• No results found

Calculating School Capacity:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Calculating School Capacity:"

Copied!
60
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Calculating

Calculating

Calculating

School Capacity:

Calculating

School Capacity:

School Capacity:

School Capacity:

Local, State & National

presented by:

Amy Yurko, AIA

[email protected]

&

Perspectives

Peter Brown, AIA, LEED AP

[email protected]

Mary Cary, AIA

Anchorage School District

p

(2)

workshop agenda

p g

ƒ

Introductions

à

who & why

à

learning objectives

ƒ

Capacity

ƒ

Capacity

à

variables

à

definitions

ƒ

Utilization

à

teaching stations

g

à

schedules

ƒ

Story Time

y

à

stories & challenges

(3)

workshop agenda

p g

ƒ

Perspectives

à

National

à

State

à

Local

ƒ

Addressing Constraints

à

Interpretations

à

Schedules

à

Multiple use

à

Joint use

Oth Id

à

Other Ideas

ƒ

Calculation Strategies

à

rules of thumb

à

specifics

(4)

Why Calculate School Capacity?

to enroll the right number of students in a

school facility

y

p y

school facility

or conversely

to plan a school facility that is the right

size for its intended enrollment

1. School construction funding

2. Maximize educational resources

3. Accommodate enrollments

4. Overcrowding & underutilization

5. Adjust Attendance Boundaries

(5)

School Capacity Defined

the number of students that can be

reasonably accommodated by a school,

p y f

y

y

,

building and site.

ƒ

physical variables

physical variables

ƒ

operational variables

(6)

Capacity Variables

p y

ƒ

physical variables

à

building size/area

bu d g s e/a ea

à

number/types of teaching stations

t f

iliti (kit h

l

h

t )

à

support facilities (kitchen, lunchroom, etc)

à

infrastructure

à

net to gross ratio

à

building & life-safety codes

building & life safety codes

à

site amenities

(7)

Capacity Variables

i

i

p y

ƒ

operational variables

à

utilization rates & efficiencyy

à

operational policies

à

staffing

staffing

à

funding structures

à

teacher/union regulations

à

teacher/union regulations

à

space management

t ff &

ti

l b d

t

à

staff & operational budgets

à

specialty program offerings

(8)

Capacity Variables

i

i

p y

ƒ

programmatic variables

à

class sizes & staff ratios

à

educational program offerings

ti

l d l

(t

d

i

t )

à

operational models (teams, academies, etc.)

à

specialty programs

à

schedules

à

partnerships, off-site learning, etc.

partnerships, off site learning, etc.

(9)

Capacity: A Spectrum of Definitions

p y

p

f f

ƒ

Maximum Capacity

Maximum Capacity

The total number of student “seats” in the school facility.

ƒ

Building Capacity

ƒ

Building Capacity

Also considers the extent of support facilities.

ƒ

Functional Capacity

ƒ

Functional Capacity

Also considers the desired level of schedule flexibility.

P

C

it

ƒ

Program Capacity

Also considers curriculum and program offerings.

ƒ

Temporary Capacity

(10)

Maximum Capacity

considers

id

p y

ƒ

total student “seats”

400

25 students each

25(2) 8(100%) 400/d

for example:

25 students each

used 8 of 8 periods

= 100% utilization

25(2) x 8(100%) = 400/day

or 50 at any given period

(11)

Building Capacity

g p y

considers

id

ƒ

total student “seats”

ƒ

support facilities

support facilities

400

350

such as:

such as:

systems

circulation

toilets

kitchen

library

offices

etc

etc…

(12)

Functional Capacity

considers:

id

p y

ƒ

total student “seats”

ƒ

support facilities

support facilities

ƒ

schedule flexibility

400

300

25 students each

25(2) 8(75%) 300

for example:

25 students each

used 6 of 8 periods

= 75% utilization

25(2) x 8(75%) = 300

(13)

Program Capacity

g

considers

id

p y

ƒ

total student “seats”

ƒ

support facilities

support facilities

ƒ

schedule flexibility

ƒ

program offerings

400

240

25 students regular

15 students special

25(1) 8(75%) 150

15 students special

used 6 of 8 periods

= 75% utilization

25(1) x 8(75%) = 150

15(1) x 8(75%) = 90

( )

(

)

(14)

The educationally appropriate percentage of

Utilization

The educationally appropriate percentage of

the school day that teaching stations can be

used for instruction.

1

used for instruction.

