The Effect of Acetylcholine and Potassium on
Repolarization of the Heart
Charles Fisch, … , Suzanne B. Knoebel, Harvey Feigenbaum
J Clin Invest.
1964;
43(9)
:1769-1775.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI105051
.
Research Article
Find the latest version:
Journal of Clinical Investigation Vol. 43, No. 9, 1964
The Effect of
Acetylcholine and Potassium
on
Repolarization
of the
Heart
*
CHARLES FISCH, SUZANNE B. KNOEBEL,
ANDHARVEY FEIGENBAUM
t
(From the Division of Cardiology, Department of
Medicine,
and the Heart Research Center, Indiana University School ofMedicine,and the Krannert Heart Research Institute,Marion County General Hospital, Indianapolis, Ind.)
Acetylcholine
has been shown to have an effect
on
the action
potentials of mammalian atrial
muscle, the sinoatrial
and the
atrioventricular
nodes,
and on the action potential of frog
ven-tricles (1-4).
On the other hand, the action
po-tential of mammalian ventricle has been found to
be
highly resistant
to
acetylcholine.
Only very
slight changes
were noted in the presence of
enor-mous
concentrations of the drug (4-6).
The
purpose of this communication is to
pre-sent
electrocardiographic evidence indicating
a)
that acetylcholine
exerts a
consistent effect
on
re-polarization
of
the
ventricles
in
the intact dog and
that
this effect is
independent of the heart rate,
ventricular
arrhythmias,
and
atrioventricular
(AV)
or
intraventricular conduction
delays, and
b) that the effect of acetylcholine
on
repolariza-tion is augmented by increasing the level
of
plasma
potassium
(K).
Methods
Eleven experiments were performed with seven mon-grel dogs weighing 10 to 14 kg. The animals were anesthetized with either pentobarbital, 30 mg per kg iv,
or a combination of morphine sulfate, 2.5 mg per kg im, followed by pentobarbital, 15 mg per kg iv. Ventila-tion was maintained through the use of a Harvard respirator. A bilateral cervical vagotomy was per-formed, and an arterial catheter was placed just above the aortic valves. Blood pressure was continuously re-cordedthrougha Cournand needle in the femoral artery. Theentire experiment was monitored with an oscilloscope, and permanent records were obtained with a
direct-*Submitted for publication January 10, 1964; ac-cepted May 15, 1964.
Supported by the Herman C. Krannert Fund, the In-diana Heart Association, InIn-diana State Board of Health, in part by U. S. Public Health Service training grant
5363, and in part with facilities provided by cardiovas-cular clinical research grant H-6308 from the National Heart Institute, U. S. Public Health Service.
t
Work doneastrainee of the National Heart Institute.writing electrocardiograph using standard lead II
con-nections. Frequent determinations of arterial plasma K were made with a Beckman flame photometer.
Increasing amounts of acetylcholine were injected
through the catheter for 15 seconds until a total amount
was reached that consistently induced second or third degree AV block. With an electric interval timer this
amount of acetylcholine was then given every 2 min-utes without interruption throughout the experiment.
Four to eight injections of this dose were made in normokalemic dogs, and the effect on the duration of
R-R, Q-T intervals and the amplitude of the T waves
was measured before the appearance of AV block and
after AV block appeared. ST-T segment
position
andconfiguration were also observed. The plasma K levels
were then elevated by the infusion of a buffered iso-tonic (155 mEq per L) solution of K phosphate in dis-tilled water administered at a rate of 0.5 to 1.0 mEqper minute through a femoral vein catheter. The effect on
the ECG was evaluated as above with
acetylcholine
in-jection in these hyperkalemic animals. As a control
study, identical experiments were carried out with the
substitution of isotonic buffered sodium phosphate for the K solution.
Results
The
amount
of acetylcholine that
was
adminis-tered
averaged
0.295
mg
per
15-second
injection,
with
arange
of 0.096
to
0.955
from
experiment
to
experiment. As pointed
out
in
anearlier
com-munication, this variation
from
experiment
toex-periment
may
have been due,
among
other factors,
to
the placement of the catheter
in
relation
tothe
coronary
ostia resulting
in
unequal
perfusion
of
the
two coronary
arteries
(7,
8).
In
8
of 11 experiments, when the
plasma
K
was
normal, acetylcholine
had
adefinite effect
on
the
amplitude of the
T wave of
the
ECG within 5
to10
seconds
after
the
startof
injection
and before
the
appearance
of AV block (p
<
0.01).
