• No results found

NEW POLICY DIRECTIONS IN DOE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS: THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE TRANSPORTATION FORUM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "NEW POLICY DIRECTIONS IN DOE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS: THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE TRANSPORTATION FORUM"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

NEW POLICY DIRECTIONS

IN DOE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS:

THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE TRANSPORTATION FORUM Kelvin J. Kelkenberg, EM-76

U.S. Department of Energy, 20400 Century Boulevard, Germantown, MD 20874 Lawrence H. Harmon

MACTEC, Inc., 12800 Middlebrook Road, Suite 100, Germantown, MD 20874

ABSTRACT

The Senior Executive Transportation Forum was established by former Energy Secretary Peña in January 1998 to coordinate the efforts of Departmental elements involved in the

transportation of radioactive materials and waste. The forum is made up of senior managers and executives from the Offices of Environmental Management; Defense Programs; Civilian

Radioactive Waste Management; Nuclear Energy; Naval Reactors; Environment, Safety, and Health; Field Management; Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs; Public Affairs; Non-proliferation and National Security; Energy Research; and Fissile Materials Disposition. The Department of Energy s (DOE) field offices are represented by the Albuquerque Operations Office.

Leadership for the Forum is a rotating chair which is currently provided by Environmental Management. The approach to business of the Forum is formal consensus-building and decision-making. The Director of the Office of Transportation and Emergency Management serves as the permanent Secretariat.

FORUM BEGINNINGS

Genesis of the Senior Executive Transportation Forum was widespread stakeholder concerns about the Department s transportation activities, particularly transportation of radioactive materials and waste:

 Perceived fragmentation in transportation planning and implementation and the involvement of stakeholders

 Stakeholders desire for timely information on shipments and routes

 Needs for emergency preparedness planning and training

 Demonstration of continued packaging and shipment safety

(2)

APPROACH

The Forum s approach is to focus on key issues emerging from the Department s shipping activities and stakeholder interest and concerns about these activities. This focus is multifaceted and includes the common packaging and transportation technical issues across the Department. The goal is a more integrated approach to issue resolution, planning, and shipping. Key to its integrated efforts are better communications, relations, and cooperation with state, tribal, and local governments. The Department will provide better information on the priority concerns about routing, emergency management, and pre-shipment notification.

CURRENT ISSUES

In resolving issues, the Forum assigns specific action items to its managers who are typically champions for these issues. The assigned champions provide regular status reports and issue papers for Forum consideration and approval. Issues are prioritized, and specific due dates are set. Officially adopted issues and action items include:

 Improving Relationships with the Department of Transportation

 Public Outreach and Communication

 Single Point of Contact

 Transportation Information Network

 Emergency Response Training

 Packaging Safety and Quality Control

 Stakeholder Funding and Technical Assistance

 Standardized Transportation Protocols PROGRESS TO DATE

The Forum has been highly successful in getting segments of the Department together to focus on key transportation issues in a disciplined way. Several action items have been completed:

Improved relationships with the Department of Transportation (DOT) are a reality. A senior manager from the DOT has agreed to participate as an Ex-Officio member of the Forum. More person-to-person contacts with both management and staff are now taking place.

Public outreach and communication has been improved through publishing a brochure, Transporting Radioactive Materials Safely: Guide to DOE Transportation. The handy single-page foldout provides a wealth of information on how and what the Department ships and how these shipments fit into its multiple missions. The brochure provides points of contact and internet addresses for more detailed program and mission information. It also provides a picture of how the Department is organized for emergency response and radiological assistance.

A single point of contact has been established as an entry point into the Department for

(3)

a response by a real person! That person will either provide the Department s response or make sure someone else does. The foldout brochure has this phone number.

ONGOING WORK

A number of activities have been assigned champions and are progressing on a less urgent basis. These initiatives are in various states of completion:

A Transportation Information Network has been proposed to provide more publicly accessible information about scheduled shipments of radioactive materials and waste. This information has been requested by numerous stakeholders including state, tribal, and local governments. New information has now been added to the Department s web site, providing a 12-month forecast of upcoming shipments. This web site is updated monthly.

Emergency response training and the adequacy of preparedness has been a longstanding stakeholder issue. State, tribal, and local emergency managers are concerned about the training standards for radiological incidents and identifying the numbers and location of people trained. The Department is pursuing a national consensus standard for training requirements. This

standard will be developed through the National Fire Protection Association and will take several years to develop. The idea of a national training registry has been rejected because of the cost involved.

Packaging safety and quality control is a Forum action undertaken as a result of a leaking radioactive waste package incident near Kingman, Arizona, in December 1997. The Department issued a report on improving packaging in April 1998. Many of the report s recommendations have now been implemented, and others are in various stages of implementation.

