cause of underperforming KPIs

4. Prioritize analysis



Filter using high number of failures or high number failure ratio (weighting)



Identify top 50 worst cells

5. Look at failure distribution in the network topology (rural, RNC border, expressway)

6. Make solution proposal to improve KPIs

(4)

Low CSSR

AMR RAB setup/access Analysis

1.

Check the problem cells and its neighbouring cells of any faulty alarms

2.

Identify root cause failure distribution and main failure contributor using Services ->

RSRAN073

3.

RAB_STP_FAIL_XXX_AC

Check UL Interference, DL Power & Code occupancy if there is need to upgrade radio capacity

REQ_CS_VOICE_REJ_UL_SRNC -> Evaluate Prx cell resource

REQ_CS_VOICE_REJ_DL_SRNC -> Evaluate Ptx cell resource

NO_CODES_AVAILABLE_SF128/SF256 -> Evaluate AMR voice code congestion

Check parameter setting with UL throughput based AC and power based AC

4. RAB_STP_FAIL_XXX_BTS

Evaluate NBAP counters (radio link reconf. Add failures) and KPIs for troubleshooting BTS resources

Service Level -> RSRAN073

Evaluate NBAP counters (radio link reconf. Add failures) and KPIs for troubleshooting BTS resources

Check BTS configuration in terms of WAM and CE allocation – Use Channel Element (5001) Counters in order to evaluate

lack of Channel Elements

Expand the Capacity or decrease the traffic offered to the site by virtue of SHO, power & site footprint control

5. RAB_STP_FAIL_XXX_TRANS

Evaluate Number of reconfiguration failure due the transmission

Check M1005C128 CANC_ADD_SRNC_TRAN_STP_FAIL

Check RAB_STP_FAIL_XXX_IUB_AAL2, M1001C531-C533

6. RAB_ACC_FAIL_XXX_UE

Evaluate Cell resource Prx and Ptx (for example high uplink interference)

Check RB reconfiguration failure ration ( If offset for activation time (RNC) setting is insufficient – recommended is

500-700ms )

7.

RAB_ACC_FAIL_XXX_RNC

Typically RNC fault or Incoming SRNC Relocation Failure (inter-RNC border)

Required ICSU log tracing if no RNC fault or SRNC relocation problem

(5)

Low CSSR

Rel99 NRT RAB Setup Success Analysis

 There is two ways to evaluate the Rel99 NRT RAB setup success performance

 M1001,

RNC_576e

Packet Service Setup Success Ratio (CSSR) / CSSR PS NRT

 M1022,

RNC_943a

R99 Setup Success Ratio from user perspective for NRT/ R99 stp SR Usr

 Since RNC_576c (M1001) is measured NRT DCH setup upto 0/0kbps, it is always showing >99.5%. So it is not useful for

data call setup analysis

 Packet calls starts with user plane capacity allocation (transfer from FACH/PCH, DCH 0/0) and ends with dedicated

resource release (transfer back to FACH/PCH, DCH 0/0, RAB release, outgoing relocation, HHO, ISHO)

Service -> RSRAN073

4 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

(6)

Low CSSR

Rel99 NRT RAB Setup Success Analysis in RU10



The number of NRT DCH setup rejects for interactive/BG traffic class due to running out of channelization codes in

DL and power in DL/UL (This counter includes initial DCH setups, handover attempts and channel type switches

from HS-DSCH to DCH)



The number of NRT DCH reconfiguration rejects (bitrate upgrade) for interactive/BG traffic class due to running out

of channelization codes in DL and power in DL/UL



Iur resources setup fails during user plane allocation/modification of PS NRT RAB over IUR branch

M1002C553 Traffic REJ_DCH_DUE_CODES_INT_DL M1002C554 Traffic REJ_DCH_DUE_CODES_BGR_DL M1002C555 Traffic REJ_DCH_DUE_POWER_INT_DL M1002C556 Traffic REJ_DCH_DUE_POWER_BGR_DL 80.00 90.00 100.00 250.00 300.00 M1002C556 Traffic REJ_DCH_DUE_POWER_BGR_DL M1002C557 Traffic REJ_DCH_REC_DUE_CODES_INT_DL M1002C558 Traffic REJ_DCH_REC_DUE_CODES_BGR_DL M1002C559 Traffic REJ_DCH_REC_DUE_PWR_INT_DL M1002C560 Traffic REJ_DCH_REC_DUE_PWR_BGR_DL

