• No results found

Auditing construction contract change orders

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Auditing construction contract change orders"

Copied!
36
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Presenter

Tony Ollmann, CPA, CCA

Director

Director

Baker Tilly

(3)
(4)

About Baker Tilly

>

Established in 1931

>

One of the top 20 largest accounting and

>

One of the top 20 largest accounting and

advisory firms in the United States according

to Accounting Today’s 2013 list of “Top 100

Firms”

>

More than 1,400 professionals

>

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP is the largest

US Baker Tilly International independent

US Baker Tilly International independent

member firm

>

Baker Tilly International is the eighth largest

public accounting network with representation

public accounting network with representation

in more than 131 countries

>

Convenient, seamless resource for worldwide

needs

4

needs

(5)

About Baker Tilly

From concept and funding to controls and compliance, Baker

Tilly has more than 250 dedicated construction and real estate

industry professionals to assist with your facility development

j

t th

h ll t

f th d

l

t lif

l

project through all stages of the development lifecycle.

(6)

Overview

Today’s topics:

What are change

orders?

Auditing construction

contract change

orders

Audit risks

Change order red

flags

Change order testing

Case studies

(7)

Learning objectives

>

Learn how to identify change orders

>

Learn how to decompose a change order

>

Determine the underlying change order driver

>

Understand the risk associated with different types of change orders

>

Develop strategies for auditing change orders and managing

construction professionals

(8)

What are change orders?

§ 7.3 CONSTRUCTION CHANGE DIRECTIVES

§ 7.3.1

A Construction Change Directive is a written order

prepared by the Architect and signed by the Owner and

Architect directing a change in the Work prior to agreement

Architect, directing a change in the Work prior to agreement

on adjustment, if any, in the Contract Sum or Contract Time,

or both. The Owner may by Construction Change Directive,

ith

t i

lid ti

th C

t

t

d

h

i th W k

without invalidating the Contract, order changes in the Work

within the general scope of the Contract consisting of

additions, deletions or other revisions, the Contract Sum and

Contract Time being adjusted accordingly.

Source: AIA 133 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager

(9)

What are change orders?

Change orders are referred to in a number of ways:

>

Ch

d

>

Change orders

>

Change directives

>

RFI

>

Engineering change notice

>

Field change request

All amount to the same thing an owner’s

All amount to the same thing, an owner s

authorization to change the terms of the prevailing

contract

(10)

AIA change directive documentation

§ 7.3.3

If the Construction Change Directive provides for an

adjustment to the Contract Sum the adjustment shall he

adjustment to the Contract Sum, the adjustment shall he

based on one of the following methods:

.1

Mutual acceptance of a lump sum properly itemized

and supported by sufficient substantiating data to permit

evaluation;

evaluation;

.2

Unit prices stated in the Contract Documents or

subsequently agreed upon;

3

Cost to he determined in a manner agreed upon by

.3

Cost to he determined in a manner agreed upon by

the parties and a mutually acceptable fixed or percentage

fee; or

.4

As provided in Section 7.3.7.

Source: AIA 133 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager

(11)

Why do change orders occur?

>

Owner initiated change to the project

>

Contingency expenditure

g

y

p

>

Change in construction conditions

>

Change in specifications

>

Change in building code

>

Change in building code

(12)

Change in specifications

Due to completion of construction documents,

h

i b ildi

d

fi

d

t i l

changes in building code or refined materials

specifications additional labor and materials

are required to deliver the scope of work

are required to deliver the scope of work

Resulting from:

Resulting from:

>

Bids based on incomplete construction documents

>

Regulatory design review demands design changes

>

Equipment specified is modified or changed

(13)

Change in market conditions

The cost of procuring construction services,

li

d

i

t

t i ll diff

t

supplies and equipment are materially different

than the estimated costs

Resulting from:

>

Dramatic material shortages

>

Dramatic material shortages

>

Labor shortages

(14)

Change in field conditions

Construction conditions are not what was

t d

t d t th

t

t

expected or reported to the contractors

M

i

l d

May include:

>

Unusually inclement or adverse weather

>

Unreported soil conditions

p

>

Environmental hazards

(15)

Owner initiated change orders

Represent new or additional work not planned

f

i th

ti

t d

for in the estimated scope

M

lt i

May result in:

>

Increase to the GMP

>

Change to the construction schedule

g

>

Use of contractor’s contingency budget

>

Use of owner’s contingency budget

>

Reduction to another part of the project budget

(16)

Change order audit risks

Audit risk categories

>

U

th i

d h

d

>

Unauthorized change orders

>

Unnecessary change orders

>

Redundant or duplicate change orders

>

Overpriced change orders

(17)

Unauthorized change orders

Work that is performed and charged for without

h

i

b

th i

d b th

having been authorized by the owner

Wh d

thi h

?