The ratio of unoccupied to occupied “seats”

1

student

The ratio of unoccupied to occupied seats

per teaching station per period.

student

1

1

seat

1

1

time

(15)

Utilization

“seat” utilization

“seat” utilization

for example:

(16)

Utilization

“seat” utilization

“seat” utilization

for example:

(17)

Utilization

R l f Th

b

higher

Rules of Thumb

higher

utilization

School Type

avg. utilization rate

equals

Elementary 95-100%

Middl /J Hi h 70 85%

tighter

Middle/Jr. High 70-85%

High

80-85%

(18)

Utilization

Example: Middle vs Junior High Schools

higher

Example: Middle vs Junior High Schools

higher

utilization

Middle School

Junior High

Teaching Stations

40

40

equals

Teaching Stations

40

40

Class Size

25

25

Periods/day

7

7

tighter

Teacher prep

Team Planning

1

1

1

0

P i d f I t

ti

5

6

scheduling

Periods of Instruction

5

6

Utilization Rate

71%

86%

Student Capacity

712

860

Student Capacity

712

860

(19)

Utilization

Example: Middle vs Junior High Schools

higher

Example: Middle vs Junior High Schools

higher

utilization

Middle School

Junior High

Student Capacity

800

800

equals

Student Capacity

800

800

Class Size

25

25

Periods/day

7

7

tighter

Teacher prep

Team Planning

1

1

1

0

P i d f I t

ti

5

6

scheduling

Periods of Instruction

5

6

Utilization Rate

71%

86%

Teaching Stations

45

37

Teaching Stations

45

37

(20)

Teaching Stations

g

what counts?

h t t ?

School Type

what counts?

What about?

Elementary

y

classrooms

Middle

classrooms

art & music

science rooms

special education

science rooms

special education

gymnasium (x1)

computer labs

High

classrooms special

education

science rooms

media center

science rooms

media center

art & music

auditorium/stage

gyms (x2)

computer labs

vocational programs pe fields

p g

p

etc…

(21)

l

i

Teaching Stations

g

average class size

School Type

average class size:

Elementary 15-25

little variety

Middle 18-25

some variety

(22)

i

f

f

iliti

f i

Case Study

comparison of facilities for science

y

Case “A”

Case A

2,780sf (2 rooms)

for 50 students

= 56 sf/student

size difference = 520sf or 11 sf/student

Case “B”

2,260sf (2 rooms)

f 50 d

for 50 students

= 45 sf/student

(23)

i

f

f

iliti

f i

Case Study

comparison of facilities for science

y

Case “A”

Case A

say 25 students each

used 6 of 8 periods

p

= 75% utilization

= 300 students/day

C

“B”

main difference = area

Case “B”

say 25 students each

d 6 f 8

i d

used 6 of 8 periods

= 75% utilization

= 300 students/day

300 students/day

(24)

i

f

f

iliti

f i

Case Study

comparison of facilities for science

y

Case “A”

Case A

say 25 students each

used 6 of 8 periods

p

= 75% utilization

or 37.5% “seat” utilization

= 300 students/day

C

“B”

seat utilization difference = 37.5%

Case “B”

say 25 students each

d 6 f 8

i d

used 6 of 8 periods

= 75% utilization

= 300 students/day

300 students/day

(25)

i

f

f

iliti

f i

Case Study

comparison of facilities for science

y

Faculty

Office

Small

Group

Prep Room

Office

Group

Case “C”

65 t d t t t l

say 65 students total

used 8 of 8 periods

=100% utilization

100% utilization

= 520 students/day

(26)

i

f

f

iliti

f i

Case Study

comparison of facilities for science

y

C

A

C

B

C

C

Case A:

200 Students

25 per Classroom

Case B:

200 Students

25 per Classroom

Case C:

200 Students

50 per Suite

p

75% Utilization

10 Classrooms

(13,900 sf total)

(excluding teacher offices &

p

75% Utilization

10 Classrooms

(11,300 sf total)

(excluding teacher offices &

p

100% Utilization

4 Suites

(11,840 sf total)

(all inclusive)

(excluding teacher offices &

(27)

Perspectives: National

p

for the median school district in the US

Elementary Schools = 70 ft

2

/student

Middle Schools

70 ft

2

/student

Middle Schools

= 70 ft

2

/student

(28)

Perspectives: National

p

for the median school district in the US

Elementary Schools = 90 ft

2

/student

Middle Schools

= 111 ft

2

/student

Middle Schools

= 111 ft

2

/student

(29)

Perspectives: National

for the median school district in the US

p

Elementary Schools = 120 ft

2

/student

Middle Schools

= 146 ft

2

/student

Middle Schools

= 146 ft

2

/student

(30)

Calculations

G

Gross Building Area – What Counts?

