• No results found

α BaCaAlF7

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "α BaCaAlF7"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Acta Cryst.(2003). E59, i17±i19 DOI: 10.1107/S1600536803001259 Werner and Weil BaCaAlF7

i17

inorganic papers

Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports

Online

ISSN 1600-5368

a

-BaCaAlF

7

Franz Werner and Matthias Weil*

Institute for Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Division of Structural Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164-SC, A-1060 Vienna, Austria

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators Single-crystal X-ray study T= 293 K

Mean(Al±F) = 0.002 AÊ Rfactor = 0.019 wRfactor = 0.043

Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.2

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2003 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved

-Barium calcium aluminium hepta¯uoride is a member of the isotypic complex ¯uorides of general formula BaCaMF7(M= Al, Ga, Cr). The crystal structure is made up of triple layers which extend parallel to the (001) plane, and are stacked along [001], with a stacking unit ofc/2. The central unit of one triple layer consists of edge-sharing12[CaF8/2] polyhedra, forming a distorted ¯uorite-type arrangement. On both sides of this layer, isolated [AlF6] octahedra are attached by edge-sharing with the central unit. The triple layers are held together by 11-coordinate Ba atoms that are located between the layers.

Comment

Complex ¯uorides are interesting host lattices for doping with rare-earth or transition metal ions to obtain luminescent materials with slightly different characteristics, compared to the widely used oxides (Rubio, 1991; Kubel et al., 1997; Joubertet al., 2001).

Numerous phases in the pseudobinary system MF2±AlF3 with M = Ca, Sr, Ba have been reported, and the corre-sponding structures solved and re®ned from either single-crystal or powder data [M= Ca: CaAlF5(Hemon & Courbion, 1991) and Ca2AlF7 (Domesle & Hoppe, 1980); M= Sr: two polymorphs of SrAlF5 (Von der Muehll et al., 1971; Kubel, 1998; Weilet al., 2001) and Sr5Al2F16 (Weil, 2001);M= Ba: four polymorphic forms of BaAlF5(Domesle & Hoppe, 1982a; Le Bailet al., 1990; Weilet al., 2001), three polymorphic forms of Ba3AlF9(Renaudinet al., 1990; Renaudin et al., 1991; Le Bail, 1993) and Ba3Al2F12 (Domesle & Hoppe, 1982b)], whereas the number of structurally well-characterized compounds in the pseudo-ternary systemMF2±M0F2±AlF3(M,

M0 = Ca, Sr, Ba) is restricted to only three representatives,

Received 7 January 2003 Accepted 14 January 2003 Online 24 January 2003

Figure 1

Powder patterns of-BaCaAlF7. Top: calculated from single-crystal data;

bottom: PDF entry # 27-0090 (ICDD, 2001); 2values are for CuK1

(2)

inorganic papers

i18

Werner and Weil BaCaAlF7 Acta Cryst.(2003). E59, i17±i19

with composition Ba0.43Sr0.57AlF5 (Kubel, 1998), Sr0.92Ca0.08AlF5 and Sr0.67Ca0.33AlF5 (Weil et al., 2001) (all single-crystal data). Additionally, two more phases with composition SrCaAlF7 and BaCaAlF7 have been reported, each with three polymorphic forms denoted as , and

(Hoffman, 1972). For four modi®cations (all SrCaAlF7 poly-morphs and ±BaCaAlF7), non-indexed powder data are given and their EuIIactivation was measured. The latter phase is a very interesting candidate as a luminescent material, since it shows a high EuIIemission line. Fig. 1 shows that the phase previously described as -BaCaAlF7 is identical to the title compound. Except for an impurity line at 2= 27.4, the entry in the powder diffraction ®le (PDF # 27-0090; ICDD, 2001) is

in agreement with the powder pattern calculated on the basis of the single-crystal structure re®nement.

