A Method for Distinguishing Exceptional and General Examples in Example based Transfer Systems
Full text
Figure
Related documents
Our aim was to ascertain the rate of management (percentage of encounters) of WAD among patients attending Australian general practice, and to review management of these
Percent of humeral head anterior to scapular line (PHHA), glenoid version, coracoscapular angles, and coracoscapular and coracohumeral distances were significantly lower for
Results: The proteomic approach revealed significantly increased expression of carbonic anhydrase I (CA1) in the synovial membrane of patients with AS as compared with the RA and
(2) There are differences in secondary outcome mea- sures [Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) [20]] between the treatment groups and the control group in favour
The peak values for the vertical and posterior ground reaction force, altered knee flexion angle and knee flexion moment from the RRA, quadri- ceps force and anterior tibial
However, to our knowledge, this is the first study to indicate the comparative invasiveness and tolerability of XLIF compared with traditional open PLIF as a minim- ally invasive
adl: subdomain activities of daily living; e/v: Subdomain energy/vitality; ES: Effect size (ES); FAOS: Foot and Ankle Outcome Score; gh: Subdomain general health perception;
reported a subluxa- tion/reluxation rate of 13% (six of 45 operated knees) in an average follow-up examination period of 13.5 years, where 14 patients and 15 Roux-Elmslie-Trillat