M1002C626

Traffic

REJ_DCH_DUE_POWER_INT_UL

M1002C627

Traffic

REJ_DCH_DUE_POWER_BGR_UL

M1002C628

Traffic

REJ_DCH_REC_DUE_PWR_INT_UL

M1002C629

Traffic

REJ_DCH_REC_DUE_PWR_BGR_UL

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111 121 131 141 151 161 m a x , a v e o c c u p a n c y & b lo c k in g ( % ) 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00

RNC_11a_Average code occupancy RNC_520b_Max Occupancy RNC_949a Code blocking rate Rej DCH due codes Rej DCH REC due codes

Reconfig reject

due to lack of

codes

M1004C165 FAIL_NRT_DCH_SETUP_IUR

NRT DCH SETUP FAIL DUE TO IUR

M1004C166

FAIL_NRT_DCH_UL_RECONF _IUR

NRT DCH UL RECONFIG FAIL FOR NRT RB DUE TO IUR

M1004C167

FAIL_NRT_DCH_DL_RECONF _IUR

NRT DCH DL RECONFIG FAIL FOR NRT RB DUE TO IUR

(7)

Low Packet/session success rate (SSSR)

Service -> RSRAN073

Rel99 Packet session setup failures Analysis (M1022)

Evaluate Dominant failures:

AC failure : lack of DL power or high UL interference, UL

Cannot differentiate Rel99 DCH , HSDPA, HSUPA setup failure

_DCH_BGR

PS_ATT_DCH

M1022C8

+

_DCH_INT

PS_ATT_DCH

M1022C7

D_ALLO_BGR

D_D_REQ_D_

M1022C32

+

D_ALLO_INT

D_D_REQ_D_

M1022C31

100



Check KPI

RNC_943a

for low Rel99 packet SSSR

6 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

admission control parameter setting

Other failure: This could be due to max HSPA users

limit reached or “radio link failure” during setup

BTS failure: lack of HW CE capacity

DMCU failure: DMCU/DSP faulty or lack of DSP

resources in RNC

TRANS failure: lack of Iub capacity

(8)

Low Packet/session success rate (SSSR)

M1022 Rel99 Packet session setup failures Analysis



Counters available to identify the Rel99 NRT DCH setup and successful setup based on initial request

bit rates or DCH upgrade bit rates



Uplink initial request and success include also HSDPA UL return channel



This is useful to identify each of the bit rate setup performance and its distribution as well as capacity

bottleneck

M1022C83 Packet_call INIT_DCH_REQ_64_UL M1022C84 Packet_call INIT_DCH_REQ_64_DL M1022C85 Packet_call INIT_DCH_REQ_128_UL M1022C86 Packet_call INIT_DCH_REQ_128_DL M1022C87 Packet_call INIT_DCH_REQ_256_UL M1022C88 Packet_call INIT_DCH_REQ_256_DL M1022C89 Packet_call INIT_DCH_REQ_384_UL M1022C91 Packet_call DCH_UPGR_REQ_64_UL M1022C92 Packet_call DCH_UPGR_REQ_64_DL M1022C93 Packet_call DCH_UPGR_REQ_128_UL M1022C94 Packet_call DCH_UPGR_REQ_128_DL M1022C95 Packet_call DCH_UPGR_REQ_256_UL M1022C96 Packet_call DCH_UPGR_REQ_256_DL M1022C97 Packet_call DCH_UPGR_REQ_384_UL M1022C89 Packet_call INIT_DCH_REQ_384_UL M1022C90 Packet_call INIT_DCH_REQ_384_DL M1022C97 Packet_call DCH_UPGR_REQ_384_UL M1022C98 Packet_call DCH_UPGR_REQ_384_DL M1022C99 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_64_UL M1022C100 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_64_DL M1022C101 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_128_UL M1022C102 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_128_DL M1022C103 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_256_UL M1022C104 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_256_DL M1022C105 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_384_UL M1022C106 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_384_DL M1022C107 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_REQ_64_UL M1022C108 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_REQ_64_DL M1022C109 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_REQ_128_UL M1022C110 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_REQ_128_DL M1022C111 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_REQ_256_UL M1022C112 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_REQ_256_DL M1022C113 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_REQ_384_UL M1022C114 Packet_call SUCC_INIT_ALLO_REQ_384_DL M1022C115 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_64_UL M1022C116 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_64_DL M1022C117 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_128_UL M1022C118 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_128_DL M1022C119 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_256_UL M1022C120 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_256_DL M1022C121 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_384_UL M1022C122 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_384_DL M1022C123 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_REQ_64_UL M1022C124 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_REQ_64_DL M1022C125 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_REQ_128_UL M1022C126 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_REQ_128_DL M1022C127 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_REQ_256_UL M1022C128 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_REQ_256_DL M1022C129 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_REQ_384_UL M1022C130 Packet_call SUCC_UPG_NRT_DCH_REQ_384_DL

