• No results found

Supervised All Words Lexical Substitution using Delexicalized Features

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Supervised All Words Lexical Substitution using Delexicalized Features"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Table 1: Details of the datasets: WN=WordNet
Table 2: Comparison to the baseline on LexSub 2007.

References

Related documents

Extending the Gold Standard for a Lexical Substitution Task is it worth it? Ludovic Tanguy (1), Ce?cile Fabre (1) , Laura Rivie?re (2) (1) CLLE ERSS CNRS & University of Toulouse, France

Additionally, lexical substitution is a more natural task than similarity ratings, it makes it possible to evaluate meaning composition at the level of individual words, and provides

The contribution of multiplicative features is mostly prominent in strict evaluation settings, i.e., lexical split ( Levy et al. , 2015 ) and out-of- domain evaluation that disable

BUTknot at SemEval-2016 Task 5: Supervised Machine Learning with Term Substitution Approach in Aspect Category Detection.. Jakub Mach´aˇcek Brno University of Technology, Faculty

As part of the SemEval-2007 evaluation exercise, we organized an English lexical sample task for word sense disambiguation (WSD), where the sense- annotated examples

So far, we have evaluated our sequence-labeling system in two different settings, the English- Spanish subset of a recent SemEval shared task (Lefever and Hoste, 2013), and an

In or- der to apply our cross-lingual WSD method to the data of the SemEval-2010 CLLS task, an EN-SP sense cluster inventory had first to be built where the senses of English

These four substitutions are the most common and the least ambiguous words from the manually compiled list of valid substitu- tions in the 2007 SemEval lexical substitution cor-