• No results found

Online Appendix for the paper Saving Lives: Evidence from a Conditional Food Supplementation Program

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Online Appendix for the paper Saving Lives: Evidence from a Conditional Food Supplementation Program"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Online Appendix for the paper “Saving Lives: Evidence from a

Conditional Food Supplementation Program”

Marian W. Meller and Stephan Litschig November 26, 2013

List of Figures

1 Figure 1: Impact on child mortality, maximum differential exposure cohorts, h=10 . 2 2 Figure 2: Impact on child mortality, seasonally matched non-exposed cohorts . . . 3 3 Figure 3: Impact on child mortality, between 1 and 8 months differential exposure

cohorts . . . 4 4 Figure 4: Impact on child mortality, maximum differential exposure cohorts,

be-fore PANN 2000 . . . 5 5 Figure 5: Impact on child mortality, maxium differential exposure cohorts, post

scaling up of PANN 2000 . . . 6

List of Tables

1 Table 1: Impact on fertility, kids born between April and November 2001 . . . 7 2 Table 2: Impact on fertility, kids born between September 2000 and November 2001 8 3 Table 7.1: Impact on health check-ups, quadratic speci cation . . . 9 4 Table 8.1: Impact on child mortality, seasonally matched non-exposed cohorts . . . 10 5 Table 8.2: Impact on child mortality, between 1 and 8 months differential exposure

cohorts . . . 11 6 Table 3: Impact on child mortality, maximum differential exposure cohorts, before

PANN 2000 . . . 12

(2)

7 Table 4: Impact on child mortality, maximum differential exposure cohorts, post scaling-up of PANN 2000 . . . 13

(3)

Figure 1: Impact on child mortality, maximum differential exposure cohorts, h=10

-.025 -.015 -.005 .005 .015 .025

Chil

d mort

alit

y rat

e (res

idua

l, bin

mea

n)

.7905 .8105 .8305 .8505 .8705 .8905 .9105 .9305 .9505 .9705 .9905

Consumption poverty index

Program provinces

-.025 -.015 -.005 .005 .015 .025

Chil

d mort

alit

y rat

e (res

idua

l, bin

mea

n)

.7905 .8105 .8305 .8505 .8705 .8905 .9105 .9305 .9505 .9705 .9905

Consumption poverty index

Linear fit Quadratic fit

Sierra provinces

Notes:

The unit of observation is the rural

parroquia

. The sample is restricted to

parroquias

within 10 percentage point distance to the cutoff. The residuals are computed from regressions

with the control variables listed in Table 6. Program provinces are Bolívar, Chimborazo,

Imbabura, and Manabí. Sierra provinces are Bolívar, Chimborazo, and Imbabura.

(4)

Figure 2: Impact on child mortality, seasonally matched non-exposed cohorts

-.025 -.005 .015 .035

Chil

d mort

alit

y rat

e (res

idua

l, bin

mea

n)

.8305

.8505

.8705

.8905

.9105

.9305

.9505

Consumption poverty index

Program provinces

-.005 -.025 .015 .035

Chil

d mort

alit

y rat

e (res

idua

l, bin

mea

n)

.8305

.8505

.8705

.8905

.9105

.9305

.9505

Consumption poverty index

Linear fit

Quadratic fit

Sierra provinces

Notes:

The unit of observation is the rural

parroquia

. The sample is restricted to

parroquias

within 6 percentage point distance to the cutoff. The residuals are computed from regressions

with the control variables listed in Table 8.1 of the Appendix. Program provinces are Bolívar,

Chimborazo, Imbabura, and Manabí. Sierra provinces are Bolívar, Chimborazo, and Imbabura.