-BaCaAlF7 is isotypic with BaCaGaF7 and BaCaCrF7 (Holler & Babel, 1985). In accordance with the slightly smaller ionic radius of AlIII (0.54 AÊ) with respect to GaIIIand CrIII (both 0.62 AÊ, values from Shannon, 1976), the unit-cell volume of the title compound is slightly smaller (Al: 544 AÊ3; Ga: 553 AÊ3; Cr: 556 AÊ3). The structure is built up from triple layers, which extend parallel to (001) and consist of a central unit and two side units (Fig. 2). The central unit is composed of edge-sharing12[CaF8/2] polyhedra with distorted square anti-prisms as the corresponding coordination polyhedra. Although the intrapolyhedral geometry differs signi®cantly from that of a cube found in the ideal ¯uorite structure, this arrangement can be considered as part of a distorted CaF2 structure. This assumption is con®rmed by comparable distancesd(Ca1ÐCa2) of 3.703 (1) and 3.902 (1) AÊ, as well as the average CaÐF distance of 2.372 AÊ and the values of thea and b axes, with respect to the distances and the lattice parameter in CaF2itself [d(CaÐCa) = 3.869 AÊ, d(CaÐF) = 2.369 AÊ and a= 5.471 AÊ; values from Zhurovaet al. (1996)]. The side units are made up from isolated [AlF6] octahedra which share common edges with the central ¯uorite-type 12[CaF8/2] layer. The average AlÐF distance of 1.808 AÊ is in the typical range for [AlF6] octahedra found in other complex aluminium ¯uorides. The largest deviation from the ideal octahedral angle is 6.6. Two triple layers are stacked along [001] with a stacking unit ofc/2 and are held together by 11-coordinated Ba atoms. The resulting [BaF11] polyhedron might be described as a distorted tricapped rectangular prism (Fig. 3), with an average BaÐF distance of 2.850 AÊ. The F atoms exhibit either a coordination number (CN) of 3, resulting in a distorted trigonal planar environment (F1, F2 and F4), or CN = 4, with a distorted tetrahedral coordination geometry (F3, F5, F6 and F7).

Experimental

A mixture of 457 mg BaF2 (Riedel-de HaeÈn, 97%), 41 mg CaF2 (Merck, Suprapur) and 44 mg AlF3(CERAC, 99.9%), corresponding to a molar ratio of 5:1:1, was added to 1 g ZnCl2(Aldrich, 98%) and placed in a platinum crucible. The reaction mixture was then heated under atmospheric conditions to 873 K over a period of 2 h. The ¯ux was kept at that temperature for 2 h and then cooled to 473 K over a period of 12 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solidi®ed melt was leached with demineralized water. Colourless plates of the title compound were isolated from the residue. Additionally, tetragonal plates of matlockite-type BaFCl (Sauvage, 1974) were found in the crystal mixture.

Crystal data BaCaAlF7 Mr= 337.40

Monoclinic,P2=n a= 5.3664 (5) AÊ

b= 5.3846 (6) AÊ

c= 18.8262 (19) AÊ

= 92.319 (2)

V= 543.55 (10) AÊ3 Z= 4

Dx= 4.123 Mg mÿ3

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 3828

re¯ections

= 3.2±30.5

= 8.49 mmÿ1 T= 293 (2) K Plate, colourless 0.120.080.06 mm Figure 2

Projection of the crystal structure along [010]; the unit cell and the [AlF6]

octahedra are outlined.

Figure 3

(3)

Data collection

Siemens SMART area detector diffractometer

!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin= 0.429,Tmax= 0.630 5719 measured re¯ections

1603 independent re¯ections 1477 re¯ections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.020 max= 30.5 h=ÿ7!7

k=ÿ7!7

l=ÿ26!26 Re®nement

Re®nement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.019 wR(F2) = 0.044 S= 1.11 1603 re¯ections 93 parameters

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0157P)2

+ 1.3785P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max< 0.001

max= 0.76 e AÊÿ3

min=ÿ0.72 e AÊÿ3

Extinction correction:SHELXL97 Extinction coef®cient: 0.0038 (3)

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (AÊ).

