R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Trichotomy of nonoscillatory solutions to
second-order neutral difference equation
with quasi-difference
Agata Bezubik
1, Małgorzata Migda
2, Magdalena Nockowska-Rosiak
3and Ewa Schmeidel
1**Correspondence:
[email protected] 1Institute of Mathematics, University of Bialystok, Ciołkowskiego 1M, Białystok, 15-245, Poland Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
In this paper the nonlinear second-order neutral difference equation of the following form:
(a
n(x
n–pnxn–1)) +qnf(xn–τ) = 0 is considered. By suitable substitution theabove equation is transformed into a new one, which is a third-order non-neutral difference equation. Using results obtained for the new equation, the asymptotic properties of the neutral difference equation are studied. Some classification of nonoscillatory solutions is presented, as well as an estimation of the solutions. Finally, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions to both considered equations being asymptotically equivalent to the given sequences.
MSC: 39A10; 39A22
Keywords: difference equation; second order; neutral type; nonoscillatory solutions; estimation of solutions
1 Introduction
In this paper we consider the difference equation in the following form:
an(xn–pnxn–)
+qnf(xn–τ) = , n∈Nmax{,τ}, ()
whereis the forward difference operator defined byyn=yn+–yn, (an), (pn), (qn) are sequences of positive real numbers,τis a nonnegative integer, and the functionf:N→R. HereRis the set of real numbersN={, , . . .}, andNk={k,k+ ,k+ , . . .},k∈N.
By a solution to () we mean a sequence (xn) which satisfies () fornsufficiently large. We consider only solutions which are nontrivial for all largen. A solution to () is called nonoscillatory if it is eventually positive or eventually negative. Otherwise it is called os-cillatory.
Let us denote
yn+=xn n
i=
pi
. ()
This implies thatxn–pnxn–= (yn)
n
i=pi. Substitution of () transforms () into the following:
an
(yn) n
i=
pi
+qnf
yn–τ+
n–τ
i=
pi
= . ()
Setting
bn= n
i=
pi ()
and assuming that
f(bn–τz) =b∗ng(z), ()
in (), we get the third-order nonlinear difference equation of the following form:
an(bnyn)
+q∗ng(yn+–τ) = , n∈Nmax{,τ}, ()
where
q∗n=qnb∗n. ()
By virtue of (), the positivity of terms of the sequence (pn) implies the positivity of terms of the sequence (bn). Note thatf(xy) =f(x)f(y) is satisfied for all power functions. Hence, by () and (), iff(x) =xγ, whereγ is a positive constant, theng=f andb∗
n=b γ n–τ
for all n∈Nτ. If f is not a power function, in some cases we can find the function g
assumed by (). For example, for f(x) =xx– andbn≡b∈R we have b∗n= b and
g(x) = (b)xx.
Neutral type difference equations have been widely studied in the literature. Some recent results on the asymptotic behavior of second-order neutral difference equations can be found, for example, in [–]. The higher-order neutral difference equations were studied in [–].
For results concerning the oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of the third-order dif-ference equation we refer to [, ], for equations with quasi-differences to [–], and to the references cited therein. Many results on the oscillation of second- and third-order functional differential and difference equations can also be found in [].
The purpose of this paper is to study the asymptotic properties of the neutral difference equation (). Transforming the considered equation into a new one, which is a third-order difference equation of type (), we get various results concerning the asymptotic behavior of solutions to this equation. These results are then used to establish some properties of the solutions to (). In particular, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions asymptotically equivalent to the given sequences.
Fourth-order non-neutral difference equations with one quasi-difference, by the tech-niques here used, were studied in [–]. Some generalizations of the results presented in these papers were published in [, ]. Even so, there is not a full analogy to the results since the Kneser type classification of the nonoscillatory solution is different for odd- or even-order equations, and of neutral or non-neutral type as well.
Throughout the rest of our investigations, one or several of the following assumptions will be imposed:
(H)
∞
i=
(H) i=
pi=O(n);
(H) zf(z) > for allz= ;
(H) f:R→Ris a continuous function.
Notice that, by virtue of (), the positivity of the sequence (bn) implies that conditions (H) and (H) hold also for the functiong.
The following definitions and theorems will be used in the sequel.
