• No results found

CNS prescription drugs and their ability to impair, y. Antidepressants. Indications for the existence of behavioral toxicity of antidepressants

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CNS prescription drugs and their ability to impair, y. Antidepressants. Indications for the existence of behavioral toxicity of antidepressants"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

“CNS prescription drugs and

their ability to impair”, y

JG Ramaekers, Dept Neuropsychology & Psychopharmacology Maastricht University, The Netherlands

(j.ramaekers@maastrichtuniversity.nl)

FACTA 2014

Antidepressants

TCAs imipramine, amitriptyline, desipramine,

doxepin

RIMAs moclobemide

SSRIs fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline,.

.

(es)citalopram, fluvoxamine

SNRIs venlafaxine, milnacipran

SARIs trazodone, nefazodone

NaSSA mirtazapine

vortioxetine

Indications for the existence of

behavioral toxicity of antidepressants

Epidemiological surveys

Basic pharmacology

(2)

Antidepressants Authors Cases vs Controls Odds Ratio TCAs SSRIs TCA+SSRIs TCAs+MAO-A Leveille et al (1994) Ray et al (1992) Rapoport (2011) Barbone et al (1998) Ravera et al (2012) Rapoport (2011) Meuleners et al (2011) Ravera (2012) 234-447 5418-33283 7393 19386 3963-18828 7393 616 (elderly) drivers with chronic condition !

3963-18828 2.3 2.2 1.03 (NS) 0.9 (NS) 2.02 1.1 1.8 4.1 1.45 (NS)

Epidemiological data

Crash risk? NS = not significant

Synaptic Effects of Antidepressants

Reuptake inhibition Receptor blockade TCA NE 5HT DA H1 α1 AcM D2 5HT2 Imipramine X X X X X X X Amitriptyline X X X X X X X SSRIs Fluoxetine X Paroxetine X X X Sertraline X X Fluvoxamine X X (es) Citalopram X

Synaptic Effects of Antidepressants

Reuptake inhibitors M A O Receptor agonist Receptor blockade SNRIs NE 5HT DA A 5HT1 H1 α1 α2 5HT2 5HT3 5HT7 Venlafaxine X X Milnacipran X X RIMAs Moclobemide X SARIs Nefazodone X X X X Trazodone X X X X NaSSA Mirtazapine X X X X Vortioxetine X X X X
(3)

Models Antidepressants Results Psychomotor tests

Cognition Actual driving

All individual ADs Impairment after sedative ADs

Experimental data

Driver impairment?

Schematic representation of the

Road Tracking Test

Left lane right lane

+5V 0 -5V

Calculation

and meaning

of the

“weaving

index”

(4)

Mean SDLP as a function of BAC

SDLP change scores at legal BAC limits for driving under the

influence in EC and US

General design

healthy subjects (N = 18 – 24)

cross-over, double-blind, placebo controlled

driving test at Tmax on Day 1 (acute effect)

driving test after 1 or 2 weeks of treatment

(subchronic effect)

therapeutic doses ( 1 or 2 dose regimens)

active control to demonstrate sensitivity

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

Day 1 Day 7/8 Day 15

DOX DOX AMI AMI IMI MIA MIA MIA 25mg td 25 mg td 25 mg td 50+25mg 50 mg bd 10mg td 10mg td 10 / 20mg td 1.0 0.8 0.5

Equivalent effect

of BAC (mg/ml)

Δ

S

D

L

at

er

al

P

os

it

ion

(

cm

)

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

TCAs and mianserin

(5)

MOC FLU PAR PAR NEF NEF VENL VENL VOR ESC 200mg bd 20mg hs 20mg qam 40mg qam 100mg bd 200mg bd 37,5/75mg bd 37,5mg bd 10mg hs 10/20 mg hs 1.0 0.8 0.5

Equivalent effect

of BAC (mg/ml)

Δ

S

D

L

at

er

al

P

os

it

ion

(

cm

)

*

*

*

RIMAs, SSRIs, SARIs and SNRIs

Regular antidepressants

• Fluoxetine

• Sertraline

• Paroxetine

• Bupropion

• Venlafaxine

• (Es)Citalopram

• Trazodone

Driving impairment after novel

antidepressants could it ever occur ?