In
the
remaining
three
experiments
(274, 275, 276-1),
before
appearance
of AV block
nochange
in
height
of T wave was
measurable, but
achange
C. FISCH S. B. KNOEBEL, AND H. FEIGENBAUM
0
in U00 0) 00
00 00
N1 00 CN 00
00~~~
00 oo N 0
0-00 0- 0
00 00°
20 000",
000000 ~C0 00 o 0_
0- 00 o- 00
I-00 CN 0 0 0 r-8
en000 000 L00
M0000 r-N
t.C00 .- ON
o 00- 00 ce,
- N N
00f oO0.o00*0 l- 00 0N0NO0 NN S- N
--0
o00o0-0iC 00
0 0N0N t 0
U 0. o0.0. C.00*
C'i0 0000nC_
-000 00 c c. o °. t0 o °:0c. N-- °ON
Nc_2 N.- C4N 002Vi , _.o _
--0- Ntv
Ni
0x 0
00 N NOcN
Neic; N.
60 6000
N .-, NNtvsONt'
N
t N~ NNNNs.
I;C;oCoo
0000 eq 00)
6000
!4.. 2020 ,20200-0-^
66 6666oo
N NNNv20
00000 00000w
0 00 0000
NX1 l2000>
00 000 00000000bt
6 66 6666O
-- 0
60 o
C; .; C
NO 4 N N1N C;6 00 N N C4 CS4 20 CS! el! 0 0 .c 20 00 0 00 C) 0 0 o0 0 0 20N 20 20 0 ONO 0000 0 C- 00 0 0 0 (N 200 rl. OR c000 0 0 ~c CS 0 00 02, 00 00 0) N z o, or)
00a, 00icc
00 CM
-02
20o
0000
0 000
002000
M o.N
o0 CO
It0
00 2020000c 000
V) ~o so\,C 0o _1 U)V
C11
V: o CS!Vo o o o o °. _CS4 _CS4-ve, '. (1
tV) If"
,_ V, *- 0 0 _o
-00 6 O0 00 _) 6 66 6 66
00 00 0r
.~2 4.
O 0
0 00
20 00 00
O00000
6 66C o6
6 _;C;
0
C1
00-0, 00
0I-I- OCN4
000000tr 0 0
006 -0C00
C 1o
000o C 0_000.O V
0000C ON tN
N NN N NS
NN N SN - 1NN
02C0 0 00 20t
NNS S SNNNN NNC
66 66sO 66
\00 90
00
t-O0 (2
O; C;O 00O000 000 00 0 204.- 4-. 0
00c c02C 0000 0it',
66; C66
00 00 2C 02 0e00 0000v
0
C0
C; 0
NI 90 000 O- _0N20C t00-0 o-0) 000020N)N,O .10 00 000 000)000 N0 0t+- e0000200 00e2 N- e00000 NC- 0020- 0000
O0 00 0a
r- t_
t-C1 IN C1 00
00 o0
el- CN CN
cd CZ .2 V, 0 ._ C. 0*-.0 C~t * O9
1770
00 00 t 100in z00 b40 j~00 bo 1S t S Y 0 00 20 0 a, r-o °.z o~O Cg
0)0 60C 0UN biCN
N0 C 000
e- IrI 0
00 u00
t- r-_ tr, W U) U) 0 0 0 C, H 0 S CO 0 00 c 0 .0 C 0 ._ C 0J 0 0 ¢ C. 0 V-) -0 -._ U -_I tN -0) -0 0) 0) ENz 0.2 a) EN 0) 0s 00 0.2
="Z
0W V--! 0e od I tJ 0 0 .11,-.4 3..t.) V.2 .".Q I.-el --!.-.d uC, r..2 ,Z:.0 z
2¢0<
0 a.0 =0 S o 02:4 0)0 0.0.t'002 tNN
- NNl ~
00 00C1 20- Clt 00 666 202 0020o 0 ON 00
00c 0000
o - -, en
0o 00 0 0
-1
6 6 00 00t6l
t 6 6l 6
11" lS el!