We say that the sequence (un) is asymptotically constant if this sequence has a nonzero limit, and we say that it is an asymptotically zero sequence if the limit of this sequence equals zero. We say that the sequence (un) is asymptotically equivalent to (vn) if (unvn) has a nonzero limit. In the present paper, we study the three types of solutions: asymptotically zero solutions, asymptotically constant solutions, and unbounded solutions. It is called a trichotomy of nonoscillatory solutions.
Definition (Uniformly Cauchy subset []) A subsetSof the Banach spaceBis said to be uniformly Cauchy if for everyε> there exists a positive integerNsuch that|xi–xj|<ε wheneveri,j>Nfor any (xn)∈B.
Lemma (Arzela-Ascoli’s theorem []) Each bounded and uniformly Cauchy subset of B is relatively compact.
Theorem (Schauder theorem []) Let S be a nonempty,closed,and convex subset of
a Banach space B and T: S→S be a continuous mapping such that T(S)is a relatively compact subset of B.Then T has at least one fixed point in S.
The following theorem of Stolz-Cesáro is a discrete analog of l’Hospital’s rule.
Theorem (Stolz-Cesáro theorem []) Let(un), (vn)be two sequences of real numbers.
Assume that(vn)is a strictly monotone and divergent sequence,and the following limit
exists:limn→∞unvn =g.Then
lim n→∞
un
vn =g.
We introduce the following notation:
Qn= n–
k=
bk k–
j=
aj =
n–
j=
aj n–
k=j+
bk
. ()
2 Existence of nonoscillatory solutions
Lemma Condition(H)implies that
∞
i=
bi
=∞, ()
where(bn)is defined by().
Proof Condition (H) implies thatni=pi≤Cn, whereCis a positive constant. It follows
thatni=p–
i ≥Cn. Using the notation of (), the above inequality takes the form
bn ≥
Cn. Since the series
∞
n=n diverges, condition () is satisfied.
Remark Condition (H) and () imply that
lim
n→∞Qn=∞, ()
where (Qn) is defined by ().
Lemma Assume that(H), (H),and the following conditions:
(H∗) zg(z) > for all z= ;
(H∗) g: R→Ris a continuous function;
are satisfied.Let(yn)be an eventually positive solution to().Then exactly one of the
fol-lowing statements holds:
(i) yn> , yn> , (bnyn) > ,
(ii) yn> , yn< , (bnyn) >
for all sufficiently large n.
Proof The proof is obvious and hence omitted.
Lemma Assume that(H)-(H)hold.If(xn)is an eventually positive solution to(),then
exactly one of the following cases holds: (I)
lim n→∞
xn
bn = ;
(II) there exist positive constantsC,C,and a positive integernsuch that
Cbn≤xn≤CbnQn+ forn≥n, ()
where(bn)is defined by()and(Qn)is defined by().
Proof Let (yn) be an eventually positive solution to (). Then, by Lemma , we have two possibilities:
lim n→∞yn= ,
Iflimn→∞yn= , then condition (I) is satisfied.
Assuming thatyn+≥Cand using substitution (), we obtain
xn
is satisfied for the functiong, from the point of view of (), there existsnsuch that
an(bnyn)
Summing again, we have
yn<A
By (), it is easy to see that each term on the right side of inequality () is less than
max{A,A,A}
whereC= max{A,A,A}. Hence
yn+≤C
n
j=n
bj j–
i=n
ai
for sufficiently largen.
Using the substitutions () and (), we obtain
xn
bn≤
C
n
j=n
bj j–
i=n
ai .
By (), we see that the required inequality is proved.
As a consequence of Lemma we obtain the following result.
Lemma Assume that(H), (H), (H∗),and(H∗)hold.If(yn)is an eventually positive
solution to(),then
(I)
lim n→∞yn= ;
(II) there exist positive constantsCandCsuch that
C≤yn≤CQn for largen.
Before we derive a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a solution to () that is asymptotically equivalent to (bn), the following theorem needs to be proved.
Theorem Let conditions(H), (H), (H∗), (H∗)be satisfied.Then a necessary condi-tion for()to have an asymptotically constant solution is that
∞
i=
bi
∞
j=i
aj
∞
k=j
q∗k<∞. ()
Proof Let (yn) be an asymptotically constant solution to (). Then (yn) is a nonoscillatory sequence. Without loss of generality, we assume that (yn) is an eventually positive solution. By Lemma it is of type (i) or type (ii). Each solution to type (i) tends to infinity. This implies that (yn) is of type (ii).
