Immune-Mediated Damage Completes
the Parabola:
Cryptococcus neoformans
Pathogenesis Can Reflect the Outcome
of a Weak or Strong Immune Response
Liise-anne Pirofski,a Arturo Casadevallb
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York City, New York, USAa; Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USAb
ABSTRACT Cryptococcosis occurs most frequently in immunocompromised
individ-uals. This has led to the prevailing view that this disease is the result of weak im-mune responses that cannot control the fungus. However, increasingly, clinical and experimental studies have revealed that the host immune response can contribute to cryptococcal pathogenesis, including the recent study of L. M. Neal et al. (mBio 8:e01415-17, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01415-17) that reports that CD4⫹T
cells mediate tissue damage in experimental murine cryptococcosis. This finding has fundamental implications for our understanding of the pathogenesis of cryptococcal disease; it helps explain why immunotherapy has been largely unsuccessful in treat-ment and provides insight into the paradoxical observation that HIV-associated cryp-tococcosis may have a better prognosis than crypcryp-tococcosis in those with no known immune impairment. The demonstration that host-mediated damage can drive cryp-tococcal disease provides proof of concept that the parabola put forth in the damage-response framework has the flexibility to depict complex and changing outcomes of host-microbe interaction.
KEYWORDS fungi, pathogenesis, virulence
C
ryptococcosis is usually observed in hosts with impaired immunity. Consequently, the agent causing cryptococcosis,Cryptococcus neoformans, is often considered pathogenic only when the immune system is unable to control its growth. This has led to its characterization as an “opportunistic pathogen” (1). In their article inmBio, L. M. Neal et al. (2) report that the CD4⫹T cell-mediated response toC. neoformansis a major contributor to tissue damage in cryptococcal meningitis in mice even though it also mediates fungal clearance. This observation adds to increasing evidence that the host response can drive cryptococcal disease and highlights the ability of the damage-response framework (DRF) to guide our understanding of microbial pathogenesis. The DRF was first put forth in 1999 (3) to provide a theory of microbial pathogenesis that could incorporate the contributions of both host and microbe to host damage that stems from host-microbe interaction. Prior to the DRF, microbial pathogenesis was largely viewed as a singular outcome of either microbial factors or host factors. While such microbe- or host-centered views were able to explain the pathogenesis of certain infectious diseases, they could not explain others, especially those caused by microbes only rarely associated with disease. This shortcoming became glaring in the late 1970s and early 1980s as the HIV/AIDS pandemic led to the emergence of previously rare and unusual diseases, including cryptococcosis (4).In the original formulation of the DRF, the outcome of host-microbe interaction with different microbes was depicted by six curves that plotted host damage as a
Published12 December 2017 CitationPirofski L, Casadevall A. 2017. Immune-mediated damage completes the parabola:Cryptococcus neoformans pathogenesis can reflect the outcome of a weak or strong immune response. mBio 8: e02063-17.https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio .02063-17.
Copyright© 2017 Pirofski and Casadevall. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Address correspondence to Liise-anne Pirofski, [email protected].
For the article discussed, seehttps://doi.org/10 .1128/mBio.01415-17.
The views expressed in this Commentary do not necessarily reflect the views of this journal or of ASM.
crossm
®
on July 14, 2020 by guest
http://mbio.asm.org/
function of the strength of the immune response. These curves, referred to as pathogen classes, were based on what was known at the time about the outcome of infection with given microbes. The rationale for the pathogen classes was underpinned by the tenet that host damage can stem from microbial factors, host factors, or both. Central to this tenet was the idea that host damage stemming from the immune response to a microbe can drive disease pathogenesis. At the time the DRF was proposed, the host inflammatory response was not generally viewed as a causal factor in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases. However, this has changed. The occurrence of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in young, previously well persons who presented with excessive pulmonary inflammation (5), reminis-cent of influenza epidemics that struck young, robust persons (6), highlighted the role that host-mediated damage can play in viral disease pathogenesis. The ability of the DRF to account for host damage due to inflammation stemming from the immune response to certain microbes (3) highlighted its flexibility and capacity to incorporate new diseases and information.