(5)

Figure 3: Impact on child mortality, between 1 and 8 months differential exposure

cohorts

-.025 -.015 -.005 .005 .015 .025

Chil

d mo

rtal

ity ra

te (

resid

ual, b

in me

an)

.8305

.8505

.8705

.8905

.9105

.9305

.9505

Consumption poverty index

Program provinces

-.025 -.015 -.005 .005 .015 .025

Chil

d mo

rtal

ity ra

te (

resid

ual, b

in me

an)

.8305

.8505

.8705

.8905

.9105

.9305

.9505

Consumption poverty index

Linear fit

Quadratic fit

Sierra provinces

Notes:

The unit of observation is the rural

parroquia

. The sample is restricted to

parroquias

within 6 percentage point distance to the cutoff. The residuals are computed from regressions

with the control variables listed in Table 8.2 of the Appendix. Program provinces are Bolívar,

Chimborazo, Imbabura, and Manabí. Sierra provinces are Bolívar, Chimborazo, and Imbabura.

5
(6)

Figure 4: Impact on child mortality, maximum differential exposure cohorts,

be-fore PANN 2000

-.025 -.015 -.005 .005 .015 .025

Chil

d mo

rtal

ity ra

te (

resid

ual, b

in me

an)

.8305 .8505 .8705 .8905 .9105 .9305 .9505

Consumption poverty index

Program provinces

-.025 -.015 -.005 .005 .015 .025

Chil

d mo

rtal

ity ra

te (

resid

ual, b

in me

an)

.8305 .8505 .8705 .8905 .9105 .9305 .9505

Consumption poverty index

Linear fit Quadratic fit

Sierra provinces

Notes:

The unit of observation is the rural

parroquia

. The sample is restricted to

parroquias

within 6 percentage point distance to the cutoff. The residuals are computed from regressions

with the control variables listed in Table 3 of the Appendix. Program provinces are Bolívar,

Chimborazo, Imbabura, and Manabí. Sierra provinces are Bolívar, Chimborazo, and Imbabura.

(7)

Figure 5: Impact on child mortality, maxium differential exposure cohorts, post

scaling up of PANN 2000

-.025 -.015 -.005 .005 .015 .025

Chil

d mo

rtal

ity ra

te (

resid

ual, b

in me

an)

.8305 .8505 .8705 .8905 .9105 .9305 .9505

Consumption poverty index

Program provinces

-.025 -.015 -.005 .005 .015 .025

Chil

d mo

rtal

ity ra

te (

resid

ual, b

in me

an)

.8305 .8505 .8705 .8905 .9105 .9305 .9505

Consumption poverty index

Linear fit Quadratic fit

Sierra provinces

Notes:

The unit of observation is the rural

parroquia

. The sample is restricted to

parroquias

within 6 percentage point distance to the cutoff. The residuals are computed from regressions

with the control variables listed in Table 4 of the Appendix. Program provinces are Bolívar,

Chimborazo, Imbabura, and Manabí. Sierra provinces are Bolívar, Chimborazo, and Imbabura.

(8)

Table

1:

