• No results found

CSO WORKSHOP ON CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION TO THE DRAFTING OF THE LEGISLATION ON ANTI DISCRIMINATION AND EQUALITY 23 December 2014, Ankara

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CSO WORKSHOP ON CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION TO THE DRAFTING OF THE LEGISLATION ON ANTI DISCRIMINATION AND EQUALITY 23 December 2014, Ankara"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

 

   

CSO  WORKSHOP  ON  CIVIL  SOCIETY  PARTICIPATION  TO  THE  

DRAFTING  OF  THE  LEGISLATION  ON  ANTI  DISCRIMINATION  AND  

EQUALITY    

(2)

Agenda

 

 

 

 

 

 

09:30  –  10:00   Registration  

10:00  –  10:15   Opening  Speech  –  Ayça  Bulut  Bican,  Resident  Advisor,  TACSO-­‐Turkey     10:15  –  11:15   Sharing  Session:  

Process   of   drafting   of   the   legislation   on   anti   discrimination   and   equality     (2009-­‐2014)  

Feray  Salman,  Human  Rights  Joint  Platform  (İHOP)    

11:15  –  11:30   Coffee  break    

11:30  –  13:00   General  discussion:    

Positive   and   negative   factor   affecting   the   process   of   drafting   of   the   legislation  on  anti  discrimination  and  equality  from  the  perspective  of  civil   society    

  13:00  –  14:30   Lunch  

 

14:30  –  16:30   Group  work:    

Identification  of  actions  for  the  participation  of  civil  society  to  the  process  of   drafting  of  the  legislation  on  anti  discrimination  and    equality    

 

16:30  –  16:45   Coffee  break    

16:45  –  18:00   Plenary:    

-­‐ Sharing  of  outcomes  of  group  work  

-­‐ Grouping  and  gathering  in  a  list  of  actions  suggested     -­‐ Alignment  of  actions  and  planning    

 

(3)

 

About  the  workshop

 

This   activity   is   organized   in   the   context   of   the   TACSO   Project   targets   on   promoting   active   participation   of   CSOs  to  policy  making  and  legislative  processes  and  improving  the  legislative  framework  that  has  its  bearing   on  the  achievement  of  their  mission.    

The  work  on  the  Framework  Legislation  on  Anti  Discrimination  and  Ensuring  Equality  is  directly  related  to  the   essential   mission   of   many   CSOs   and   civil   movements   active   in   this   field   and   further,   it   is   also   critical   for   fundamental  rights  that  have  its  significant  place  in  Turkey’s  accession  to  the  EU.    

The   CSO   Workshop   related   to   the   legislation   on   anti   discrimination   and   ensuring   equality   intends   to   contribute  to  the  following  objectives:    

• Ensuring  that  CSOs  and  civil  movements  share  their  past  and  recent  work  on  anti  discrimination  and   equality.    

• Contributing   to   the   visibility   and   recognition   of   civil   movements   in   the   field   of     anti   discrimination   and  equality.    

• Establishing  a  joint  CSO  position/stance  for  civil  society  on  the  basis  of  CSO  work  in  the  field  of  anti   discrimination  and  equality.    

• Developing  an  action  plan  to  take  part  in  the  process  of  drafting  which  is  expected  to  start  soon  in   legislative  process.    

• Contributing  to  the  creation  of  cooperation  and  networks  among  participating  organizations.      

The  activity  was  organized  jointly  by  TACSO-­‐Turkey,  its  Local  Advisory  Group  members  Kaos  Gay  and  Lesbian   Cultural   Studies   and   Solidarity   Association  (Kaos   GL),  Human   Rights   Joint   Platform   (İHOP)   and   Women’s   Group  of  Equality  Monitoring  and  took  place  for  one  full  day  in  Ankara  on  23  December  2014.  