Despite the ability of the DRF to classify most microbes into one of the original six pathogen classes, new knowledge from clinical and experimental studies led to the conclusion that some of the original classifications were incorrect. Again, lessons learned from the HIV/AIDS pandemic provided new insights into microbial pathogen-esis, perhaps best exemplified by cryptococcosis.C. neoformanswas first classified as a class 2 pathogen, the definition of which was “pathogens that cause damage either in hosts with weak immune responses or in the setting of normal immune responses” (3). This characterization was consistent with available knowledge in 1999. However, the emergence ofCryptococcus gattiiin apparently healthy persons in the Pacific Northwest (7) and the unexpected appearance of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)-associated cryptococcosis in patients with HIV/AIDS after initiation of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) (8, 9) revealed that the host immune response itself can contribute to the pathogenesis of cryptococcosis. Thus, classification ofC. neoformans
as a class 2 pathogen needed to be revisited.
Another example of a pathogen needing reclassification isPneumocystis jirovecii, which was originally classified as a class 1 pathogen, defined as “pathogens that cause damage only in the setting of weak immune responses” (3). However, pneumocystis pneumonia is associated with intense inflammation in children and after initiation of therapy in patients with HIV/AIDS (10, 11). In fact, a major advance in treating pneumocystis pneumonia was the realization that corticosteroid therapy reduced morbidity and mortality, a finding that was counterintuitive, since this disease arose in the setting of profound HIV-associated immunodeficiency. Thus, inflammation may drive pneumocystis- and cryptococcus-mediated damage, even in patients with severely impaired immunity, defying their initial classifications as class 1 and 2 pathogens, respectively. Although one might propose that these microbes be reclassified as class 3 pathogens, “pathogens that cause damage in the setting of appropriate immune responses and cause damage at both ends of the continuum of immune response” (3), most persons with normal immune responses never exhibit clinically detected damage as an outcome of interaction with these microbes. These examples highlight limitations of the original DRF pathogen classes and illustrate that each of the six classes is actually a derivative of a single parabola that can shift to the left, right, up, or down to depict the impact of the immune response on disease pathogenesis (Fig. 1).
The emergence of IRIS-associated cryptococcosis in the setting of ART initiation provided clear evidence that host damage in patients with cryptococcal disease may be driven by inflammation (12). IRIS often occurred in patients with very low initial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lymphocyte counts (8), and has been associated with chemo-kine dysregulation (13) and activated CD4⫹T cells and macrophages (12, 14, 15). Similar
findings have also been reported in some non-HIV-infected patients with cryptococcal meningitis (16, 17). A role for CD4⫹ T cells in the pathogenesis of
cryptococcus-associated IRIS has also been demonstrated in experimental mouse models. Eschke and
Commentary ®
on July 14, 2020 by guest
http://mbio.asm.org/
colleagues induced IRIS in RAG1⫺/⫺mice by reconstituting them with naive (wild-type)
CD4⫹T cells 1 month after pulmonary infection with 500 CFU ofC. neoformans(18). In
this model, mice developed wasting and systemic inflammation evidenced by high levels of Th1-type cytokines (interleukin 6 [IL-6], tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-␣], and gamma interferon [IFN-␥]), activated CD4⫹T cells, and granulomatous
inflamma-tion in the liver compared to control mice that did not receive CD4⫹T cells (and mice
that received CD4⫹T cells and were not infected). Reconstitution did not affect fungal
clearance. This model demonstrated that CD4⫹T cell reconstitution induced systemic
inflammation inC. neoformans-infected mice that closely resembled ART-induced IRIS in HIV-infected patients with cryptococcosis.