(9)

Low Packet/session success rate (SSSR)



Counters available also to identify the Rel99 NRT DCH

Reconfiguration failure during initial request (DCH0/0 to DCH x/x kbps

or cell Fach to DCH) and bit rate upgrade request



Also HSDPA uplink allocations update these counters

M1022C13

5 FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_UL_BTS

DCH UPLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO BTS FOR INTERACTIVE M1022C13

6 FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_UL_BTS

DCH UPLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO BTS FOR BACKGROUND M1022C13

7 FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_DL_BTS

DCH DOWNLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO BTS FOR INTERACTIVE M1022C13 DCH DOWNLINK RECONFIG FAIL

M1022 Rel99 Packet session setup failures Analysis

M1022C143 FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_UL_OTH

DCH UPLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO OTHER REASONS FOR INTERACTIVE

M1022C144 FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_UL_OTH

DCH UPLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO OTHER REASONS FOR BACKGROUND

M1022C145 FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_DL_OTH

DCH DOWNLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO OTHER REASONS FOR INTERACTIVE

M1022C146 FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_DL_OTH

DCH DOWNLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO OTHER REASONS FOR BACKGROUND

In DL, Failures mainly from

8 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks M1022C13

9

FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_UL_A C

DCH UPLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO AC FOR INTERACTIVE

M1022C14

0 FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_UL_AC

DCH UPLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO AC FOR BACKGROUND

M1022C14 1

FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_DL_A C

DCH DOWNLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO AC FOR INTERACTIVE

M1022C14

2 FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_DL_AC

DCH DOWNLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO AC FOR BACKGROUND

M1022C13

8 FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_DL_BTS

DCH DOWNLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO BTS FOR BACKGROUND

M1022C13 1

FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_UL_TRAN S

DCH UPLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO TRANSPORT FOR INTERACTIVE M1022C13

2 FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_UL_TRANS

DCH UPLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO TRANSPORT FOR BACKGROUND

M1022C13 3

FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_DL_TRAN S

DCH DOWNLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO TRANSPORT FOR INTERACTIVE

M1022C13

4 FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_DL_TRANS

DCH DOWNLINK RECONFIG FAIL DUE TO TRANSPORT FOR BACKGROUND 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1 000.00 1 200.00 1 400.00 1 600.00 1 800.00 2 000.00 1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118 FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_DL_TRAN S FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_DL_TR ANS FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_DL_BT S FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_DL_BTS FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_DL_AC FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_DL_AC FAIL_REC_INTERA_DCH_DL_OT H FAIL_REC_BGR_DCH_DL_OTH

In DL, Failures mainly from

AC (Interactive and

(10)

Low HSDPA Accessibility

HSDPA Accessibility failure cause analysis can be done with traffic measurements

(RNC_605b) and Packet call measurements (RNC_914b)

System Program – RNC_605a

Service Level –RNC_914a

Low HSDPA

accessibility

(RNC_605b)

Check Number of simultaneous HSDPA users in BTS or cell level depending on the scheduler type No Action Needed

Too many HSDPA users reached No Yes Yes No

Based on Traffic

measurement

analysis (M1002)

Check BH Channel Element resource Usage (Lack of CE for UL return Channel)

Check BH UL Power Congestion

(Lack of Radio resources for UL return Ch.)

Check BH AAL2 Iub congestion (Lack of Iub resources for UL return Ch.)

