• No results found

DCM 18.1 How to Prepare a Data Center Strategy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "DCM 18.1 How to Prepare a Data Center Strategy"

Copied!
28
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

DCM 18.1 How to Prepare

a Data Center Strategy

What you need to know to build a business case

for data center sourcing

Presented by:

Steve Miano, Managing Principal, &

Gary Davis, Principal/Director, Data Center

Practice at PlanNet Consulting

(2)

DCM 18.1 How to Prepare a Data Center Strategy

We will present an informative how-to-guide for data

center managers looking to understand the process of

developing a data center strategy. Along with helpful

tips, real-life project examples will be utilized for

decision-makers to decide whether to upgrade, build, consolidate

or co-locate their data centers.

(3)

Agenda

What is a data center strategy?

Getting started

Assessing the current state

Developing a future state model

Building a business case

What your decision makers want to know

Case studies

(4)

Data Center Strategy

A data center strategy is usually initiated for any or all of

the following reasons:

Data center failures are impacting the business

Growth is expected to exceed power, cooling and/or space

capacities

Risk – real or perceived

Lowering Cost of Operation

Improve systems availability and disaster recovery

(5)

Getting Started

Define your objectives

Business drivers

Technology imperatives

Desired outcome

Assemble a Core Team

Identify/appoint a project sponsor

Sponsorship typically comes from Real Estate, Facilities or IT

Typical make-up of a Core Team

Facilities representative (VP, Director)

IT representatives

-

CIO, IT Infrastructure VP, Network, user representative(s)

(6)

Identify Stakeholders

A data center strategy has

many stakeholders

It’s critical to engage to

appropriate stakeholder

resources to gain consensus

and eliminate surprises

Missing a key stakeholder is

analogous to missing a tire on

your car

(7)

Gather Information

Formalize the project with a stakeholder kick-off

Introduce the initiative and objectives

Layout timelines

(8)

Assessing the Current State

Develop and issue a Comprehensive

Request for Information and meet with

Stakeholders to gather information

Some of the information is

available electronically (e.g.,

CMDB, As-Built drawings, energy

bills, etc.)

Some of the information will be

drawn out in Stakeholder

meetings (e.g., application

portfolio, financial models, etc.)

RFI Categories

Equipment/application inventory

Data Center Facilities

Real Estate

Operations

Network

Business Systems and Services

Business Continuity

Finance

Growth and Capacity Planning

IT Strategic Plan

(9)

Assessing the Current State

Key Points

Establish current demand load

KW is the currency

Determine historical demand growth (3-5 years)

Assess existing facility’s attribute and constraints (e.g., Tier rating, power, cooling,

space, SPOCs)

Identify applications and their tier levels

Identify network constraints (e.g., latency sensitive applications)

Identify adjacency requirements/constraints

Identify key business and IT initiatives (e.g., new business ventures,

merger/acquisition, virtualization, etc.)

(10)
(11)

Future State

Identify the future state scenario

Establish operational objectives and service levels

Establish availability targets

Tier Rating

Geography

Determine efficiency objectives (PUE)

Define sustainability goals

Consider adaptability needs

(12)

Establish the Future State

Determine relevant sourcing models

Co-Location

Greenfield

Tenant Improvement

Retrofit Existing Facilities

Cloud Managed Services

Select markets to be evaluated

Ideally, markets with co-location options, cheap power and free-cooling potential

Determine business affinity to particular markets

Existing operations

Business drivers

Existing or future real estate or facility programs

Include any market bias of executive management

(13)

Establish Demand Forecast

Align business growth with IT growth

Optimize IT deployment as part of the deployment of a new data

center

6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 Cap ac ity D em an d -k W at ts

(14)

Establish Demand Forecast

Establish capacity threshold vs. demand forecast

Depict historical growth with future planning

(15)

Define Day 1/Day 2

Plan for incremental deployment based on demand

forecast

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 k W at ts

Site 1 - Production Buildout Phases

* DAY 1: 3,900 kW, 22.5K SF

(16)

Market Analysis

Qualitative Metrics

use to disqualify markets

Energy

 Rates vs. Nat’l average  Sustainability  Free cooling  Reliability

Telecommunications

 Diversity  Relative costs  Latency

Labor

 Availability  Relative costs

Facilities

 Control/Lease Terms

Transportation/Accessibility

 Flight Availability  Door to Door Time

Vendor and Services Support

 Proximity to critical vendors

Environmental Risk

 Seismic/Volcanic  Hurricane/Tidal  Severe Weather

Incentives (very dependent on specific properties)

 Enterprise Zones  Sales Tax

(17)

Qualitative Market Rankings

What’s

important to

you?

