• No results found

Capsule Process Validation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Capsule Process Validation"

Copied!
28
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by FORMULATION :

PRODUCT NAME : LINE :

REASON FOR PERFORMING THE VALIDATION STUDY :

Reason ( tick which ever is applicable) Remarks Department

New product

Modification in the manufacturing process.

Change in Facility and / or location of manufacturing. Batch fail to meet product & process specifications.

Number of batches studied: ________________ Batch numbers: 1. _______________ 2.. _______________ 3. _______________

Validation activity authorized By:

_____________________________Date:_______________________

Validation Team:

DEPARTMENT VALIDATION TEAM

PRODUCTION

QUALITY ASSURANCE

QUALITY CONTROL

REMARKS:

(2)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by APPROVALS:

DEPARTMENT SIGN & DATE PRODUCTION QUALITY ASSUARANCE QUALITY CONTROL PRODUCT DEVLOPMENT ENGINEERING 1.0 GENERAL: 1.1 INTRODUCTION:

The process validation will be performed as prospective validation. The complete documentation for the validation comprises several independent documents, references to relevant documents will be given as part of this protocol, (see below). The results of the validation activities will be summarized in the validation report.

1.2 List of Documents for Validation:

 Validation protocol,

 Details of sampling for the validation batches, test parameters ( Product

performance characteristics) with reference to test methods & Acceptance criteria. (acceptable Limit)

 Methods for recording / evaluating results including statistical analysis.  Reference to relevant documents.

1.2.2 Batch manufacturing records.

(3)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by 2.0 PERSSONEL RESPONSIBILITIES.

SR ACTIVITY RESPONSIBILITY REMARKS 1 Preparation of validation protocol 2 Approval of Validation protocol 3 Production of validation Batches 4 Testing of validation samples & Preparation of validation report

5 Approval of validation report.

3.0 PROCESS DESCIRPTION / FLOW SHEET

The information given below provides a general description of the process. Detailed information for the manufacturing will be supplied separately in the batch manufacturing record.

1.0 DISPENSING OF MATERIAL 2.0 SHIFTING

3.0 GRANULATION (if required). 4.0 BLENDING 5.0 MIXING 6.0 FILLING 7.0 BLISTERING/ STRIPPING/COUNTING. 3.1 FORMULATION: BATCH SIZE:

(4)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by

SR INGREDIENTS/EXCIPIENTS SPECIFICATION MG.CAPS. PER BATCH PER LOT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NOTE:

(5)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by

CAPSULE FLOW CHART

R.M.DISPENSING SHIFTING GRANULATION (IF REQUIRED) COMPECT (IF REQUIRED) MILLING (IF REQUIRED) FILLING

BLISTER/ STRIP PACKING/ COUNTING MIXING FINAL PACKING QUARANTINE F.G.STORE BULK ANALYSIS QUARANTINE

FINISHED PRODUCT ANALYSIS 1. MIXING TIME 2. SPEED

BLENDING 1. MIXING TIME

2. SPEED

1.0 WEIGHT VERIATION

(6)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by 4.0 EQUIPMENT / FACTORY.

A detailed list of equipment used for validation together with the cleaning status will be provided in the manufacturing documents.

4.1 LIST OF SOP’S , VALIDATION & QUALIFICATION REPORT USED AS REFERENCES=

SR ID. NUMBER TITLE VERIFIED BY

DATE

1. Equipment cleaning procedure for Master sifter #20,#40 2. Equipment operating procedure for Master sifter #20,#40 3. Equipment cleaning procedure for Rapid mixer

granulator.

4. Equipment operating procedure for Rapid mixer granulator.

5. Equipment cleaning procedure for Octagonal Blender. 6. Equipment operating procedure for Octagonal blender. 7. Equipment cleaning procedure for capsule filling

machine.

8. Equipment operating procedure for capsule filling machine.

9. Equipment cleaning procedure for capsule polishing & Checking machine.

10. Equipment operating procedure for capsule polishing & Checking machine.

11. Equipment cleaning procedure for strip packing machine. 12. Equipment operating procedure for strip packing

machine.

