Future Global
Supply Chain Logistics:
Coming Back Closer to Home as a Consequence of Rising
Energy Cost?
© FIR 2010
2010 EARTO Annual Conference
Gothenburg, 20th May 2010
Profile of FIR
Application-oriented research to explore the „company of the future“
Director
Prof. Dr. Günther Schuh
Managing Director
Dr.-Ing. Volker Stich
Production Management
Supply Chain Design Order Management
© FIR 2010
Information management
Information Logistics
Information Technology Management
Service Management Service Engineering Lean Services Community Management Order Management Logistic Management
Founded in 1953 as an „at-Institute“ of the RWTH Aachen Research oriented applications with development and
application of methods and tools 160 employees
app. 40 projects funded by public authority per year
app. 60 consulting projects with industrial clients per year
Agenda
Future consequences for supply chains
„Coming back closer to home as a consequence of
rising energy cost?“
Fundamental changes in the environment of supply chains
© FIR 2010
Future consequences for supply chains
Wrap Up
„Coming back closer to home...?“
Manufacturing companies evaluate the effect of their offshoring activities of the last 5 years differently
Source: Fraunhofer ISI 2008 N = 400 8 14 11 18 31 0 1 4 5 9
Medical, Sensorical, Optical technologies Paper and Printing Industry Chemical Industry Rubber and plastic processing Automotive
% of companies with offshored functions
% of companies reversing the offshoring within 5 years
Manufacturing companies still show a strong activity concerning
offshoring activities Examples in public discussion
© FIR 2010
offshoring activities
Some branches give examples of reversed decisions (e.g.
automotive), which is not the fact across all branches (e.g. paper and printing vs. automotive)
Overall, there is only a slight tendency to reverse offshoring
decisions
Manufacturing companies mainly show activities of
„leaving home“, buffered by some examples of „coming closer back home“
„Varta as a pioneer in insourcing“ 1
Sources: 1 Die Zeit, 2005 2USA Today, 2008
„Steiff – German teddy bear firm brings production back from China“ 2
„...as a consequence of rising energy costs?“
110 94 61 36 24 28 20 16 18 60 150 60 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 2020 09 08 06 04 02 00 98 12 96 94 92 Years U S $ / B a rr e l C ru d e O ilFossil fuel resources are scarce and show a future price increase between 60 and 150 $/Barrel
Source: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Energiedaten, 2009
Supply chain design is merely affected by oil price changes in the range between 60 and 150 $/Barrel
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 7,0 6,5 6,0 10,0 0,0 Retail Industry N u m b e r o f lo c a l r e p re s a n ta ti o n s US $ / Barrel Crude Oil
Source: 4 Flow, Logistics Study 2010
© FIR 2010
Source: 4 Flow, Logistics Study 2010
Decisions in supply chain design happen not only due to energy costs but as a consequence of a variety of factors.
Ratio of product cost, logistic cost and energy cost
Total product cost (100%)
logistics cost (12%)
energy related (4%)
Agenda
Future consequences for supply chains
„
Coming back closer to home as a consequence of
rising energy cost?“
Fundamental changes in the environment of supply chains
© FIR 2010
Future consequences for supply chains
Wrap Up
Globalization
– New markets and shift in economic balances (BRIC-countries)
Information revolution through new technologies – New technologies like RFID enable a higher
information transparency
Ecology
– Climate change and limited availability of
Megatrends like globalization, sustainability, demographic change processes
and regulatory requirements will have an influence on the future supply chain
Globalization Ecology New
Technologies
Future influencing factors on supply chains Explanation of the influencing factors
© FIR 2010
– Climate change and limited availability of ressources
Demographic change processes
– Aging population in western countries as well as the urbanization tendency
Regulatory requirements
– Compulsory requirements for companies, e.g. carbon footprint
Source: GCI / Capgemini 2008
Regulatory Requirements
Demographic Change Processes
The globalization activities seem to focus China and India
In 2010 inteded global investments seperated by regions
© FIR 2010
The shifting of production and assembly to BRIC countries currently increases
China outperforms all other countries and pockets one-third of the worlwide investments:
– Low labor and production costs – Increasing consumer market
India reaches a high momentum as an investment region for IT and R&D
Eastern Europe positioned itself as a top outsourcing region
The future real-time information availability in supply chains is a
key factor for dealing with increasing dynamics
S E Pu Pr A
6
4
Status quo of information processing
Heterogeneous system landscape and data
management, integration through numerous interfaces with high maintanance
No company-wide system integration (e.g.
ordering per fax)
Hindered information exchange because of
too many different data standards (EDIFACT, Odette etc.)
