• No results found

Cloud Computing Performance. Benchmark Testing Report. Comparing ProfitBricks vs. Amazon EC2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cloud Computing Performance. Benchmark Testing Report. Comparing ProfitBricks vs. Amazon EC2"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Cloud Computing Performance

Benchmark Testing Report

Comparing ProfitBricks vs. Amazon EC2

April 2014

(2)

Contents

 

The  Cloud  Computing  Performance  Benchmark  report  is  divided  into  several  sections:

Topics ……….Page

Introduction ... 1

Executive Summary ... 2

Benchmark Testing Methodology ... 2

UnixBench Results ... 4

DBENCH Results ... 7

Iperf Results ... 10

Next Steps ... 13

We  invite  you  to  contact  one  of  our  Cloud  Computing  consultants  by  emailing  inbound-­‐

[email protected]  or  calling  866-­‐852-­‐5229.  We  also  have  a  14-­‐day,  no  obligation  trial  account   option  that  does  not  require  a  credit  card.  Please  visit  www.ProfitBricks.com  to  get  started.  

(3)

Introduction

At ProfitBricks, Cloud Computing performance is a primary focus for our teams of engineers. We take a comprehensive view on IaaS performance benchmarking. We contract with 3rd parties, explore, research and develop new testing methodologies in-house, and discover the bugs and limitations of traditional and new benchmarking tools. As a Cloud Computing service provider we realize that we are an edge case – our responsibility for high performance extends from hardware and network architecture to the virtualization layer, to the software we develop to manage the environment. Cloud Computing’s multi-tenant architecture requires that we keep and maintain performance levels that exceed our customers’ expectations, and we strive to remain the highest performance cloud available in the market. The ProfitBricks performance engineering team continually tests the performance of other cloud platforms and services. Performance is our passion – and the team is dedicated to publishing accurate and repeatable results.

Benchmark testing Cloud Computing environments that are not similar requires a thorough understanding of the respective environments, the effects that each component may have on performance, in addition to ensuring that the configurations are similar. It’s also essential that each benchmark test is run on top of a similar stack and software configuration.

We welcome questions about our methodologies. ProfitBricks strives to share our expertise with the community and to engage in an open dialogue about cloud performance.

(4)

Executive Summary

In this report, the ProfitBricks performance engineering team presents our latest series of standardized benchmark testing results (UnixBench, DBENCH, Iperf), comparing ProfitBricks virtual data centers and instances with Amazon’s EC2 instances. We strive to create an apples to apples comparison of virtual servers/instances at both ProfitBricks and Amazon EC2, and we believe our methodologies are fully transparent (see description in Section 3). In January 2014 Amazon introduced a new line of instance sizes, based on new CPUs and new architecture. ProfitBricks engineers spent eight weeks configuring and testing these new EC2 “m3” instance types and compared them to similar ProfitBricks instances alongside Amazon’s legacy “m1” instances. The results show that ProfitBricks continues to be the performance leader in the cloud on all tested configurations, using all three standard benchmarks, showing results that are at least twice the performance of Amazon. In some cases the performance difference between ProfitBricks and Amazon EC2 is an astounding 17x (Iperf).

Benchmark Testing Methodology

 

All benchmarking tools were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit) servers running a 3.2.0.58 Linux kernel, and each test was performed three times on three separate days with the results averaged. By taking advantage of ProfitBricks’ granular scaling features, we were able to compare Amazon’s latest EC2 offerings to ProfitBricks servers with similar resource specifications. For example, we contrasted the performance of an EC2 m3.large with 2 vCPUs and 7.5GB of RAM with a ProfitBricks server containing 2 dedicated cores and 7.5GB of dedicated RAM (and equivalent InfiniBand-powered double redundant storage devices).

In all cases, these are standard configurations at both ProfitBricks and Amazon. No special or optional services were added to the configurations. For each report, three test runs were completed on each instance for three days. Note: we continually see performance variations (sometimes large) on Amazon EC2 services that vary by instance size, by hour, and by data center. This is the main reason for multiple runs – we want to ensure that we’ve determined a representative composite result.

(5)

Server Configuration:

Amazon virtual instances are sold and packaged with a pre-packaged quantity of vCPUs, RAM and temporary storage.

ProfitBricks virtual instances are not pre-packaged, thus every instance can be uniquely configured. We’ve done our best to match equivalent ProfitBricks instances to Amazon instances on a hardware basis – not a cost basis.