13. Equipment cleaning Procedure for Blister Packing machine.

14. Equipment operating procedure for Blister Packing machine.

15. Equipment cleaning procedure for Cap counting machine 16. Equipment operating procedure for Cap counting

(7)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by 4.2 DETAILS OF EQUIPMENT TO BE USED.

EQUIPMENT DETAILS SIFTING : TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY: MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: M.O.C. BLENDER: TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY: MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: M.O.C. MIXER : TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY: MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: M.O.C. MILLING TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY: MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: machine

17. Equipment cleaning procedure for Fluid Bed Dryer. 18. Equipment operating procedure for Fluid Bed Dryer. 19. Enter any other reference sop.

(8)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by M.O.C. DRYING TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY: MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: M.O.C. CAPSULE FILLING MACHINE: TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY: MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: M.O.C. CAPSULE POSISHING &

CHECKING MACHINE TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY: MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: M.O.C. STRIP PACKING MACHINE: TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY: MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: M.O.C. BLISTER PACKING MACHINE: TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY:

(9)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: M.O.C. CAPSULE COUNTING MACHINE TYPE : MODEL: CAPACITY: MANUACTURER: TAG.NO.: REMARKS:

(10)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by

4.3 IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL PROCESS VARIBLES/ PARAMETER.

4.3.1 PROBABLE CAUSES THAT MAY EFFECT FINAL PRODUCT:

MATERIAL SIFTING

MIXING AIR DRYING

BLENDING GRANULATION ( IF REQUIRED) FILLING EXCIPIENT ACTIVE LOAD SIZE MIXER SPEED MIXER SPEED WEIGHT LEAK TEST POLISHING STRIPING/ BLISTERING/COUNTING

(11)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by CRITICAL PROCESS PARAMETERS (CPP’s) :

SR CRITICAL PROCESS VARIABLE RESPONSE PARAMETER REMARKS 1. Granulation 2. BLENDING Blend uniformity

Fixed order of addition

Sequence of excipient

addition

Fixed batch size

Load blending vessel. Fixed, no variation of blending speed.

Blending time Variation of blending time

3. FILLING

Weight of capsule

Weight uniformity

Fixed weight as per label claim

Locking length.

Capsule filling speed Fixed , no variation of filling speed.

D.T.

4. STRIPING/BLISTERING/COUNTING

Leak test Leakage No leakage

(12)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by Critical process variable (CPV):

SR PROCESS / VARIABLE MACHINE SETTING (CONTROL VARIABLES) REMARKS

1 Mixing Mixing time

Setting and conditions as mentioned in the batch manufacturing record to be followed.

2 Filling Speed, locking 3 Stripping/ blistering Leak test, speed.

(13)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by 5.0 SAMPLING , TEST PARAMETERS, ACCEPTANCE CIRTERIA

5.1 Sampling Locations:

Side view:

Top view:

Sampling location in blender 1 2 3 1 2 3

(14)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by 5.3 SAMPLING STAGE/ TEST PARAMETER SAMPLING ( SIZE,LOCATION,TIME) REMARKS MIXING ASSAY

After 20 min of mixing time  N=3 samples at each interval  Sample size: 1.0 – 1.5 g CAPSULE FILLING Appearance Weight of 20 caps. Weight variation Disintegration time

Draw the sample at interval of 30 min. during Filling .

 N=____ sample  Sampling : at start,

every two hours, immediately after the brake time , end of filling..

 Sample size:_____

Each sample comprises the amount for the different tests required.

STAGE / TEST PARAMETER EQUIPMENT ( SIZE , LOCATION TIME) ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA MIXING ASSAY

Sampling thief:  Assay 95 % to 105 %  Rel. std. : < 3.0 % CAPSULE FILLING Appearance Weight of 20 caps. Visual inspection, Analytical balance As specified in the BMR.