Let us denote
lim
n→∞yn=α> . ()
Then there exist positive constantsCandCsuch that
C≤yn+–τ≤C for largen.
By (H∗) and (H∗), we see that there exists a positive constant
C= min
z∈[C,C]
which means that, foryn+–τ∈[C,C], we have
bk and summing both sides of it from
i=n– ton– we obtain
By (), the following inequality holds:
This means that
∞
i=
q∗i
i
j=
aj j
k=
bk <∞.
The above condition is equivalent to condition ().
The next example shows that the condition () in Theorem is not a necessary condi-tion for () to have an asymptotically zero solucondi-tion.
Example Let us consider the following equation of the form ():
yn+ yn= .
Herean≡,bn≡,qn∗≡ ,g(x) =x, andτ = . It is easy to see that condition () is not
satisfied, but the above equation has an asymptotically zero solutionyn=n.
Sufficient conditions, under which, for every real constant, there exists a solution to the higher-order difference equation with quasi-differences convergent to this constant are obtained in Theorem . in []. Hence, for (), we have the following.
Theorem Assume that(H), (H), (H∗), (H∗)hold and condition()is satisfied.Then for every c∈Rthere exists a solution x to()such thatlimn→∞x(n) =c.
Corollary Let conditions(H), (H), (H∗), (H∗)be satisfied.Then the condition
∞
i=
bi
∞
j=i
aj
∞
k=j
q∗k=∞ ()
implies that()has no asymptotically constant solution.
Proof This corollary follows directly from Theorem .
Theorem If conditions(H)-(H)are satisfied,then a necessary and sufficient condition for()to have a solution(xn)asymptotically equivalent to the sequence (
n
i=pi)is the
condition
∞
i=
i
l=
pl
∞
j=i
aj
∞
k=j
qkb∗k<∞. ()
Proof Using the notation of (), (), and () in condition () the conclusion of this
theo-rem follows directly from Theotheo-rem and Theotheo-rem .
Remark Let the assumptions of Theorem be satisfied. If
lim n→∞
n
i=
then condition () is a necessary and sufficient condition for () to have an asymptotically zero solution such that (xn)∼(
n i=pi).
As a consequence of Theorem we get the following result for the Emden-Fowler type equation
an(xn–pnxn–)
+qnxγn–τ = , n∈Nmax{,τ}, ()
where (an), (pn), (qn) are sequences of positive real numbers,τ is a nonnegative integer, andγ is the ratio of odd positive integers.
Corollary Let conditions(H)and(H)be satisfied.A necessary and sufficient condition for()to have a solution(xn)asymptotically equivalent to the sequence(
n
Example Consider the following equation:
of Corollary are satisfied. Hence () has at least one solution asymptotically equivalent to the sequence (ni=pi) =
√
n+ . In factxn=
√
n+ + is such solution.
Example Consider the following equation:
(xn–xn–) +
sumptions of Corollary are satisfied. Hence, () has at least one solution asymptotically equivalent to the sequence (ni=pi)≡. This means that () has an asymptotically con-stant solution. In factxn= +n+ is one such solution.
Finally, we present a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of an asymp-totically (Qn) solution to (). We start with the following theorem.
Theorem If conditions(H), (H), (H∗), (H∗)are satisfied and
g is a monotonic function, ()
then a necessary and sufficient condition for()to have a solution(yn)satisfying
lim n→∞
yn
Qn
is that
∞
i=
q∗ig(CQi+–τ)<∞, ()
where C is some nonzero constant.
Proof Necessity. Let (yn) be a nonoscillatory solution to () which satisfies (). Without loss of generality, we may assume that
lim n→∞
yn
Qn
=β> .
Then there exist positive constantsCandCsuch that
CQn≤yn≤CQn for largen.
Hence
CQn+–τ≤yn+–τ ≤CQn+–τ for largen, sayn≥n.
Thus, by (), we get
g(yn+–τ)≥g(CQn+–τ), ()
whereC=Cif the functiongis nondecreasing andC=C if the functiongis
nonin-creasing.