Neal and colleagues (2) describe another mouse model in which CD4⫹ T cells
mediate inflammation and host damage in the setting ofC. neoformansinfection. Their study was undertaken to gain insight into the role that CD4⫹T cells may play in the
pathogenesis of IRIS- and postinfectious inflammatory syndromes (PIIRS) in HIV-infected and HIV-unHIV-infected patients with cryptococcosis. Mice HIV-infected intravenously with 106CFU ofC. neoformanswere monitored clinically or analyzed to determine their
central nervous system (CNS) fungal burden (CFU), inflammatory pathology, and cel-lular and cytokine responses. The number ofC. neoformansCFU in the brains of mice increased from 1 to 3 weeks after infection and then decreased from 3 to 5 weeks thereafter. Interestingly, the mice developed symptomatic disease and neurological deterioration 3 to 4 weeks after infection, corresponding to fungal clearance and surprisingly, mortality. CNS pathology revealed cellular inflammation marked by leu-kocytes beginning 3 weeks after infection that subsequently increased due to infiltra-tion of CD4⫹and CD8⫹T cells, with CD4⫹T cells being the predominant population
and both populations being antigen experienced. Infiltrating CD4⫹and CD8⫹T cells
exhibited a Th1-type bias, producing IFN-␥. Depletion of CD4⫹ T cells resulted in
reduced mortality and inflammatory pathology, providing proof of concept that CD4⫹
FIG 1 Outcomes of host-Cryptococcus neoformansinteraction depicted by the basic parabola of the damage-response framework. The left side of the parabola, shaded in green and labeled weak, depicts the original circa 1999 concept thatC. neoformanswas a class 2 pathogen that caused damage in the setting of a weak or normal immune response. Here, the immune response fails to limit fungal growth, which results in host damage. The right side of the parabola, shaded in red and labeled strong, depicts information that has emerged since 1999, which has revealed that C. neoformanscan elicit strong immune responses that produce host damage stemming from inflammation. The portion of the parabola that rises above the black dotted line represents the threshold for clinical disease. The portion of the parabola that lies below the black dotted line represents the state ofC. neoformanslatency, which is not associated with clinically evident host damage. Proposed therapeutic interventions, based on counter-acting the main source of host damage are depicted by red (to enhance weak response) or green (to reduce strong response) arrows. Some factors that contribute to weak and strong immune responses are shown along theyaxis for each type of response, though immunity is likely multifactorial, and additional factors are also likely to contribute (16, 29 –35).
on July 14, 2020 by guest
http://mbio.asm.org/
[image:3.594.66.345.70.258.2]T cells were the principal mediators of inflammation and damage in this model. Notably, survival of infected, CD4⫹ T cell-depleted mice was improved despite an
inability to induce fungal clearance and markedly elevated fungal burdens compared to mice with sufficient CD4⫹T cells.
The data generated by Neal et al. (2) demonstrate that CD4⫹ T cells can play
dichotomous roles inC. neoformansinfection. On one hand, they can mediate fungal clearance in the CNS, but on the other hand, they can induce inflammation that leads to neurological deterioration and death. This suggests a possible explanation for why inflammation is often a prominent feature of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-uninfected, but not HIV-infected patients, and raises the intriguing possibility that the profound CD4⫹ T cell deficiency, which portends risk for cryptococcosis, may actually limit
inflammatory pathology in HIV-infected persons not on ART. This dichotomy may also provide insight into the failure of adjunctive steroid therapy to reduce mortality or improve morbidity in HIV-associated cryptococcosis (19) and the fact that cryptococ-cosis may have a better prognosis in immunosuppressed patients than in nonimmu-nosuppressed patients (20–22). The detrimental effect of activated CD4⫹T cells in mice
also suggests the possibility that antifungal therapy-induced fungal clearance and reduced levels of glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) (an immune suppressing molecule [23–25]), could enhance CD4⫹T cell activation and damage. This may help explain
paradoxical worsening of cryptococcosis in certain patients after initiation of antifungal therapy (26).