Why does this happen?

>

Miscommunication

>

Procrastination

>

Budget overruns

>

Schedule delays

>

Rework

>

Rework

(18)

Unnecessary change orders

Change orders that have been properly

d b t d li

t

l

t th

approved but deliver no apparent value to the

project

Resulting from

>

Existing scope

>

Existing scope

>

Unnecessary add on

18

(19)

Overpriced change orders

Change orders that have been approved but

i

d f

th

f

k

d

are overpriced for the scope of work proposed

O

i i

f

Overpricing comes from:

>

Inflated labor rates

>

Inflated hours

>

Exaggerated profit margins

(20)

Contingency budgets and allowances

Contractors contingency: Contractor’s budget

f

i

b d

t h

for in scope budget changes

O

ti

O

’ b d

t f

Owner’s contingency: Owner’s budget for

scope changes

Allowances: Segregated construction budget

dedicated for a specific use that may not have

dedicated for a specific use that may not have

a budget and contract or GMP time.

(21)

Change order red flags

>

No rejected change orders

>

Project end change orders

>

No negotiated change orders

>

Remodeling projects

>

Project end change orders

>

Significant value engineering

adjustments

>

Ch

i

t

t

d i

>

Remodeling projects

>

Too few change orders

>

Change order value greater

th

10% f

i i

l b d

t

>

Changing contractors during

construction

>

Too few change orders

than 10% of original budget

>

Bids prepared at less than

100% of construction

d

t

>

Material substitutions

>

No contractor’s contingency

reconciliation

documents

>

Remodeling projects

(22)

Audit program

Change order audit program planning:

>

D

t ti

d

t l

>

Documentation and control

>

Authorization

>

Price analysis

>

Scope analysis

(23)

Documentation and control

Change

Order Date Date 3% Total change

Order Date Date 3% Total change

Number Submitted Approved Contractor Description Change Order Reason Submitted Change Submitted Fee order amount

1 11/5/2007 Footing corrections, backfill and  pumping Change in conditions $      12,927.57 $      387.83 $      13,315.39 1 8/15/2007 Sand, 90 loads Change in conditions $       5,450.00 $      163.50 $      5,613.50 1 11/5/2007 Undocumented change order Change in conditions $      12,421.80 $      372.65 $      12,794.46 1 Change Order Adjustment Change Order Adjustment $      ‐ 1 7/27/2007 Lobby floor change Owner initiated change $       3,986.00 $      119.58 $      4,105.58 1 Change in conditions $       (1,410.00) $      (42.30) $       (1,452.30) 1 Landscaping changes Owner initiated change $       1,477.39 $      44.32 $      1,521.71 1 Owner initiated change $       2,128.00 $      63.84 $      2,191.84 1 S it S Ch Ch i S $ 16 962 50 $ 508 88 $ 17 471 38 1 Sanitary Sewer Change Change in Scope $      16,962.50 $      508.88 $      17,471.38 1 Change Order Adjustment Change Order Adjustment $      ‐ $       ‐ 1 Substitute granite for marble Owner initiated change $       (358.00) $      (10.74) $      (368.74) 1 Plumbing changes Owner initiated change $       8,811.00 $      264.33 $      9,075.33 1 Revisions resulting from state plan  review Code Compliance $       8,584.00 $      257.52 $      8,841.52 1 Change Order Adjustment Change Order Adjustment $ ‐ $ ‐ 1 Change Order Adjustment Change Order Adjustment $       $        1 Revisions resulting from local code  compliance Code Compliance $      61,317.00 $        1,839.51 $      63,156.51 1 Change Order Adjustment Change Order Adjustment $      ‐ $       ‐ 1 Eliminate vinyl trim and substitute  vinyl for stone Owner initiated change $       (4,157.00) $      (124.71) $       (4,281.71) 1 Owner initiated adds and deletes Owner initiated change $       4,088.00 $      122.64 $      4,210.64 1 Code compliance from reviews Code Compliance $       6,150.00 $      184.50 $      6,334.50 1 Owner initiated adds and deletes Owner initiated change $         (19,417.00) $      (582.51) $      (19,999.51) 1 Owner initiated adds and deletes Owner initiated change $       7,691.00 $      230.73 $      7,921.73 1 Change Order Adjustment Change Order Adjustment $      ‐ $       ‐ 1 Additional cultured stone Owner initiated change $       6,936.00 $      208.08 $      7,144.08 1 Design oversight.  No towel bars Design deficiency $       1,585.00 $      47.55 $      1,632.55

(24)