Impact

on

fertility

,kids

born

between

April

and

No

vember

2001

Dependent var iable: num ber of liv e

-births between April

and Novem ber 2001 per wo m an aged 15 -4 4 y ears in November 2001 Neighbor hood h (percentage points) 3 4 5 6 P re -program controls N Y N Y N Y N Y Compa rison m ean Panel A: B olív ar, Chim borazo, Im babura, Manabí -0. 009 0. 004 -0. 004 -0. 0 01 0. 001 -0. 0 01 0. 003 0. 0 01 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0 .13 (0. 015 ) (0. 013 ) (0. 015 ) (0. 015 ) (0. 011 ) (0. 011 ) (0. 011 ) (0. 0 10 ) Observat ions 48 48 58 58 70 70 75 75 R 2 0. 1 10 0. 490 0. 086 0. 350 0. 062 0. 294 0. 059 0. 273 Com pari son m ean Panel B: Bolív ar, Chim borazo, I mbabura -0 .024 -0.020 -0.008 0. 002 -0. 006 -0.0 10 0. 002 0. 0 00 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0 .15 (0. 021 ) (0. 028 ) (0. 022 ) (0. 024 ) (0. 017 ) (0. 019 ) (0. 017 ) (0. 018 ) Observat ions 30 30 39 39 46 46 49 49 R 2 0. 2 19 0. 62 0 0. 152 0. 402 0. 112 0. 335 0. 077 0. 277 Notes: OLS estimat es. The unit of observat ion is the rural parroquia . h is the per centage poi nt distance from the eligibi lity cutoff 0.8905. P re -program controls include the n u m b er o f l iv e -births between April and Novem ber 1990 per wom an aged 15 -44 y ears in Novem ber 1990 , num ber of check -ups at health posts per 0 to 4 year -old during y ear 1999 (1999 heal th census), proportion of last -born children born between April 1988 and F ebruary 1989 who had died by Novemb er 1990 (1990 census), proportion of stunted children under 5 y ears old in 1990 (199 0 census and 1988 nutr itio n survey ), an indicator for the presence of a heal th center in the parro quia in 2000 (20 00 health census ), proport io n of wom en aged 18 or older wh o com pleted prim ary schooling (2001 census), proport ion of dwelli ngs wit h access to piped water (2001 census) , proportion of households w ith toilet (2001 census), average number of persons per room (2001 census), number of last -born children bor n between A pril 1988 and F ebruary 1989 liv ing in the parroquia in 1990 (1990 census) . Comparis on m eans are the estim ated constant term s in h = 3 without contr

ols. Robust standard errors in parenthes

es. *, ** , and ** * indica te significance at 10%, 5%, a nd 1% lev el s, respecti vely.

(9)

Table

2:

Impact

on

fertility

,kids

born

between

September

2000

and

No

vember

2001

Dependent var iable: num ber of liv e -births between Septe m ber 2000 and Nov emb er 2001 per wom an aged 15 -4 4 years in Novem ber 2001 Neighbor hood h (percentage points) 3 4 5 6 P re -program controls N Y N Y N Y N Y Com par ison m ean Panel A: Bolí var, Chim borazo, Im babura, Manabí 0. 0 10 0. 0 15 0. 00 7 0. 0 01 0. 00 6 -0. 0 0 3 0. 00 5 -0. 0 0 2 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0 .22 (0. 0 21 ) (0. 0 18 ) (0. 0 21 ) (0. 01 7 ) (0. 01 6 ) (0. 01 4 ) (0 .01 5 ) (0. 0 1 3 ) Observat ions 48 48 58 58 70 70 75 75 R 2 0. 044 0. 4 37 0. 0 41 0. 459 0. 0 45 0. 388 0. 05 8 0. 414 Com pari son m ean Panel B: Bolív ar, Chim bo razo, Imbabura 0. 009 -0.02 6 0. 009 -0. 01 5 0. 014 -0.0 1 5 0. 013 -0. 0 0 8 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0.23 (0. 036 ) (0. 03 7 ) (0. 033 ) (0. 032 ) (0. 026 ) (0. 023 ) (0. 024 ) (0. 020 ) Observat ions 30 30 39 39 46 46 49 49 R 2 0. 06 2 0. 650 0. 060 0. 5 50 0. 041 0. 491 0. 053 0. 494 Notes: OLS estimat es. The unit of observat ion is the rural parroquia . h is the per centage poi nt distance from the eligibi lity cutoff 0.8905. P re

-program controls includ

e the num ber of live -births b etween Septem ber 1989 and Novem ber 1990 per wom an aged 15 -44 y ears in November 1990 , number of check -ups at health post s per 0 to 4 year -old during y ear 1999 (1999 health census) , propor tion of last -born children bor n between April 1988 and February 1989 who had died by Novem ber 1990 (1990 censu s), proportion of stu nted childr en under 5 y ears old in 1990 (1990 cens us and 1 988 nut rit ion surv ey), an indica tor for the presence of a h ealth cent er in th e parroqui a in 200 0 (2000 he alth c ensus), pr oport ion of wom en aged 18 or older who com pleted prim ary schooling (2001 census) , propor tion of dwell ings wit h access to piped water (2001 census ), proportion of households w ith toilet (2001 census), average number of persons per room (2001 census), number of last -born childr en born between April 1988 and F ebruary 1989 liv ing in the parroquia in 1990 (1990 census) . Comparis on m eans are the estim ated constant term s in h = 3 without contr

ols. Robust standard errors in parenthes

es. *, ** , and ** * i ndicate sign ificance at 10%, 5 %, and 1% l evels , respectiv el y . 9