Check RB reconfiguration failure rate (Terminal Problem)

Check RNC Unit load (DMPG), max number of users/RNC, DSP failures and faulty alarms HSDPA Setup Fail due

BTS

Rejection of UL Return Channel Rejections

HSDPA Setup Fail Iub (Both UL & DL)

HSDPA Setup Fail UE

HSDPA Setup Fail RNC Internal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No

(11)

Low HSDPA Accessibility

PS Setup Failure due AC

Low HSPA Setup

Performance (RNC_914b)

Yes

No

Air Interface PS Setup Failure due BTS

Yes

No

BTS

Problem In

RSRAN073

HSDPA Accessibility failure analysis based on Packet Call Measurement (M1022)

If not DMCU faulty,

check DSP resource

10 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

PS Setup Failure due Iub

Yes

No

Iub

PS Setup Failure due to, DMCU

Yes

RNC

PS Setup failure due to Others

No

Yes

High Traffic Event

Yes

PS Setup failure due to UE

No action needed

Terminal Issue?

Others failure

could be max

HSPA users been

reached or “radio

link failure” during

setup

check DSP resource

usage and availability

with RU M609 DSP

Service Stats and

M615 DSP Resource.

(12)

Low HSDPA Accessibility



There are counters in packet call to identify packet call attempt to cells which are not HSPA enabled.

New KPI (RNC_914b) gives better results in terms of HSDPA accessibility when networks mixed with

HSPA and non-HSPA enabled cells. This avoids separate aggregation which required previously in

RAS06.



RNC_914b does not include statistics from serving cell change mobility. Thus, the performance could

be lower as well due to statistical calculation

RNC_914b: (NetAct names)

100* sum(

HS_E_REQ_HS_E_ALLO_INT

+

HS_E_REQ_HS_E_ALLO_BGR

+

RNC_605b: (NetAct names)

100*

sum(

ALLO_HS_DSCH_FLOW_INT

+

ALLO_HS_DSCH_FL

OW_BGR

) / sum(

ALLO_HS_DSCH_FLOW_INT

+

HS_E_REQ_HS_E_ALLO_BGR

+

HS_E_REQ_HS_D_ALLO_INT

+

HS_E_REQ_HS_D_ALLO_BGR

+

HS_D_REQ_HS_D_ALLO_INT

+

HS_D_REQ_HS_D_ALLO_BGR

) /

sum(

PS_ATT_HSDSCH_EDCH_INT

+

PS_ATT_HSDSCH_EDCH_BGR

+

PS_ATT_HSDSCH_DCH_INT

+

PS_ATT_HSDSCH_DCH_BGR

-HS_D_REQ_D_D_ALLO_BGR_CELL

-HS_D_REQ_D_D_ALLO_INT_CELL

-HS_E_REQ_D_D_ALLO_BGR_CELL

-HS_E_REQ_D_D_ALLO_INT_CELL

)

OW_BGR

) / sum(

ALLO_HS_DSCH_FLOW_INT

+

ALLO_HS_DSCH_FLOW_BGR

+

REJ_HS_DSCH_RET_INT

+

REJ_HS_DSCH_RET_BGR

+

SETUP_FAIL_RNC_HS_DSCH_INT

+

SETUP_FAIL_BTS_HS_DSCH_INT

+

SETUP_FAIL_IUB_HS_TOTAL_INT

+

SETUP_FAIL_RNC_HS_DSCH_BGR

+

SETUP_FAIL_BTS_HS_DSCH_BGR

+

SETUP_FAIL_IUB_HS_TOTAL_BGR

+

SETUP_FAIL_UE_HS_DSCH_INT

+

SETUP_FAIL_UE_HS_DSCH_BGR

+

DCH_SEL_MAX_HSDPA_USERS_INT

+

DCH_SEL_MAX_HSDPA_USERS_BGR

)

The number of DCH/DCH allocations after an HS-DCSH/E-DCH request for the background traffic class due to the cell not supporting HSUPA and HSDPA

(13)

1.

