• No results found

Risk Based Distribution System Asset Management

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Risk Based Distribution System Asset Management"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Risk Based

Distribution System

Asset Management

Dag Eirik Nordgård

Kjell Sand

(2)

Contents

Background

Current risk exposure within distribution companies

Risk management

About the Risk DSAM-project

(3)

Background

The deregulation of the electricity sector has lead to a significant

change in focus and thinking among distribution system operators

(DSOs) – with a general emphasis on efficiency improvements and

cutting of costs.

There has however become an increasing awareness concerning

whether the DSOs still are performing their business with sufficient

risk margins, or whether they are approaching (or exceeding)

acceptance limits regarding important risk criteria.

It is recognized that the total risk the DSOs are facing, consists of

several risk criteria

(4)

Background

”Asset management”

A buzz word among distribution companies the later years

What does it mean?

“The process of managing demand and guiding

acquisition, use and disposal of assets to make the most

of their service delivery potential, and manage risks and

costs over their entire life.”

Australian Government - The Department of the Environment and Heritage - http://www.deh.gov.au/parks/best-practice/reports/asset/glossary.html

(5)

Asset management -

Life cycle assessment with acceptable risk

Risk acceptance boundaries

Construction Production Installation Operation &

Maintenance Disposal

Life cycle cost - LCC

(6)

Current Risk Exposure

Physical Operational Planning Strategic Society Authorities Customers Owners Regulator DSO Company

(7)

Current Risk Exposure II

Some of the key questions being asked by distribution system asset

managers are:

 When is the right time to do the maintenance?

 Should we reinvest instead of doing maintenance? Is extension of lifetime possible?

 When is the right time to reinvest?

 What are the economical and technical aspects?

 Are the installations safe? How safe?

 Are the company facing an acceptable risk concerning economic performance, safety and other risk criteria?

(8)

Current Risk Exposure III

Risk exposure

is the aggregation of exposure to different

risk criteria

An initial survey among the participating companies in the project

points out the following risk criteria as being the most relevant:

 Safety to personnel

 Environmental risk

 Reputational risk

 Economic risk

 Quality of supply

The different risk criteria address different sides to the DSO’s total risk

exposure, and are by their nature somewhat different and may call for

different methods for handling.

(9)

Risk management

 Risk management consists of different aspects, all describing different sides of the whole of risk management. These aspects are:

 Risk assessment

 Risk treatment

 Risk acceptance

 Risk communication

 Where

risk assessment being the overall process of risk analysis and risk evaluation,

risk treatment being the process of selection and implementation of measures to modify risk,

risk acceptance being the decision to accept a risk, and

risk communication being exchanging or sharing of information about risk between

the decision maker and other stakeholders,

Source: ISO / IEC Guide 73 Risk management – Vocabulary – Guidelines for use in standards

(10)

About the Risk DSAM project

 To meet challenges as stated in the paper a project has been launched.  The RISK DSAM project is foremost a competence building project with the

aim to improve the knowledge of relevant methods and approaches for holistic risk management within distribution companies.

 Project period: 2006-2010

 The project will address several issues related to risk assessment in distribution system companies - including:

 Measures of quantification of risk exposure on strategic level

 Identifying maintenance and reinvestment strategies’ impact on the risk exposure

(11)

About the Risk DSAM project II

 The Risk DSAM project is funded by the Norwegian Research Council, together with Norwegian and international distribution companies and research partners:

 Project participants

 Statkraft alliance Network group -

BKK Nett, TEV Nett, Agder Energi Nett, Skagerak Nett and Istad Nett (Norway)

 Hafslund Nett (Norway)

 Lyse Nett (Norway)

 Fredrikstad Energiverk/Energi 1 (Norway)

 EdF R&D (France)

 Reserach partners

 SINTEF Industrial Management, Dept. of Safety and Reliability (Norway)

 NTNU, Dept. of Electrical Power Engineering and Dept. of Mathematical Sciences (Norway)

(12)

Concluding remarks

Distribution system asset management

cover many rather different issues –

economic, technical and other more

qualitative criteria such as safety of

personnel.

There is a need to establish a holistic

asset management scheme covering

these issues.

To address these challenges the RISK

DSAM project has been launched to

References

Related documents

Yelowitz (1995) iinds that expsnding Medicaid mverage to children at levels above AFDC eligibility levels, increased labor force participation rates by 1 percentage point among

The costs are related with the reduction of both past and future human capital accumulation, with the negative impact on aggregate social welfare due to the reduction of

In addition, in Malaysia, due to data limitations, there is a lack of modelling dengue studies has been conducted on large enough data sets to predict the incorporation of

The hybrid elites that were tested in the yield trials of SCDVV Blaj were: 5-26 (Traminer roz x Iordană) and 11-26 (Fetească regală x Muscat Ottonel) and from the test ield

Conclusion: Level of education, cognitive performance, and depressive symptoms influence the speech perception in noise of elderly hearing aids users.. The better the cognitive level

based abstention, and his definition of indifference and the decision-rule followed by citizens differ from the ones adopted in this paper.. Section 3 describes the data

If they're like me, they rank giving presentations many, many steps lower than, for example, (1) holding hands with Judy, (2) playing tennis, (3) riding a bicycle, (4)