• No results found

Observation status and ethical considerations for case managers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Observation status and ethical considerations for case managers"

Copied!
39
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Carrie Valiant, Esq.

Member, Epstein Becker & Green Founder and President

Health Care Industry Access Initiative

Patrice Sminkey Chief Executive Officer

Commission for Case Manager Certification

1

Proprietary to CCMC®

Observation status and

(2)

Agenda

2

Welcome and Introductions

Learning Objectives

Patrice Sminkey, CEO, the Commission

Carrie Valiant, Esq., member, Health Care and Life Sciences

practice of the Epstein Becker & Green law firm; and founder and

president, Health Care Industry Access Initiative

(3)

Audience Notes

3

There is no call-in number for today’s events. Audio is by streaming only. Please use your computer speakers, or you may prefer to use headphones.

Please use the “chat” feature on the lower left-hand part of your screen to ask questions throughout the presentations. Questions will be addressed as time permits after both speakers have presented.

A recording of today’s session will be posted within one week to the Commission’s website, http://www.ccmcertification.org

One continuing education credit is available for today’s webinar only to those who registered in advance and are participating today.

(4)

L

earning Objectives Overview

4

After the webinar, participants will be able to:

•Demonstrate familiarity with the eight principles of the Code of Professional Conduct for Case Managers;

•Describe how the Commission’s Code of Professional Conduct supports and clarifies the case manager’s priorities and role as patient advocate while

balancing the need for efficiency and resource management;

•Summarize the appropriate designation of patients under “observation status” versus inpatient admission in the hospital, as well as other current practices and challenges to patient access.

(5)

Introduction

Patrice Sminkey Chief Executive Officer

(6)

6

• Webinars

• Certification Workshops

• Issue Briefs

• Speaker’s Bureau

www.ccmcertification.org

(7)

Why a code of professional

conduct for case managers?

Protect the public interest

http://ccmcertification.org/content/ccm-exam-portal/code-professional-conduct-case-managers

(8)



Principles



Rules of Conduct



Standards for Professional Conduct



Procedures for Processing Complaints

(9)



Principle 1: Certificants will place the public interest above

their own at all times.



Principle 2: Certificants will respect the rights and inherent

dignity of all of their clients.



Principle 3: Certificants will always maintain objectivity in

their relationships with clients.

(10)



Principle 4: Certificants will act with integrity in dealing with

other professionals to facilitate their clients’ achieving

maximum benefits.



Principle 5: Certificants will keep their competency at a level

that ensures each of their clients will receive the benefit of

services that are appropriate and consistent for the client’s

conditions and circumstances.

(11)



Principle 6: Certificants will honor the integrity and respect

the limitations placed on the use of the CCM designation.



Principle 7: Certificants will obey all laws and regulations.



Principle 8: Certificants will help maintain the integrity of the

Code.

(12)

12

Observation status and

ethical considerations for case managers

Carrie Valiant, Esq.

Member, Epstein Becker & Green Founder and President

(13)

Code of Professional Conduct

for Case Managers

Observation Status and Ethical

Considerations for Case Managers

(14)

• Observation includes ongoing short term treatment, assessment, and reassessment before a decision can be made regarding whether

patients will require further treatment as hospital inpatients or if they are able to be discharged from the hospital.

– Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, CMS Pub. No. 100-02, Ch. 6, §20.6.

Same language in Medicare Claims Processing Manual, CMS Pub. No.100-04, Ch. 4, §290.1.

• Observation services are commonly ordered for patients who present to the emergency department and who then require a significant

period of treatment or monitoring in order to make a decision concerning their admission or discharge.

• The purpose of observation is to determine the need for further

treatment or for inpatient admission. A patient receiving observation services may improve and be released, or be admitted as an inpatient

(15)

• Not a status – a type of outpatient service

– When a physician orders that a patient receive observation

care, the patient’s status is that of an outpatient.

• Outpatient: a person who has not been admitted by

the hospital as an inpatient but is registered on the

hospital records as an outpatient and receives services .

. . from the hospital.

• Inpatient: a person who has been admitted to a

hospital for bed occupancy for purposes of receiving

inpatient hospital services.

• “Status” usage for observation is still very common

(16)

• Medicare hospital inpatient vs. outpatient

status vs. observation

• Case manager expertise being called on to

– Apply Interqual/Milliman standards

– Educate physicians

– Make status determination

(17)

• Ramifications for patients

– coverage of post- hospital services

– coinsurance obligations

• Ramifications for hospital

– amount of reimbursement (usually)

– potential False Claims Act liability

(18)

• Manuals say observation should not exceed

24-48 hours

• Also, patients who begin as inpatients may

later be changed to outpatient/observation

(Condition Code 44)

• Condition Code 44, Transmittal 299 (Sep.

