• No results found

Sustainable Aquaculture Development Planning Through GIS Modeling: An Experience From Timor-Leste

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Sustainable Aquaculture Development Planning Through GIS Modeling: An Experience From Timor-Leste"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Sustainable Aquaculture Development

Planning Through GIS Modeling:

An Experience From Timor-Leste

Shwu Jiau Teoh1, Raimundo Mau2, Julio da Cruz2,

Jharendu Pant1 & Michael Phillips1

1 WorldFish, Penang, Malaysia

2 National Directorate of Fisheries and Aquaculture (NDFA),

Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF), Timor-Leste - World Aquaculture Adelaide 2014 -

(2)

Outline

Background

The Process

Results

(3)

Background

Timor-Leste (also know as East Timor)

is a new country, achieved

independence on 20 May 2002

Aquaculture

has been identified by the

Government of Timor-Leste as one of

the

options for livelihood diversification

Widespread

poverty and malnutrition

:

About 40% of the population living

below US$0.55/day;

Malnutrition among children under

5 years estimated at:

− Underweight: 45%

(4)

Background

Per capita annual fish consumption:

Timor-Leste:

6.1kg

(RFLP/FAO, 2011)

Global:

18.9kg

(FAO, 2011)

Current annual fish supply in

Timor-Leste

:

Capture fisheries:

3,200t

(FAO, 2007)

Aquaculture:

46t

(NDFA, 2010)

To reach closer to global average,

Timor-Leste needs a fish supply

of

30,000t

by 2030

(5)

Background

Government of Timor-Leste developed

National Aquaculture Development

Strategy (2012-2030)

:

Supported by

WorldFish

Funded by

RFLP/FAO

and

CTSP

The Strategy emphasizes the

development of

aquaculture in agro-ecological ‘niches’ area

with

favorable resource-base and social-economic contexts

Key targets of the Aquaculture Strategy:

Annual fish supply:

30,000t by 2030

(12,000t to come from aquaculture)

Average per capita fish consumption:

15kg/capita/year by 2020

http://www.worldfishcenter.org/resource_ centre/WF_3602.pdf
(6)

The Process

The process involved aquaculture suitability

mapping of area taking a set of biophysical

and socio-economic factors into account

A

simplified Geographical Information

Systems (GIS) modeling using multi-criteria

evaluation (MCE)

was used for delineating

recommendation domains for freshwater

aquaculture across Timor-Leste

(7)

The Process

Identifying influencing factors (criteria)

1

Weighing the factors

2

Mapping indicators for factors

3

Applying suitability rating to indicator maps

4

Mapping the suitability sub-models (MCE)

5

Mapping overall suitability model (MCE)

6

Consultation with stakeholders

Facilitator, stakeholder & expert inputs

GIS/Mapping tasks

GIS technical expertise & software required

(8)

Identifying Influencing Factors/criteria

1

Consultation meeting with national experts organized:

National Directorate of Fisheries and Aquaculture (NDFA)

National Directorate of Agriculture

National Directorate of Forestry

Agricultural Land use GIS (ALGIS)

 The experts were asked to list down factors (major determinants) for freshwater

aquaculture development

 The discussions were guided by asking a few key questions:

Which area(s) have high potential for

aquaculture development in Timor-Leste?

(9)

Weighing the Factors

(based on their relative importance)

2

 The determinants for freshwater aquaculture development are:

biophysical & socio-economic

 All factors were grouped to construct sub-models

 Each factor was weighed based on its relative importance in every single sub-model  Each sub-models was then weighed in another round to produce the overall model

Boxes:

Green: biophysical factors

(10)

Mapping Indicators for Factors

3

Factor Group Indicators Data sources

(suitability sub-model) (proxy function) Biop hy sic al

Biophysical Water (water supply for pond)

Irrigated rice field (supplemental water supply from irrigation system)

Natural lakes (natural conditions for aquaculture) Slope steepness (ease of pond construction)

ALGIS ALGIS ALGIS CIAT-CSI SRTM v4.1 Socio -ec on omic Inputs &

Experiences Number of fish farmers (experiences with aquaculture)

Access to hatcheries (access to seed) Access to different feeds (access to feed)

NDFA,ALGIS NDFA,ALGIS ALGIS

Market & Accessibility

Population densities (local demand) Access to markets (market to sell fish) Proximity to road network (infrastructure) Coastal/Inland sucos (access to sea fish)

ALGIS

NDFA,ALGIS ALGIS

ALGIS

(11)

Mapping Indicators for Factors

3

 Indicator maps were generated from data layers collected

 River Network  DEM

Create proximity cost distance surface to rivers / streams by take into

consideration the slope

Proximity to rivers & streams (unitless)  DEM Slope steepness (percent) Near Far Gentle Steep

Water supply (Proximity to rivers & streams)

(12)

Applying Suitability Rating to Indicator

Maps

4

 Each indicator map was standardized to a common measurement scale of suitability rating ranging from 0 to 255 (0 = not suitable for aquaculture; 255 highly suitable for aquaculture)

 Need expert knowledge for applying the suitability rating

Apply suitability rating

0: Least

255: Most suitable

Water supply (Proximity to rivers & streams)

(13)

Mapping the Suitability Sub-models (MCE)

5

15%

Water supply (proximity to rivers & streams)

Supplemental water supply (location of rice field)

Natural lakes (location of lakes)

Terrain (slope steepness)

45% 15% 25%

=

+

+

+

Biophysical Sub-model

Combined indicator maps using

Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) Market & Accessibility Inputs & Experiences Biophysical Least Most suitable

(14)

Mapping Overall Suitability Model (MCE)

6

45% 35% 20%

=

+

+

Market & Accessibility Inputs & Experiences

Biophysical Least suitable Most suitable Moderately suitable Suitable Overall Model Reclassify Sub-Models Least Most suitable

(15)

Results: Harnessing Freshwater Fish

Production Potential

 1 ha : 3 tons productions  Focal districts: * Bobonaro * Ermera * Baucau Least suitable Most suitable Moderately suitable Suitable
(16)

Drilling Down to Identify Limitations

Knowing the limitations helps determine what interventions are needed

Biophysical Inputs & Experiences Market & Accessibility Overall Suitability 1: Least suitable 4: Most suitable 2: Moderately suitable 3: Suitable Least Most suitable

Sub-Models (fuzzy) Most limiting factors

0 -255 least-most suitable

Most limiting factor

0 -255 least-most suitable

fuzz_suitbiophy

(17)

Conclusions & Recommendations

 GIS is a useful decision support tool :

Comprehensive database/map layers generated showing spatial

distribution of area potential for aquaculture development in Timor-Leste

GOs/NGOs prioritizing aquaculture development interventions in high potential areas

In Sucu ida, Produto ida (one village one product) program, the

government is promoting aquaculture in nine sub-districts of 3 high aquaculture potential districts

(18)

Conclusions & Recommendations

 Quality of suitability maps largely depends on the accuracy & quality of available data (spatial & temporal availability)

 Further refinement of the maps can be done using updated databases over time

 Weightage given to each of the factors depends on judicious decision made by local experts/stakeholder – hence, a thorough discussion on each of the factors is vital

(19)
(20)
http://www.worldfishcenter.org/resource_centre/WF_3602.pdf

References

Related documents