• No results found

Spare Parts and Repair Services Decisions of Courts in Europe

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Spare Parts and Repair Services Decisions of Courts in Europe"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Spare Parts and Repair Services

Decisions of Courts in Europe

Leopold von Gerlach

Brussels, 29 January 2016

(2)

Hogan Lovells

Decisions of the European Court of Justice

• C - 238/87 VOLVO

• C - 53/87 Maxicar / Renault • C - 63/97 BMW / Deenik • C - 206/01 Arsenal

• C - 228/03 Gillette

• C - 48/05 Adam Opel / Autec • C - 487/ 07 L‘Oreal / Bellure

(3)

Hogan Lovells

Vacuum cleaner bag – trade mark law

German Federal Court of Justice, 2005

• Compatible vacuum cleaner bags were advertised "fitting with VORWERK KOBOLD 130"

• The use of the original brand name - necessary to

explain the compatibility - does not violate honest trade practices – even if instances of confusion may occur

(4)

Big inspection for everybody – trade mark law

German Federal Court of Justice, 2011

• Use of the "VW" emblem in advertisements for repair services

• Device mark must not be used for third party advertising - if use of word mark interfered less strongly with the

(5)

Hogan Lovells

BMW-Emblem – trade mark law

German Federal Court of Justice, 2015

5

• Use of BMW trade mark on badges to be sticked on other spare parts

• The trademark is the sole feature of the badge; as such the trade mark is not used "for" a spare part but is the spare part itself. Such trade mark use does not benefit from the

(6)

Repackaging of spare parts – trade mark law

Higher Regional Court Hamburg, 2001

• The importer of third party spare parts removed the

packaging bearing the original trademark and re-packed the spare parts in neutral packaging.

• The repacking of the spare parts cannot reverse the infringement that occured already at the time of import. • The initial packaging was trademark infringing as it used

the trademark without additional words like "fitting with" or "suitable for".

(7)

Hogan Lovells

Vacuum cleaner bag – comparative advertising German Federal Court of Justice, 2015

• Vacuum cleaner bags were advertised with

reference to the well known trade mark: "similar to

SWIRL"

• No unfair exploitation of reputation by using a well

known trade mark for comparative advertising in an

offer for sale on the internet – even if this aimes at

raising attention to own products

(8)

Tuning – comparative advertising

German Federal Court of Justice, 2015

• Motor vehicle tune-ups were advertised by referring also to the car brand: "Porsche 911 with TECHART

adjustmetns"

• The reference to the car brand is permissible – as long as it is clear that it only refers to the vehicle in its original state

(9)

Hogan Lovells

Wheel rims – design law

District Court of Dusseldorf, 2013

9

• Distribution of wheel rims in Germany, manufactured by an Italian company - alleged infringement of a national

registered design

• Repair clause under European design law (Art. 110 CDR) is not applicable as defence against claims of infringement of a German design right

(10)

Wheel rims – design law

Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart, 2014

• Distribution of wheel rims in Germany, manufactured by an Italian company - alleged infringement of a

community design

• Art. 101 CDR only applies in case of repair, which does not include the delivery of a set of four wheel rims

• Wheel rims do not represent "designs which constitute a component part of a complex product" and therefore do not fall within the scope of Art. 101 CDR

(11)

Hogan Lovells

Nintendo remote control – design law

Higher Regional Court Dusseldorf, 2016

• Offer of Nintendo-compatible remote control and use of Nintendo's design protected products on website – as reference product for the remote control.

• Questions referred to the European Court of Justice:

1. Is it permissible to display a design protected product (game console) in order to advertise a compatible

accesoire product (remote control).

2. Wich law is applicable on offers that are targeted to all European countries

(12)

Windows – comparative advertisinht

Supreme Court of Austria, 2011

• Offer of windows as "suitable replacement for VELUX windows"

• reference to the trade mark of the market-leader‘s brand is unjustified, as a reference to windows of all kinds as well as custom made windows would have been

(13)

Hogan Lovells

Aluminium wheel rims – design and trade mark law

- Supreme Court of Denmark, 2015

• Use of aluminium wheel rims imitating the

BMW-design - and bearing the BMW trade mark.

• Aluminium wheel rims do not fall within the scope of

Art. 101 CDR as they are used to decorate and

upgrade the overall appearance.

• Wheel rims attached with the BMW trade mark

infringe BMW's trade mark rights

(14)

Spare parts for vacuum cleaners – trade mark law

Supreme Court of Italy, 2014

• Use of device mark placed on spare parts for

vacuum cleaners.

• Device mark placed on the product is no indication

for the product's intended purpose but rather an

indication of its origin – and thus a trade mark

infringing use

(15)

www.hoganlovells.com

"Hogan Lovells" oder die "Sozietät" ist eine internationale Anwaltssozietät, zu der Hogan Lovells International LLP und Hogan Lovells US LLP und ihnen nahestehende Gesellschaften gehören.

Die Bezeichnung "Partner" beschreibt einen Partner oder ein Mitglied von Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP oder einer der ihnen nahestehenden Gesellschaften oder einen Mitarbeiter oder Berater mit entsprechender Stellung. Einzelne Personen, die als Partner bezeichnet werden, aber nicht Mitglieder von Hogan Lovells International LLP sind, verfügen nicht über eine Qualifikation, die der von Mitgliedern entspricht.

Weitere Informationen über Hogan Lovells, die Partner und deren Qualifikationen, finden Sie unter www.hoganlovells.com.

Sofern Fallstudien dargestellt sind, garantieren die dort erzielten Ergebnisse nicht einen ähnlichen Ausgang für andere Manda nten. Anwaltswerbung. © Hogan Lovells 2016. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

*Kooperationsbüros

Hogan Lovells hat Büros in: Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Brüssel Budapest* Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dschidda* Dubai Düsseldorf Frankfurt am Main Hamburg Hanoi

Ho Chi Minh Stadt Hongkong Houston Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxemburg Madrid Mailand Mexiko-Stadt Miami Minneapolis Monterrey Moskau München New York Northern Virginia Paris Peking Perth Philadelphia Riad* Rio de Janeiro Rom San Francisco São Paulo Schanghai Silicon Valley Singapur Sydney Tokio Ulaanbaatar Warschau Washington DC Zagreb*

References

Related documents

In the period 2013–15, researchers at IDS worked with World Vision Indonesia to assess whether data produced through mobile phone technology might trigger faster response by

We are represented on the market by our seven flagship brands, Hard Material Solutions by CERATIZIT, Toolmaker Solutions by CERATIZIT, Tool Solutions by CERATIZIT, Cut- ting

The major aim of the study is to explore CELPAD teacher’s perception towards the Task- Based Language Teaching and highlight the reasons why they opt to avoid or implement

Group 05—Remove and Install Engine Group 10—Blower Housing and Flywheel Group 15—Cylinder Head and Valves Group 20—Cylinder Block and

FICE CODE: 1085CR COMPLETED BY: Alex Becker INSTITUTION: UAM-Crossett DATE COMPLETED: September 15, 2017 FISCAL YEAR: FY17 TELEPHONE NO..

This study presents the findings of a naturalistic cohort study investigating remission and relapse rates following the completion of LiCBT interventions delivered in

Two general tracks for guiding future research to understand and enhance the diverse sorghum production systems in WCA can be suggested: a) focus on options for creating greater

Since the average annual hours worked in the four major European countries is, on average, 76% of that in the U.S., the quantitative result obtained here suggests that different