Identify root cause of failure distribution and main failure contributor

2. If high HSDPA Access Failure _too many HSDPA users



Check simultaneous HSDPA users (RNC_646c to RNC_654c) & (RNC_1028b to RNC_1035b) &

(RNC_1665a to RNC_1668a)



RU10 new counters on max & average HSPA users

Low HSDPA Accessibility

Service level -> RSRAN073

M1000C282 Cell_Resource MAX_HSDPA_USERS_IN_CELL M1000C283 Cell_Resource MAX_HSUPA_USERS_IN_CELL M1000C284 Cell_Resource SUM_HSDPA_USERS_IN_CELL

M1000C285 Cell_Resource DENOM_HSDPA_USERS_PER_CELL

12 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

3. If high HSDPA Access Failure_UL DCH



Rejected HS-DSCH return channel due to lack of radio power resource



Check M1002C521 or M1002C522 or M1000C144 – only when HSDPA static allocation



Check Cell resource PrxTotal, PtxTotal



Check parameter setting for uplink throughput based and interference based admission control

4. If high HSDPA Access Failure_UE



Check RB reconfiguration failure rate



ICSU log for UE types troubleshooting ?



Counters to measure HSDPA setup success in RB reconfiguration phase

M1000C286 Cell_Resource SUM_HSUPA_USERS_IN_CELL M1000C287 Cell_Resource DENOM_HSUPA_USERS_PER_CELL

M1006C149

RRC

ATT_RB_SETUP_HSDPA

M1006C150

RRC

SUCC_RB_SETUP_HSDPA

M1006C192

RRC

FAIL_RB_SETUP_HSDPA_NOREPLY

M1006C193

RRC

FAIL_RB_SETUP_HSDPA_UE

(14)

Low HSDPA Accessibility

5.

If high HSDPA Access Failure_BTS



Lack of UL channel resources (check CE resource utilisation using M5001 counters at BH)



Too high SHO overhead – all branches must have enough CE capacity if UE is in SHO when HS-DSCH allocation is

started



RU10 brings new counters measure on the setup/success/failure for HSDPA MAC-d setup on NBAP Radio link

Reconfiguration phase

600 800 1000 1200 15 20 25 30 SETUP_FAIL_BTS_HS_DSCH_BGR (Traffic)

M1005C241

L3Iub

ATT_MACD_SETUP_FOR_HSDPA

M1005C242

L3Iub

SUCC_MACD_SETUP_FOR_HSDPA

M1005C247

L3Iub

FAIL_MACD_SETUP_HSDPA_NORESP

M1005C248

L3Iub

FAIL_MACD_SETUP_HSDPA_RNL

M1005C249

L3Iub

FAIL_MACD_SETUP_HSDPA_TR

M1005C250

L3Iub

FAIL_MACD_SETUP_HSDPA_PROT

M1005C251

L3Iub

FAIL_MACD_SETUP_HSDPA_MISC

6. HS-DSCH return channel setup fail due to Iub transport



Breakdown the failure distribution (64,128,384,MAC-d)



Evaluate RU10 UL rejection failure cause (M1022C131…C146)



Evaluate number of reconfiguration failure due the transmission



Check M1005C128 CANC_ADD_SRNC_TRAN_STP_FAIL



Check RAB_STP_FAIL_XXX_IUB_AAL2, M1001C531-C533

0 200 400 600 1 14 27 40 53 66 79 92 105 118 131 144 157 170 183 196 209 222 235 248 261 274 287 0 5 10 15 AVE_AVAIL_PERC_POOL_CAPA_UL (Cellres)

(15)

Low HSDPA Cell/User Throughput



HSDPA throughput limiting factors:

System Program -> RSRAN000

HSPA -> RSRAN051

HSPA -> RSRAN039

HSDPA Throughput Analysis

Air interface support from CQI distribution

HSDPA Throughput Available from Iub

BTS Power Availability HSDPA UL Return channel limitation (Iub)

HSDPA UL Return channel limitation (UL

Interference)

Problem in

Air Interface

Iub

BTS

14 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

BTS Power Availability for HSDPA Cell Channelisation code Availability for

HSDPA

RNC limiting factors: DSP, #simultaneous HSDPA users and

throughput

Iu-PS capacity available or HSDPA

HSDPA UL Return channel limitation (CE)

RNC

Iu-PS

BTS scheduler limitation (#simultaneous users per scheduler)

(16)

Low HSDPA Cell/User Throughput

1.