The aforementioned experimental models provide possible mechanistic explana-tions for the dichotomous role that the immune response may play in the pathogenesis of IRIS- and PIIRS-associated cryptococcosis while contributing to fungal clearance. Thus, microbe and host both contribute to host damage and where an individual patient’s immune response lies on the continuum of the DRF parabola determines the nature of the disease process. At one end, on the left, a weak immune response can result in tissue damage due to fungal proliferation that results in compression of brain tissue with little or no inflammation in what is primarily microbe-mediated damage. At the other end, on the right, a strong cellular immune response can also damage brain tissue due to excessive inflammation in what is primarily host-mediated damage. The occurrence of host damage in the setting of weak and strong immune responses provides important clues as to why it has been so difficult to consistently use agents that modulate inflammation, such as corticosteroids and interferon, to improve the outcome of cryptococcosis. Although adjunctive IFN-␥therapy in HIV-associated cryp-tococcosis (27) and corticosteroids can ameliorate IRIS (28) in some patients, such immune-modulating agents may not be effective in other patients, because physicians do not usually know whether the preponderance of damage is due to host factors, microbial factors, or both. In this regard, the failure and detrimental effects of steroid therapy in patients with HIV-associated cryptococcosis (19) probably represent addi-tional suppression of weak immunity resulting in enhancement of fungus-mediated damage. Hence, the effective use of immunotherapy is likely to require a rational approach that incorporates knowledge of where the immune response of an individual lies along the immune response co ntinuum depicted by the DRF parabola.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
L.P. is supported in part by NIH grant R01AI97096. A.C. is supported in part by NIH grants 5R01HL059842, 5R01AI033774, 5R37AI033142, and 5R01AI052733.
REFERENCES
1. Casadevall A, Pirofski L. 2001. Host-pathogen interactions: the attributes of virulence. J Infect Dis 184:337–344.https://doi.org/10.1086/322044. 2. Neal LM, Xing E, Xu J, Kolbe JL, Osterholzer JJ, Segal BM, Williamson PR,
Olszewski MA. 2017. CD4⫹T cells orchestrate lethal immune pathology
despite fungal clearance during Cryptococcus neoformans meningoen-cephalitis. mBio 8:e01415-17.https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01415-17.
3. Casadevall A, Pirofski LA. 1999. Host-pathogen interactions: redefining the basic concepts of virulence and pathogenicity. Infect Immun 67: 3703–3713.
4. Casadevall A, Pirofski LA. 2015. What is a host? Incorporating the micro-biota into the damage-response framework. Infect Immun 83:2–7.https:// doi.org/10.1128/IAI.02627-14.
Commentary ®
on July 14, 2020 by guest
http://mbio.asm.org/
5. Lang ZW, Zhang LJ, Zhang SJ, Meng X, Li JQ, Song CZ, Sun L, Zhou YS, Dwyer DE. 2003. A clinicopathological study of three cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Pathology 35:526 –531.https://doi.org/10 .1080/00313020310001619118.
6. Fukuyama S, Kawaoka Y. 2011. The pathogenesis of influenza virus infections: the contributions of virus and host factors. Curr Opin Immunol 23:481– 486.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2011.07.016.
7. Datta K, Bartlett KH, Baer R, Byrnes E, Galanis E, Heitman J, Hoang L, Leslie MJ, MacDougall L, Magill SS, Morshed MG, Marr KA, Cryptococcus gattii Working Group of the Pacific Northwest. 2009. Spread of Cryptococcus gattii into Pacific Northwest region of the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1185–1191.https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1508.081384.
8. Boulware DR, Bonham SC, Meya DB, Wiesner DL, Park GS, Kambugu A, Janoff EN, Bohjanen PR. 2010. Paucity of initial cerebrospinal fluid inflam-mation in cryptococcal meningitis is associated with subsequent immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Infect Dis 202:962–970.https:// doi.org/10.1086/655785.
9. Haddow LJ, Colebunders R, Meintjes G, Lawn SD, Elliott JH, Manabe YC, Bohjanen PR, Sungkanuparph S, Easterbrook PJ, French MA, Boulware DR, International Network for the Study of HIV-associated IRIS (INSHI). 2010. Cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-1-infected individuals: proposed clinical case definitions. Lancet Infect Dis 10:791– 802.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70170-5.
10. Church JA, Fitzgerald F, Walker AS, Gibb DM, Prendergast AJ. 2015. The expanding role of co-trimoxazole in developing countries. Lancet Infect Dis 15:327–339.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71011-4. 11. Skerrett SJ, Park DR. 2001. Anti-inflammatory treatment of acute and
chronic pneumonia. Semin Respir Infect 16:76 – 84.https://doi.org/10 .1053/srin.2001.22731.