BaÐF4i 2.5498 (16)

BaÐF1i 2.6763 (17)

BaÐF7ii 2.7542 (17)

BaÐF1iii 2.7831 (17)

BaÐF5i 2.7860 (17)

BaÐF6i 2.8244 (16)

BaÐF5iv 2.8660 (18)

BaÐF7i 2.9510 (17)

BaÐF5v 3.0058 (18)

BaÐF7vi 3.0102 (17)

BaÐF3iv 3.1421 (17)

AlÐF1vii 1.7535 (19)

AlÐF2vii 1.8038 (17)

AlÐF7 1.8047 (18)

AlÐF3 1.8083 (18)

AlÐF5viii 1.8133 (18)

AlÐF6ix 1.8614 (18)

Ca1ÐF4x 2.2282 (17)

Ca1ÐF4 2.2282 (17)

Ca1ÐF3vii 2.3880 (16)

Ca1ÐF3xi 2.3880 (16)

Ca1ÐF6xii 2.4102 (16)

Ca1ÐF6xiii 2.4102 (16)

Ca1ÐF2xiv 2.4609 (18)

Ca1ÐF2xv 2.4609 (18)

Ca2ÐF4xii 2.2392 (17)

Ca2ÐF4 2.2392 (17)

Ca2ÐF2 2.3868 (16)

Ca2ÐF2xii 2.3868 (16)

Ca2ÐF6xvi 2.4231 (17)

Ca2ÐF6xvii 2.4231 (17) Ca2ÐF3viii 2.4389 (17)

Ca2ÐF3xi 2.4389 (17)

Symmetry codes: (i) 1

2ÿx;y;12ÿz; (ii) xÿ12;ÿy;zÿ12; (iii) xÿ12;1ÿy;zÿ12; (iv) 1

2‡x;1ÿy;zÿ12; (v)12ÿx;yÿ1;12ÿz; (vi)12‡x;ÿy;zÿ21; (vii) 1ÿx;1ÿy;1ÿz; (viii)ÿx;1ÿy;1ÿz; (ix)ÿx;ÿy;1ÿz; (x)3

2ÿx;y;32ÿz; (xi)21‡x;1ÿy;12‡z; (xii) 1

2ÿx;y;32ÿz; (xiii) 1‡x;y;z; (xiv) x;yÿ1;z; (xv) 32ÿx;yÿ1;32ÿz; (xvi) 1

2ÿx;1‡y;32ÿz; (xvii)x;1‡y;z.

Data collection:SMART(Siemens, 1996); cell re®nement:SAINT (Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:

ATOMS for Windows (Dowty, 2000); software used to prepare

material for publication:SHELXL97.

References

Domesle, R. & Hoppe, R. (1980).Z. Kristallogr.153, 317±328. Domesle, R. & Hoppe, R. (1982a).Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.495, 16±26. Domesle, R. & Hoppe, R. (1982b).Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.495, 27±28. Dowty, E. (2000).ATOMS for Windows. Version 5.1. Shape Software, 521

Hidden Valley Road, Kingsport, TN 37663, USA.

Hemon, A. & Courbion, C. (1991).Acta Cryst.C47, 1302±1303. Hoffman, M. V. (1972).J. Electrochem. Soc.119, 905±909. Holler, H. & Babel, D. (1985).Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.523, 89±98.

ICDD (2001). The Powder Diffraction File. International Centre for Diffraction Data, 12 Campus Boulevard, Newton Square, PA 19073±3273, USA.

Joubert, M. F., Guyot, Y., Jacquier, B., Chaminade, J. P. & Garcia, A. (2001).J. Fluorine Chem.107, 235±240.

Kubel, F., Hagemann, H. & Bill, H. (1997).Mater. Res. Bull.32, 263±269. Kubel, F. (1998).Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.624, 1481±1486.

Le Bail, A., FeÂrey, G., Mercier, A. M., de Kozak, A. & SamoueÈl, M. (1990).J. Solid State Chem.89, 282±291.

Le Bail, A. (1993).J. Solid State Chem.103, 287±291.

Renaudin, A., FeÂrey, G., de Kozak, A. & SamoueÈl, M. (1990).Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem.27, 571±580.

Renaudin, A., FeÂrey, G., de Kozak, A. & SamoueÈl, M. (1991).Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem.28, 373±381.

Rubio, O. J. (1991).J. Phys. Chem. Solids,52, 101±174. Sauvage, M. (1974).Acta Cryst.B30, 2786±2787. Shannon, R. D. (1976).Acta Cryst.A32, 751±767.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996).SADABS. University of GoÈttingen, Germany. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of

GoÈttingen, Germany.

Siemens (1996).SMARTandSAINT. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Von der Muehll, R., Anderson, S. & Galy, J. (1971).Acta Cryst.B27, 2345± 2353.