By (H∗), we see thatg(CQn+–τ) is positive. On the other hand, summing () from
n=n+τton– , by Lemma , we obtain
<an(bnyn) =an(bnyn) –
n–
i=n
q∗ig(yi+–τ) forn≥n.
This implies that
n–
i=n
q∗ig(yi+–τ)≤an(bnyn) <∞.
So, by (), we have
∞
i=n
q∗ig(CQn+–τ) <∞.
Sufficiency. LetCbe a given positive constant. Set
In=
C
Qn,CQn
From the above, () and (H∗), there exists a maximum of the functiongon intervalIn, which we denote as the pointCQnwithC=C if the functiongis nonincreasing and
C=Cif the functiongis nondecreasing. Thus we get
g(yn)≤g(CQn) forn∈In. ()
Assume that () holds forC=C. Then there exists a positive integernsuch that
∞
Consider the Banach spaceBof all real sequencesy= (yn) such that
y=sup
It is easy to see thatSis a bounded, convex and closed subset ofB. Now we define an operatorT:S→Bin the following way:
ThusTmapsSinto itself.
and therefore
We see thatTis a continuous mapping.
Finally, we need to show thatT(S) is uniformly Cauchy. To see this, we have to show that, given anyε> , there exists an integernsuch that form>n>n; we have
Furthermore, by Stolz’s theorem (see Theorem ) and (), we have
lim
This completes the proof.
Now, letan ≡ and bn ≡. This means thatan≡ andbn≡. HenceQn=n–n+ is a quadratic polynomial. Obviously, by virtue of (), this case holds only ifpn≡.
Theorem Let conditions(H)-(H)be satisfied and
f is a monotonic function.
Then a necessary and sufficient condition for()to have a solution(xn)which is
asymptot-ically equivalent to the sequence(Qn+ni=pi)is the convergence of the series
∞
i=
qi
Cf
Qi+–τ
i
j=
pj
, ()
where C is some nonzero constant.
Proof Using the notation of (), (), and () in condition () the conclusion of this
theo-rem follows directly from Theotheo-rem .
Note that for particular cases of (), if (an) is a polynomial sequence andpn≡, from Theorem we get the existence of asymptotically polynomial solutions.
Example In Example () is considered. In this equationan≡ andpn≡. All as-sumptions of Theorem are satisfied. Hence () has an asymptotically (Qn) solution, whereQn=n–n+ . It means that () has an asymptotically polynomial solution.
Some results concerning asymptotically polynomial solutions to difference equations can be found, for example, in [–].
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The authors declare that the study was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details
1Institute of Mathematics, University of Bialystok, Ciołkowskiego 1M, Białystok, 15-245, Poland.2Institute of Mathematics, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3A, Pozna ´n, 60-965, Poland.3Institute of Mathematics, Lodz University of Technology, Wólczanska 215, Łód´z, 90-924, Poland.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland (PB-43-081/14DS).
Received: 13 February 2015 Accepted: 8 June 2015 References
1. Galewski, M, Jankowski, R, Nockowska-Rosiak, M, Schmeidel, E: On the existence of bounded solutions for nonlinear second order neutral nonlinear difference equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.2014, 72 (2014) 2. Galewski, M, Schmeidel, E: On the well posed solutions for nonlinear second order neutral difference equations.
Math. Slovaca (2015, in press)
3. Jankowski, R, Schmeidel, E: Almost oscillatory solutions of second order neutral difference equations of neutral type. In: Hartung, F, Pituk, M (eds.) Recent Advances in Delay Differential and Difference Equations. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 94, pp. 121-130. Springer, Berlin (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08251-6_4
4. Liu, Z, Xu, Y, Kang, SM: Global solvability for a second order nonlinear neutral delay difference equation. Comput. Math. Appl.57, 587-595 (2009)
5. Migda, J, Migda, M: Asymptotic properties of solutions of second-order neutral difference equations. Nonlinear Anal.
6. Schmeidel, E: Asymptotic behavior of certain second order nonlinear difference equations. In: Elaydi, S, Ladas, G, Aulbach, B, Do˘sly, O (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Difference Equations and Applications (Brno, 2003), pp. 245-252. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2005). doi:10.1201/9781420034905.ch28 7. Schmeidel, E: An application of measures of noncompactness in investigation of boundedness of solutions of
second order neutral difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ.2013, 91 (2013). doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2013-91 8. Huang, X, Xu, Z: Nonoscillatory solutions of certain higher order neutral difference equations. Southeast Asian Bull.