 

Methodology  

The   workshop   aimed   at   sharing   past   experiences   related   to   civil   participation   to   the   drafting   of   the   Legislation  on  Anti  Discrimination  and  Equality,  identifying  negative  and  positive  factors  presently  affecting   civil  participation,  and  on  the  basis  of  this  information,  developing  a  relevant  action  plan.    

The  meeting  was  designed  so  as  to  proceed  in  three  stages.    

At  the  first  stage  İHOP  outlined  experiences  of  the  legislative  process  upon  which  participants  recollected   their  specific  experiences  and  shared  information.  Also,  participants  shared  their  experiences  related  to  the   legislative   process   concerned,   the   presence   of   civil   society   in   this   process   and   in   legislative   processes   in   general.    

Then,   in   a   plenary   discussion,   participants   addressed   existing   negative   and   positive   factors   related   to   legislative  action  and  evaluated  associated  opportunities  and  threats.  This  discussion  clarified  fundamental   points  to  be  considered  in  the  action  plan  to  be  developed  in  relation  to  civil  participation.    

Finally,  participants  were  engaged  in  group  work  to  develop  suggestions  for  participating  to  the  legislative   process   on   Legislation   on   Anti   Discrimination   and   Equality   and   came   up   with   a   joint   action   plan   after   discussing  these  suggestions  in  the  plenary  session.    

   

(4)

Experiences  in  civil  participation  to  legislative  processes    

In  her  short  presentation  on  behalf  of  İHOP,  Feray  Salman  summarized  the  process  of  work  related  to  the   Legislation  on  Anti  Discrimination  and  Ensuring  Equal  Rights  since  2009  and  informed  the  audience  about   steps   taken   for   civil   participation.   Salman   compared   the   draft   developed   in   2009   together   with   the   Anti-­‐ Discrimination  Group  through  a  participatory  approach  to  the  draft  made  public  by  the  Ministry  of  Interior  in   2010  and  gave  information  about  initiatives  taken  since  2012  to  re-­‐start  the  process  that  had  been  stopped   in  2010.  According  to  the  statement  made  in  July  2014  by  the  Ministry  of  Interior,  the  draft  is  now  reads  for   submission  to  the  Prime  Ministry.    

During  and  after  the  presentation  of  İHOP  participants  found  opportunity  to  share  their  experiences  relating   both  to  this  particular  draft  and  legislation  process  in  general.    

 

Factors  affecting  civil  participation  to  legislative  processes  

 

Participants  engaged  in  a  general  discussion  and  focused  on  factors  that  may  negatively  or  positively  affect   legislative  processes.  Points  raised  are  as  follows:    

-­‐ In  earlier  processes,  the  time  period  given  to  submit  opinions  on  the  draft  was  too  short.  In  the  case  of   Legislation  on  Anti  Discrimination  and  Equality  there  may  be  no  such  period  for  submitting  opinions  at   all.  

-­‐ It  is  important  to  check  the  draft  for  its  compliance  with  other  legislation  enacted  particularly  after  2011.   In  the  same  vein,  there  is  also  need  to  consider  some  other  international  conventions  (i.e.  Convention  on   the  Rights  of  the  Child)  that  Turkey  is  a  State  Party  –with  some  reservations.    

-­‐ Methodologies  and  strategies  that  helped  in  civil  participation  and  emergence  of  good  practices  in  the   past  may  not  yield  the  same  results  in  present  day  conditions.    

By   discussing   in   detail   each   point   in   the   context   of   possible   opportunities   and/or   risks   and   threats,   participants  identified  points  that  should  be  taken  into  account  while  working  on  the  action  plan.    

 

Development  of  an  action  plan  

 

The  second  half  of  the  day  was  allocated  to  the  development  of  an  action  plan  for  civil  participation  to  the   process  of  drafting  Legislation  on  Anti  Discrimination  and  Equality.    