Stakeholder funding and technical assistance, particularly for transportation and emergency preparedness, is being provided by many organizations within the Department. A more

coordinated and integrated way of providing both funding and assistance has appealing

arguments and could simplify how the Department does business. An effort is now underway for capturing all funds for these activities under an $umbrella# grant in the FY2000 budget process. TRANSPORTATION PROTOCOLS % A PRIORITY ISSUE

Background

The DOE s operating programs currently employ a number of different protocols and practices for shipping radioactive materials and wastes, consistent with applicable laws and regulations. To a large degree, these differences derive from the broad range of hazards associated with different types of materials and wastes. For example, spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste shipments (which contain higher levels of radioactivity) require different handling than low-level radioactive waste shipments to properly protect health, safety, and the environment. In addition,

(4)

some radioactive material shipments involve national security materials with special safeguarding requirements.

The Issue to be Addressed

DOE has a good record of conducting shipments safely under existing protocols and practices. Nevertheless, stakeholders have expressed concern about the lack of uniformity in the

Department s shipping protocols and practices and the lack of clear communication of the reasons for these differences in such protocols and practices.

Purpose of the Initiative

To address these stakeholder concerns, DOE s Senior Executive Transportation Forum is

undertaking an initiative to identify and evaluate the shipping protocols and practices being used. Differences identified will be analyzed to determine whether protocols and practices can and should be made uniform. Where it is appropriate, DOE will standardize transportation protocols and practices among DOE elements for various types of radioactive material and waste. DOE will provide an explanation of the reasons where standardization is determined not to be appropriate.

Phased Evaluation Process

In undertaking this effort, DOE recognizes the importance of communication with and input from state, tribal, and local governments and other interested stakeholders. Therefore, opportunities for frequent interactions with, and meaningful input from, stakeholders will be provided.

DOE recognizes that Memoranda of Agreement concerning shipping practices for certain radioactive materials either already exist or are being developed. If this evaluation determines that any aspect of these Agreements warrants potential modification, such determinations will be discussed with the parties to the Agreements. Otherwise, existing Agreements will be unaffected by this process.

DOE plans to conduct this initiative in the following four phases:

C Phase I: Compile information on current protocols and practices. The 17 protocol areas listed in the table below are being evaluated. DOE will share this information with

stakeholders to obtain input on the process to evaluate protocols and practices and on issues DOE should consider.

(5)

C Phase II: Analyze the compiled protocol and practice information, including input from stakeholders, to determine where standardization might be appropriate. Share preliminary evaluations with various

stakeholder groups to obtain their input.

C Phase III: Identify proposed protocols and practices where DOE considers

standardization to be appropriate and desirable. Identify the degree of standardization to be pursued. Where standardization is not considered to be appropriate, explain why different protocols

and practices are necessary. Issue these results in a draft protocols and practices document for public comment.

C Phase IV: Evaluate and incorporate stakeholder input and issue a final protocols and practices document. Distribute the completed document to involved stakeholders.

DOE intends to periodically update the protocols and practices document for accuracy,

completeness, and continued compliance with laws and regulations. As preparations are made for new DOE radioactive material and waste shipments, the sites will discuss with stakeholders planned protocols and practices for new shipments. Protocols and practices for new shipping campaigns will be incorporated into the protocols and practices document.

SUMMARY

The Senior Executive Transportation Forum is indeed providing a new and widely supported focus on the difficult issues surrounding radioactive materials transport. Under the leadership of Environmental Management s Office of Site Operations, issues are being addressed and decisions made. Bringing the Department s diverse mission and support elements together at an executive level has demonstrated a resolve to consider and respond to legitimate stakeholder concerns. After a year of activity, the Forum remains energized and is promoting integration, coordination, and cohesion. Its outlook is very positive!

Protocol Areas

Pre-Notification Tracking

Emergency plans Weather/road conditions Routing Safe parking/safe haven Inspections Accident notification Public information Emergency response Carrier/driver reqs. Crisis communication Training Remediation

Security Post-shipment Equipment

References

Related documents

The robot system interfaces to FFRH using 14 independent commands for the following joints: Fore finger close and open, Middle finger close and open, Ring

Poster presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT), Memphis, TN. Therapists’ experiences in working with

Applications include telecommunication equipment, radio and tape recorders, TV tuners, video cameras, watches, pocket calculators, automotive industry, computers, instruments,

The following section explores the term pedagogy together with an overview of various pedagogical practices used by teachers in school generally (whether

The entrance ceremony was held five days after the initial training course in which I participated had finished, and although this was the formal m arker

In faith, we meet Jesus who steps in to heal the wounds of the world and the ones that are self- inflicted, reminds us that we are a part of God’s own family, and opens the gates

12.3 The project shall be the heat source for the county district heating with capacity of 80t/h to meet the needs of heating in Gushi county industry cluster zone, replacing

Table 2 shows the performance of the AMMC approach. It can be seen that the parallel algorithm achieves negli- gible, if any, reduction in runtime with increasing proces- sors.