• No results found

AITS-0110 SharePoint 2013 Upgrade

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "AITS-0110 SharePoint 2013 Upgrade"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

AITS-0110

SharePoint 2013 Upgrade

Kick-off Meeting

July 9, 2014

(2)

Agenda

Project Overview

Scope & High-Level Tasks

Project Processes

Impact, Dependencies, and

Assumptions

Risks & Issues

Project Team

(3)

Project Overview

This project will upgrade all existing SharePoint

2010 farm environments (Development, Test,

Production) to SharePoint 2013. These SharePoint

environments are part of the enterprise shared

service to the university

(

http://web.uillinois.edu/sharepoint

)

(4)

Project Goals

 Upgrade SharePoint 2010 farms to SharePoint 2013 in Development, Test, and

Production environments.

 Keep the same URL for SP 2013 (intranet.uillinois.edu)

The SP 2010 site will be called old.intranet.uillinois.edu

 SharePoint 2013 upgrade methodology

Upgrade the core infrastructure to SP2013

Retain site collections in SP2010 compatibility mode

Upgrade individual site collections. Site Collection Administrators select one of two options below:

1. Site collections to be upgraded when the infrastructure goes live

2. Site collections to be upgraded by the Site Collection Administrator within 6 months of the infrastructure goes live date

(5)

Project Scope

In Scope

All existing SharePoint 2010 farm environments will be upgraded to SP 2013

All existing SharePoint 2010 site collections on the Shared Service will be

upgraded to SP 2013

Decommissioning of all SharePoint 2010 environments 6 months after SP

2013 goes live

Implementing new servers for SharePoint 2013 environments (Development,

Test and Production)

Disabling Remote Blob Storage (RBS)

Out of Scope

No new functionalities other than default SharePoint 2013 enhancements

No migration from SharePoint 2007 to SP 2013

Cutover to SiteMinder authentication

(6)

High-Level Tasks

Identify site collections to be upgraded with the farm upgrade

Develop project plan

Build Development (complete) and Test environments

Run test upgrade of identified site collections

Site Collection Administrators coordinate testing of their sites

Site Collection Administrators coordinate communication to their user

communities

Coordinate deployment activities

Build Production environment

Execute dress rehearsal of the migration upgrade

Production GO LIVE

Decommission SharePoint 2010 farm & upgrade all site collections to SP 2013

(7)

Site Collection Administrator (SCA)Role

Identify when their site collections

will be upgraded. S

elect one of the

two options:

1.

Site collections to be upgraded when

the infrastructure goes live

2.

Site collections to be upgraded by the

Site Collection Administrator within 6

months of the infrastructure goes live

date

(8)

Site Collection Administrator (SCA) Role

Coordinate their site collections upgrade with their department in

regards to:

Communication

Schedule

Testing

Test all site collections (SP 2013 and SP 2010

compatibility mode)

Report issues to “2013 Upgrade” discussion board

Provide time for department testing

Ensure issues resulted from testing are resolved

How to look for help

Post your questions to “2013 Upgrade” discussion board on

https://intranet.uillinois.edu

(9)

Site Collection Content Owner Role

Informed and aware of the

schedule, changes, updates, etc.

Report any issues or concerns to

the SCA

Test and verify the content is

migrated completely and correctly

(10)

Project Processes

Weekly Operation Team Meetings

Review project status, action items, issues, risks, decisions

Monthly meeting/communication for Site Collection Administrators

SharePoint for document collaboration

Change of scope will be considered according to process in the

Project Charter

Issues/Risks/Decisions reviewed in project status meetings

(11)

Impacts, Dependencies,

Assumptions

Impact:

 Business functionalities may be impacted depending on what departments built with their SharePoint 2010

Dependencies:

 Control Point

 Bamboo Alerts Plus

 ARC GIS

Assumptions:

 By the SharePoint customization policy, if third party customizations don’t work they will not delay the SharePoint 2013 upgrade

https://intranet.uillinois.edu/sites/spboard/Shared Documents/Policy and Governance Documents/SharePoint 3rd Party Add-On Policy and Expectation.docx

 New servers are acquired and tested for the project implementation

 Tasks will be prioritized by the team, and project team resources are available to work on this project

(12)

Risks

This project requires acquisition of multiple servers for the

environments upgrade. We can’t upgrade if we don’t have

the servers.

We mitigate this risk by proactively requesting funding to acquire

the servers.

Due to the number of site collections and their variances, the

upgrade is complex.

We mitigate this risk by planning for high quality testing in

non-production environments.

Provide time for department testing.

(13)

Project Team

Role/Participant Responsibility

Amin Kassem Director of SharePoint Shared Service provides overall project oversight and approval of deliverables

SharePoint Shared Service Advisory Group

Provide consultation on project deliverables Shawn Lee, Brad Horn, Larry

Gibson, Hussain Zaidi and Tyler Rubach

Conduct technical planning, upgrade installations, and systems testing

Amanda Hemming, Deb Bramowicz

Provide functional analysis and testing, serve as the main liaisons with end-users

DBAs Conduct Database provisioning and configuration

CRM Communicate preparation information to Site Collection Administrators

QAs Conduct vulnerability, load, and accessibility testing Windows Administrators Server provisioning

Deployment Implement the upgrade to production environments Security Provide security assessment and sign-off

Noni Ledford Provide project management oversight to ensure project deliverables meet the requirements.

(14)

Estimated Effort

Effort

Participant

Hours of effort

SharePoint Administration

Shawn Lee, Brad Horn,

Larry Gibson, Tyler Rubach,

Hussain Zaidi

1040 hours

Deployment

Debbie Peterson

40 hours

Security

Troye Kauffman

20 hours

Functional Testing

Amanda Hemming, Deb

Bramowicz

80 hours

Database provisioning

Chris Newman

100 hours

Communication

Mark Pollard

40 hours

Testing

QA

40 hours

Windows Administration

TBD

80 hours

Project Management

Noni Ledford

120 hours

Post-deployment support

Shawn Lee, Brad Horn,

Larry Gibson, Tyler Rubach,

Hussain Zaidi

50 hours

TOTAL

1610 hours

(15)

Proposed High-level Schedule

Identify

site

collections

to be

upgraded

with farm

upgrade

Now – July

31

st

2014

Build Test

environme

nt and run

test

upgrade

of site

collections

By August

31

st

2014

Site

Collection

Testing in

Test

environme

nt

Sept-Dec

2014

Deployment activities: Build Production environment & execute dress rehearsal 3-5 weeks before go live Production GO LIVE

January

2015

Decommis

sion SP

2010 – all

site

collections

are

upgraded

July 2015

15

(16)

Next Steps

By July 31

st

, Site Collection Administrators need to request

if they would like their site collections to be upgraded

when the infrastructure goes live

Go to

https://intranet.uillinois.edu

Select “2013 Upgrade”

Click on “2013 Upgrade Request”

Select “reply” and provide the requested

information described in the discussion item

Start Planning phase

Build Test environment

Develop project plan and communication plan

(17)

Questions?

Comments?

Concerns?

References

Related documents