0 0
1771
ACETYLCHOLINE AND REPOLARIZATION OF THE HEART
TABLEII
Change in amplitude of T wave due to acetylcholine
Differencebetween
Normal plasma K (A) ElevatedplasmaK(B)* A and B Before AVblock During AVblock Before AV block During AV block Before During
Experi- AV AV
meant K Control Change Change K Control Change Change block block
mEq/L mm mm % mm % mEq/L mm Momm ag mm % % S 274 3.5 2.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 5.8 1.0 0.5 50 6.0 600 50 600 275 4.2 2.0 0.0 0 1.0 50 5.6 1.0 0.0 0 2.0 200 0 150 276 2.4 2.0 1.0 50 5.0 1.5 1.25 117 67
276-1 4.1 2.5 0.0 0 0.2 8 7.1 2.3 0.7 30 1.2 52 30 44 277 3.6 3.0 1.0 33 3.0 100 8.4 4.0 5.0 125 10.0 250 92 150 278 3.7 1.2S 0.5 40 0.75 60 6.8 0.75 0.75 100 1.25 167 60 107 278-1 2.7 1.0 0.5 50 0.75 75 7.5 1.25 0.75 60 2.75 220 10 145 279 3.0 0.75 0.5 66 5.4 1.0 2.0 200 134
281 2.6 3.3 0.3 10 1.0 30 7.3 4.0 2.0 50 6.2 155 40 125 282 4.2 0.75 0.25 33 7.8 2.0 3.5 175 142
285 4.3 1.5 1.5 100 8.0 2.5 5.5 220 120
Mean 1.82 0.5 34.5 0.96 46 1.94 2.40 102 4.2 235 68 189
SD 1.87 :10.49 ±32.0 40.98 ±36 ±1.17 ±2.00 ±73 +3.3 ±173 ±49 4195
p <0.01 <0.001 <0.001 <0.05 *Highestplasma K at which acetylcholineinducedAVblock.
ples K
5.5
mEq/L
_._ .
X--I4r
USA
::::I-:I.. I I: . I':
i-K-;Y'I-Exp.
JI. 'I
1 i
IIA-P'iVI!
[:v A" .1 tA .4
A A
4JkI
K
4.3
mEqLm_
...
,7,,_ ..._._ __,..,... _ _ . . ., _. _ ._
,.7 7.,....,.,. __
A B
FIG. 1. THE EFFECT OF ACETYLCHOLINE IN TWO NORMOKALEMIC DOGS (EXPERIMENTS 276, 285) AND ONE WITH AN ELEVATED PLASMA K (EXPERIMENT 277). The T-wave
changes
areindependent
of theheart rate or alteration of the QRS complex. The stripsin columns A and B were obtained before and during injection of acetylcholine. The dose of the drug was
0.30, 0.61,
and 0.09 mg in experiments 277, 276, and 285,re-spectively.
Inexperiments
276 and 285, in addition to T-wave changes, the P wavesbecame
diphasic,
the Ta segmentelevated, and the P-R interval prolonged.I
AlArL.-JAI-Al
F- lw"R- WERIN A%Jvjwio .
-,.. 1-1 .1
w"q 0 WI
I
7777:...
:,
:.--:-.j
I---: I- I::::::-, : --S"
Exp.
M
K
3.4mEq/L
V 1
71:
.--j
t s*4 @
s: -:.
UIL---I
W-Ullr--Wwq.
t t
Exp. 965
i*.I
^..L:--.
1at-.
.!r,
.::.. --'I- in 'TC. FISCH S. B. KNOEBEL, AND H. FEIGENBAUM
in configuration
was noted. In all 11 experimentsT-wave amplitude
was altered byacetylcholine
after plasma
K was elevated (p <0.001). Thepercentage
of
change in
T-waveamplitude
pro-duced by acetylcholine
was greater in all caseswhen
the animals
werehyperkalemic than that
demonstrated in normokalemic dogs (p
<0.001).
The alteration in T
wave wasindependent
ofbloodpressure
and the R-R interval. There
was nosig-nificant change in the Q-T interval.
In
sevenexperiments AV block
wasproduced
by acetylcholine
atboth normal and elevated
plasma K levels.
The acetylcholine effect
onT-wave amplitude during AV block
wasalso
con-sistently augmented
by increased plasma K levels
(p
<0.05).
In
three
experiments acetylcholine injection
re-sulted in a shift
of
the ST segments. Thesechanges
were accentuatedby elevation of plasma
K.
The effect
of acetylcholine
atdifferent
Klevels
on
the
heart
rate,amplitude of the T
waves,Q-T
interval, and blood
pressure forall
11
experi-ments
is presented in Tables I and II.