(10)

Table

7.1:

Impact

on

health

check-ups,

quadratic

specication

Dependent v ariable: Num ber of check -ups at healt h post s per 0 to 4 y ear -old duri ng y ear 2000 Neighborhood h (percent age points ) 3 4 5 6 P re -program controls N Y N Y N Y N Y Compar ison m ean Panel A: Bolí var , Chim borazo, Im babura, Manabí 0.00 1 0.377 0.119 0.312 0.072 0.172 0.144 0.235 Treatm ent parroquia (ye s = 1) 0.869 (0.436) (0.411) (0.373) (0.313) (0.356) (0.256) (0.333) (0.268) F -test (quadratic term s) 1.15 9 0.116 1.461 0.311 0.211 0.065 0.666 0.861 [p -value ] [0.324] [0.891] [0.241] [0.734] [0.810] [0.937] [0.517] [0.428] Observati ons 48 48 58 58 70 70 75 75 R 2 0.04 5 0.581 0.110 0.612 0.02 4 0.580 0.022 0.574 Com parison m ean Panel B: Bolí var, Chim borazo, Im babura 0.460 1.122 0.920** 1.504** 1.165** 1.340** 0.986* 1.1 80 ** Treatm ent parroquia (ye s = 1) 0.783 (0.339) (0.640) (0.439) (0.663) (0.495) (0.557) (0.499) (0.467) F -test (quadrat ic terms ) 1.949 0.519 0.569 1.252 1.069 0.995 1.284 3.275 [p -value ] [0.164] [0.606] [0.572] [0.305] [0.353] [0.382] [0.287] [0.050] Observati ons 30 30 39 39 46 46 49 49 R 2 0.196 0.770 0.220 0.741 0.188 0.747 0.159 0.728 Notes: OL S e st im at es . T he un it of ob se rv at ion i s t he ru ral parroquia . h is the perce nt

age point distance from

the eligi bility cutoff 0.8905 . T h e total number of check -u p s o f 0 t o 4 y ea r-olds is norm alized by the esti m ated populat ion of 0 to 4 y ear -olds in 2000 based on F lores (2001). Pr e -program control s include num ber of check -ups at health posts per 0 to 4 y ear -old during y ear 1999 (1999 health census), proport ion of last -bo rn children born between April 1988 and F ebruary 1989 who had died by Novem ber 1990 (1990 censu s), proportion of stunted children under 5 yea rs old in 1990 (199 0 cen sus and 1988 nutri tion surv ey) , an indi cator for the p resence of a heal th center in the parroquia in 2000 (2 000 hea lth census), propor tion of wom en aged 18 or older who com pleted primary schooling (2001 census), proporti on of dwell ings wit h access to piped wate r (2001 census), propor tion of househol ds wit h to

ilet (2001 census), average number of persons per room (2001

census), num ber of last -bo rn child ren born betw een April 1999 and F ebruary 2000 living in the parroquia in 2001 (2001 census), num ber of last -born children born between April 1988 and F ebruary 19 89 livi ng in the parroquia in 1990 (19 90 censu s). Co m paris on m eans are the estim ated constant term s in h = 6 wit hout contr ols. Rob ust st andard error s in pare ntheses. *, ** , and *** indicat e significa nce at 10% , 5% , and 1% l evel s, respect iv el y .