Weil, M., Zobetz, E., Werner, F. & Kubel, F. (2001).Solid State Sci.3, 441±453. Weil, M. (2001).Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.627, 2669±2672.

Zhurova, E. A., Maximov, B. A., Simonov, V. I. & Sobolev, B. P. (1996).

Kristallogra®ya,41, 438±443.

Acta Cryst.(2003). E59, i17±i19 Werner and Weil BaCaAlF7

i19

(4)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, i17–i19

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, i17–i19 [doi:10.1107/S1600536803001259]

α

-BaCaAlF

7

Franz Werner and Matthias Weil

S1. Comment

Complex fluorides are interesting host lattices for doping with rare-earth or transition metal ions to obtain luminescent

materials with slightly different characteristics as compared to the widespread used oxides (Rubio, 1991; Kubel et al.,

1997; Joubert et al., 2001).

Numerous phases in the pseudobinary system MF2—AlF3 with M = Ca, Sr, Ba have been reported and the

corresponding structures solved and refined either from single-crystal or powder data [M = Ca: CaAlF5 (Hemon &

Courbion, 1991) and Ca2AlF7 (Domesle & Hoppe, 1980); M = Sr: two polymorphs of SrAlF5 (von der Muehll et al.,

1971; Kubel, 1998; Weil et al., 2001) and Sr5Al2F16 (Weil, 2001); M = Ba: four polymorphic forms of BaAlF5 (Domesle

& Hoppe, 1982a; Le Bail et al., 1990; Weil et al., 2001), three polymorphic forms of Ba3AlF9 (Renaudin et al., 1990;

Renaudin et al., 1991; Le Bail, 1993) and Ba3Al2F12 (Domesle & Hoppe, 1982b)], whereas the number of structurally well

characterized compounds in the pseudo-ternary system MF2–M′F2–AlF3 (M, M′ = Ca, Sr, Ba) is restricted to only three

representatives, with composition Ba0.43Sr0.57AlF5 (Kubel, 1998), Sr0.92Ca0.08AlF5 and Sr0.67Ca0.33AlF5 (Weil et al., 2001)

(all single-crystal data). Additionally, two more phases with composition SrCaAlF7 and BaCaAlF7 are reported, each with

three polymorphic forms denoted as α, β and γ (Hoffman, 1972). For four modifications (all SrCaAlF7 polymorphs and α

-BaCaAlF7), non-indexed powder data are given and their EuII activation was measured. The latter phase is a very

interesting candidate as a luminescent material since it shows a high EuII emission line. Fig. 1 shows that the phase

previously described as α-BaCaAlF7 is identical to the title compound. Except for an impurity line at 2θ = 27.4°, the entry

in the powder diffraction file (PDF # 27–0090; ICDD, 2001) is in agreement with the powder pattern calculated on the

basis of the single-crystal structure refinement.

α-BaCaAlF7 is isotypic with BaCaGaF7 and BaCaCrF7 (Holler & Babel, 1985). According to the slightly smaller ionic radius of AlIII (0.54 Å) with respect to GaIII and CrIII (both 0.62 Å, values from Shannon, 1976), the unit-cell volume of

the title compound is slightly smaller (Al: 544 Å3; Ga: 553 Å3; Cr: 556 Å3). The structure is built up from triple layers

which extend parallel to (001) and consist of a central unit and two side units (Fig. 2). The central unit is composed of

edge-sharing 2

∞[CaF8/2] polyhedra with distorted square antiprisms as the corresponding coordination figures. Although

the intrapolyhedral geometry differs significantly from that of a cube found in the ideal fluorite structure, this

arrangement can be considered as part of a distorted CaF2 structure. This assumption is confirmed by comparable

distances d(Ca1—Ca2) of 3.703 (1) and 3.902 (1) Å, as well as the average Ca—F distance of 2.372 Å and the value of

the a and b axis with respect to the distances and the lattice parameter in CaF2 itself [d(Ca—Ca) = 3.869 Å, d(Ca—F) =

2.369 Å and a = 5.471 Å; values from Zhurova et al. (1996)]. The side units are made up from isolated [AlF6] octahedra

which share common edges with the central fluorite-type 2

∞[CaF8/2] layer. The average Al—F distance of 1.808 Å is in the

typical range for [AlF6] octahedra found in other complex aluminium fluorides. The largest deviation from the ideal

octahedral angle is 6.6°. Two triple layers are stacked along [001] with a stacking unit of c/2 and are held together by

(5)

supporting information

sup-2

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, i17–i19

prism (Fig. 3), with an average Ba—F distance of 2.850 Å. The F atoms exhibit either a coordination number (CN) of 3,

resulting in a distorted trigonal planar environment (F1, F2 and F4), or CN = 4, with a distorted tetrahedral coordination

geometry (F3, F5, F6 and F7).