Figure 1 (experiments 277, 276, 285) is
anex-ample of the effect of acetylcholine
onthe T
wavein
twonormokalemic animals
(276, 285) and in
onein
which the plasma K
waselevated
(277).
The strips
onthe left show the
ECG before
in-jection of acetylcholine.
The
ones onthe
right
were
recorded during the injection of
acetylcho-line and
immediately before the
appearanceof
AV block.
An increase in amplitude of T
wavesis noted in all three strips.
In addition
apro-longation of P-R interval is evident.
In
experi-ments
266 and 285 the P
wavebecame diphasic
and the P-Ta
segmentelevated.
No change in
shape
orduration of QRS
nor anymeasurable
change in the
durationof the
QT
interval wasobserved.
Thisfigure
also demonstrates thatthe
effect
of acetylcholine
onthe T
waveis
inde-pendent
of the heart rate.PLASMA K 3.6MEQ/L
-1i .. . .
.. .1 .-1
'______
Fl
-I
-X
:lT -.1 --A
PLASMAK 8.4MEQ/L
I
PLASMAK 6.6 !I
!LKL~h
1
I1
J
1,1 11
1.
1 I,li
ly
-1.1
1'1 1:
TT
-L S 1.1; 1.1:.!-1' *.I.TI
I..1
LI'
II
'-1-
I1I
1:
I li
iL A
tthu-Li1
1I I I I I
II=
I1
[II
'T;:q:
I1-
1I1
1'
J.J.I.1- 1::
I! -1
1
'i
III
I, I1II
-:-' iii
FIG. 2. CONTINUOUS TRACINGS OF THREE SEPARATE INJECTIONSOF0.30 MG OF ACETYLCHOLINE AT DIFFERENT PLASMA LEVELS OF K. The beginning of each strip signifies the onset of injection. Prompt alteration of the T wave is
evi-dent, and this alteration is exaggerated by elevating the plasma K. In addition, the effect of acetylcholine on P
and Ta is augmented by raising the plasma K.
lI11 ! 11
'I1I I11:
il .I
- EXP. 277
-I
'L
L
-
i I-iHI-MEQ/L
4-l_ = !|!.
1 11l
I-1--1I
ljl-!
OSA
AN11
I
",-- 1,-,f I -1 1. .1 .1
1
Al
1-1 1.- 61-1 1.14
I. L.-.-.t--lI
01
-1k I'll- 11 I I 11 I 1!.1 i
ll. .:a
I. 1: :::.i.: L i:
J,
..11
:, 1.
I.:
li A
..ULMLL
-Il
lF
1772
i-''.1''-1'1'1- 4 I.
.T11
I.1 ! [--1 --r
1F-1 1!H 1IT l -,-I -l ;l I F- It -I-, I l,
,.,
..
Ello
-A k-'A
1::V.
.7',W
"H,
1 -,'V
F
,I'
i-I-I,,77-
--_
l7
Ii
.i._T]_
i,; ,Il I
..- :A
I!
14
ACETYLCHOLIN'E AN'D REPOLARIZATION OF THE HEART
-Ir
A
tVo
X mmW 7UdJUwiJUq
d11773
=-.A.--4I-l-ji :1-1: t-Vhf la
|-": V o
-I-J.
* .-i:-. * @14AlV^-x*-=++ v -, s-., o-***--_-:
s-T.:-w6--nwO-n
w-i:,I:
an-..tA B C D
FIG. 3. MOREDETAILED REPRESENTATION OF THECHANGES DESCRIBED IN FIGURE 2. Rows A, B, C, and D
are representativeof tracings recordedat the start of
acetylcholine injection,
justbefore appearance of AV block, during the AV block, and immediately after disappearance of the block.K~~~~~~~.
'I '_1. H~:
K .E_d -.-.
-It'-1-I Il.I__:.- =- 7:7_ iil&_
5.L- 1 : -- i -T
5.5 H -. --:- - - A
I.-1.-1:1 - --
-A S C
FIG. 4. THE ACCENTUATION OF T-WAVE NEGATIVITY (EXPERIMENT 282) AND ELEVATION OF S-T
SEG-MENT (EXPERIMENT 279) AFTER INJECTION OF0.09AND0.12 MG OFACETYLCHOLINE, RESPECTIVELY. The ef-fect of acetylcholine on the T wave in experiment 282 was accentuated by raising the plasma K to 7.8 mEq per L. Similarly the shift of S-T segment in experiment 279 was augmented by elevating the plasma K to 5.5 mEq per L.