Check HSDPA active Throughput in the cell (RNC_722b/c) and Average throughput in the cell

(RNC_606c) or with cell throughput in RNC/WBTS measurements (RNC_941a)

KPI RNC_941a : sum (

HS_DSCH_DATA_VOL

* 8) /sum ( 1000 *

PERIOD_DURATION

)* 60 (kbps)

RNC_606c: sum(

RECEIVED_HS_MACD_BITS

-

DISCARDED_HS_MACD_BITS

) /

sum(PERIOD_DURATION)*60 (kbps)

2.

Calculate rough HSDPA User Throughput by dividing RNC_722b with average number of

simultaneous HSDPA users (RNC_726a) or two new KPIs based on users in buffer where v2.1 is

System Program -> RSRAN000

HSPA -> RSRAN051

HSPA -> RSRAN039

Traffic - RSRAN077

M5002C21

Cell_Throughput_WBTS

HS_TOTAL_DATA

simultaneous HSDPA users (RNC_726a) or two new KPIs based on users in buffer where v2.1 is

for user throughput <1.5Mbps

(

)

ELLS S_3_0_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_2_1_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_1_2_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_0_3_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_2_0_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_1_1_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_0_2_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_1_0_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_0_1_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS) S_3_0_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_0_3_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_2_1_IN_C HSDPA_USER CELLS RS_1_2_IN_ (HSDPA_USE 3 ELLS) S_2_0_IN_C HSDPA_USER ELLS S_1_1_IN_C HSDPA_USER CELLS RS_0_2_IN_ (HSDPA_USE 2 ELLS) S_1_0_IN_C HSDPA_USER CELLS RS_0_1_IN_ (HSDPA_USE _PER_TTI _WITH_DATA HSDPA_BUFF 500 TS HS_MACD_BI DISCARDED_ -S S_MACD_BIT RECEIVED_H v3.0 experience user End + + + + + + + + + + + ⋅ + + + ⋅ + + ⋅ ⋅ =

(

)

2

_PER_TTI

_WITH_DATA

HSDPA_BUFF

500

TS

HS_MACD_BI

DISCARDED_

-S

S_MACD_BIT

RECEIVED_H

v2.1

experience

user

End

=

(17)

Low HSDPA Cell/User Throughput

Below is comparison of all the throughput per user formulas as well as

RNC_722b

Average HSDPA

16 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

Average HSDPA

Throughput per User

has increased a lot

based on users in data

(18)

Low HSDPA cell/user Throughput

3.

Check RNC_706a Ave Reported CQI and CQI distribution (M5000C8-M5000C39) or Ecno

distribution for bad coverage issue (M1007C38-M1007C47)

4.

High CQI / Ecno but low HSDPA user throughput



Check problem at core network or application server (FTP, HTTP) or in measurement tools & PC

settings



Check any shortage on Iub user plane and CEs shortage due to DCH traffic is too high



Check if UL return channel is limiting due to interference (PrxLoadMarginMaxDCH -> 0 dB)



Check the if there is code blocking for HSDPA (set HSPDSCHMarginSF128 from 8-> 0)



Check HSDPA power parameter setting (M1000C232-C235) & (M1000C236-C239)

System Program -> RSRAN000

HSPA -> RSRAN051

HSPA -> RSRAN039



Check simultaneous HSDPA users in the Node B Scheduler (increase the scheduler capacity from 16

users/BTS to 48 users/BTS (16/cell)



Check HSDPA FMCS mobility parameters (lower window add for HSDPA than for R99 to save capacity in

target cell due to smaller SHO OH)

(19)

Low HSDPA Cell/Users Throughput

5.

