• No results found

Novel Approach for Modification of K-Means Algorithm Based On Genetic Algorithms

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Novel Approach for Modification of K-Means Algorithm Based On Genetic Algorithms"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Ankit Mishra, IJRIT

55

IJRIT International Journal of Research in Information Technology, Volume 1, Issue 7, July, 2013, Pg. 55-63

International Journal of Research in Information Technology (IJRIT)

www.ijrit.com

ISSN 2001-5569

Novel Approach for Modification of K-Means Algorithm Based On Genetic Algorithms

1

Ankit Mishra,

2

Prof. Gajendra Singh Chandel

1Computer Science & Engineering, SSSIST Sehore, Madhya Pradesh, India

2Professor, Computer Science & Engineering, SSSIST Sehore, Madhya Pradesh, India

1 [email protected], 2[email protected]

Abstract

Clustering is an unsupervised learning technique. The main advantage of clustering analysis is a descriptive task that seeks to identify homogeneous groups of objects based on the values of their attributes. Clustering algorithms can be applied in many domains. Most of the data categorization process suffered the problem of seed generation and content validation. In this paper we apply clustering technique for data categorization or grouping of data. This work is focused on the k-mean algorithm. K-Means is one of the most common algorithms used for clustering. It is the unsupervised learning technique. For k-mean to minimize the problem of seed generation and right number of cluster using optimization technique such as genetic algorithm. K-means algorithm is a basic partition method in cluster analysis, but it is sensitive to the initial cluster centers, improper choice of cluster centers will result in cluster failure. K values need to artificially pre-determined, which is very difficult for those who has no experience affected by the isolated points, each round of calculation of the cluster center has deviation and eventually lead to cluster failure. At present people mainly using genetic algorithm to determine the value and achieved good results.

Keywords: Data mining, Clustering, K-Means, Genetic Algorithm.

1. Introduction

Clustering can be considered the most important unsupervised learning problem; so, as every other problem of this kind, it deals with finding a structure in a collection of unlabeled data [2] enhancement.

(2)

Ankit Mishra, IJRIT

56 Figure 1.1 Clustering Procedure Steps

1.1 Types of Clustering

There exit a large number of clustering algorithms in the literature .The choice of clustering algorithm depends both on the type of data available and on the particular purpose and application. If cluster analysis is used as a descriptive or exploratory tool, it is possible to try several algorithms on the same data to see what the data may disclose. In general, major clustering methods can be classified into the following categories [9].

1. Partition based: The partitioning method initially creates partitions. Then an iterative relocation technique is used to improve partitioning and moves objects from one group to another.

2. Hierarchical: A hierarchical method creates a hierarchical decomposition of the given set of data objects [8].

3. Density based: The density based approach is to continue growing the given cluster as long as the density i.e.

number of objects or data points in the neighborhood exceeds.

4 . Grid based: Grid based methods quantize the object space into a finite number of cells that forms a grid structure.

5. Model based clustering: The model based clustering hypothesizes a model for each of the clusters and finds the best fitted data according to the given model

.

K-means algorithm which is a partition based clustering, and it is one of the most popular methods used in data clustering due to its good computational performance [4]. However, it is well known that its result depends on the initialization process, which is generally done by random selection. To improve the performance a new initialization technique has been proposed. Different runs of K-means on the same input data may produce different results.

2. K-Means for Clustering

The K-Means algorithm is one of the partitioning based, nonhierarchical clustering technique [8]. For any given set of numeric objects X and an integer number K, the K-Means algorithm searches for a partition of X into k

(3)

Ankit Mishra, IJRIT

57 clusters that minimizes the within groups sum of squared errors. The K-means algorithm starts by Initializing the k cluster centers. The input data points are then allocated to one of the existing clusters according to the square of the Euclidean distance from the clusters, choosing the closest. The mean (centroids) of each cluster is then computed so as to update the cluster center. The processes of re-assigning the input vectors and the update of the cluster centers is repeated until no more change in the value of any of the cluster centers. The K Means clustering method can be considered, as the cunning method because here, to obtain a better result the centroids, are kept as far as possible from each other. The steps for the K-means algorithm are given below:

1. Initialization: choose randomly K input vectors (data points) to initialize the clusters.

2. Nearest-neighbor search: for each input vector, find the cluster center that is closest, and assign that input Vector to the corresponding cluster.

3. Mean update: update the cluster centers in each cluster using the mean (Centroids) of the input vectors assign to that cluster.

4. Stopping rule: repeat steps 2 and 3 until no more change in the value of the means.

2.1 Drawbacks of the K-Means Algorithm

Despite being used in a wide array of applications, the K-Means algorithm is not exempt of drawbacks.

Some of these drawbacks have been extensively reported in the literature. The most important are listed below:

 The learning algorithm requires Apriori specification of the number of cluster centers.

 The use of Exclusive Assignment - If there are two highly overlapping data then k-means will not be able to resolve that there are two clusters.

 The learning algorithm is not invariant to non-linear transformations i.e. with different representation of data we get different results.