Fixed and static planning of current IT
systems (MRP II) 1 2 3 4 China USA Germany India South America © FIR 2010
The planning and control of logistic networks is subjected to dynamic conditions which is buffered by inventory and
capacities today. S E Pu Pr A S E Pu Pr A S E Pu Pr A S E Pu Pr A 2 5 3 1 systems (MRP II)
No real time capture of order entries (e.g.
only rare feedback per day)
Application of RFID labels only for component
identification without control function
5
6
As a consequence of limited resources and climate change
sustainability will be on the agenda for companies in the future
Today: unlimited, cheap energy and raw materials
Tomorrow: limited, expensive energy and raw materials
Consequence: cost efficiency is only reachable through sustainable product design and a
„Green Supply Chain“ The focus to increase sustainability differs by region
static range in years
gold strontium chromium tin silver copper barium crude oil lead zinc mercury
Source: WI/MaRess, 2009, BMWi 2006 Not only crude oil but also other resources will be limited in the foreseeable future
© FIR 2010
The governmental influence and / or social
cultural incentives for sustainability in supply chains are less encouraging in North America.
The disregard of sustainability might lead in the long-run to a worse performance in terms of customer and regulatory requirements.
Source: IBM 2009
Warehouse/DC selection
Supplier selection
Low carbon distribution design Outsourcing selection Transportation selection Strategic plans and initiatives Product Design and Packaging
Manufacturing targets North America Western Europe Asia Pacific
The focus to increase sustainability differs by region
The global population balance will change during the following
50 years even more than during the last 50 years
Aging society in high wage countries
Relocation of production sites to world
regions due to a lack of manpower
Consumer goods industry has to adopt to
changed customer structure in high wage countries
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, 2004 Demographic change using the example of Germany
© FIR 2010
Subsidiary, warehouse and production locations as well as logistic concepts have to be
reconsidered in this context
Intelligent transportation and distribution systems are necessary
Source: United Nations, World Urbanization Prospects, 2007 Urbanization of world population
64 42 51 17 15 29 79 76 72 41 37 49 87 84 78 54 51 60
Asia Europe Southern America Northern America Africa World 2030 2007 1950
An increase of direct governmental influence through regulatory
requirements is expected
Source: PRTM Management Consultants 13 16 20 24 27 Percentage
Differentiate from competitors Improve company image Increase customer confidence Fulfill customer requirement Achieve regulary compliance
Reasons for focusing sustainable supply chain activities
N = 300
© FIR 2010
Still current formalities have an indirect impact on supply chains
– Ecological formalities (e.g. emission badges, reduction of CO2 emissions in Germany of 40% by 2020, NO-X ratio of tanker and a car: 1:177 Million)
– Governmental subventions in international trade (e.g. 25 % protective duty on foreign steel in China)
A stronger governmental influence is expected particularly concerning climate change
and the forseeable energy and resource scarcity
Agenda
Future consequences for supply chains
„Coming back closer to home as a consequence of
rising energy cost?“
Fundamental changes in the environment of supply chains
© FIR 2010
Future consequences for supply chains
Consequences of the 5 factors on future supply chains – Example
Consequences of future supply chain development can be shown by regarding Logistic Service Providers (LSP´s)
Logistic Service Providers
Logistics Indicator in Germany
© FIR 2010
LSP´s are „the glue“ of international supply chains
Global economies are linked by their services and exchange of materials and goods
The state of global economy is reflected by the state of LSP´s
Consequences of the 5 factors on Logistic Service Providers (1/2)
Impact of Globalization
Global Transport routes change with a focus e.g. on pivotal shipping lines, which are used more frequently
Need for larger ports which can cope with
increasing ship-size
Logistic Routes can become a bottleneck
element Source: McKinsey, Volatile World 2010
© FIR 2010
Impact of new technologies
New Technologies enable information transparency
RFID tags used in air freight
Real time information about status of
freight
Consequences of the 5 factors on Logistic Service Providers (2/2)
Impact of ecology and regulatory requirements
Objective of less emissions leads to
necessity for higher transport efficiency
Stack density in ships and trucks will be
increased
Route planning will be optimized towards
less emissions
Source: McKinsey, Volatile World 2010
© FIR 2010
Impact of changing demographic processes
Change in demographic structure rises need for different training methodologies
Companies need to come up with training methods and suitable tasks for elderly co-workers
Education at university will be adapted
Agenda
Future consequences for supply chains
„Coming back closer to home as a consequence of
rising energy cost?“
Fundamental changes in the environment of supply chains
© FIR 2010
Future consequences for supply chains
Wrap Up – „Coming back closer to home as a consequene of rising energy
cost?“
Manufacturing companies currently show activities of „leaving home“, buffered by some examples of „coming closer back home“.
Decisions in supply chain design happen not only due to energy cost but as a consequence of a variety of factors.
Future action fields for supply chains
Deal with logistics as a crucial ressource (e.g. transport routes) Improve information transparency
© FIR 2010
Adress emission causes and lower the exhaust-ratio
Take legal regulations into account (e.g. protective duties) Focus on employees and their abilities
If european companies shape their supply chains accordingly, „coming back home“ becomes far more probable for many manufacturing firms
Contact
Pontdriesch 14/16
·
52062 Aachen · Germany www.fir.rwth-aachen.deDipl. Wi.-Ing.
Tobias Brosze
Telefon: +49 (0)241 477 05-402
© FIR 2010