HSDPA power in BTS



The counters tell the number of samples (TTI) per class when the actual used HS-PDSCH power (given as % value from the

max HS-PDSCH pwr) is within the limits defined for a class



This give hints whether low HSDPA throughput due to lack of HSDPA power (high RT/Rel99 NRT traffics in the cell)

M5000C268 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_01 M5000C269 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_02 M5000C270 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_03 M5000C271 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_04 M5000C272 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_05 M5000C273 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_06 M5000C274 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_07 M5000C275 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_08 M5000C276 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_09 M5000C277 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_10

18 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

6. DMPG resource sharing causes the total throughput per user is not only limited by the #

simultaneous users per cell and their activity but also the amount of simultaneous users per

DMPG (per RNC sharing the total RNC throughput) and their activity

M5000C277 HSDPA_WBTS SAMPLE_HS_PDSCH_PWR_CLASS_10

Max HSDPA Throughput per RNC (62 x 7.2Mbps currently on RNC Throughput 450Mbps)

Sum ( #_users_with_data_in_buff_per_TTI / all_active_TTIs) x avg_#_HSDPA_users_in_RNC

HSDPA_NRTD_PEAK_CALLS

(20)

Low HSUPA Accessibility



HSUPA Accessibility KPI is measured with

RNC_913a (Traffic Measurement)



If HSDPA setup is failing also HSUPA setup will fail, but it could be also that only HSUPA will fail. The

reasons are similar to HSDPA

RNC_956b E-DCH Setup FR due to BTS (RL reconfiguration failure to RNC)

RNC_1105b E-DCH Setup FR due to Transport (RL reconfiguration cancel from RNC)

RNC_1106b E-DCH Setup FR due to UE (RB reconfiguration failure from UE)

RNC_1104b E-DCH Setup FR due to Other Failures (RNC internal reason)

RNC_1103b

E-DCH Allocation FR due to NA AS (due to non-acceptable E-DCH active set)

 Also there could be too many HSUPA users (20/cell, 24/NodeB,In RU10:64 users/Node B)

System Program -> RSRAN000

Service Level -> RSRAN073

 Also there could be too many HSUPA users (20/cell, 24/NodeB,In RU10:64 users/Node B)

RNC_968b UL DCH Selected due to too many HSUPA users

RNC_969b

DL DCH Selected due to the HSDPA power (updated when only HSDPA static power allocation used)

 HSUPA setup failed due to BTS reports HSUPA cannot be allocated

RNC_957b E-DCH Not Selected due the BTS HW (BTS sent radio resource measurement report)

M1000C268-C270

– These counters measure the BTS HW limitation during HSUPA Calls

(21)

Low HSUPA Accessibility

For static resource allocation the power could limit

M1002C521 DL_DCH_SEL_HSDPA_POWER_INT

M1002C522 DL_DCH_SEL_HSDPA_POWER_BGR

M1002C602DL_DCH_SEL_HSDPA_POWER_STR

AC: (PtxTotal>PtxTargetHSDPA or PtxNC>PtxTargetHSDPA)

 EDCH cannot be allocated in case HSUPA is not supported in SHO

branch

M1002C519 EDCH_ALLO_CANC_NA_AS_INT

System Program -> RSRAN000

Service Level -> RSRAN073

20 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

M1002C519 EDCH_ALLO_CANC_NA_AS_INT

M1002C520 EDCH_ALLO_CANC_NA_AS_BGR

M1002C601EDCH_ALLO_CANC_NA_AS_STR

(22)

Low HSUPA Throughput

 Check Mininum, Maximum & Average HSUPA throughput from

WBTS counter measurement

(

M5000C153)

 Check average or data volume HSUPA throughput from

Cell Throughput measurement

with RNC_952c

sum(

NRT_EDCH_UL_DATA_VOL

+

RT_E_DCH_UL_STREA_DATA

) * 8 / sum(PERIOD_DURATION)*1000000*60

Check HSUPA throughput from M5002 Cell Throughput_WBTS and its throughput distributions in classes

Traffic -> RSRAN070/077

HSPA -> RSRAN051

HSPA -> RSRAN039

System Program -> RSRAN000

Counter ID Measurement

Counter name

M5002C41 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP03

M5002C42 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP04

M5002C43 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP05

M5002C44 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP06

 Check HSUPA user throughput by dividing above with

KPI RNC_1037a -Average number of simultaneous HSUPA

users, during HSUPA usage

M5002C44 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP06 M5002C45 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP07 M5002C38 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP00 M5002C39 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP01 M5002C40 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP02 M5002C46 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP08 M5002C47 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP09 M5002C48 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP10 M5002C49 Cell_Throughput_WBTS UE_HSUPA_TP11 M5002C2 Cell_Throughput_WBTS EDCH_DATA_SCELL_UL M5002C3 Cell_Throughput_WBTS EDCH_DATA_NSC_S_EDCH_UL M5002C4 Cell_Throughput_WBTS EDCH_DATA_NSC_NS_EDCH_UL