 Euclidean distance measures can unequally weight underlying factors.

 The learning algorithm provides the local optima of the squared error function.

 Randomly choosing of the cluster center cannot lead us to the fruitful result.

 Applicable only when mean is defined i.e. fails for categorical data.

3. Genetic Algorithms

Genetic Algorithm is based on the ideas of natural evolution. In general, GA start with an initial population, then find cromosomes for each indiviual and then a new population is created based on the fitness value of chromosomes. Fitness is the measure for how good is the population. Typically a distance measure is the most common [5]. Then a process called crossover is done over the new population by swapping the substrings from selected chromosomes in order to produce new chromosomes. After that mutation process is applied to produce randomization. This process continues until a termination condition is achieved.

In literature it has been found that Genetic algorithmis used to initialize K-means and known as GA initialized K-means (GAIK). The purpose of GA is to optimize the performance of K-means. It has been also noticed that the performance of K-means depends upon the initial centroid selection. GA provides the initial cluster centroids, which act as starting point for Kmeans. For using GAs into clustering, an initial population of random clusters is generated. At each generation, each individual is evaluated and recombined with others on the basis of its fitness. New individuals are created using crossover and mutation.

(4)

Ankit Mishra, IJRIT

58 3.1 Chromosome representation

The first step of GA is representation (or encoding) of chromosomes. The encoding may be done in binary, integer or real numbers. Different research uses different encoding schemes.

3.2 Fitness evaluation

A fitness function is needed to evaluate the fitness of chromosomes. The fitness function should return some real value. K being the number of clusters, mk the centre of cluster Ck, which makes it similar to the k-means algorithm [6].

3.3 Selection

Selecting chromosomes for production of new generation is called Selection. Selection is done on the basis of the fitness value. The best fitted chromosomes are selected for crossover. There are verities of selection procedures like uniform selection, roulette wheel selection, tournament etc.

3.4 Crossover

The purpose of crossover is to create two new individuals chromosomes from two existing chromosomes selected from current population. Typical crossover is one point crossover, two point crossover, cycle crossover and uniform crossover.

3.5 Mutation

Mutation is done in order to produce randomization. Also it extends the search space. It is done with a pre defined rate called mutation probability. For mutation a particular bit is changed randomly with the mutation probability.

4. Proposed Algorithm

This work evaluates the performance of K means [1] with VSM and Genetic algorithm for the human activity recognition using Smartphone, Gas sensor arrays in open sampling settings, internet advertisements dataset.

The basic idea about selecting initial cluster centers using genetic algorithm In the proposed algorithm, we first use random function to select K data objects as initial cluster centers to form a chromosome, a total of M chromosomes selected, then have K-means operation on each group of cluster center in the initial population to compute fitness, select individuals according to the fitness of each chromosome, select high-fitness chromosomes for the crossover and mutation operation eliminating low fitness chromosomes, format next generation group finally. In this way, within each new generation of groups, the average fitness are rising, each cluster center is closer to the optimal cluster center, and finally select chromosome that have the highest fitness as the initial cluster center.

4.1 Steps of the Proposed Algorithm

1. Set the parameters: population size M, the maximum number of iteration T, the number of clusters K, etc.

2. Generate m chromosomes randomly; a chromosome represents a set of initial cluster centers, to form the initial population.

(5)

Ankit Mishra, IJRIT

59 3. According to the initial cluster centers showed by every chromosome, carry out K-means clustering, each chromosome corresponds to once K-means clustering, then calculate chromosome fitness in line with clustering result, and implement the optimal preservation strategy.

4. For the group, to carry out selection, crossover and mutation operator to produce a new generation of group.

5. To determine whether the conditions meet the genetic termination conditions, if meet then withdrawal genetic operation and turn 6, otherwise turn 3.

6. Calculate fitness of the new generation of group; compare the fitness of the best individual in current group with the best individual's fitness so far to find the individual with the highest fitness.

7. Carry out K-means clustering according to the initial cluster center represented by the chromosome with the 8. Highest fitness, and then output clustering result.

Figure 4.1 Flowchart of Proposed Algorithm

(6)

Ankit Mishra, IJRIT

60

5. Experimental Analysis & Performance Evaluation

Comparing K-means algorithm based on genetic algorithm (the article) with the original K-means algorithm and two known improved algorithms to verify the effectiveness that selecting initial cluster center using genetic algorithm. Improved algorithm 1 is proposed in, the improved algorithm 2 is proposed in. In order to exclude the impact of isolated points, the article use the method proposed in that using the average value of subset whose object is more close to center as a new round of cluster center to improve K-means algorithm, and also apply this method to original K-means algorithm, improved algorithm 1 and improved algorithm 2, having a comprehensive comparison on them. We added groups of isolated points respectively to the two sets of data above-mentioned. Iris data, adding five isolated points (10,3.0,1.5,5), (5.8,3.6,20,0. 2), (0,0,0,0) , (9.0,6.6,14,0), (6.9,9,1.4,9); wine data, adding five isolated points (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), (13.34,94,2.36,1. 7,110,0.55,0.42,3.17, 1. 02, 1.