I
3
C. FISCH S. B. KNOEBEL, AND H. FEIGENBAUM
Figure
2 (experiment 277) shows continuousrecordings
during three separate injections ofacetylcholine. The
injectionsweremadeatplasmaK of 3.6, 8.4, and 6.6
mEq per L, respectively.In addition
tothe
previously described effect ofacetylcholine
when the plasma K is normal (toptracing), the augmentation
of the acetylcholineeffect
onthe
T waveat an elevated plasma K levelis
demonstrated.
The
accentuation of the T-waveamplitude is evident
before and after appearanceof
acetylcholine-induced
AV block. The heartrate
during AV block
was the same in all threeinjections.
The
mostmarked
T-wave change isevident
ataplasma K level
of8.4
mEqper Lwith
lesser alterations
at aplasma
K of 6.6 mEq perL.The alteration of P and
Ta segment also is mostpronounced
atthe higher plasma
Klevel.
The
changes described in Figure
2 arepresented
ingreater
detail in Figure
3,where
rows A,B,
C,and D
arerepresentative
sections
oftracings
re-corded before
acetylcholine
injection, just before
the
appearanceofAV block, during the
AV block,and
immediately after disappearance of the block.
In Figure 4 the strips shown in
rowsA,
B,
and
C were
recorded
atthe
start, atthe end, and 10
seconds after infusion
wasstopped.
Experiment
282 shows that with elevation of plasma K
to7.8
mEq
per Lacetylcholine
accentuates thebiphasic
nature
of
the T wave(row B).
Experiment 279
is
anexample of
anobservation made in 3 of the
11
experiments
inwhichacetylcholine,
inaddition
to
increasing
theheight
of the Twave, shifted S-Tsegment. This
elevation
was moststriking
whenthe
plasma
Kwasraised.
Discussion
The
data show
thatacetylcholine
wheninjected
just
above the aortic valves of the normokalemicdog
had ameasurable
effect on theamplitude
ofthe Twave of the surface
ECG
in 8 of 11experi-ments, and in 3 the
configuration
of the T wavechanged.
The measurement of the T-waveam-plitude during
infusionof
acetylcholine
isattimesdifficult
because of the appearance of Tasegment,
a shift
of
J point,
and alteration in contour andposition
of ST segment. In eachexperiment
theeffect of
acetylcholine
on the T wave wasaug-mented
by increasing
theplasma
Klevel. T-wavechanges
may be due either to altered conductionvelocity
or to primary change in the
duration
of
repolarization.
In our
experiments
the
configura-tion and duraconfigura-tion
of the QRS
remained
un-changed,
and for this reason the alteration in
height
and
configuration
of the T wave is primary
and indicative
of
accelerated repolarization.
The
variation in magnitude
of T-wave
change
from
experiment
to
experiment
may be
due
to an
un-even
effect
of
acetylcholine
on
repolarization
of
the
ventricle.
The failure
of
the
QT interval to change in our
experiments might result from
uneven
perfusion
of the
myocardium
or,
if
perfusion
were
uniform,
from
aninhomogeneous effect
on
repolarization
(9, 10) of the ventricle.
The
failure
to
register
change of the Q-T interval,
on
the
other hand,
may
be
due
to
lack
of sufficient
sensitivity
and fine
resolution of the recording
instrument.
It
should
be
noted, however, that the Q-T interval did
notincrease despite reduction of the heart
rate
due
to
AV
block.
Although the surface ECG does
not
give precise
information
as
to
the
electrical behavior of the
cell, it is the differential
quotient
of the
mono-phasic action potentials
of
the cardiac fibers
(11-13); thus,
our
results
might
be
assumed
toindi-cate
aneffect
of
acetylcholine
onthe
mammalian
ventricle.
As
suggested by
Hecht
(13),
altera-tion of R-T
junction
and
RS-T
segment may
be
related
to
change in the first
phase
of
recovery
and alteration of the
T
wavetomodification of the
duration of the slope of the final
recovery
process
(phase
3).
The
clear
demonstration
of the effect of
acetyl-choline
onrepolarization
in
ourexperiments
is
in
contrast
toobservations
of
previous
workers.