(11)

Table

8.1:

Impact

on

child

mortality

,seasonally

matched

non-e

xposed

cohorts

Dependent vari

able: Proportion of last

-born chil dren born between April 1997 and F ebruary 19 9 8 who ha d died by N ovem ber 2001 Neighborhood h (percentage points) 3 4 5 6 P re -program controls N Y N Y N Y N Y Compar ison m ean Panel A: Bolív ar, Chim borazo, Im babura, Manabí 0.01 0 0.0 30* -0.00 5 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.00 7 0.0 11 0.0 1 4 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0.0 14 (0.01 3 ) (0.01 6 ) (0.01 3 ) (0.01 6 ) (0.01 1 ) (0.01 2 ) (0.01 5 ) (0.01 6 ) Observations 48 48 58 58 70 70 75 75 R 2 0.0 28 0. 320 0.0 60 0. 195 0.0 03 0. 139 0.0 37 0. 154 Com pariso n m ean Panel B: Bol ív ar, Chim borazo, Im babura -0.0 0 4 0.0 41* -0.0 21 -0.01 1 -0.0 04 0.0 11 0.0 20 0.0 30 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0.02 0 (0.02 3 ) (0.0 2 3 ) (0.01 9 ) (0.0 30 ) (0.01 6 ) (0.01 1 ) (0.0 23 ) (0.0 26 ) Observations 30 30 39 39 46 46 49 49 R 2 0.0 03 0. 623 0 .135 0. 345 0. 008 0. 189 0.0 80 0. 274 Notes: OLS estim ates. The unit of obser vati on is the rural parroquia . Child mort ality is the proportion of last -born children born betwee n October April 1997 and F ebruary 1998 who had died by Novem ber 2001 (2001 cen sus). P re -program controls include number of check -ups at health posts per 0 to 4 y ear -old during y ear 1999 (1999 health census), proporti on of last -born children born between October 1986 and August 1987 who had died by Novem ber 1990 (1990 census), pr opo rtion of stunted children under 5 y ears old in 1990 (1990 census and 1988 nut riti on survey ), an indicator for the presence of a healt h center in the parroquia in 2000 (2000

health census), proportio

n of wom en aged 18 or old er who compl eted prim ary schoolin g (2001 census), proporti on of dwelli ngs with access to piped water (2001 census), proportion of households with toilet (2001 census), averag e number of persons per room (2001 census), number of last -born children born betw een October 1997 and August 1998 livi ng in the parroquia in 2001 (2001 census), num ber of last -born children born between October 1986 and August 1987 liv ing in the parroquia in 1990 (1990 census) . Compari son m eans are the estim ated constant terms in h = 3 without controls. Robust stand ard errors in parentheses. *, ** , and *** indicate si gnificance at 10%, 5%, a nd 1% l evels , respectiv el y . 11

(12)

Table

8.2:

Impact

on

child

mortality

,between

1

and

8

months

dif

ferential

exposure

cohorts

Dependent var iable: Proporti on of last

-born children born

between Septem ber 199 8 and August 2000 w ho had di ed by Novembe r 2001 Neighbor hood h (percentage points) 3 4 5 6 P re -program controls N Y N Y N Y N Y Com par ison m ean Panel A: Bolí var, Chim borazo, Im babura, Manabí -0.0 06 -0.0 09 -0.0 05 -0.0 08 -0.0 04 -0.0 07 -0.00 4 -0.0 07 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0.02 2 (0.00 7 ) (0.00 7 ) (0.00 7 ) (0.00 6 ) (0.00 6 ) (0.0 0 6 ) (0.00 5 ) (0.00 6 ) Observat ions 48 48 58 58 70 70 75 75 R 2 0.0 30 0. 329 0. 008 0.4 07 0.0 07 0. 340 0.0 10 0. 338 Com pari son m ean Panel B: Bolív ar, Chim borazo, Im babura -0.0 08 -0.0 09 -0.0 07 -0.0 05 -0.0 05 -0.0 05 -0.0 04 -0.0 04 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0.0 2 4 (0.01 0 ) (0.01 6 ) (0.01 0 ) (0.01 1 ) (0.0 09 ) (0.0 09 ) (0.0 08 ) (0.0 08 ) Observat ions 30 30 39 39 46 46 49 49 R 2 0.0 44 0. 385 0. 018 0.4 52 0.0 15 0.4 32 0.0 16 0. 438 Notes: OLS estimat es. The unit of observat ion is the rural parroquia . h is the per centage poi nt distance from the eligibi lity cutoff 0.8905. Child mort ality is the proportion of last -born chi ldren born between Sept em ber 1998 and August 2000 wh o had di ed by November 2001 (2001 census). Pre -program