S2. Experimental

A mixture of 457 mg BaF2 (Riedel-de Haën, 97%), 41 mg CaF2 (Merck, Suprapur) and 44 mg AlF3 (CERAC, 99.9%),

corresponding to a molar ratio of 5:1:1, was added to 1 g ZnCl2 (Aldrich, 98%) and placed in a platinum crucible. The

reaction mixture was then heated under atmospheric conditions to 873 K over a period of 2 h. The flux was kept at that

temperature for 2 h and then cooled to 473 K over a period of 12 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solidified melt

was leached with demineralized water. Colourless plates of the title compound were isolated from the residue.

[image:5.610.129.481.237.474.2]

Additionally, tetragonal plates of matlockite-type BaFCl (Sauvage, 1974) were found in the crystal mixture.

Figure 1

Powder patterns of α-BaCaAlF7. Top: calculated from single-crystal data; bottom: PDF entry # 27–0090 (ICDD, 2001);

(6)

supporting information

[image:6.610.132.374.70.395.2]

sup-3

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, i17–i19

Figure 2

(7)

supporting information

[image:7.610.126.492.71.347.2]

sup-4

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, i17–i19

Figure 3

Displacement ellipsoid plot of the coordination environment of the Ba atom with ellipsoids drawn at the 75% probability

level.

Barium calcium aluminium heptafluoride

Crystal data BaCaAlF7

Mr = 337.40

Monoclinic, P2/n Hall symbol: -p 2yac a = 5.3664 (5) Å b = 5.3846 (6) Å c = 18.8262 (19) Å β = 92.319 (2)° V = 543.55 (10) Å3

Z = 4

F(000) = 608 Dx = 4.123 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 3828 reflections θ = 3.3–30.5°

µ = 8.49 mm−1

T = 293 K Plate, colourless 0.12 × 0.08 × 0.06 mm

Data collection Area detector

diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) Tmin = 0.429, Tmax = 0.630

5719 measured reflections 1603 independent reflections 1477 reflections with I > 2σ(I) Rint = 0.020

θmax = 30.5°, θmin = 2.2°

(8)

supporting information

sup-5

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, i17–i19

Refinement Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019

wR(F2) = 0.044

S = 1.11 1603 reflections 93 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0157P)2 + 1.3785P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001 Δρmax = 0.76 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.72 e Å−3

Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 Extinction coefficient: 0.0038 (3)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

Ba 0.24906 (3) 0.24041 (3) −0.067757 (8) 0.01162 (7) Al 0.20069 (15) 0.22470 (14) 0.38092 (4) 0.00837 (15) Ca1 0.7500 0.20769 (13) 0.7500 0.00786 (13) Ca2 0.2500 0.68150 (13) 0.7500 0.00703 (13) F1 0.5997 (3) 0.5949 (3) 0.56404 (9) 0.0165 (3) F2 0.5649 (3) 0.8622 (3) 0.68045 (9) 0.0141 (3) F3 0.0901 (3) 0.4812 (3) 0.32626 (9) 0.0133 (3) F4 0.4141 (3) 0.3614 (3) 0.69206 (8) 0.0133 (3) F5 0.0530 (3) 0.7185 (3) 0.56042 (9) 0.0159 (3) F6 0.0154 (3) −0.0288 (3) 0.67494 (8) 0.0122 (3) F7 0.2750 (3) −0.0454 (3) 0.43446 (9) 0.0167 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