2004), now at Medicare Claims Processing

Manual, CMS Pub. No. 100-04, Ch. 1, §50.3,

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/downloads

/clm104c0

1.pdf (p. 138)

(19)

• Increasingly, longer stays in an acute care hospital

may be called “observation services”

• Why?

– Focus on readmissions – there can’t be a readmission if

there wasn’t an admission in the first place!

– Government scrutiny of medical necessity of inpatient

admissions, particularly short stays

• Hospital complaints that auditors were denying large numbers of claims for inpatient care because the patient

could have been considered an outpatient under observation.

(20)

• Hospitals’ Use of Observation Stays and Short

Inpatient Stays for Medicare Beneficiaries,

OEI-02-12-00040

• Found that Medicare beneficiaries had

– 1.5 million observation stays in 2012, spending 1 night

or more in the hospital.

– An additional 1.4 million long outpatient stays, some of

which may have been observation stays

• Of the observation stays

– 11% of observation stays were at least 3 nights

– 26% of observation stays were two nights

(21)

Most common problems associated with longer observation

stays (in descending order) –

– Back problems

– Signs and symptoms – Nutritional disorders – Digestive disorders – Circulatory disorders – Dizziness

– Fainting

– Respiratory Signs and Symptoms – Irregular heartbeat

– Chest pain (#1 reason for observation and short inpatient stays)

Most long outpatient stays began in the ED.

Characteristics of Longer

Observation Stays

(22)

• Denial of coverage for post-acute

care

• Denial of coverage for inpatient

drugs

• Additional coinsurance cost to

patient

Consequences of Conversion to

Observation

(23)

• Medicare generally pays more for a short inpatient stay than an

observation stay.

• But beneficiaries may pay more.

– There is no cap on the aggregate outpatient 20%

coinsurance amount

– Coinsurance is charged separately with respect to each

service/item received in observation

– Self-administered drugs are not covered during an

outpatient visit (but they are covered during an inpatient

visit

– Thus, coinsurance charges and charges for non-covered

services may be higher than the inpatient deductible.

(24)

• “Beneficiaries in observation stays sometimes

paid more than the deductible charged to

beneficiaries in inpatient stays.

• For 6 percent of all observation stays, or

83,747 stays, beneficiaries paid more than the

inpatient deductible.

• Notably, for 3,439 observation stays,

beneficiaries paid more than two times the

inpatient deductible.”

(25)

• SNF benefits depend on a qualifying

inpatient hospital stay

• “The beneficiary must have been

hospitalized . . . for medically necessary

inpatient hospital care . . . for at least 3

consecutive calendar days, not counting

the day of discharge.” 42 C.F.R.

§409.30(a)(1)

Coverage Consequences for

Patients

(26)

• Time spent in observation status in the

emergency room prior to (or instead of) an

inpatient admission does not count toward

the 3-day qualifying inpatient stay.

• Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, CMS Pub.

No. 100-02, Ch. 8, §20.1.

Coverage Consequences for

Patients

(27)

• If the patient is admitted as Inpatient after

Observation, it is effective at time of the

admitting order

• This means that generally only certain “Part B

only” services can be billed before the

inpatient admission

• This means there is no compensation for

routine services/bed and board prior to

inpatient admission

(28)

• Condition code 44 changes a patient's initial inpatient status to

outpatient for purposes of billing and payment.

• Must meet the following criteria –

– UR Committee decides inpatient criteria are not satisfied – A physician concurs with the utilization review committee’s

decision

– Change is made before discharge

– Patient rights, notice and participation interpretation – Hospital has not submitted a Medicare claim

• Observation time starts when the physician orders observation

and nursing begins to implement it.

• Not retroactive; time on inpatient status does not count

(29)

• Patients may begin as inpatients and end up

outpatients prior to discharge.

• Patient notice of retroactive changes is not required

because a change in status is not considered a

denial of coverage.

• Some hospitals have special observation units but

many do not.

• So patients on observation may be in a bed on a

regular inpatient unit, getting treatment and

services exactly the same as inpatients.