Change order schedule checklist

>

Verify all change orders are authorized

– Look for rejected items being resubmitted

j

g

>

Decompose consolidated change orders into individual line items

>

Look for duplicate change orders

– Same value at with different dates

Same value at with different dates

– Same documentation used individually and consolidated

>

Verify all computations

>

Look for old line items

>

Look for old line items

(25)

Change order pricing

Case Study Facts

Scope: Add outlets lights

Analysis:

>

Materials

ere passed

Scope: Add outlets, lights,

dimmers per owners

request

>

Materials were passed

through at cost

>

Overhead and profit were at

t

t t

contract terms

>

Labor was at contracted rate

>

Owner was overcharged

Electrical contractor’s invoice

Labor cost: 280 hours @ $95

$26,600

$2,660 or 6% of the change

order value

Why? Labor rate

Material cost: Outlets, switches,

lights. Supported with supplier

invoices

$15,000

(26)

Change order pricing audit checklist

>

Request detail backup for lump sum

change orders

Resources

>

TRA SER

>

Verify labor rates with base contract

>

Verify hours are appropriate for

scope of work

>

Verify quantities are appropriate for

>

TRA-SER

>

Equipment Watch

>

Composite crew rate

>

Verify quantities are appropriate for

scope of work

>

OCIP projects make sure to

discount labor rates for owner paid

p

analysis

>

RS Means

>

Labor burden analysis

workers compensation insurance

>

Negative change orders should

include a CM fee credit

>

Verify that general conditions

>

Labor burden analysis

>

Verify that general conditions

changed before accepting a GC fee

adjustment

(27)

Polling question #4

A

A.

Average crew billing rate

B.

Weighted average crew

billing rate

What is a composite

crew rate?

(28)

Composite crew rate analysis

Labor Burden

Total

Hourly

Fully Loaded

Composite Composite

Crew Planning

Rate

Rate

Wage

Quantity

Hours

Daily Wage

Rate

Raw Wage

Raw Wage

2009

Superintendent

40.15

0.00%

$

-

$

40.15

1

8

$

321.20

$

321.20

General Foreman

36.15

0.00%

$

-

$

36.15

1

8

$

289.20

$

289.20

Foreman

34.35

0.00%

$

-

$

34.35

2

16

$

549.60

$

549.60

Journeyman

30 65

0 00% $

$

30 65

13

104

$

3 187 60

$

3 187 60

Journeyman

30.65

0.00%

$

-

$

30.65

13

104

$

3,187.60

$

3,187.60

Apprentice

19.25

0.00%

$

-

$

19.25

5

40

$

770.00

$

770.00

0.00%

22

176

$

5,117.60

29.0772727

$

5,117.60

29.077273

2010

0.00%

Superintendent

41.58

0.00%

$

-

$

41.58

1

8

$

332.64

$

332.64

General Foreman

37.58

0.00%

$

$

-

$

$

37.58

1

8

$

$

300.64

$

$

300.64

Foreman

35.67

0.00%

$

-

$

35.67

2

16

$

570.72

$

570.72

Journeyman

31.85

0.00%

$

-

$

31.85

13

104

$

3,312.40

$

3,312.40

Apprentice

20

0.00%

$

-

$

20.00

5

40

$

800.00

$

800.00

0.00%

22

176

$

5,316.40

30.2068182

$

5,316.40

30.206818

0.00%

2012

0.00%

Superintendent

41.8

0.00%

$

-

$

41.80

1

8

$

334.40

$

334.40

General Foreman

37.8

0.00%

$

-

$

37.80

1

8

$

302.40

$

302.40

Foreman

35.9

0.00%

$

-

$

35.90

2

16

$

574.40

$

574.40

Journeyman

32.05

0.00%

$

-

$

32.05

13

104

$

3,333.20

$

3,333.20

Apprentice

20 15

0 00% $

$

20 15

5

40

$

806 00

$

806 00

Apprentice

20.15

0.00%

$

-

$

20.15

5

40

$

806.00

$

806.00

22

176

$

5,350.40

30.4

$

5,350.40

30.4

28

(29)
(30)

Labor burden analysis

Contractor Name:

Rate Applicability Period:

Straight

Time

Reported

B

W

($ P

H

)

$

42 37

$

42 37

Contractor Labor Rate Calculation

Occupation: Superintendent

Base Wage ($ Per Hour)

$

42.37

$

42.37

Taxable Benefits (Vacation -As applicable

Subtotal Taxable Wages & Benefits

$

42.37

$

42.37

Union Benefits

401K assume 2% of wages

$

0.77

Health & Welfare assume $1000 per month

$

p

$

$

5.77

Safety

$

0.03

Substance Testing

$

0.04

Skills Training

$

1.00

Reported 35%

$

14.83

Total Benefits

$

7.61

$

14.83

S bt t l B

R t

F i

$

49 98

$

57 20

Subtotal Base Rate + Fringes

$

49.98

$

57.20

Insurance

Workers Compensation (2%)