(15)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by Weight variation

Disintegration time

Assay:

Analytical balance

DT apparatus with water at

37 + 10C, with discs.

NMT ____minutes.

___________

6.0 RECORDING OF DATA & DATA TREATMENT

DATA RECORDING SHEET NO.

1. For recording mixing assay observation & results

2. For recording blending observations & results.

3. For recording Drying observation & results.

4. For recording filling observations and results

5. For recording polishing observation and results

6. For recording blister / stripping/ counting observation and record.

7. For recording general utilities /equipment / method Analytical /results.

8. For recording analytical method validation.

9. For recording blister / stripping/counting observation and record.

10. For recording general utilities /equipment / method Analytical /results.

(16)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by 6.1DATA RECORDING

The data obtained from the various analysis & observations shall be recorded in

the DATA RECORDING SHEET for first three commercial batches.

DATA RECORDING SHEET #1 SIFTING:

Equipment Name :_________________________

Identification no :_________________________ Date:___________________

Sieves : _________________________

Integrity of the sieve (before): ___________________ (After)__________________ MIXING :

Equipment name :_______________________

Identification no :_______________________ Date:____________________

Capacity : ______________________lt.

DRYING:

Equipment Name :_______________________ Date:___________________ Identification No :_______________________

Ingredients and sequence of material addition: ____________________ Total weight of ingredients : _______________kg/lot.

Mixing time: 20 minutes Setting – Mixer: slow Granulator : OFF

Procedure : As outlined in the batch manufacturing record.

Plan : Samples to be drawn at of 20 minutes of mixing from 3 different locations FOR DRY MIXING RESULTS. BATCH NO:

Sample no: 1 2 3 Average std.Dev. Range RSD LCL UCL

(17)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by

POINTS

Method of analysis adopted Ref No.:

Anlyst: Date

Meet acceptance criteria. YES ( ) NO ( )

CONCLUSIONS:_______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________

(18)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by DATE RECORDING SHEET #2

BLENDING:

Equipment name: OCTAGONAL BLENDER Identification no:

_____________________________Date:_________________________ Capacity :______________________lt.

Ingredients & sequence of material addition:__________

Procedure : as outlined in the batch manufacturing record.

Plan : Samples to be drawn at intervals of 20 minutes of mixing from top , middle, bottom and pool sample.

Lubrication results BATCH NO: ______________________ Sample no: 1 2 3 4( POOL) Average std.Dev. Range RSD LCL UCL

Method of analysis adopted Ref No.:

Anlyst: Date

Acceptance criteria 95 % TO 105 %

(19)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by

CONCLUSIONS:_________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________

(20)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by DATA RECORDING SHEET# 3

Equipment Name: Capsule filling machine

Identification Name : ___________________________________ Date:____________________

Ejection side: Left /Right Sample no: B/M/E BATCH NO:

APPEARANCE Visual inspection

As specified in the B.M.R. WEIGHT OF 20 capsule Analytical balance

WEIGHT VARIATION Analytical balance

DISINTEGRATION TIME DT apparatus with water at 37 + 20 C , with discs.

ASSAY 95 % TO 105 %

TEST APPEARANCE AV.WT. ( MG) WT. Variation ( MG) D.T (sec) Assay ( %) Sample qty. (Beginning sample) Middle sample End sample Avg. X X X S.D. X X X R.S.D. complies X X X

(21)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by REMARKS:

________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________

(22)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by DATA RECORDING SHEET # 4

Equipment Name : POLISHING & CHECKING MACHINE

Identification no: ________________________________

Date:______________________

Speed:____________________

Sample no: Average wt Polishing B

M E

Acceptance criteria : _________________to____________________mg.

Meets Acceptance criteria : yes/ no

Conclusion: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________ Checked by ;___________________________Date_________________________

(23)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by DATA RECORDING SHEET # 5

Equipment Name : BLISTER/STRIP/SCORPIO COUNTING MACHINE

Identification no: ________________________________

Date:______________________

Speed:____________________

Sample no: Leak test Coding

Acceptance criteria : _________________to____________________mg.