• dose-effect studies

• acute vs subchronic effects

• pharmacokinetic interactions

• Poor vs Extensive metabolizers

(6)

Antidepressant effects

at P450 isozymes

CYP1A2 CYP2C19 CYP2D6 CYP2E1 CYP3A3/4

Substrates clozapine citalopram paroxetine ethanol sertraline propanolol moclobemide fluoxetine fluoxetine theophylline diazepam venlafaxine venlafaxine caffeine (N-demethyl) bupropion alprazolam mirtazapine omeprazole ß-blockers triazolam TCAs midazolam haloperidol diazepam mirtazapine terfenadine

carbamazepine mirtazapine Inhibitors fluvoxamine moclobemide (nor)fluoxetine (nor) fluoxetine moclobemide ketoconazole sertraline nefazadone paroxetine fluvoxamine venlafaxine grapefruit moclobemide

haloperidol

Effects of combined antidepressant and BZD treatments

on driving performance of depressed outpatients (N=40)

18 23 28 33 38 B1 B2 1 3 6 Fluoxetine Moclobemide Treatment (wks) SD La tera l P o si ti o n (cm ) Ramaekers et al. 1997

Patients receiving BZDs and potential drug/drug

interaction at Cytochrome P450 enzymes

Fluoxetine (N=19) Moclobemide (N=22)

# patients Substrate for

isozyme 3A3/4

# patients Substrate for

isozyme 2C19 Nordiazepam Clotiazepam Bromazepam Alprazolam Oxazepam Lorazepam 2 - 4 3 3 3 No No Yes Yes No No 7 1 1 1 5 1 Yes Yes No No No No Total cases 15 6 16 8 Ramaekers et al. 1997

(7)

Treatment (wks) SD La tera l P o si ti o n (cm ) Ramaekers et al. 1997

Effects of combined antidepressant and BZD treatments

on driving performance of depressed outpatients

18 23 28 33 B 1 3 6 B 1 3 6 No comedication compatible BZD comedication incompatibele BZD comedication Fluoxetine Moclobemide

Effects of combined antidepressant and BZD treatments

on driving performance of depressed outpatients

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

Week 1 Week 3 Week 6

FLU FLU FLU MOC MOC MOC No BZD Comp BZD Inc BZD No BZD Comp BZD Inc BZD

1.0 0.8 0.5

Equivalent effect

of BAC (mg/ml)

Δ

S

D

L

at

er

al

P

os

it

ion

(

cm

)

*

*

*

*

If a antidepressant with sedative

properties has to be prescribed, how

can possible driving impairment be

avoided ?

• behavioral tolerance

• ascending dose regimens

• nocturnal vs daytime dosing

(8)

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

Day 1 Day 7 / 8 Day 15 Day 22

Mirtazapine Mirtazapine Mirtazapine Mianserin Dothiepin

15 mg / 30mg hs 30 mg/ 45 mg hs 30 mg hs 30mg /60mg hs 75mg / 150mg hs 1.0 0.8 0.5

Equivalent effect

of BAC (mg/ml)

Δ

S

D

L

at

er

al

P

os

it

ion

(

cm

)

*

*

*

*

Driving after nocturnal doses of sedating

antidepressants

*

But even nocturnal doses can cause

“unexpected” residual impairment

• Poor vs Extensive metabolizers

Mianserin Mirtazapine Esmirtazapine maleate (enantiomer) H3C

Antidepressant

10 mg tid

Antidepressant

30-45 mg nocte

Insomnia?