B ildi

A

Wh t C

t ?

lockers ?

dining/kitchen facilities ?

dining/kitchen facilities ?

overhangs & canopies ?

vertical circulation ?

toilet facilities (specific to program) ?

toilet facilities (specific to program) ?

(31)

CEFPI’s National Averages

Perspectives: North America

CEFPI’s National Averages

(gross area per student)

Average Range

p

Elementary School Buildings

Canada

104.2

74 - 133

Southern Tier of States

70.1

46 - 107

Southern Tier of States

70.1

46 107

Remaining 48 states

111.5

77 - 147

Middle School Buildings

Middle School Buildings

Canada

96.5

77 - 116

Southern Tier of States

81.2

77 - 90

Remaining 48 states

154.4

114- 212

High School Buildings

Canada

130.4

91 - 166

(32)

Perspectives: National

codes & regulations

p

- Occupancy Loading

Occupancy Loading

- Access & Egress

- Life-safety

(33)

Perspectives: State Example

Alaska Department of Education & Early

Childhood Development

p

x p

p

Elementary Schools

=114 ft

2

/student

Middle Schools

=165 ft

2

/student

Middle Schools

=165 ft /student

High Schools

=165 ft

2

/student

(34)

Perspectives: State Example

Arkansas

p

x p

Utilization

Factors*:

teaching

t ti

K-5 = 100%

6-8 = 85%

station

count

total student

population

(incl SpEd)

9-12 = 85%

*

f th

(incl. SpEd)

average

class size

for the purpose

of planning

class size

utilization

factor

Notes:

Class sizes may vary from school to school.

factor

Self-contained classrooms are in addition to

the calculated number of teaching stations.

Art Music & PE do not count as teaching

stations at the elementary level

stations at the elementary level.

(35)

Perspectives: State Example

Wyoming School Facilities Commission

p

x p

uses a

sliding scale

to recognize

remote rural

areas

(36)

Perspectives: State Example

West Virginia

p

x p

“The student

capacity of a

school

building is

affected by the

educational

program: it

changes each

ti

th

time the

program is

modified.”

(37)

Perspectives: State Example

West Virginia

p

x p

El

t

S h

l

Elementary Schools:

Calculate the number and type of classrooms using the

maximum program capacity for each regular or special

Calculating

Building

Program

maximum program capacity for each regular or special

classroom.

Assume that all students are seated in a first period block without

ll

t

Program

Capacity:

pullout programs.

Do not include library/media, cafeteria, itinerant spaces,

resource rooms, or optional academic classrooms such as art,

p

music, and computer labs that act as pullout programs to

(38)

Perspectives: State E

xa

mple

West Virginia

p

x

p

Secondary Schools:

Calculating

Building

Program

Secondary Schools:

Middle/Junior High School programs where various schedules

exist, calculate the number and type of classrooms using the

Program

Capacity:

maximum program capacity for each regular or special

classroom.

Assume for example that all students are seated in a first period

Assume for example that all students are seated in a first period

block and with the exception of library/media, science labs,

resource rooms or any space that cannot be used for other

course offerings should be included in the daily capacity of

g

y

p

y

each facility.

The maximum capacity for instructional spaces for specialty

classrooms would be counted once and this type of space may

classrooms would be counted once and this type of space may

be available throughout the school day but due to its

specialized design or equipment render it impractical to use for

other instructional purposes

(39)

Perspectives

Public High School Principals Report, 2005

p

Th

h

l th t i

i

l d

ib d

d d

d

Those schools that principals described as overcrowded used a

variety of approaches to deal with the overcrowding:

using portable classrooms (78%)

More than

half of the

principals

converting non-classroom space into classrooms (53%)

increasing class sizes (44%)

principals

reported

that their

school had

building new buildings or additions (35%)

using off-site instructional facilities (5%)

school had

fewer

students

h

h

or other approaches (12%).

than the

school’s

design

capacity.

(40)

Perspectives: Local Example

Chicago Public Schools

p

p

Overcrowdingg

Any school that exceeds 80% of its maximum capacity.

Severe Overcrowdingg

Schools that are above 100% of their maximum capacity

Underutilization

If a school falls below 65% of its maximum capacity, it is assumed to have 

excess building space. 