Meets Acceptance criteria : yes/ no

Conclusion: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________ Checked by ;___________________________Date_________________________

(24)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by DATA RECORDING SHEET # 5

SR NAME OF CRITICAL EQUIPMENT/UTILITIES QUALIFICATION/ VALIDATION FILE REF.NO. DATE OF QUALIFICATION / VALIDATION 1 Master sifter

2 Rapid mixer granulator

3 Double cone blender

4 Empty gelatin capsule feeder

5 Capsule filling machine

6 Empty capsule shorting machine

7 Empty capsule shorting machine

8 Strip packing machine

UTILITIES: 1 AHU SYSTEM 2 WATER SYSTEM 3 COMPRESSED AIR 4 STEAM 5 LIGHTNING 6 DRAIN

(25)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by DATA RECORDING SHEET # 6

NAME OF PRODUCT: SR Parameters Type of sample Actual reading Observed reading Analysis performed by Analysis checked by Ref. Work sheet 1 Accuracy % Recovery of known amount. Sample A(known amount of analysis. 90 % of A 110 % of A 2 Precision Repeatability ( under same condition ) Test by same analyst at same time from same homogenous validated mass but from different sample plan ( by taking sample of different quantity) Sample A1 ( from one sample point) Sample A2 ( from second sample point) Sample A3 ( from third sample point) 3 Reproducibility under different conditions. Sample A1 On ______

(26)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by Test by different analyst on different days. Sample A2 On ______ Sample A3 On ______ 4 Linearity and range Response concentration curve on graph paper. 25 % of A 50 % of A 75 % of A 100 % of A 125 % of A

(27)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by SR Parameters Type of sample Actual reading Observed reading Analysis performed by Analysis checked by Ref. Work sheet 5 Specificity/ selectivity( by larger communication of analytical method.) for identification of impurities assay of active component etc…Temp & humidity / degradation factored to main ingredients by 15 min, 30 min,45 min or known degraded products. Sample A1 15 min. degradation Sample A2 30 min. degradation Sample A3 45 min. degradation 6 Limit of detection ( LOD) & limit of quantitative (LOQ) Qualitative & Quantitative result 0.1 % of A 1% of A 5 % of A 10 % of A 20 % of A 7 Analysis method (for non pharmacopoeial Method A Method B

(28)

Company Name & Address

PROCESS VALIDATION PROTOCOL

(CAPSULE)

PROTOCOL NO: DATE OF EFFECTIVE

Prepared by Checked by Approved by to be performed

by other public lab.

Method C

REMARKS:

1. Specifically / selectivity analysis(4) and Reproducibility (2B) also given raggedness and robustness.

2. Limit of Quantitative (5) also gives sensitivity of test procedure.

Above procedure to be repeated over three batches to get minimum nine variables for each parameter.

References

Related documents

North Indian musicians use the claps to designate the measures, vibhag which are highly stressed.. The most stressed measure is the beginning of

Berinde, “Quadruple fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces,” Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis, vol. Luong, “Quadruple

25.107 or that all entities with whom the Applicant has a contractual relationship to purchase power are registered with or certified by the independent organization and comply with

There are several reasons that insurance companies should consider allowing an allocation to BBB-rated corporates and the higher credit quality spectrum of the high-yield

Couples where female partners reported using other illicit drugs (not including marijuana or injection drug use) in the past 90 days were more likely to have protected sex (OR =

Whichever way you choose to do the programme, you will become part of a unique global community of 1,000+ degree participants and 40,000+ alumni living in 160+ countries..

The observed limiting current density, which represents the rate of steel metal corrosion in phosphoric acid, at 25 ºC, decrease with increasing the concentration of the

Error bars indicate standard errors of the means (n = 3-5).. Bar charts depicting seasonal changes of a) nitrogen per unit leaf area (N area ) and b) carbon per 16.. unit leaf mass