1.5-4.5 mg nocte

(9)

CYP2D6 phenotyping

• Subjects received one tablet of dextromethorphan before bedtime • Excretion ratio dextrometorphan/dextrorphan was determined in morning urine • Poor metabolizers: excretion ratio >= 0.3 (N=7)

• Extensive metabolizers : excretion ratio < 0.3 (N=25)

-1,5 -0,5 0,5 1,5 2,5 3,5 4,5 Δ SD L P (cm )

ESM ESM ZOP ESM ESM 1.5 4.5 7.5 1.5 4.5

Single dose Multiple doses

Equivalent effect BAC 0.5 mg/mL Non inferiority margin * *

Mean (95% CI) SDLP difference from placebo after single doses of esmirtazapine (ESM) and zopiclone (ZOP) and after multiple doses of ESM.

(* = non-inferiority not shown, upper bound of the 95% CI is above the non-inferiority margin of 2.4 cm)

SDLP - overall

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Equivalent effect BAC 1.0 mg/mL 0.8 mg/mL 0.5 mg/mL Non inferiority margin Poor metabolizers Extensive metabolizers

Single dose Multiple doses Single dose Multiple doses

Δ S DL P ( cm) * * * *

SDLP – CYP2D6

(10)

Do healthy volunteers studies apply

to depressed patients ?

Depressed patients are ill, and symptom

reduction by antidepressant treatment might

actually improve their driving capacity !

24 Depressed patients without antidepressants

24 Depressed patients with 6-52 weeks

antidepressants

24 Healthy controls

Characteristics:

active depression (HAM<17)

no antidepressants

21-65 years

5000 km/year past 3 years

From previous study

(Ramaekers et al. 1997)

parallel groups

Study design (1)

24 Depressed patients without antidepressants

24 Depressed patients with 6-52 weeks antidepressants 24 Healthy controls Characteristics: diagnosis depression (DSM-IV criteria) receiving SSRI-type antidepressant for 6-52 weeks 21-65 years

5000 km/year past 3 years

Study design (2)

(11)

24 Depressed patients without antidepressants

24 Depressed patients with 6-52 weeks antidepressants 24 Healthy controls Characteristics: healthy, no medication 21-65 years

5000 km/year past 3 years

matched for age, gender, IQ

and driving experience

Study design (3)

parallel groups

Allowed SSRI- medication

Citalopram (Cipramil®): 20-60 mg/day

• Fluoxetine (Prozac®): 20-60 mg/day

• Paroxetine (Seroxat®): 20-50 mg/day

• Sertraline (Zoloft®): 50-200 mg/day

• Venlafaxine (Efexor®): 75-375 mg/day

• Fluvoxamine (Fevarin®): 100-300 mg/dag

17.9 20.3 24.0 5 10 15 20 25 30

*

***

Standard Deviation Lateral Position

+

(12)

Global driving ability scores of depressed patients

receiving AD treatment

Brunnauer et al, 2008

General conclusions from

experimental driving studies

Sedative antidepressants such as TCAs severely impair driving performance when taken over the day

The impairing effects on performance of antidepressants with sedative properties are reduced to minimal levels when administered as a nocturnal dose.

Novel antidepressants such as RIMAs, SSRIs, SARIs and SNRIs generally do not affect driving performance when given in therapeutic doses

Combinations of antidepressants and BZDs or other drugs may produce PK interactions giving rise to serious driving impairment

Depression induced driving impairment is only partly ameliorated by succesfull antidepressant therapy

•Long acting, long-elimination half life

•Daytime use

•GABA agonists

•GABA, major inhibitory NT in CNS

•By definition, BZD anxiolytics must be very sedative

BZD anxiolytics

(13)

Relative risk of injurious traffic accidents as functions of cumulative elapsed time after prescription of hypnotics (RRH ) and anxiolytics(RRA). Based on data from Neutel (1995)

