Accreditation Results, 2002

(1)

Accreditation Results for Univer

sities’

Under

graduate Colleges

Second-cycle accreditations of four unive

rsities’

under

gradu

ate co

lleg

es were conduc

ted in 2002. Out of a m

axim

um possible scor

e of

500,

the highest score was 427.90 and the lowest

416.30. All evaluated univers

ities exceeded the m

inimum

required score of 350 and r

eceived

an accreditation valid for six years.

T

able 1a: Overall Resu

lts

Universit

ies

Evaluated

Universit

ies

Accr

edited

Remarks

Ch onb uk Nation al Un iv ersity Ch onn am Nati on al Un iv ersity C hu ngnam Nat ional Uni versi ty Pu san Nation al Un iv ersity Ch onb uk Nation al Un iv ersity Ch onn am Nati on al Un iv ersity C hu ngnam Nat ional Uni versi ty Pu san Nation al Un iv ersity All un iv ersities m et stan da rd s for accreditation in key eval uation indicies.

Universities are recognized as “

good” if their evaluation scores

in specific categories m

eet or

exceed 90% of the total possibl

e po

ints.

T

able 1b: Results by C

ategory

Category Good

Ar

eas

Evaluated

Comprehensive University

Accreditation System

Accreditation Results, 2002

_Ko

rea

n Co

unc

il fo

r Un

iversity Education

Center for University

Accreditat

(2)

(share of total ev aluation scor e in parenth eses)

(

≥

90%

)

Administra

tion / Finan

ces

(60) No ne y Adm ini st rat iv e st rat egi es a nd m anagem ent y In stitu tion al specializatio n y Fi nance s y Utilization of first-cycle accre ditation results

Gr

ow

th S

trategy / M

iss

ion

(50) Ch onb uk Nation al Un iv ersity Ch onn am Nati on al Un iv ersity C hu ngnam Nat ional Uni versi ty Pu san Nation al Un iv ersity y Lo ng -t erm goa ls an d st rat egi es y G ro w th strategy y Im pl em ent ati on pr og ram

T

eaching & Curricula /

Community

Service

(120) No ne y Edu catio na l obj ectiv es y Curricula a nd teaching m ethods y Academ ic administration y Co mm un ity se rv ice

Resear

ch

Activ

ity /

Business-Educational Cooperation

(100) No ne y Research pe rform ance y Research environm ent y B usi ness -e duc at ional c oo pera tion

St

udent Ev

aluations /

Faculty-S

ta

ff Develop

m

ent

(90) No ne y St ude nt e val ua tions y Facu lty d ev elop m en t y St af f de vel opm ent

Academic Support

Facilities & Pr

ograms

(80) No ne y St ude nt s upp or t pr og ram s y Edu catio na l sup por t pr ogr am s y Resear ch suppo rt p rog ra m s y In fo rm ational sup po rt pr og ra m s

Accreditation Results for Universities’

Graduate Schools

Second-cycle accreditations of f

our universities’

graduate schools were conducte

d in 2002. Out of a m

axi

mum

possible score of 3

(3)

3

highest score was 250.50 and the

lowest 235.3. All evaluated univers

ities exceeded the m

ini

m

um

re

quired score of 210 and receiv

ed an

accred

itatio

n valid for s

ix years.

T

able 2a: Overall Resu

lts

Universities

Evaluated

Universities

Accr

edited

Remarks

Ch onb uk Nation al Un iv ersity Ch onn am Nati on al Un iv ersity C hu ngnam Nat ional Uni versi ty Pu san Nation al Un iv ersity Ch onb uk Nation al Un iv ersity Ch onn am Nati on al Un iv ersity C hu ngnam Nat ional Uni versi ty Pu san Nation al Un iv ersity All un iv ersities m et stan da rd s for accreditation in key eval uation indicies.

Universities are recognized as “goo

d” if their graduate school ev

aluation scores in specific categor

ies m

eet or exceed 90% of t

he

tota

l

possible points.