Note: HSUPA cell throughput

measurement is less accurate

than HSDPA cell throughput

due to counters updating

across total measurement

period and not in active data

transfer period

(23)

Low HSUPA Throughput

Check CQI distribution (M5000C8-M5000C39) or Ecno distribution for bad coverage issue

(M1007C38-M1007C47)

 Check If low throughput due to high number of retransmission & failed retransmission

(RNC_917a HSUPA

MAC-es BLER)

 Check

KPI RNC_1165a/RNC_1166a

for low HSUPA throughput due to Iub congestion (frame delay or frame loss)

 In RU10, there is new counters to check on the Rise Over Thermal in Fractional load:L = 1 - (Pnoise/Ptotal), The

fractional load is calculated in the normal scheduling operation. HSUPA throughput will be limited by high

fractional load in the cells

Traffic -> RSRAN070/077

HSPA -> RSRAN051

HSPA -> RSRAN039

System Program -> RSRAN000

M5000C245 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_00 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (L = 0). M5000C246 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_01

22 of 17 © Nokia-Siemens Siemens Networks

M5000C246 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_01 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0 < L <= 0.05) M5000C247 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_02 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.05 < L <= 0.1) M5000C248 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_03 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.1 < L <= 0.15) M5000C249 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_04 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.15 < L <= 0.2) M5000C250 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_05 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.2 < L <= 0.25) M5000C251 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_06 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.25 < L <= 0.3) M5000C252 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_07 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.3 < L <= 0.35) M5000C253 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_08 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.35 < L <= 0.4) M5000C254 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_09 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.4 < L <= 0.45) M5000C255 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_10 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.45 < L <= 0.5) M5000C256 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_11 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.5 < L <= 0.55) M5000C257 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_12 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.55 < L <= 0.6) M5000C258 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_13 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.6 < L <= 0.65) M5000C259 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_14 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.65 < L <= 0.7) M5000C260 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_15 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.7 < L <= 0.75) M5000C261 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_16 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.75 < L <= 0.8) M5000C262 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_17 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.8 < L <= 0.85) M5000C263 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_18 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.85 < L <= 0.9) M5000C264 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_19 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.9 < L <= 0.95) M5000C265 FRACT_LOAD_DISTR_CLASS_20 - Ptotal>=Pnoise : (0.95 < L <= 1)

(24)

Low HSUPA Throughput

Check CQI distribution (M5000C8-M5000C39) or Ecno distribution for bad coverage issue

(M1007C38-M1007C47)

 Check If low throughput due to high number of retransmission & failed retransmission

(RNC_917a

HSUPA MAC-es BLER)

 Check

KPI RNC_1165a/RNC_1166a

for low HSUPA throughput due to Iub congestion (frame delay

or frame loss)

Traffic -> RSRAN070/077

HSPA -> RSRAN051

HSPA -> RSRAN039

System Program -> RSRAN000

 Check

AVG_NON_HSDPA_PWR (M1000C138) & AVG_ACTIVE_NON_HSDPA_PWR

to investigate

whether high DCH power (DCH traffic) causes low HSUPA throughput

 Others reasons with low HSUPA throughput

 Check problem at core network or application server

References

Related documents

For example, our respondents told us that statutes are sometimes drafted in contorted ways to guard committee jurisdic- tion and agency oversight; that committee

Through end-to-end knowledge of the application environment - users, queries, applications and databases - Teleran software aligns IT processes with business needs,

Many Armenians have resisted discussion of  Many Armenians have resisted discussion of  the political and social context in which the the political and social context in which

If the relationship between income level and economic growth, on post conflict risk is fragile, it is unlikely that these two variables will have corresponding effects on

When we used time points that were exactly the same for each subject and the exchangeable working association matrix, SPSS appeared to have fewer numerical issues than repolr

My findings are consistent with theirs, though my methodology differs in a number of ways: (1) I focus on one country, rather than many, which allows me to employ data on

There was less repetition of performance itself than in theatre, but the same structure of repeated re- hearsal leading to live performance, and some sense of ensemble created