(18)

Building a Business Case

Determine Capital Expenditures

Determine Operational Expenditures

Develop a Multi-Year Total Cost of Ownership for each

model (5/10 yr)

(19)

Determine CapEx & OpEx

OPEX

Lease costs

Power

Maintenance

Facility Management

Security

IT Operations Staff

Telecommunications

Services

Sales Tax

Migration

CAPEX

Construction and Soft Costs (Greenfield, TI)

Cable Plant

Network Electronics

Depreciation

Migration

• Equipment • IT Labor / Services

(20)

Total Cost of Operation

(21)

Total Cost of Operation

Tenant Improvement Example

Seattle TI/Lease Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5 year Total Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 10- Year Total Operating Costs Power $ 297 $ 320 $ 345 $ 371 $ 400 $ 1,734 $ 429 $ 460 $ 494 $ 530 $ 568 $ 4,216 Predictive Maintenance $ 131 $ 221 $ 279 $ 233 $ 240 $ 1,104 $ 247 $ 254 $ 262 $ 270 $ 278 $ 2,415 Rent $ 462 $ 476 $ 490 $ 505 $ 520 $ 2,453 $ 536 $ 552 $ 568 $ 585 $ 603 $ 5,296 IT Staff $ 250 $ 258 $ 265 $ 273 $ 282 $ 1,328 $ 290 $ 299 $ 308 $ 317 $ 326 $ 2,868 Facilities Staff $ 147 $ 151 $ 155 $ 160 $ 165 $ 778 $ 170 $ 175 $ 180 $ 186 $ 191 $ 1,680 Telecommunications $ 828 $ 845 $ 861 $ 879 $ 896 $ 4,309 $ 914 $ 932 $ 951 $ 970 $ 990 $ 9,066 Other Costs $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -DC Equipment Sales Tax $ 131 $ 134 $ 137 $ 139 $ 142 $ 683 $ 145 $ 148 $ 148 $ 151 $ 151 $ 1,425 Operating Costs Subtotal $ 2,246 $ 2,405 $ 2,533 $ 2,561 $ 2,644 $ 12,388 $ 2,730 $ 2,820 $ 2,911 $ 3,009 $ 3,107 $ 26,966 Capital Costs

DC TI $ 6,078 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,078 $ 876 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,954 Racks / Cabling $ 1,112 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,112 $ 127 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,240 Network Electronics $ 1,157 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,157 $ 378 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,535 Migration Costs $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $

(22)

-Compare Models

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

5 year Total

Dif $

Dif %

10 Year Total

Dif $

Dif %

As-Is Owned

$

2,929

$

3,125

$

3,461

$

3,661

$

3,878

$

17,054

$

-

0%

$

39,639

$

-

0%

Optimized Owned

$

2,669

$

2,869

$

3,047

$

3,232

$

3,433

$

15,251

$

(1,804)

-11%

$

35,527

$

(4,112)

-10%

Market 1

Co-Lo

$

3,145

$

3,117

$

3,281

$

3,298

$

3,383

$

16,224

$

(830)

-5%

$

33,773

$

(5,866)

-15%

Market 2

Co-Lo

$

3,205

$

3,188

$

3,362

$

3,391

$

3,489

$

16,635

$

(419)

-2%

$

34,896

$

(4,743)

-12%

Market 3 TI / Lease

$

4,388

$

3,653

$

3,900

$

3,882

$

3,993

$

19,816

$

3,620

21%

$

44,423

$

4,784

12%

Market 4

Co-Lo

$

3,327

$

3,400

$

3,610

$

3,677

$

3,814

$

17,828

$

3,449

20%

$

38,203

$

(1,436)

-4%

Market 5 TI / Lease

$

3,302

$

3,497

$

3,730

$

3,717

$

3,823

$

18,068

$

3,447

20%

$

38,071

$

(1,569)