controls include number of check

-ups at health posts per 0 to 4 y ear -old during y ear 1999 (1999 healt h census), proporti on of last -born children bor n bet ween Septem ber 198 7 and August 1989 who had died by November 1990 (1990 census), pro portion of stunt ed children under 5 y ears old in 1990 (1990 census and 1988 nutrit ion survey) , an indicat or for the presence of a health center in the parroquia in 200

0 (2000 health census), proporti

on of

wom

en aged

18 or older

who comple

ted primary schooling (2001

census ), proportion of dwell ings with access to piped water (2001 census), proportion of househol ds wit h toilet (2001 census) , average num ber of per sons per room (2001 census ), number of last -born children born between Septem ber 199 8 and August 2000 livi ng in the parroquia in 2001 (20 01 cens us), number of last -born children born between Septe m ber 198 7 and August 1989 living in the parroquia in 1990 (1990 cens u s). Comparison means are the estimated constant terms in h = 3

without controls. Robust standard error

s in parentheses. *, ** , and ** * indica te significance at 10%, 5%, a nd 1% lev els, respectiv el y .

(13)

Table

3:

Impact

on

child

mortality

,maximum

dif

ferential

exposure

cohorts,

before

PANN

2000

Dependent v ariable: Proportion of l ast -born childr en born between April 19 88 and F ebruary 1989

who had died

by N ovem ber 1990 Neighborhood h (perce ntage points) 3 4 5 6 P re -program controls N Y N Y N Y N Y Com pa rison m ean Panel A: Bolív ar, Chim borazo, Im babura, Manabí -0.0 08 -0.0 07 -0.0 05 -0.0 0 2 -0.0 0 4 -0.0 0 3 -0.00 3 -0.0 0 2 Treatment parroquia (yes = 1) 0.0 3 1 (0.0 11 ) (0.0 1 1 ) (0.0 10 ) (0.0 10 ) (0.00 9 ) (0.00 9 ) (0.00 8 ) (0.00 8 ) Obse rvations 48 48 58 58 70 70 75 75 R 2 0.0 09 0. 0 66 0. 0 51 0. 13 7 0.0 2 3 0. 0 70 0.0 2 2 0. 06 9 Compa rison m ean Panel B: Bolív ar, C him borazo, Im babura -0.0 02 0.0 0 0 -0.0 1 1 -0.0 04 -0.0 19 -0.01 3 -0.01 4 -0.0 1 0 Treatment parroquia (yes = 1) 0.0 32 (0.0 21 ) (0.0 21 ) (0.01 4 ) (0.014) (0.01 3 ) (0.01 4 ) (0.01 1) (0.01 1 ) Obse rvations 3 0 3 0 39 39 46 46 49 49 R 2 0.0 9 9 0. 1 71 0.1 21 0. 2 37 0.0 56 0. 1 59 0.0 51 0. 1 62 Notes: OLS estimates. The unit of observation is the rural parroqui a . h is the percentage point distance from the eligibility cutoff 0.8905. Child mortality is the proportion of last -born childr en bor n between April 19 88 and F ebruary 1989 who had di ed by November 1990 ( 19 90 census). P re -program co ntrols include num ber of last -born children

born between April

19 88 an d F ebruary 1989 living in the parr oquia in 1990 (1990 census) and the avera ge age of the children in that cohort. Comparison means are the estimated constant terms in h = 6 without controls. Robust stan

dard errors in parentheses.