$

0.85

Liability Insurance (1.5%)

$

0.64

Payroll Taxes:

State Unemployment (3.9% of $12,300)

$

0.23

State U e p oy e t (3 9% o $

,300)

$

0 3

Fed Unemployment (6.2% of $7,000)

$

0.21

Medicare (1.45%)

$

0.61

F.I.C.A. (7.65%)

$

3.24

Reported 50%

$

28.60

Total Tax & Insurance

$

5.78

$

28.60

55 76

$

$

85 80

Cost Per Hour

$

55.76

$

85.80

Contract Hourly Rate

$

85.80

Premium (Discount)

$

30.04

(31)

Change order scope analysis

Know what is allowed in the contract!!

>

E

i

th

h

d

f

th

f th

h

>

Examine the change order scope for the source of the change

>

If you can’t discover the source from the documentation ask the

subcontractor for an explanation.

>

E

l

f t

i

l

ll

bl

h

d

>

Examples of typical non-allowable change orders

– Rework for quality

– Rework for plan and specification compliance

I i

l

d i

h

l

d

ifi

i

– It is already in the plans and specifications

– It should have been in the plans and specifications. An owner has a realistic

expectation that the construction drawings will satisfy local and state building

code. Design oversight may result in the architect compensating the

g

g

y

p

g

(32)

Contractor’s contingency

Case study facts:

>

Original lump sum contract

Analysis:

>

Review of the change order

>

Original lump sum contract

value: $6,000,000 with a

$50,000 contractor’s

contingency budget

>

Review of the change order

log shows no documented

use of contingency budget

>

Contractor billed through

contingency budget

>

Change orders reviewed and

approved of $750,000

increasing the contract value

>

Contractor billed through

100% of the change orders

with 9% for CM and GC fees

>

Th fi

l

li

ti

increasing the contract value

to $6,750,00

>

Contract requires the owner

to approve any use of the

>

The final application was

adjusted for the contingency

and the owner was credited

$54 500

to approve any use of the

contingency budget

$54,500

(33)

Upcoming webinar

Wednesday, June 5

Noon to 1:00 PM CT

Subcontract default insurance

Guest Speakers:

Tim Cleary, M3 Insurance and

Tim Anderson, Construction Risk Underwriters

,

(34)

Questions?

Tony Ollmann, CPA, CCA

Director

Director

608 240 2618

[email protected]

Reminder

T

lif f

th CPE

dit

t

l t th

l

ti

f

t

To qualify for the CPE credit, you must complete the evaluation form at

the end of the webinar.

(35)

Disclosure

Pursuant to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as

promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, nothing contained

in this comm nication

as intended or

ritten to be sed b an ta pa er for the

in this communication was intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the

purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal

Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose. No

one, without our express prior written permission, may use or refer to any tax

d i

i thi

i

ti

i

ti

k ti

di

advice in this communication in promoting, marketing, or recommending a

partnership or other entity, investment plan, or arrangement to any other party.

Baker Tilly refers to Baker Tilly Virchow Krause LLP an independently owned and

Baker Tilly refers to Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, an independently owned and

managed member of Baker Tilly International. The information provided here is of

a general nature and is not intended to address specific circumstances of any

individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should

be sought © 2012 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause LLP

(36)

References

Related documents

Additional Work consists of work that must be undertaken to meet the contract requirements and without which the work requested in the original contract could not be

DfR also audits the characteristics of the stencil apertures to identify if sufficient solder paste is being placed on the pads to ensure optimum solder joints without

This report shows total number of change orders, % of successful change orders, % of unsuccessful change orders, and % of successful change orders with errors for a given

Sponsor-based vouchers Alaska, Atlanta, Cambridge, Charlotte, Keene, King County, Lawrence-Douglas, Lexington, Louisville, Minneapolis, Oakland, Orlando, Philadelphia, Portage, San

Contract Price incorporating this Change Order: Contract Times with all approved Change Orders. Substantial Completion (days or dates):

Some districts have used the force account method to develop a unit price for work as the contractor performs the work prior to executing a unit price based change order.. Such

change orders, the maximum Markup Percentage Fee to be paid to any Contractor (regardless of tier) on self-performed work shall be a single markup percentage not-to-exceed ten

Enable cookies on the auditing invoice amounts that provides agencies are used in this notice or owes the disputes clause that need billed monthly statement has the standards Are