OS Configuration:

Operating System: Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit) with 3.2.0.58 Linux kernel

Each instance had the following packages installed if the provider did not include them with their images: make, GCC, automake, libpopt-dev, zlib1g-dev, g++, git

All benchmark software used in these tests are open source – and we have provided the information you would need (including configuration details) to run these tests. You can download the tools from these URLs:

UnixBench: https://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz

DBENCH: Use git to create a local branch of the official git repository and download the tree: `git clone git://git.samba.org/sahlberg/dbench.git dbench`

Iperf: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/iperf/iperf-2.0.5.tar.gz

For DBENCH and UnixBench, both of which test storage performance, a separate block device (EBS on EC2 vs. ProfitBricks block storage) was formatted with ext4 and mounted:

• mkfs.ext4 /dev/second_device • mount /dev/second_device /bench

(6)

UnixBench Results

 

UnixBench   is   one   of   the   most   popular   open   source   benchmark   performance   testing   tools,   which   combines  multiple  tests  to  assess  various  aspects  of  a  system’s  performance  in  a  Unix-­‐like  system.   ProfitBricks   performance   engineers   run   these   tests   multiple   times   over   numerous   days.   The   entire   set  of  index  values  is  then  combined  to  calculate  an  overall  performance  index  for  the  system.    

In   this   UnixBench   benchmark   test,   ProfitBricks   exceeds   the   performance   of   Amazon’s   new   m3   instances   by   2   to   4.4x,   and   Amazon’s   m1   instances   by   2.2   to   3.1x   depending   on   the   instance   size.     These  tests  were  run  over  three  separate  days  and  the  results  and  test  configuration  can  be  found  in   the  UnixBench  test  results  on  the  next  two  pages.  

 

   

UnixBench test configuration:

Get HZ environment variable to what is configured as "CONFIG_HZ_?" in the kernel configuration: "grep 'CONFIG_HZ_' /boot/config-3.2.0-58-virtual"

• In case of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS: 250 HZ

Edit Makefile and change the following line:

-­‐ from "OPTON = -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -ffast-math -Wall"

-­‐ to "OPTON = -march=native -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -ffast-math -Wall"

Compile UnixBench:

-­‐ -HZ="250" make

Run UnixBench:

-­‐ HZ="250" ./Run -c NR_OF_CORES

-­‐ NR_OF_CORES equals the number of virtual cores available to each VM

(7)

 

UnixBench Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m3

   

Instance Size ProfitBricks UnixBench score AWS EC2 UnixBench score ProfitBricks Performance Advantage EC2: m3.medium, ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM)

1213.16 274.31 4.4x

EC2: m3.large,

ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM)

1766.58 759.50 2.3x

EC2: m3.xlarge,

ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM)

2475.73 1218.80 2.0x       0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

m3.medium m3.large m3.xlarge

UnixBench A

verage Score ProfitBricks UnixBench score

(8)

UnixBench Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m1  

   

Instance Size ProfitBricks UnixBench score AWS EC2 UnixBench score ProfitBricks Performance Advantage EC2: m1.medium, ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM) 1213.16 389.10 3.1x EC2: m1.large, ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM) 1766.58 762.82 2.3x EC2: m1.xlarge, ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM) 2475.73 1103.38 2.2x       0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

m1.medium m1.large m1.xlarge

UnixBench A

verage Score ProfitBricks UnixBench score

(9)

DBENCH Results

DBENCH is a popular open source performance testing tool that generates I/O workloads for a file system or networked CIFS of NFS server. It is used to stress a file system to see which workload becomes saturated.

In this DBENCH benchmark test, ProfitBricks exceeds the performance of standard EBS volumes on Amazon’s new m3 instances by 10.5 to 16x and Amazon’s m1 instances by 9.5 to 12.7x depending on instance size. These tests were run over three separate days and the results and test configuration can be found on the DBENCH test results on the next two pages.

DBENCH test configuration:

Compile  DBENCH:  

-­‐ CFLAGS=”-­‐march=native”  ./autogen.sh  

-­‐ CFLAGS=”-­‐march=native”  ./configure  

-­‐ make  

Run  DBENCH:  

-­‐ ./dbench  –backend=fileio  –t  60  –D  /benchmark/bench  –loadfile=loadfiles/client.txt  48  

(10)

DBENCH Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m3

Instance Size DBENCH (MB/s) ProfitBricks DBENCH (MB/s) AWS EC2 Performance Advantage ProfitBricks

EC2: m3.medium,

ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM)

344.85 32.87 10.5x

EC2: m3.large,

ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM)

505.05 31.13 16.2x

EC2: m3.xlarge,

ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM)

641.31 48.63 13.2x 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

m3.medium m3.large m3.xlarge

DBENCH A

verage Score (MB/s)

ProfitBricks DBENCH (MB/s) AWS EC2 DBENCH (MB/s)

(11)

DBENCH Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m1

Instance Size DBENCH (MB/s) ProfitBricks DBENCH (MB/s) AWS EC2 ProfitBricks Performance Advantage

EC2: m1.medium,

ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM)

344.85 27.13 12.7x

EC2: m1.large, ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU

cores/7.5GB RAM)

505.05 41.74 12.1x

EC2: m1.xlarge,

ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM)

641.31 67.80 9.5x 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

m1.medium m1.large m1.xlarge

DBENCH A

verage Score (MB/s)

ProfitBricks DBENCH (MB/s) AWS EC2 DBENCH (MB/s)

(12)

Iperf Results

 

Iperf is a popular open-source network testing tool that creates TCP and UDP data streams and measures the throughput of the network that it is running on.