*, ** , and *** indicate si gnificance at 10%, 5%, and 1% l evel s, respectiv el y . 13

(14)

Table

4:

Impact

on

child

mortality

,maximum

dif

ferential

exposure

cohorts,

post

scaling-up

of

PANN

2000

Dependent var iable: Proporti on of last

-born children born

between April 2008 and F ebruary 200 9 who ha d died by N ovem ber 20 10 Neighbor hood h (percentage points) 3 4 5 6 P re -program controls N Y N Y N Y N Y Com pa rison m ean Pane l A: Bolí var , Chim borazo, Im babura, Manabí -0.0 07 -0.01 3 -0.0 06 -0.0 04 -0.0 05 -0.0 06 -0.00 5 -0.0 06 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0.0 14 (0.00 8) (0.0 11 ) (0.00 7 ) (0.00 9 ) (0.007) (0.00 8 ) (0.00 6 ) (0.00 8 ) Observat ions 48 48 58 58 70 70 75 75 R 2 0.0 15 0. 149 0. 015 0. 118 0.0 10 0. 112 0.0 12 0. 120 Com pari son m ean Panel B: Bolív ar, C him borazo, Im babura -0.0 12 -0.0 11 -0.0 03 0.0 04 -0.0 02 0.0 01 -0.0 02 0.0 01 Treatm ent parroquia (yes = 1) 0.0 14 (0.01 5 ) (0.0 29 ) (0.01 2 ) (0.01 9 ) (0.01 2 ) (0.01 6 ) (0.010) (0.01 3 ) Observat ions 30 30 39 39 46 46 49 49 R 2 0.0 3 5 0. 248 0. 021 0. 165 0.0 18 0. 153 0.0 16 0. 147 Notes: OLS estimat es. The unit of observat ion is the rural parroquia . h is the per centage poi nt distance from the eligibi lity cutoff 0.8905. Child mort ality is the proportion of last -born children bor n betwee n April 2008 and F ebruary 200 9 who had died by November 20 10 (20 10 census). Pre -program

controls include number of check

-ups at health posts per 0 to 4 y ear -old during y ear 1999 (1999 healt h census), proporti on of last

-born children born betwe

en April 1988 and February

1989

who

had died by Novem

ber 1990

(1990 census)

, proportion of stunted childr

en under 5 y ears old in 19 90 (1990 census and 1988 nutrition survey ), an indicator for the p resence of a health center in the parroquia in 2000 (2000 h ealth census), proport ion of wom en aged 18 or older w ho com pleted prim ary schooling (2001 census) , proport ion of dwell ings with access to piped water (2001 census) , proportion of household s wit h toilet (2001 census), aver age num ber of persons per room (200 1 census), number of last -born children born between A pril 1999 and F ebruary 2000 liv ing in the parro quia in 2001 (2001 census), num ber of last -born children bor n between April 1988 and F ebruary 1989 liv ing in the parroquia in 1990 (1990 census) . Comparis on m eans are the estim ated constant term s in h = 3 without contr

ols. Robust standard errors in parenthes

es. *, ** , and ** * indica te significance at 10%, 5%, a nd 1% lev els, respectiv el y .

References

Related documents

o Salivation – stimulated by the sight, smell or thought of food; also stimulated by parasympathetic impulses, the presence of food in the oral cavity, and irritation of the

The reason why equilibrium pro…ts (welfare) may be higher (lower) under price competition than under quantity and supply function competition lies in …rms being able to price well

In the 18 articles included in the study, 10 different templates or sets of data are described: 2 methodologies for assessing major incident responses, 3 templates intended

Impact of a Growth Mindset Intervention on Academic Performance of Students at Two Urban High Schools..

students from across Iraq were admitted to the first undergraduate class, and the university simultaneously launched an MBA program for students planning to study business

On the other hand, have developed techniques and plants that are responsible for producing fuels from waste plastics (ej, RPF (Refused Paper and Plastic Fuel).. Several

Equilux 17 th March Moon – waning 27.52 days old Does Not fit the Apostolic testimony of the crucifixion narrative in relation to the timing of the two calendars governing the

While this is the first larger study suggesting that checkpoint inhibition may also confer benefit to patients with brain tumors, various questions remain open such as the