93,750,5.36,66 6), (14.34,1. 68,2.7,25,98,2.8,31,0.53,2.7, 13,0.57, 1.96,666),( 14.2,1. 76, 2.45,15.2,1. 12, 3.27,3.39,0.34, 1.97,6.75, 1. 05,2.85, 450),(12.67,0.98,2.24,18,99,2.2,1. 94,0.3, 1. 46,2.62, 123,3.16, 450).

Experiment parameter settings are as follows: k = 3; pcl = 0.9; pc2 = 0. 6; pml = 0.5; pm2 = 0.1; pc = 0. 6; pm = 0.1;

m (initial population size) = 50, maxgen (the maximum number of iteration) = 100.

5.1 Experiments on Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone Data Set

Figure 5.1 Result of K-mean algorithm on Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone Data Set

(7)

Ankit Mishra, IJRIT

61 Figure 5.2 Result of Proposed (KVG) methods on Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone Data Set

Figure 5.3 Parameter graph between k-mean and KVG for Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone Data Set

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

K-Means Modified K-Means

Threshold Error Rate No. of clusters

(8)

Ankit Mishra, IJRIT

62 Table 5.1 Base Parameter comparison on Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone Data Set

Figure 5.4 Comparison of Iteration through cluster between k-mean and KVG 0

1 2 3 4 5 6

0 1 2 3 Cluster

It er at ion

K-Means v/s KVG

KVG K-means S.N Clustering

Algorithm

Threshold Iteration Time Error Rate

1. K-means Algorithm

0.8 4 3.79082 4.6621

2. KVG Algorithm 0.8 5 3.04202 1.73368

(9)

Ankit Mishra, IJRIT

63

6. Conclusion and Future Work

In this paper K-Means algorithm that is one of the popular clustering techniques has been surveyed and tried to apply one of the optimization method named genetic algorithm improve in unsupervised clustering procedure. Genetic algorithms are population based methods that use from operators for processing of population chromosomes. In this research, we defined a representation of chromosome string and combine K-Means and GA together. Observing simulations in different running show that K-Means clustering based on Genetic algorithm improved clustering measurement better and more efficient rather than pure K-Means considerably

7. References

[1] Anwiti Jain, Anand Rajavat, Rupali Bhartiya, “Design, Analysis and Implementation of Modified K-Mean Algorithm for Large Data-set to Increase Scalability and Efficiency”, 2012 Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, 2012, ISBN: 978-0-7695-4850-0, Val. No.:12, Page No.627, Copy Right 2012 IEEE.

[2] Gibbons F.D, Roth F.P. Judging the quality of gene expression-based clustering methods using gene annotation.

Genome Res. 2002;12(10):1574–1581.

[3] A. K. Jain, M. N. Murty, and P. J. Flynn, “Data clustering: A review,” ACM Computing Surveys, 31(3), pp. 264- 323, 1999.

[4] KailashChander, Dr. Dinesh Kumar, “Vijay Kumar, Enhancing Cluster Compactness using Genetic Algorithm Initialized K-means”, International Journal of Software Engineering Research & Practices Vol.1, Issue 1, Jan, 2011.

[5]Qin Ding and Jim Gasvoda,”A genetic algorithm for clustering on image data”. International Journal of Computational Intelligence, vol.1, 2005.

[6] J. Grabmeier and A. Rudolph, “Techniques of cluster algorithms in data mining,.” Data Mining and Knowledge Discover, 6, pp. 303- 360, 2002.

[7] www.mathworks.com

[8] Qinghe Zhang, Xiaoyun Chen” Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering based on Affinity Propagation Algorithm” 3rd International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling, 2010.

[9] Divakar Singh, Anju singh, “A New Framework for Texture based Image Content with Comparative Analysis of Clustering Techniques”

References

Related documents

(A) Ecdysteroidome of white pupae reared on lipid-depleted food supplemented with individual sterols; complex ‘ yeast ’ and ‘ plant ’ foods are shown for comparison..

For the Stordalen Mire site, we es- timated bias in the Global Soil Wetness Project Phase 3 (GSWP3) climate reanalysis dataset using site-level long- term meteorological

We developed a device - intraoperative limb-length measurement and osteotomy device (ILMOD), and applied it to patients who were treated with hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck

The volumetric entities of a REW contain flow domains commonly encountered or described within a watershed: 1) the unsaturated flow domain, 2) the saturated flow domain, 3)

TSQM-9 domain scores at time 1 were compared between low compliers (modified Morisky scale score<6) and medium compliers (modified Morisky scale score > = 6 but <7)

Further, we collect sentiment ratings for vulgar tweets to study the re- lationship between the use of vulgar words and perceived sentiment and show that explicitly modeling

the controller will work properly with the Storage Expansion Feature (#6501) installed. but Control Storage Expansion cannot be utilized. Note: Several remote loop

Ligament in-situ strains are not reported for most structures in the wrist complex, and applications of normal strains (~2%) applied to the model ligaments caused deformation of