The discrepancy
canperhaps
be
explained by
the
technique of intracoronary
injection
in
the
in-tact
animal.
The
possibility
mustalso
be
con-sidered
that,
in
the
intact
animal,
liberation of
other effector substances such
ascatecholamines
from
the
storeswithin
the
heart itself contributed
to
ST-T
changes
observed
in
ourexperiments
(14).
It may also
be
that for
anacetylcholine
effect
onthe action
potentials
of
ventricle
tobe-come
manifest,
the
proper K
environment needs
to be
present.
If
acetylcholine
affects the
re-polarization phase
of the action
potential
by
in-creasing
K
permeability,
the
importance
of
suffi-cient
K
is
implied
(15-19).
ACETYLCHOLINE AND REPOLARIZATION OF THE HEART
A discussion of the changes noted in atrial
re-polarization in
our
experiments is
not
pertinent;
they
may inpart
be
due
to
change in
atrial
con-ductivity
asindicated by alteration
in
appearanceand
duration
of
the
P wave.
Summary
Acetylcholine has
been
shown
to
alter
the
re-polarization of
the ventricles in the
intact dog.
This
effect
is
augmented
by raising the plasma
level
of
potassium.
References
1. Burn, J. H., E. M. V. Williams, and J. M. Walker.
The effects ofacetylcholine in the heart-lung prep-aration including the production of auricular fibril-lation. J.Physiol. (Lond.) 1955, 128,277.
2. Loomis, T. A., and S. Krop. Auricular fibrillation induced and maintained in animals byacetylcholine
or vagal stimulation. Circulat. Res. 1955, 3, 390. 3. Cranefield,- P. F., B. F. Hoffman, and A. P. de
Carvalho. Effects of acetylcholine on single fibers of the atrioventricular node. Circulat. Res. 1959,
7, 19.
4. Hoffman, B. F., and P. F. Cranefield.
Electrophysi-ology of the Heart. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1960, pp. 56, 86, 277.
5. Rothschuh, K. E. Electrophysiologie des Herzens. Darstelling, Kritie, Probleme. Darmstadt, Verlag Dr. 0. Steinkopff, 1952.
6. Hoffman, B. F., and E. E. Suckling. Cardiac cel-lular potentials: effect of vagal stimulation and
acetylcholine. Amer. J. Physiol. 1953, 173, 312.
7. Fisch, C., H. Feigenbaum, and J. A. Bowers. The inhibition of acetylcholine-induced atrioventricular
block by potassium. J. clin. Invest. 1963, 42, 563.
8. James, T. N. Anatomy of the Coronary Arteries,
New York, Paul B. Hoeber, 1961, p. 162. 9. Schaefer, H., and H. G. Haas. Handbook of
Physi-ology. Circulation. Baltimore, Williams and Wil-kins, 1962, p. 382.
10. Han, J., and G. K. Moe. Nonuniform recovery of
excitability of ventricular muscle. Circulat. Res. 1964, 14, 44.
11. Eyring, H., and R. Parlin. Some molecular aspects of heart behavior. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1957, 65,679.
12. Hecht, H. H. Some observations on theories
con-cerning the electrical behavior of heart muscle. Amer. J. Med. 1961, 30, 720.
13. Hecht, H. H. Normal and abnormal transmembrane potentials of the spontaneously beating heart. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1957, 65, 700.
14. Hoffmann, F., E. Hoffmann, S. Middleton, and J. Talesnik. The stimulating effect of acetylcholine on the mammalian heart and the liberation of an epinephrine-like substance by the isolated heart. Amer. J. Physiol. 1945, 144, 189.
15. Holland, W. C., C. E. Dunn,and M. E. Greig. Stud-ies on permeability, VIII. Role of acetylcholine
metabolism in the genesis of the electrocardiogram. Amer. J. Physiol. 1952, 170, 339.
16. Hodgkin, A. L., and R. D. Keynes. The potassium
permeability of a giant nerve fibre. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 1955, 128, 61.
17. Hodgkin, A. L., and P. Horowicz. The influence
of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane
potential of single muscle fibres. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 1959, 148, 127.
18. Hutler, 0. F., and D. Noble. Rectifying properties
of heart muscle. Nature (Lond.) 1960, 188, 495. 19. Harris, E.J.,and0.F. Hutler. The action of acetyl-choline on the movements of potassium ions in the sinus venosus of the heart. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 1956, 133, 58.