• No results found

Vieta Pell and Vieta Pell Lucas polynomials

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Vieta Pell and Vieta Pell Lucas polynomials"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Vieta-Pell and Vieta-Pell-Lucas polynomials

Dursun Tasci and Feyza Yalcin

*

*Correspondence:

[email protected] Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Gazi University, Ankara, 06500, Turkey

Abstract

In the present paper, we introduce the recurrence relation of Vieta-Pell and Vieta-Pell-Lucas polynomials. We obtain the Binet form and generating functions of Vieta-Pell and Vieta-Pell-Lucas polynomials and define their associated sequences. Moreover, we present some differentiation rules and finite summation formulas. MSC: Primary 11C08; secondary 11B39

Keywords: Vieta-Pell; Vieta-Pell-Lucas polynomials

1 Introduction

Andre-Jeannin [] introduced a class of polynomialsUn(p,q;x) defined by

Un(p,q;x) = (x+p)Un–(p,q;x) –qUn–(p,q;x), n≥, with the initial valuesU(p,q;x) =  andU(p,q;x) = .

Lucas polynomials were studied as Vieta polynomials by Robbins []. Vieta-Fibonacci and Vieta-Lucas polynomials are defined by

Vn(x) =xVn–(x) –Vn–(x), n≥, vn(x) =xvn–(x) –vn–(x), n≥,

respectively, whereV(x) = ,V(x) =  andv(x) = ,v(x) =x[]. The recursive properties of Vieta-Fibonacci and Vieta-Lucas polynomials were given by Horadam [].

Forp=  andq= , Vieta-Fibonacci polynomials are a special case of the polynomials

Un(p,q;x) in []. Further,Un,m(p,q;x) in [] forp= ,q= ,m=  gives Vieta-Fibonacci

polynomials.

Chebyshev polynomials are a sequence of orthogonal polynomials which can be defined recursively. Recall that thenth Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and second kind are denoted byTn(x) andUn(x), respectively.

It is well known that the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and second kind are closely related to Vieta-Fibonacci and Vieta-Lucas polynomials. So, in [] Vitula and Slota redefined Vieta polynomials as modified Chebyshev polynomials. The related features of Vieta and Chebyshev polynomials are given as

Vn(x) =Un

 x

[],

vn(x) = Tn

x see [, ]

.

(2)

For|x|> , we considertn(x) andsn(x) polynomials by the following recurrence relations:

tn(x) = xtn–(x) –tn–(x), n≥, sn(x) = xsn–(x) –sn–(x), n≥,

wheret(x) = ,t(x) =  ands(x) = ,s(x) = x. We calltn(x) thenth Vieta-Pell

polyno-mial andsn(x) thenth Vieta-Pell-Lucas polynomial.

The relations below are obvious

sn(x) = Tn(x),

tn+(x) =Un(x).

The first few terms oftn(x) andsn(x) are as follows:

t(x) = x, s(x) = x– , t(x) = x– , s(x) = x– x, t(x) = x– x, s(x) = x– x+ , t(x) = x– x+ , s(x) = x– x+ x, t(x) = x– x+ x, s(x) = x– x+ x– , t(x) = x– x+ x– , s(x) = x– x+ x– x.

The aim of this paper is to determine the recursive key features of Pell and Vieta-Pell-Lucas polynomials. In conjunction with these properties, we examine their interrela-tions and define their associated sequences. Furthermore, we present some differentiation rules and summation formulas.

2 Main results

Some fundamental recursive properties of Vieta-Pell and Vieta Pell-Lucas polynomials are given in this section.

Characteristic equation

Vieta-Pell and Vieta-Pell-Lucas polynomials have the following characteristic equation:

λ– +  =  with the rootsαandβ

α=x+√x– ,

β=x–√x– .

Also,αandβsatisfy the following equations:

α+β= x,

αβ= , ()

(3)

Binet form

By appropriate procedure, we can easily find the Binet forms as

tn(x) =

αnβn

αβ , ()

sn(x) =αn+βn. ()

Generating function

Vieta-Pell and Vieta-Pell-Lucas polynomials can be defined by the following generating functions:

n=

tn(x)yn=y

 – xy+y–,

n=

sn(x)yn= ( – xy)

 – xy+y–.

Negative subscript

We can also extend the definition oftn(x) andsn(x) to the negative index

tn(x) = –tn(x),

sn(x) =sn(x).

Simson formulas

tn+(x)tn–(x) –tn(x) = –,

sn+(x)sn–(x) –sn(x) = 

x– .

We arrange the first ten coefficients oftn(x) in Table . LetT(n,j) denote the element in

rownand columnj, wherej≥,n≥. As seen from the Table , it is obvious that

T(n, ) = T(n– , ) +T(n– , )

Table 1 The first ten coefficients oftn(x)

n\j

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 4 –1

4 8 –4

5 16 –12 1

6 32 –32 6

7 64 –80 24 –1

8 128 –192 80 –8

(4)

can be written like the coefficients of Pell polynomials in []. Moreover,

n– 

j=

T(n,j) =n.