12. Bicanic T, Meintjes G, Rebe K, Williams A, Loyse A, Wood R, Hayes M, Jaffar S, Harrison T. 2009. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syn-drome in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a prospective study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 51:130 –134. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI .0b013e3181a56f2e.
13. Chang CC, Omarjee S, Lim A, Spelman T, Gosnell BI, Carr WH, Elliott JH, Moosa MY, Ndung’u T, French MA, Lewin SR. 2013. Chemokine levels and chemokine receptor expression in the blood and the cerebrospinal fluid of HIV-infected patients with cryptococcal meningitis and cryptococcosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syn-drome. J Infect Dis 208:1604 –1612.https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jit388. 14. Meya DB, Okurut S, Zziwa G, Rolfes MA, Kelsey M, Cose S, Joloba M, Naluyima P, Palmer BE, Kambugu A, Mayanja-Kizza H, Bohjanen PR, Eller MA, Wahl SM, Boulware DR, Manabe YC, Janoff EN. 2015. Cellular im-mune activation in cerebrospinal fluid from Ugandans with cryptococcal meningitis and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Infect Dis 211:1597–1606.https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu664.
15. Meya DB, Manabe YC, Boulware DR, Janoff EN. 2016. The immunopatho-genesis of cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: understanding a conundrum. Curr Opin Infect Dis 29:10 –22.https://doi .org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000224.
16. Panackal AA, Wuest SC, Lin YC, Wu T, Zhang N, Kosa P, Komori M, Blake A, Browne SK, Rosen LB, Hagen F, Meis J, Levitz SM, Quezado M, Hammoud D, Bennett JE, Bielekova B, Williamson PR. 2015. Paradoxical immune responses in non-HIV cryptococcal meningitis. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004884.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004884.
17. Panackal AA, Williamson KC, van de Beek D, Boulware DR, Williamson PR. 2016. Fighting the monster: applying the host damage framework to human central nervous system infections. mBio 7:e01906-15.https://doi .org/10.1128/mBio.01906-15.
18. Eschke M, Piehler D, Schulze B, Richter T, Grahnert A, Protschka M, Müller U, Köhler G, Höfling C, Rossner S, Alber G. 2015. A novel experimental model of Cryptococcus neoformans-related immune reconstitution in-flammatory syndrome (IRIS) provides insights into pathogenesis. Eur J Immunol 45:3339 –3350.https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545689. 19. Beardsley J, Wolbers M, Kibengo FM, Ggayi AB, Kamali A, Cuc NT, Binh
TQ, Chau NV, Farrar J, Merson L, Phuong L, Thwaites G, Van Kinh N, Thuy PT, Chierakul W, Siriboon S, Thiansukhon E, Onsanit S, Supphamongk-holchaikul W, Chan AK, Heyderman R, Mwinjiwa E, van Oosterhout JJ, Imran D, Basri H, Mayxay M, Dance D, Phimmasone P, Rattanavong S, Lalloo DG, Day JN, CryptoDex Investigators. 2016. Adjunctive dexameth-asone in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 374: 542–554.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1509024.
20. Brizendine KD, Baddley JW, Pappas PG. 2013. Predictors of mortality and
differences in clinical features among patients with cryptococcosis ac-cording to immune status. PLoS One 8:e60431.https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0060431.
21. Liao CH, Chi CY, Wang YJ, Tseng SW, Chou CH, Ho CM, Lin PC, Ho MW, Wang JH. 2012. Different presentations and outcomes between HIV-infected and HIV-unHIV-infected patients with cryptococcal meningitis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 45:296 –304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii .2011.12.005.
22. Nguyen MH, Husain S, Clancy CJ, Peacock JE, Hung CC, Kontoyiannis DP, Morris AJ, Heath CH, Wagener M, Yu VL. 2010. Outcomes of central nervous system cryptococcosis vary with host immune function: results from a multi-center, prospective study. J Infect 61:419 – 426.https://doi .org/10.1016/j.jinf.2010.08.004.
23. Ellerbroek PM, Walenkamp AM, Hoepelman AI, Coenjaerts FE. 2004. Effects of the capsular polysaccharides of Cryptococcus neoformans on phagocyte migration and inflammatory mediators. Curr Med Chem 11:253–266.