In this Iperf benchmark test, ProfitBricks exceeds the performance of Amazon’s new m3 instances by 7.3 to 17x and Amazon’s m1 instances by 4.9 to 7.2x depending on the instance size. These tests were run over three separate days and the results and test configuration can be found on the Iperf test results on the next two pages.

 

 

   

Iperf test configuration:

VMs  were  configured  on  both  providers  for  both  the  client  and  the  server  –  instances  appeared  to  run  on  separate   hardware  to  ensure  that  a  local  bridge  was  not  used  in  these  tests.  

  Compile  iperf:    ./configure  make   Run  iperf:  Server:  ./src/iperf  –s  

Client:  ./src/iperf  –c  IP_OF-­‐SERVER  –f  m  –t  60  –P  4  

(13)

Iperf Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m3  

   

Instance Size ProfitBricks Iperf (Mbit/s)

AWS EC2 Iperf (Mbit/s)

ProfitBricks Performance Advantage

EC2: m3.medium,

ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM)

5112.67 300.11 17.0x

EC2: m3.large,

ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM)

5189.67 678.78 7.6x

EC2: m3.xlarge,

ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM)

5660.89 778.89 7.3x       0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

m3.medium m3.large m3.xlarge

Iperf (Mbit/s)

ProfitBricks Iperf (Mbit/s) AWS EC2 Iperf (Mbit/s)

(14)

Iperf Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m1

   

Instance Size ProfitBricks Iperf (Mbit/s)

AWS EC2 Iperf (Mbit/s) ProfitBricks Performance Advantage EC2: m1.medium, ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM) 5112.67 1033.56 4.9x EC2: m1.large, ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM) 5189.67 717.67 7.2x EC2: m1.xlarge, ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM) 5660.89 1120.89 5.1x       0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

m1.medium m1.large m1.xlarge

Iperf (Mbit/s)

ProfitBricks Iperf (Mbit/s) AWS EC2 Iperf (Mbit/s)

(15)

Next Steps

ProfitBricks is here to help you evaluate us as your cloud provider, from benchmark testing to pricing questions our team of knowledgeable Cloud Computing Consultants and Sales Engineers are available by emailing [email protected] or calling 866-852-5229.

ProfitBricks offers a 14-day, no obligation trial account that does not require a credit card for activation. Visit www.profitbricks.com/trial today!

Finally, for up-to-the-minute information about our products and services, be sure to check out our Resource Center at http://www.profitbricks.com/press-and-info-center

ProfitBricks Inc. 15 Tudor Street Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: +1 866 852 5229 Fax: +1 888 620 3376 Email: [email protected] www.profitbricks.com twitter.com/profitbricksusa blog.profitbricks.com

©2014  ProfitBricks,  Inc.  All  rights  reserved.   ProfitBricks,  the  ProfitBricks  logo  and  Data  Center   Designer  are  trademarks  of  ProfitBricks  Inc.  All  other   trademarks  are  the  property  of  their  respective   owners.  ProfitBricks  reserves  the  right  to  make   changes  without  further  notice.  

References

Related documents

Izabrani motor ima manju razlučljivost nego originalni motor - 0,325° u usporedbi sa 0,088° na originalnom motoru. Razlučljivost motora dikitra vrsta enkodera. Razlučljivost

Poly-Formalism Agent-Landscape Model Architecture agent Discrete-event, Rules-based Models landscape Discrete-time,. Cellular

Sleeves are short or rolled up during hand washing Cuts are covered with a waterproof dressing Hands are visibly clean Alcohol based hand rub is dispensed onto the hands

The main objective of the Project on Railway Reservation System is to manage the details of Train, Ticket, Booking, Customer, Payment.. It manages all the information about

In order to evaluate the performance loss introduced by the proposed channel estimation scheme and the requirements put on the pilot period D as defined in Section II, performance

Misfit parameter to a sinc shape at the output of the laser (red circles) and peak nonlinear phase shift (blue squares) versus filter bandwidth B for a flat-top spectral pulse

Η ΜΠΑΛΑΝΣΑ ΣΟΤ ΚΤΡ ΜΕΝΣΙΟΤ Am G Δεν λυγϊνε τα ξερϊδια και πονϊνε τα ρημϊδια Dm E κοτςα μια και κοτςα δυο ςτησ ζωόσ το ρημαδι Am G

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is the mycotoxin of Aspergillus flavus fungus which is the most pathogenic and carcinogenic and can affect the health of livestock