(9)

supporting information

sup-6

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, i17–i19

F7 0.0190 (8) 0.0144 (8) 0.0167 (8) 0.0033 (6) 0.0005 (7) 0.0049 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Ba—F4i 2.5498 (16) Ca1—F4xiii 2.2282 (17) Ba—F1i 2.6763 (17) Ca1—F4 2.2282 (17) Ba—F7ii 2.7542 (17) Ca1—F3vii 2.3880 (16) Ba—F1iii 2.7831 (17) Ca1—F3xiv 2.3880 (16) Ba—F5i 2.7860 (17) Ca1—F6xv 2.4102 (16) Ba—F6i 2.8244 (16) Ca1—F6xvi 2.4102 (16) Ba—F5iv 2.8660 (18) Ca1—F2xvii 2.4609 (18) Ba—F7i 2.9510 (17) Ca1—F2xviii 2.4609 (18) Ba—F5v 3.0058 (18) Ca1—Alx 3.4086 (9) Ba—F7vi 3.0102 (17) Ca1—Alxix 3.4086 (9) Ba—F3iv 3.1421 (17) Ca1—Ca2xvi 3.7025 (7) Ba—Ali 3.5178 (9) Ca1—Ca2 3.7025 (7) Al—F1vii 1.7535 (19) Ca2—F4xv 2.2392 (17) Al—F2vii 1.8038 (17) Ca2—F4 2.2392 (17) Al—F7 1.8047 (18) Ca2—F2 2.3868 (16) Al—F3 1.8083 (18) Ca2—F2xv 2.3868 (16) Al—F5viii 1.8133 (18) Ca2—F6xx 2.4231 (17) Al—F6ix 1.8614 (18) Ca2—F6xxi 2.4231 (17) Al—Ca1x 3.4086 (9) Ca2—F3viii 2.4389 (17) Al—Ca2viii 3.4201 (9) Ca2—F3xiv 2.4389 (17) Al—Bai 3.5178 (9) Ca2—Alviii 3.4201 (9) Al—Baxi 3.6427 (8) Ca2—Alxiv 3.4201 (9) Al—Baxii 3.9106 (8) Ca2—Ca1xxii 3.7025 (7)

(10)