T

able 2b: Results by C

ategory

Good

₍

≥

90%

)

Ar

eas Evaluated

Gr

ow

th S

trategy / M

iss

ion

(35) No ne y Lo ng -t erm goa ls an d st rat egi es y Ad m in istrativ e strateg ies and im pl em en tatio n resu lts y In stitu tion al specializatio n y Fi nance s y Utilization of first-cycle accre ditation results

T

eaching & Curricula

(60) No ne y Edu catio na l obj ectiv es y Curricula a nd teaching m ethods

Academic Administration

/

Disserta

tio

n Guidance

₍₅₅₎ No ne y Adm issions y Academ ic administration y R esearch in vol vem ent & di ss ert at ion gu id an ce

(4)

Rese ar ch Ac tivit y (60) No ne y Research pe rform ance y U se o f re se ar ch f und ing

St

udent Ev

aluations /

Faculty-S

ta

ff Develop

m

ent

(45) No ne y St ude nt e val ua tions y Facu lty d ev elop m en t y St af f de vel opm ent

Academic S

u

pport

Facilities & Pr

ograms

(45) No ne y St ude nt s upp or t pr og ram s y Edu catio na l sup por t pr ogr am s y Resear ch suppo rt p rog ra m s y In fo rm ational sup po rt pr og ra m s

Accreditation Results for Newly Established Universities

Accreditations of six ne

wly established

universities (two general, one industrial,

and three religious)

were conducted in 2002.

Out of a

m

axi

m

um possible score of 300, the highest score was 272.4 and the

lowest 21

1.5. All evaluated uni

versities exceeded the m

inimu

required sco

re of 210 and received an

accred

itation valid for six years.

T

able 1a: Overall Resu

lts

Universit

ies

Evaluated

Universit

ies

Accr

edited

Far East Un iv ersity Korea Po lytech ni c Un iv ersity Lu th er Un iv ersity Seou l Christian Un iv ersity Seou l Jan gs in Un iv ersity Ta m na Un iv ersity Far East Un iv ersity Korea Po lytech ni c Un iv ersity Lu th er Un iv ersity Seou l Christian Un iv ersity Seou l Jan gs in Un iv ersity Ta m na Un iv ersity

Newly established universities are recognized

as “good” if their evaluation scores in

specific categories m

eet or exceed 90% of

the total

(5)

T

able 1b: Results by C

ategory

Good

₍

≥

90%

)

Ar

eas Evaluated

T

eaching & Curricula

(75) No ne y Edu catio na l obj ectiv es y Cu rricu la y Course i nstruction y St ude nt s upp or t m echani sm s

Community

Service

(15) Korea Po lytech ni c Un iv ersity y Co mm un ity se rv ice y E xte rn al co op er atio n

Faculty

(45) Korea Po lytech ni c Un iv ersity y Facu lty co m positio n y Co urse l oad s & facu lty sup po rt y Facul ty pe rso nn el m anagem ent y Facu lty d ev elop m en t

Resear

ch Activity

(30) Korea Po lytech ni c Un iv ersity y Research pe rform ance y Research environm ent y Resear ch suppo rt p rog ra m s

Academic

Administra

tion

(20) Korea Po lytech ni c Un iv ersity y Academ ic adm inistration syste m s y Lev el o f satisfactio n with acad em ic adm ini st rat ion

Facilitie

s

(45) Korea Po lytech ni c Un iv ersity Lu th er Un iv ersity Seou l Jan gs in Un iv ersity y Basic ed ucati on al facilities y Edu catio na l sup port facilities y Lab & trai ni ng facilities y St ud en t/facu lty serv ice facilities

Finances &

Administra

tion

(50) Korea Po lytech ni c Un iv ersity y Fu nd -rai si ng y B ud get ary m anagem ent y Adm ini st rat io n & pers onnel m anagem ent y Decision-m aking structures

(6)

Institu

tiona

l

Specializ

ation

(20) Korea Po lytech ni c Un iv ersity y Plan s for in stitu tio na l sp ecializatio n y Pro m otio n of sp ecializatio n initiativ es