24. Vecchiarelli A, Retini C, Pietrella D, Monari C, Tascini C, Beccari T, Kozel TR. 1995. Downregulation by cryptococcal polysaccharide of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1 beta secretion from human monocytes. Infect Immun 63:2919 –2923.
25. Vecchiarelli A, Retini C, Monari C, Tascini C, Bistoni F, Kozel TR. 1996. Purified capsular polysaccharide of Cryptococcus neoformans induces interleukin-10 secretion by human monocytes. Infect Immun 64: 2846 –2849.
26. Singh N, Lortholary O, Alexander BD, Gupta KL, John GT, Pursell K, Munoz P, Klintmalm GB, Stosor V, del Busto R, Limaye AP, Somani J, Lyon M, Houston S, House AA, Pruett TL, Orloff S, Humar A, Dowdy L, Garcia-Diaz J, Kalil AC, Fisher RA, Husain S, Cryptococcal Collaborative Transplant Study Group. 2005. An immune reconstitution syndrome-like illness associated with Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 40:1756 –1761.https://doi.org/10 .1086/430606.
27. Jarvis JN, Meintjes G, Rebe K, Williams GN, Bicanic T, Williams A, Schutz C, Bekker LG, Wood R, Harrison TS. 2012. Adjunctive interferon-gamma immunotherapy for the treatment of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized controlled trial. AIDS 26:1105–1113.https:// doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283536a93.
28. Bahr N, Boulware DR, Marais S, Scriven J, Wilkinson RJ, Meintjes G. 2013. Central nervous system immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Curr Infect Dis Rep 15:583–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11908-013-0378-5.
29. Dufaud C, Rivera J, Rohatgi S, Pirofski LA. 2017. Naive B cells reduce fungal dissemination in Cryptococcus neoformans infected Rag1⫺/⫺ mice. Virulencehttps://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2017.1370529. 30. Subramaniam K, Metzger B, Hanau LH, Guh A, Rucker L, Badri S, Pirofski
LA. 2009. IgM⫹memory B cell expression predicts HIV-associated
cryp-tococcosis status. J Infect Dis 200:244 –251. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 599318.
31. Panackal AA, Rosen LB, Uzel G, Davis MJ, Hu G, Adeyemo A, Tekola-Ayele F, Lisco A, Diachok C, Kim JD, Shaw D, Sereti I, Stoddard J, Niemela J, Rosenzweig SD, Bennett JE, Williamson PR. 2017. Susceptibility to cryp-tococcal meningoencephalitis associated with idiopathic CD4⫹
lym-phopenia and secondary germline or acquired defects. Open Forum Infect Dis 4:ofx082.https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx082.
32. Rohatgi S, Gohil S, Kuniholm MH, Schultz H, Dufaud C, Armour KL, Badri S, Mailliard RB, Pirofski LA. 2013. Fc gamma receptor 3A polymorphism and risk for HIV-associated cryptococcal disease. mBio 4:e00573-13. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00573-13.
33. Meletiadis J, Walsh TJ, Choi EH, Pappas PG, Ennis D, Douglas J, Pankey GA, Larsen RA, Hamill RJ, Chanock S. 2007. Study of common functional genetic polymorphisms of FCGR2A, 3A and 3B genes and the risk for cryptococcosis in HIV-uninfected patients. Med Mycol 45:513–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13693780701390140.
34. Rosen LB, Freeman AF, Yang LM, Jutivorakool K, Olivier KN, Angkase-kwinai N, Suputtamongkol Y, Bennett JE, Pyrgos V, Williamson PR, Ding L, Holland SM, Browne SK. 2013. Anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies in patients with cryptococcal meningitis. J Immunol 190:3959 –3966. https://doi .org/10.4049/jimmunol.1202526.
35. Ou XT, Wu JQ, Zhu LP, Guan M, Xu B, Hu XP, Wang X, Weng XH. 2011. Genotypes coding for mannose-binding lectin deficiency correlated with cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-uninfected Chinese patients. J Infect Dis 203:1686 –1691.https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir152.