supporting information

sup-7

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, i17–i19

F6i—Ba—F5iv 112.66 (5) F3xiv—Ca1—F6xvi 163.38 (6) F4i—Ba—F7i 152.69 (5) F6xv—Ca1—F6xvi 116.22 (8) F1i—Ba—F7i 107.15 (5) F4xiii—Ca1—F2xvii 147.39 (6) F7ii—Ba—F7i 73.51 (6) F4—Ca1—F2xvii 73.69 (6) F1iii—Ba—F7i 51.97 (5) F3vii—Ca1—F2xvii 110.94 (6) F5i—Ba—F7i 117.99 (5) F3xiv—Ca1—F2xvii 134.67 (5) F6i—Ba—F7i 112.10 (5) F6xv—Ca1—F2xvii 71.17 (6) F5iv—Ba—F7i 50.75 (5) F6xvi—Ca1—F2xvii 61.58 (5) F4i—Ba—F5v 112.88 (5) F4xiii—Ca1—F2xviii 73.69 (6) F1i—Ba—F5v 155.78 (5) F4—Ca1—F2xviii 147.39 (7) F7ii—Ba—F5v 88.15 (5) F3vii—Ca1—F2xviii 134.67 (5) F1iii—Ba—F5v 111.77 (5) F3xiv—Ca1—F2xviii 110.94 (6) F5i—Ba—F5v 136.74 (6) F6xv—Ca1—F2xviii 61.58 (5) F6i—Ba—F5v 52.08 (5) F6xvi—Ca1—F2xviii 71.17 (6) F5iv—Ba—F5v 81.12 (5) F2xvii—Ca1—F2xviii 81.79 (8) F7i—Ba—F5v 60.06 (5) F4xv—Ca2—F4 79.34 (9) F4i—Ba—F7vi 112.88 (5) F4xv—Ca2—F2 151.92 (7) F1i—Ba—F7vi 154.80 (5) F4—Ca2—F2 75.25 (6) F7ii—Ba—F7vi 137.13 (7) F4xv—Ca2—F2xv 75.25 (6) F1iii—Ba—F7vi 113.73 (5) F4—Ca2—F2xv 151.92 (7) F5i—Ba—F7vi 88.07 (5) F2—Ca2—F2xv 131.87 (9) F6i—Ba—F7vi 52.00 (4) F4xv—Ca2—F6xx 114.63 (6) F5iv—Ba—F7vi 60.92 (5) F4—Ca2—F6xx 125.05 (6) F7i—Ba—F7vi 83.08 (5) F2—Ca2—F6xx 72.22 (6) F5v—Ba—F7vi 48.98 (5) F2xv—Ca2—F6xx 77.31 (6) F4i—Ba—F3iv 58.84 (5) F4xv—Ca2—F6xxi 125.05 (6) F1i—Ba—F3iv 95.87 (5) F4—Ca2—F6xxi 114.63 (6) F7ii—Ba—F3iv 138.91 (5) F2—Ca2—F6xxi 77.31 (6) F1iii—Ba—F3iv 127.61 (5) F2xv—Ca2—F6xxi 72.22 (6) F5i—Ba—F3iv 50.21 (4) F6xx—Ca2—F6xxi 99.85 (8) F6i—Ba—F3iv 60.14 (4) F4xv—Ca2—F3viii 73.17 (6) F5iv—Ba—F3iv 99.88 (4) F4—Ca2—F3viii 74.72 (6) F7i—Ba—F3iv 146.66 (4) F2—Ca2—F3viii 110.68 (6) F5v—Ba—F3iv 105.15 (4) F2xv—Ca2—F3viii 86.55 (6) F7vi—Ba—F3iv 66.75 (4) F6xx—Ca2—F3viii 158.97 (6) F1vii—Al—F2vii 95.58 (9) F6xxi—Ca2—F3viii 61.92 (6) F1vii—Al—F7 90.02 (9) F4xv—Ca2—F3xiv 74.72 (6) F2vii—Al—F7 90.26 (8) F4—Ca2—F3xiv 73.17 (6) F1vii—Al—F3 95.26 (9) F2—Ca2—F3xiv 86.55 (6) F2vii—Al—F3 93.15 (8) F2xv—Ca2—F3xiv 110.68 (6) F7—Al—F3 173.40 (9) F6xx—Ca2—F3xiv 61.92 (6) F1vii—Al—F5viii 90.13 (9) F6xxi—Ca2—F3xiv 158.97 (6) F2vii—Al—F5viii 173.74 (9) F3viii—Ca2—F3xiv 137.88 (8)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, y, −z+1/2; (ii) x−1/2, −y, z−1/2; (iii) x−1/2, −y+1, z−1/2; (iv) x+1/2, −y+1, z−1/2; (v) −x+1/2, y−1, −z+1/2; (vi) x+1/2, −y,

z−1/2; (vii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (viii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ix) −x, −y, −z+1; (x) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (xi) x−1/2, −y, z+1/2; (xii) x−1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (xiii) −x+3/2, y, −z+3/2; (xiv) x+1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (xv) −x+1/2, y, −z+3/2; (xvi) x+1, y, z; (xvii) x, y−1, z; (xviii) −x+3/2, y−1, −z+3/2; (xix) x+1/2, −y, z+1/2; (xx) −x+1/2,

Figure

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

References

Related documents

Petrescu-Mag Ioan Valentin: Bioflux, Cluj-Napoca (Romania) Petrescu Dacinia Crina: UBB Cluj, Cluj-Napoca (Romania) Sima Rodica Maria: USAMV Cluj, Cluj-Napoca (Romania)

As with other rapidly reconfigurable devices, optically reconfigurable gate arrays (ORGAs) have been developed, which combine a holographic memory and an optically programmable

We have found adequate for transportation conformity purposes the motor vehicle emission budgets in the Ventura County 2004 Air Quality Management Plan Revision (2004 Revision) for

A 21 year old is five weeks pregnant and is experiencing vaginal bleedingb. When reviewing the possible causes of the bleeding, you

Another important JUJUTSU (柔術) school that is called YOSHIN RYU (楊心流), but not related to HONTAI YOSHIN RYU (本體楊心流), had a great influence on the

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current vac- cination status of the HCWs in all of the Departments different from the Department for the Health of Women and Children of one

Tools Instruments Seminar Publication Research Team Tools Information Knowledge IP Customers Peers Textbooks Remote Students Web Content Problems:. • LONG stove pipe • Web

The hypothesis for the second research question stated that students who participate in restorative justice practices experience a difference in Active Accountability compared to