• No results found

Session 1 Operation of the Auto Insurance System in Canada s Provinces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Session 1 Operation of the Auto Insurance System in Canada s Provinces"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Session 1 – Operation of the Auto Insurance

System in Canada’s Provinces

Marie-Hélène Malenfant, FCIA, FSA Director of actuarial liability valuation, SAAQ

(2)

No-Fault System in Québec

 Before 1978

 28% of injured were not compensated;

 2 to 10 years of payment delay;

 High legal fees; and

 Rising premiums.

 Government adopted the no-fault system

 1978 implementation of tort law for property damage and

bodily injury

(3)

No-Fault System in Québec

 1978 implementation of no-fault system

3

SAAQ

• No-fault bodily injuries

• Compulsory coverage

• Benefits defined by law

• Based on economic

losses

Private Insurers

• Tort system for collision

and property damage

• Minimum compulsory

coverage

• Direct compensation to

the insured

(4)

No-Fault system in Québec

Benefits defined by law to compensate the losses:

Income replacement indemnity

First 2 years after the accident, start after a 7-day waiting period, and paid every 14 days. Start on the 181st day after the accident for the unemployed at the time of accident.

From the 3rd year on, the income replacement is adjusted with a determined employment compatible with their abilities. Benefits end at age 68.

Relapse possible.

Treatment expenses for care and rehabilitation

Personal home assistance, job training and profession reintegration expenses, medication, etc.

Lump-sum compensation for non-pecuniary damage

Compensation for loss of enjoyment of life, mental suffering and pain

Death benefits

To a surviving spouse, for funeral expenses, etc.

(5)

No-Fault System in Québec

Examples of benefits:

Income replacement indemnity: 90% of the net income computed on the basis of a gross annual income not exceeding the maximum insured salary of $69,500

Lump sum to surviving spouse: $67,340 to $347,500

Funeral expenses: $5,046

Non-pecuniary damage: maximum of $236,131

Home care expenses: maximum of $843/week

Lump sum indemnity for students: $5,046 at elementary, $9,260 at secondary, and term at post- secondary school level (up to $18,519/year)

$55/ physiotherapy treatment (effective September 24)

$36/occupational therapy

$86.60/psychological treatment

Medications: 100% on presentation of bills or receipts

Review of the benefits will be completed in the near future

5

(6)

No-Fault System in Québec

 Subrogation right

 Abolition of lawsuit based on responsibility in a car accident

All Québec residents are covered here and around the world

Québec resident having an accident outside province of Québec

Non-Québec resident having an accident here in Québec*

* Québec has agreements with Manitoba, Alberta, and Ontario (limited to non-pecuniary

damages).

(7)

No-Fault System in Québec

 Subrogation statistics

Accidents in Canada (excl. Québec)

200 cases with possibility of subrogation

2/3 from Ontario, Alberta, and Manitoba (agreement)

Accidents in U.S.A.

200 cases with possibility of subrogation

70% cases are accidents in FL, ME, NY, VT and NH

SAAQ recovers 30-35% depending of the insurance coverage (1/3 lawyers)

Accidents outside Canada and U.S.A.

100 cases with possibility of subrogation

Vacation spots (Mexico, Cubs, etc.), France

Usually those people from vacation spots have no insurance coverage

7

(8)

No-Fault System in Québec

 Subrogation calculation : 2–4 cases/year

Past indemnities

Accumulated with interest

Future indemnities

Best estimate of future payments

Doctor’s opinion on the deterioration of the victim’s condition

Subject to laws of the jurisdiction where the road accident occurred

4320.04 – The assumptions and methods used by the actuary should take account of the circumstances of the work, including applicable law, regulation, court practice, and established legal principles relevant to the work.

(9)

No-Fault System in Québec

 A little history!

 Law modifications in 1990 and 2000 for benefits

 Creation of the insurance fund (trust) in 2004

 First underfunding position in 2004: Action Plan

Expenses related to the injured in a year are larger than the income

($500M)

Premiums should be increased ($300M)

Road accidents reduction ($130M)

Costs reduction ($70M)

9

(10)

No-Fault System in Québec

 Premiums increased

 Increase in 2008

Very far from the risk because it was the same amount as 1985

Increase over a 3-year period to fill in 60% of the shortfall

Annual indexation

Spreading of payments was offered

Annual driver’s licences

 Now the premiums are revised every three years

10

(11)

No-Fault System in Québec

11

15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000 35 000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Number of people with benefits

Year of accident

(12)

No-Fault System in Québec

 Cost reductions

 Risk management of claim processing

Process revisions

Management of the invalidity period

Services better adapted to the situation

(13)

No-Fault System in Québec

 We overachieved the goal

 The new pricing done last year will provide decrease in

premiums starting in 2016.

 Capitalization and financing of the accident year: CHECK

 Decrease in number of deaths and injured persons

Even though there is an increase in delivering driver’s licenses and car

registration

 Better services to those who claim compensation

13

(14)

Benchmarking*

 Comparing with similar Qc organizations and three other

provinces (BC, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan)

Capitalization rate: 3/5

Administration costs per $1 benefit: 1/5

 Comparing with other Canadian provinces

Lowest costs (bodily and material damages) of car insurance: 1/12

*

SAAQ annual report 2014, pages 133 to 138

References

Related documents

Based on the criterion formulated in the Bronner case, if the second firm wishes to enter the market, the incumbent firm (the owner of the infras- tructure) may be required to

Staff of the securities regulatory authorities in each of Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Québec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia (collectively, staff

with high summer temperatures may exceed the threshold temperature of 18-20°C in biotopes within the south of the UK, which would likely cause mortality of Desmarestia spp.,

Latent variable models found that Agreeableness had no relationship with creativity, but Honesty–Humility did: people lower in Honesty–Humility had higher creativity

In the first turn, you might spend $300 on 2 Chuck Wagons, and send 5 Cowboys to the South West with the new Chuck Wagon, and do the same in the East, so the end of your turn

The marginal densities in three different locations of the domain obtained using the white noise prior (first column) and the Mat´ ern prior (second column) in different

Everything about the scenario described above is local: nodes can have dependency links only up to length r, the connectivity links are tied to an underlying lattice structure

By providing accident victims with a full range of no-fault benefits plus access to tort, the Ontario auto insurance system gives consumers a balanced approach--quick access to