(30)

• Physician determines need for hospital care

– Orders: “Admit to Case Management Protocol”

• Possibly standing orders

• – “Hold” status for X hours (e.g., 2, 6, 12) while

Utilization Management assigns status using

established criteria

• – Default to Outpatient/Observation if not assigned

during the hold period

• If assigned to Observation, physician re-evaluates

within 24-48 hours for possible inpatient admission or

discharge

Case Management Assignment

Protocol (CMAP)

(31)

• CMS has not approved the use of CMAP

• A specific physician order is required for

either Inpatient Admission or Observation

• CMS has stated concern that standing

orders remove the physician from the

decision making process

(32)

• There is physician involvement

– Medical staff involved in creation of the protocol

even if not in individual decision

• Physicians not educated in intricacies of

patient status

– Hospitals generally use InterQual criteria

(McKesson Corp.) to make status decisions

– Criteria is based on severity of illness and intensity

of service

(33)

No standing orders

No defaults

Case management reviews/recommends

Recommendation communicated to

physician

Requires separate physician’s order

accepting the recommendation after it is

made

Modified Case Management

Approach

(34)

• Audit presumption that stays lasting two midnights or longer are reasonable and necessary and will qualify for inpatient admission under Medicare Part A. • Stays lasting less than two midnights will not be presumed to qualify as

inpatient stays and instead will be paid under Medicare Part B, which covers outpatient services.

• When the physician “expects to keep the patient in the hospital for only a limited period of time that does not cross two midnights, the services are generally inappropriate for [inpatient] payment under Medicare Part A, regardless of the hour that the patient came to the hospital or whether the patient used a bed.”

• Physician must sign an admitting order, which must be “supported by the physician admission and progress notes, in order for the hospital to be paid for hospital inpatient services under Medicare Part A.”

(35)

• The two midnight “clock” begins when the patient starts receiving hospital services (including observation services).

• September 26 open-door forum, CMS clarification –

– If a patient stays one midnight in observation and the physician expects that the patient will require at least another midnight in the hospital, the patient can be appropriately admitted despite the fact that it will be a one-day inpatient stay.

– If a patient is admitted but ultimately doesn’t stay two midnights, clear physician documentation supporting the order and expectation of two midnights will be required.

– RAC auditors will review cases with stays less than two midnights. If a facility is audited, the reviewers will look for a codified physician order and certification, plus supportive documentation.

• However, the clock for beneficiary qualification for SNF services remains the same, only from the time of the inpatient admission.

(36)

• Expected to result in a net increase of around

40,000 admissions nationally, with a substantial

increase in two-day cases.

• CMS proposed a 2% payment cut to pay for the

increase in admissions.

• Legal Challenges –

– Hospital systems and trade associations filed suit

– Disagree that all stays shorter than two midnights are

inappropriate

– Physician judgment should be the only factor

considered for an inpatient admission.

(37)

Carrie Valiant, Esq. Partner

Epstein Becker Green

1227 25th Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20037

202-861-1857

CValiant@ebglaw.com

Epstein Becker Green is one of the largest health care law firms in the United States. Our firm represents a wide range of organizations in the health care industry including health professionals, management companies, equipment suppliers, health systems, payors and manufacturers.

For more information, please visit our website at: www.ebglaw.com

(38)

38 Proprietary to CCMC®

Commission for Case Manager Certification

15000 Commerce Parkway, Suite C, Mount Laurel, NJ 08054

1-856-380-6836 • Email: ccmchq@ccmcertification.org

www.ccmcertification.org

(39)

Thank you!

39 Proprietary to CCMC®

Please fill out the survey after today’s session

Those who signed up for Continuing

Education will receive an evaluation from the

Commission.

A recording of today’s webinar and slides will

be available in one week at

References

Related documents

learning community Principals as instructional leaders School boards supporting schools Department of Education supporting school boards requires skilful leaders who

.2 Cleaned and prepared surfaces shall be inspected by Paint Inspection Agency who shall notify Owners Representative and General Contractor in writing of defects or problems,

Les enfants habitant avec plus de deux autres enfants, de la même tranche d’âge, sont plus affectés par la malnutrition globale, avec un taux de 18,4 %, contre 3,3 % pour ceux

Although various tourism academics have suggested the perceived costs and benefits as the intervenient variables in the relationships of the support to

This brief evaluation of the two Tannery Court complexes has identified some of the ways this social housing initiative has affected the residents’ quality of life

Abstract: The present study was carried out to know the effect of different soil amendments and biological control on disease incidence, different plant growth and flower

We present a new probabilistic symbolic algorithm that, given a variety defined in an n-dimensional affine space by a generic sparse system with fixed supports, computes the

Evaluation of the effect of different processing conditions and rotor types on HDPE nanocomposite morphology showed all conditions and rotors produced exfoliated