A pharmacoepidemiological study in 78000 hypnotic

users, 148000 anxiolytic users and 98000 controls

Diazepam effects on SDLP in

anxiolytic patients

Van Laar, 1995 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 1 1 1 1 8 7 14 21 28 1 1 2 9 1 7 1 8 C h a n g e i n S D L P ( cm ) Day: Dose (mg): 5 10 5 5 15 20 20 20 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 Regimen: o.d. t.i.d. t.i.d. per day t.i.d. t.i.d. t.i.d. b.i.d. b.i.d. Subjects: HV HV HV AP HV/AP HV HV HV AP Study nr: 1 2 6 5 3 7 2 4 8 E quivalent effects of alcohol while BAC is 1.0 mg/ml 0.8 mg/ml 0.5 mg/ml diazepam lorazepam
(14)

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1 181 8 7 14 21 28 11 1 11 18 29 11 1 C h a n g e i n S D L P ( cm ) Day:

Dose (mg): 5 1 1 4 4 15 20 20 20 5 10 5 10 50 0.2 1XR 1IR 1IR Regimen: b.i.d.. b.i.d. per day o.d. t.i.d. t.i.d. b.i.d. b.i.d. o.d. o.d. Drug: RIT OND BUS BUS CLO OXA ALPI SUR ALPR ALPR

Study nr: 4 6 5 2 3 3 8 7 10 9 E quivalent effects of alcohol while BAC is 1.0 mg/ml 0.8 mg/ml 0.5 mg/ml

Other anxiolytics and SDLP

Acute (black bars) and subchronic (grey bars) effects of ritanserin (RIT), ondansetron (OND), buspirone (BUS), clorazepate (CLO), oxazepam (OXA), alpidem (ALPI), suriclone (SUR) and alprazolam (ALPR) in various doses on Standard Deviation Lateral Position (SDLP) in the highway driving test in 8 separate studies

Vermeeren et al, 2009

Actual driving in healthy volunteers after

immediate and controlled release formulations of

alprazolam 1mg (Leufkens et al 2007)

Subjects:

- 18 healthy subjects (9 males, 9 females) - Mean (±SE) age: 32.3 (±2.0) - Range 20-45

Design:

- Double blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way crossover study Treatments: - placebo - alprazolam IR 1 mg - alprazolam XR 1 mg time co n ce n tr ati o n alprazolam IR alprazolam XR

Tmax alprazolam IR: 0.7 – 1.8 hrs Tmax alprazolam XR: 5-12 hrs

alprazolam XR:

delayed absorption fewer and less severe side effects (Rickels, Expert Opin Pharmacother 2004)

Adapted from Wright, Curr Ther Res 1995

(15)

SDLP (4-5 hrs post dose)

15 20 25 30

placebo alprazolam XR alprazolam IR

Mean SDLP (cm)

Increment SDLP (cm)

from placebo +3.9 +8.2

*

*

Tests prematurely terminated 3 (out of 18) 7 (out of 18)

A case study: driving under the

influence of alprazolam (movie)

Δ S D LP (c m )

***

Equivalent effect of BAC (mg/ml) 1.0 0.8 0.5 0 2 4 6 8 10

References

Related documents

Secure communication solutions from Crypto AG can be smoothly integrated into your existing networks and offer end-to-end voice encryption for maxi- mum security

It is quite reasonable to think that, as it is now for the absorption coefficient, we shall end with two or three different definitions and standards also for the

 Structural grant is not paid to all municipalities and county councils but is only paid to the local authorities that previously received supplements under certain models used in

The study investigates how writers from two different disciplines; Applied Linguistics and Economics, negotiate the marked theme (context frames) in the RA

In Danish tax law, an agency PE may arise if a person is authorized to conclude contracts that are binding on the principal in a strict legal sense. Thus, it will often be possible

actual systematic links, the model considers the main variables (population, income, …) under different policy scenarios: providing suggestions to policy makers about the

The Centre has five partner institutes (Lincoln University, Massey University, Plant &amp; Food Research, AgResearch &amp; Scion) and six other collaborating institutes.. The Centre

International relations scholars and foreign policy analysts have asserted that Southeast Asian countries such as Indonesia and Thailand have not exhibited any hard-balancing