Math.32, 445-458 (2008)
9. Jankowski, R, Schmeidel, E: Asymptotically zero solution of a class of higher nonlinear neutral difference equations with quasidifferences. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. B19, 2691-2696 (2014)
10. Liu, M, Guo, Z: Solvability of a higher-order nonlinear neutral delay difference equation. Adv. Differ. Equ.2010, Article ID 767620 (2010). doi:10.1155/2010/767620
11. Migda, J, Migda, M: Oscillatory and asymptotic properties of solutions of even order neutral difference equations. J. Differ. Equ. Appl.15, 1077-1084 (2009)
12. Migda, M, Zhang, G: Monotone solutions of neutral difference equations of odd order. J. Differ. Equ. Appl.10, 691-703 (2004)
13. Zhou, Y, Zhang, BG: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions of higher-order neutral delay difference equations with variable coefficients. Comput. Math. Appl.45, 991-1000 (2003)
14. Saker, SH: New oscillation criteria for third order nonlinear neutral difference equations. Math. Slovaca61, 579-600 (2011)
15. Saker, SH: Oscillation of a certain class of third order nonlinear difference equations. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc.35, 651-669 (2012)
16. Andruch-Sobiło, A, Migda, M: Bounded solutions of third order nonlinear difference equations. Rocky Mt. J. Math.36, 23-34 (2006)
17. Do˘slá, Z, Kobza, A: On third-order linear difference equations involving quasi-differences. Adv. Differ. Equ.2006, Article ID 65652 (2006). doi:10.1155/ADE/2006/65652
18. Graef, J, Thandapani, E: Oscillatory and asymptotic behaviour of solutions of third-order delay difference equations. Funkc. Ekvacioj42, 355-369 (1999)
19. Liu, Z, Wang, L, Kimb, G, Kang, S: Existence of uncountably many bounded positive solutions for a third order nonlinear neutral delay difference equation. Comput. Math. Appl.60, 2399-2416 (2010)
20. Saker, SH: Oscillation Theory of Delay Differential and Difference Equations: Second and Third Orders. Verlag dr. Müller, Saarbrücken (2010)
21. Zhang, BG, Cheng, SS: On a class of nonlinear difference equations. J. Differ. Equ. Appl.1, 391-411 (1995)
22. Yan, J, Liu, B: Oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of fourth order nonlinear difference equations. Acta Math. Sin.13, 105-115 (1997)
23. Graef, JR, Thandapani, E: Oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of fourth order nonlinear delay difference equations. Fasc. Math.31, 23-36 (2001)
24. Migda, M, Musielak, A, Schmeidel, E: On a class of fourth order nonlinear difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ.2004, 23-36 (2004)
25. Migda, M, Schmeidel, E: Asymptotic properties of fourth order nonlinear difference equations. Math. Comput. Model.
39, 1203-1211 (2004)
26. Cheng, SS, Patula, WT: An existence theorem for a nonlinear difference equation. Nonlinear Anal.20, 193-203 (1993) 27. Gy ˝ori, I, Ladas, G: Oscillation Theory of Delay Differential Equations with Applications. Clarendon, Oxford (1991) 28. Agarwal, RP: Difference Equations and Inequalities: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Dekker, New York (1992) 29. Migda, M: Oscillation and nonoscillation results for higher order nonlinear difference equations. Fields Inst. Commun.
42, 285-294 (2004)
30. Hasanbulli, M, Rogovchenko, YV: Asymptotic behavior nonoscillatory solutions ton-th order nonlinear neutral differential equations. Nonlinear Anal.69, 1208-1218 (2008)
31. Migda, J: Asymptotically polynomial solutions of difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ.2013, 92 (2013) 32. Migda, J: Approximative solutions of difference equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.2014, 13 (2014) 33. Migda, J, Migda, M: On the asymptotic behavior of solutions of higher order nonlinear difference equations.
Nonlinear Anal.47, 4687-4695 (2001)