-4%

Market 6

Co-Lo

$

3,306

$

3,368

$

3,557

$

3,622

$

3,746

$

17,599

$

3,425

20%

$

37,778

$

(1,861)

-5%

Annual Operating Costs Years 1 -10

(in 1000's)

(23)

Scenario Analysis

$1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Annual Operating Expense Comparison

Annua l O pe rt ing E xpe ns es (1 ,0 00 's) Year Scenario 2 $65.5M 10 Yr TOC Senario 1 $68.1M 10 Yr TOC Scenario 3 (Current-state with expansion)

$58.7M 10 Yr TOC

2009 w/Stabalization 2009

(24)

Case Studies

Issues

Aging primary data center in a high risk region

Sub Tier 2 design

History of outages

Running out of capacity

Facing major capital expenditures to retrofit

the primary data center

Lease expiring on Disaster Recovery site

Results

Analysis

Assess deficiencies of existing facilities

Determine amount of time before the DC reaches

capacity

Evaluate low-risk markets

Evaluate own vs. co-lo

Outcome

Move primary DC to co-lo

Retrofit existing DC to Tier 2

Repurpose existing DC to sub-production and DR

Improved availability with nominal increases in TOC

(25)

Case Studies

Issues

40+ data centers worldwide

Growing through acquisition

Unsustainable operating costs

Unmanageable data center footprint

Business driver to consolidate operations

Latency sensitivity from global engineering

applications

Results

Analysis

Assess operation efficiencies and costs

Evaluate multiple markets and corporate owned real

estate

Evaluate geo-regional consolidation alternatives

Analyze enterprise architecture

Evaluate own vs. co-lo

Outcome

Geo-regional consolidation (N.A, ENAME, PAC-RIM)

Deploy owned Tier 2+ DCs

Multi-site recovery

$100M+ 10-year future cost avoidance

(26)

Case Studies

Issues

Significantly high energy costs

High-risk location

Planning for significant business technology

initiatives

Facing future capital expenditures to uplift

primary data center

Results

Analysis

Assess deficiencies of existing facilities

Determine impact of new computing demand

Evaluate low-cost markets

Evaluate own vs. co-location

Outcome

Expand primary DC to co-lo

Leverage existing facility for business partner and

DR

Recommended phased deployment to optimize

(27)

Case Studies

Issues

Aging primary data center in a high risk region

Sub Tier 2 design

History of outages

Running out of capacity

Facing major capital expenditures to retrofit

the primary data center

Affinity for in-State deployment

Results

Analysis

Assess deficiencies of existing facilities

Assess mitigation strategies to buy time

Evaluate regional markets

Evaluate own vs. co-location

Outcome

Move primary DC to co-lo in a lower risk

geography

Repurpose existing DC to sub-production and DR

Stabilize current environment

(28)

Thank you for your time!

Steve Miano

Principal

PlanNet Consulting

714.982.5820

[email protected]

Gary Davis

Principal

PlanNet Consulting

714.982.5886

[email protected]

www.PlanNet.com

References

Related documents

Those erroneous parameters were the result of a take-off data entry error which resulted in the incorrect take-off weight being entered into the electronic flight bag during

The table shows the results of phytochemical test on fresh samples of nutmeg stem bark contain secondary metabolites of alkaloid, terpenoid, phenolic and flavonoid groups,

Wireless fire alarm detection systems are safe as the systems using conventional cables for connection, because it is a two-way communication between the detector and the

The festival's major participants should include King Ericall, all of the NPCs listed in the Nonplayer Characters section, all charac- ters who decide to attend, and any of your

Foremost, since virtual learning is a new phenomenon (at least in its current form, since the Internet has only seen widespread use in the past one to two decades), there has not

Relationship between nirS and nirK gene abundance and denitrification potential (DNP) for summer, fall, and winter sampling dates WLISS samples. Relationships analyzed with

Cobra Oil Company, and its unknown successors-in-interest Daisy Bloss, if living, and if deceased, her unknown heirs, successors, devisees, administrators, trustees and assigns.

lbis regression only includes data from JLU1e 29, 2006 to SepterriJer 17, 2007 to control for the Federal Funds target rate as it remained at 5.25% over the period Columns (3)