For example, forn=  we can find 

j=

T(,j) =T(, ) +T(, ) +T(, ) +T(, ) = .

LetPndenote thenth Pell number, so we have

n– 

j=

T(n,j)=Pn.

2.1 Interrelations oftn(x) andsn(x)

Most of the equations below can be obtained by using the Binet form and convenient routine operations

tn+(x) –tn–(x) =sn(x) = xtn(x) – tn–(x), () sn+(x) –sn–(x) = 

x– tn(x), ()

tn(x)sn(x) =tn(x),

sn(x) + x– tn(x) = sn(x),

sn(x) – x– tn(x) = ,

tn+(x) –tn(x) =tn+(x),

sn+(x) –sn(x) = x– tn+(x), sn+(x) +sn(x) = xsn+(x) + , tn+(x) –tn–(x) = xtn(x),

sn(x)sn+(x) – 

x– tn(x)tn+(x) = x, sn(x)sn+(x) + 

x– tn(x)tn+(x) = sn+(x), sn(x) –  = 

x– tn(x),

tn+(x) –xtn(x) =

 sn(x), sn+(x) – xsn(x) = 

x– tn(x).

Proposition  sn(x– ) –sn(x) = –.

Proof Consider the expressionsn(x– ). Thenα,β,Δare replaced byα∗,β∗,Δ∗,

re-spectively. So,α∗=α,β∗=β,Δ∗= and by using the Binet form, the proof is

(5)

2.2 Associated sequences

applied repeatedly, the results emerge

tnj(x) =sn(j–)(x) =Δjtn(x),

Since the derivation function ofsn(x) is a polynomial, all of the derivatives must exist for

(6)

Proposition 

In this section we deal with the matrix

V=

(7)

It is known that

If we use the matrix technique for summation in [], we get the first finite summation as follows. be the series of matrices. Then we have

VA=V+V+· · ·+Vn–+Vn.

(8)

=(α+β) – αβ– (α

m++βm+) +αβ(αm+βm)

 – x

=x–  – (α

m++βm+) +αm+βm

( –x)

by ()

=sm+(x) –sm(x) +  – x (x– )

by ().

This completes the proof.

Theorem  LetVbe a square matrix such thatV= xVI.Then,for all n∈Z+,

Vn=tn(x)Vtn–(x)I,

where tn(x)is the nth Vieta-Pell polynomial andIis a unit matrix.

Proof The proof is obvious from induction.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The authors declare that the research was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility and contributions. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the referees for their valuable suggestions, which improved the standard of the paper.

Received: 4 April 2013 Accepted: 11 July 2013 Published: 24 July 2013

References

1. Andre-Jeannin, R: A note on general class of polynomials. Fibonacci Q.32(5), 445-454 (1994)

2. Robbins, N: Vieta’s triangular array and a related family of polynomials. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.14, 239-244 (1991) 3. Horadam, AF: Vieta polynomials. Fibonacci Q.40(3), 223-232 (2002)

4. Djordjevic, GB: Some properties of a class of polynomials. Mat. Vesn.49, 265-271 (1997) 5. Vitula, R, Slota, D: On modified Chebyshev polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl.324, 321-343 (2006) 6. Jacobsthal, E: Über vertauschbare polynome. Math. Z.63, 244-276 (1955)

7. Halici, S: On the Pell polynomials. Appl. Math. Sci.5(37), 1833-1838 (2011)

8. Mahon, JM, Horadam, AF: Matrix and other summation techniques for Pell polynomials. Fibonacci Q.24(4), 290-309 (1986)

doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2013-224

Figure

Table 1 The first ten coefficients of tn(x)

References

Related documents

In the distant periphery, composed of terms that are neither frequently nor immediately mentioned by the participants (high rank and low frequency) among the different elements of the

The results will be presented in two main sections along with the different hypotheses of the present research: (1) first, the structure of the crisis social representation,

representation of risk in a gambling context , identified in Study 1; these 15 terms were: to lose, money, danger, gain, luck, losing money, addiction, adrenaline, probability,

A narrative analysis of poetry written from the words of people given a diagnosis of

This may explain why in the case when facial physical similarity becomes maximal (i.e. for monozygotic twins), participants are less able to discriminate the self- from the

See Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (2006), Recommendations on the Plan o f Action o f the European Neighbourhood Policy with the Government o f Egypt on enhancing

Results from a set of generalized linear models on a sub-sample of 2,065 participants indicate that household consumer durable assets are positively associated with

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the variability on Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and Acute Stress Disorder (ASD) prevalence, and evaluate the specific weight