During  group  work,  participants  were  asked  to  develop  their  suggestions  for  action  by  using  the  framework   given  below:  

Activity/Action   2015   In  charge   Funding/Financial  Support  

Opportunities   Ja n.   Fe b.   Ma r.   Ni s.   Ma y.   Ju ne   Tem .   Au g.   Se pt .   Oc t.   No v.   De c.                                                                  

Suggestions  developed  by  three  groups  were  discussed  and  grouped  under  specific  headings  in  the  plenary   session  and  a  final  set  of  actions  was  reached  by  merging  similar  activities  are  grouped  as  follows:    

(5)

-­‐ Dissemination  of  information    

-­‐ Creating  a  network    bringing  together  relevant  CSOs     -­‐ Campaign  work    

-­‐ Lobbying      

Finally,  CSOs  to  be  in  charge  of  suggested  actions  were  identified  and  the  planning  work  was  completed.  It   was   decided   to   prepare   a   position   statement   in   the   context   of   the   plan,   launch   a   campaign   on   civil   participation  and  set  up  mechanisms  to  ensure  effective  sharing  of  information.    

(6)

Participants

 

Organization   City  

Bianet   İstanbul  

Human  Rights  Joint  Platform    (İHOP)   Ankara  

İstanbul  Bilgi  University  Human  Rights  Law  Centre     İstanbul   Education   and   Solidarity   Foundation   of   People   with  

Disabilities  (ÖZEV)   Ankara  

Dom  Tribe  Demolishers  and  Junkman  Association     Hatay  

Hrant  Dink  Foundation   İstanbul  

İzmir  Black  Pink  Triangle  İzmir  Association    İzmir  

Purple  Roof  Women’s  Shelter  Foundation   İstanbul  

EU  Delegation  to  Turkey   Ankara  

Agenda  Child   Ankara  

Civil  Society  Development  Centre  (STGM)   Ankara  

Women’s  Group  for  Monitoring  Equality  (Eşitiz)   İstanbul  

Organisation  for  Living  Area  (YAŞAD)   Ankara  

Ankara   Branch   of   Association   for   Supporting   Woman  

Candidates  (Ankara)   Ankara  

Association  for  Solidarity  with  Youth  Deprived  of  Freedom  

(Öz-­‐Ge  Der)   Ankara  

(7)

Organization   City  

Karakutu  (Black  Box)  Association   İstanbul  

Association  of  Monitoring  for  Equal  Rights  (ESHİD)   İstanbul  

Association  of  Women  with  Disabilities  (ENKAD)   Ankara  

Federation  of  Caucasian  Associations  (KAFFED)     Ankara  

Pink  Life  LGBTT  Solidarity  Association   Ankara  

Women’s  Coalition   Ankara  

Dom   Tribe   Cultural   Research,   Development,   Social  

Assistance  and  Solidarity  Association     Hatay  

Kaos   Gay   and   Lesbian   Cultural   Studies   and   Solidarity  

Association  (Kaos  GL)   Ankara  

Amnesty  International-­‐Turkey     Ankara  

Roma  Rights  Forum  (ROMFO)   Ankara  

   

References

Related documents

We find that (1) indicators of the level of financial development - the size of the formal financial intermediary sector relative to GDP, the importance of banks relative to

The Government of Canada is seeking views on whether to allow the payment of variable retirement benefits directly from the defined contribution account.. The payment of

The result of the classification model of the Ensemble Boosted Trees classifier with the L_Blue dataset was 99.9 % accuracy, the prediction speed 1,200 observations/sec and the

Kara’s suggestion that relevant websites be highlighted at school is an illustration of how school-based sexual health education might make more effective use of the internet,

Using the total proportion of fibre raw material from certified forestry ope- rations/organic production purchased annually by the factory, assuming that fibre raw material

Methods in Finance Project Management Python for Finance Responsible Business Retailing Risk Management Services Marketing Economic Globalization Game Theory

Licensed function title Product group Product category IBM InfoSphere MDM Account Hub - InfoSphere InfoSphere Advanced Ed for Fin Svcs Master Data

The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of North Carolina high school agricultural educators toward including students with special needs when implementing