Programmatic Exceptions

For High Schools, CPS bases design capacity on curriculum programming. For 

instance, a Career Academy will be a larger building with larger classrooms where the 

programming of the school requires larger spaces for such needs as auto shops or

programming of the school requires larger spaces for such needs as auto shops, or 

culinary arts kitchens. So you would have more space, but not necessarily more than 

an average number of students in the school. 

(41)

Perspectives: Local Example

Chicago Public Schools

p

p

Elementary & Middle Schools

Elementary & Middle Schools

30 students  ‐

for average size classrooms (600‐1200 sq.ft.)

15 students  ‐

for less than average size classrooms (less than 600 sq. ft.)

40 students

for above average size classrooms (more than 1200 sq ft )

40 students  ‐

for above average size classrooms (more than 1200 sq. ft.) 

High Schools

CPS

fi

d t d b th

t

t ith th Chi

CPS uses figures mandated by the contract with the Chicago 

Teachers Union instead of the physical area of the classroom. 

Exclusions

spaces not originally intended as classrooms (i.e. auditoriums, 

gymnasiums, storage closets, etc.) that may currently be used as 

such

temporary facilities such as mobile units, or "demountables" as 

they are now called.

(42)

Perspectives: Local Example

District of Columbia Public Schools

p

p

i i

f

ili i

i

i l

l

d

b

l

ki

h

For existing facilities, capacity is calculated by looking at the

number of students divided by the total Building Square

Footage.

Elementary School

=150 ft

2

/student

Middle/Junior High School

=170 ft

2

/student

High School

g

=180 ft

2

/student

/

(43)

Perspectives

Case Study: DC High Schools

p

Detailed findings from this floor space analyses led to the following 

recommendations: 

(1) revise the standard specs to allow greater flexibility so that existing high 

p

g

y

g g

schools will not face a complete demolition of their interiors at 

extremely high cost; 

(2) change the floor space design standard value or eliminate its use 

altogether; 

(3) calculate the quantity of net floor space by measuring instructional and 

administrative space, thereby helping with the determination of 

enrollment capacities; 

(4) reexamine the quantity of total existing gross floor space, which is 

critical to the determination of excess space; and 

(5)

d t k

it

t di

t d t

i

h th

t

t

d

ki

th

(5) undertake site studies to determine whether structured parking or other 

improvements are possible to alleviate site constraint problems.

(44)

Perspectives: Local Example

Clark County School District

p

p

Current prototype school ed specs include the following areas:

Elementary

= 96-100 ft

2

/student

Middle/Junior High

= 85 90 ft

2

/student

Middle/Junior High

= 85-90 ft

2

/student

(45)

Perspectives: Local Example

Anchorage School District

p

p

i

i

l

l

d

b

id i

i

Program capacity is calculated by considering various

programmatic criteria including:

N

b

f t

hi

t ti

il bl f i t

ti

- Number of teaching stations available for instruction

- Average class sizes (regular & smaller)

- Utilization rates (& teacher preps)

Extent of support facilities (considered but not calculated)

- Extent of support facilities (considered but not calculated)

type:

class sizes:

utilization:

Elementary

24 & 12

100%

Middle

28 & 12

71% (5 of 7)

High

28 & 12

83% (5 of 6)

(46)

Strategies for Increasing Capacity

Scheduling (daily & annual)

g f

g p y

Scheduling (daily & annual)

Multiple-Use Facilities

Joint Use Facilities

Joint Use Facilities

Off-Site Facilities

Increase efficiency

Reassignment of spaces

Reassignment of spaces

(47)

Strategies for Increasing Capacity

Calendar & Schedule

g f

g p y

sep oct nov dec jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug

TRADITIONAL 600 students Traditional BREAK SINGLE-TRACK 600 students MINI BREAK MINI BREAK MINI BREAK 600 students MULTI-TRACK(example) Track A – 200 students Track B – 200 students

Track C – 200 students STAGGERED MINI BREAKS Track D – 200 students

Assumptions for this example:

(48)

M lti l U F

iliti

(49)

M lti l U F

iliti

(50)

Strategies for Increasing Capacity

Faculty/Staff Support

g f

g p y

café tables café tables café tables café tables café tables café tables

enette erator owave

internet carrels internet carrels internet carrels lounge seating lounge seating lounge seating

work / dining counter kitch e refrig e sink micr o island copier

(51)

Strategies for Increasing Capacity

Distributed Media Resources

(52)

Strategies for Increasing Capacity

Alternative Settings

g f

g p y

Project P j t CEO Project Patio Student Workstations Project

Room Project Room

Library Faculty Faculty Animation Technology Labs (Science) Offices Music General Classroom Multi-Purpose Reception Student Commons Student Workstations Project

Room Project Room

Admin. Restrooms

Animation Lab General

Classroom ClassroomGeneral ClassroomGeneral Offices

Tech stage

(53)

Strategies for Increasing Capacity

Off-Site & Distance Learning

(54)

Strategies for Increasing Capacity

Off-Site & Distance Learning

g f

g p y

(55)

F ti

l

t t

&

l

l id li

Recommendations

general

For national, state & local guidelines

ƒ

Use Net Building Area

general

Country:

y

Use Net Building Area

ƒ

Consider State-wide specifics

State:

ƒ

Include District-wide parameters

District:

Include District-wide parameters

District:

ƒ

Account for Specific Programs

specific

School:

(56)

F ti

l

t t

&

l

l id li

Recommendations

general

For national, state & local guidelines

ƒ

Use Net Building Area

general

Country:

Use Net Building Area

Calculate net usable vs gross building area for equity among facilities,

Define what “counts” as net area vs what is gross area,

Include Net:Gross area guidelines on a sliding scale that recognizes

y

Include Net:Gross area guidelines on a sliding scale that recognizes

various climates, construction types, systems, etc.

Consider the impact of national assessment mechanisms.

specific

specific

(57)

F ti

l

t t

&

l

l id li

Recommendations

general

For national, state & local guidelines

ƒ

Consider State-wide specifics

general

Consider State wide specifics

Recognize climate and environment.

Incorporate funding mechanisms.

Define “baseline” net area parameters then define and allow for

Define baseline net area parameters, then define and allow for

exceptions as necessary.

Include Net:Gross area guidelines on a sliding scale that recognizes

various climates, construction types, systems, etc.

State:

,

yp , y

,

Recognize state-wide student demographics & special needs.

Consider the impact of state-wide assessment mechanisms.

specific

specific

(58)

F ti

l

t t

&

l

l id li

Recommendations

general

For national, state & local guidelines

I

l d Di t i t id t

general

ƒ

Include District-wide parameters

Accommodate district-wide educational initiatives.

Understand student demographics and special needs

Understand student demographics and special needs.

Reflect operational budgets and strategies.

Consider attendance boundaries and transportation.

Recognize various scheduling options

Recognize various scheduling options.

Address teacher needs and contracts.

District:

District:

specific

specific

(59)

F ti

l

t t

&

l

l id li

Recommendations

general

For national, state & local guidelines

A

t f

S

ifi P

general

ƒ

Account for Specific Programs

Address curriculum, program offerings and specific class sizes.

Incorporate intended scheduling flexibility (utilization factor)

Incorporate intended scheduling flexibility (utilization factor)

Reflect the intended scheduling strategy (block, YRE, etc.)

Consider operational and organizational specifics.

Accommodate various individual needs of the school community

Accommodate various individual needs of the school community.

Allow for gross area variation based on specific climate/environment.

specific

School:

(60)

Calculating

Calculating

Calculating

School Capacity:

Calculating

School Capacity:

School Capacity:

School Capacity:

thank you!

presented by:

Amy Yurko, AIA

[email protected]

k y

CEFPI Pre-Conference Workshop - October 6, 2007

Peter Brown, AIA, LEED AP

[email protected]

Mary Cary, AIA

References

Related documents

It is the policy of the West Virginia University Hospitals Radiologic Technology Education Program in Nuclear Medicine to provide reasonable radiation protection to

Project Lead included a logically sequenced plan that combined the intellectual preparation by a graduate level program in educational leadership, offered by the University

Enhance the efficiency, resourcefulness, and competence of teachers and other educational personnel through training, capacity building , and motivation… Ensure that

In addition, the differential capacity plots are used to explain the capacity fading mechanism, the kinetics of electrode process of SiO x are not affected by applying

Asset-Based Community Capacity Building: A Process for Asset-Based Community Capacity Building: A Process for Expanding a Retirement Home Physical Activity Program Expanding

The results were r = 0.00 p < 0.05; showing that capacity building is significantly related to competency in primary school management hence the hypothesis H o 1 :

The Educational Leadership – Public Education Administration Program at West Virginia University prepares individuals for leadership positions in elementary, secondary,

The West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine recognizes the importance of a safe, healthy and efficient work and educational environment. Being under the influence of any