Community-Acquired
Pneumonia
Bradley A. Sharpe, M.D. Associate Professor Medicine Department of Medicine UCSF [email protected]
Roadmap
• Background • Etiology • Diagnosis • Treatment • PreventionCAP: A Practical Approach
Specific Goals:
• Describe the most common causes of community-acquired pneumonia in the outpatient setting
• Order appropriate diagnostic tests for CAP • Initiate appropriate antibiotics in the treatment
of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) • State the optimal duration of therapy in CAP • State the benefits and need for preventative
measures for CAP
CAP: A Practical Approach
Sources
• Guidelines for Community-Acquired Pneumonia
♦ IDSA/ATS Consensus Guidelines 2007
(IDSA = Infectious Disease Society of America) (ATS = American Thoracic Society)
♦ BTS: British Thoracic Society
• Updated Literature Review
Caveats
• Practical, nuts and bolts (use it tomorrow…)
• Run-of-the-mill community-acquired pneumonia • Will not talk about healthcare-associated
pneumonia (HCAP)
• Will not discuss admission decision (complex)
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
CAP: Background
• 5 million cases/year in the U.S. • 80% of CAP is treated outpatient • Sixth leading cause of death • Inpatient mortality 10-35%
▪One-year mortality = 40% (vs. 29% in controls)
• Outpatient mortality < 1%
CAP: A Practical Approach
CAP: Background
• Higher mortality among Caucasians • Some evidence that quality of care for
African-Americans with CAP is worse
CAP: A Practical Approach Mortensen EM, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:20.
Mayr FB, et al. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:759.
CAP: Background
Cough 90%*
Dyspnea 66%
Sputum 66%
Pleuritic chest pain 50%
CAP: A Practical Approach
* Yet, only 4% of all visits for cough are pneumonia
Halm EA, Teirstein AS. N Engl J Med
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Clinical Presentation: Geriatrics
• Less “classic” presentations♦ 10% have NONE of the classic signs or symptoms
• Up to 40% will not have fever
• Up to 45% will have altered mental status
Mehr DR, et al. J Fam Prac2001;50(11):1101. Riquelme R, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1997;156:1908.
CAP: A Practical Approach
“Typical” vs. “Atypical”
• Classic teaching is not supported by the literature
• Some general trends
♦ S. pneumoniaein older pts, co-morbidities
♦ Bacterial infections more common in immune deficiencies
♦ Viruses more common in older patients
♦ Mycoplasmain patients < 50 years old
CAP: A Practical Approach
“Typical” vs. “Atypical”
• Classic teaching is not supported by the literature
• Some general trends
• But - no history, exam, laboratory, or radiographic features predict organism
♦ “Walking pneumonia”
♦ “Classic lobar pneumonia”
CAP: A Practical Approach
Etiology of CAP
Outpatients (mild) • S pneumoniae(30-50%) • Resp. viruses (10-30%) • M pneumoniae • H influenzae • C pneumoniae Non-ICU inpatients • S pneumoniae • M pneumoniae • C pneumoniae • H influenzae • Legionella spp • Resp. viruses ICU inpatient • S pneumoniae • Legionella spp • H influenzae • GNRs • S aureus File TM. Lancet2003;362:1991.CA-MRSA
• Community-acquired MRSA CAP • First reported in 2003; increasing • Specific strain of MRSA
-- Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) genes
CAP: A Practical Approach
CA-MRSA
Clinical Features % of Patients
• Flu Prodrome 30-75% • Shock 50-100% • Multi-lobar 50-100% • Necrotizing 33-100% • Leukopenia 25-100% • Ventilated 50-100% • Mortality ~ 40%
CAP: A Practical Approach
Diagnosis of CAP
1) Select clinical features
(e.g. cough, fever, sputum, pleuritic chest pain)
AND
2) Infiltrate by CXR or other imaging
CAP: A Practical Approach
IDSA/ATS Guidelines. CID. 2007;44:S27-72.
Diagnosis of CAP
• Clinical history and physical examination are not sensitive or specific
• All patients with suspected pneumonia should have a CXR
CAP: A Practical Approach
Wipf JE, et al. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1082. IDSA/ATS Guidelines. CID. 2007;44:S27-72.
Blood Cultures
• Provides a specific diagnosis • The data:
♦ Cultures within 24 hours of arrival are associated with 10% lower odds of 30d mortality • No evidence of benefit in outpatient setting
CAP: A Practical Approach Meehan TP, et al. JAMA1997;278.
Blood Cultures in CAP
• Limitations
♦ Positive in < 10% of cases
• Medicare database of 13,000 patients
• Determined predictors of blood-culture positivity
♦ The sicker you are. . .
CAP: A Practical Approach Metersky ML, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2004;169(3):342-7
Blood Cultures in CAP
• Limitations
♦ Positive in < 10% of cases
♦ High percentage of contaminants
♦ Cultures change antibiotics in < 5% of patients
♦ Costly
CAP: A Practical Approach Metersky ML, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2004;169(3):342-7
Blood Cultures in CAP
• In general, blood cultures are not indicated in the management of outpatient CAP
• For inpatient CAP, blood cultures are optional
unless clear risk factors for positive blood cultures
▪ICU, Severe liver disease, Cavitary infiltrates, Pleural effusion
CAP: A Practical Approach
Sputum for CAP
• Complicated and Controversial • Simple, inexpensive, specific for
pneumococcus • Problems include:
♦Up to 30% could not produce adequate sputum
♦Good quality available in only 14%
♦Most don’t narrow antibiotics
CAP: A Practical Approach
Sputum Cultures in CAP
• In general, sputum cultures are not indicated in the management of outpatient CAP
• For inpatient CAP, sputum is indicated:
▪High-quality specimen, right to the lab
▪ICU, Cavitary infiltrates, Underlying lung disease
CAP: A Practical Approach
IDSA/ATS Guidelines. CID. 2007;44:S27-72.
The future in CAP
• Pneumococcal urinary antigen • Rapid test, specificity > 90%• If positive, tx for pneumococcal disease • Probably does not reduce antibiotic spectrum
-- > 70% with no change
CAP: A Practical Approach
Sorde R, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:166.
The future in CAP - biomarkers
• Procalcitonin: precursor of calcitonin
● No hormonal activity
● Inflammatory marker
● Increased in sepsis, bacterial infection
CAP: A Practical Approach
Meta-analysis/systematic review
• Four studies, ~3500 patients with respiratory tract infections
• Less antibiotic exposure**
• A 22% decrease in prescriptions • Average 2.3 days less abx overall
• No difference in mortality/clinical outcomes
Soni NJ, et al. JHM. 2013;8:530.
Treatment Principle #1
Outpatients (mild) • S pneumoniae • M pneumoniae • H influenzae • C pneumoniae • Resp. virusesCAP: A Practical Approach
Must cover all these organisms
Treatment Principle #2
Outpatients (mild) • S pneumoniae • M pneumoniae • H influenzae • C pneumoniae • Resp. virusesCAP: A Practical Approach
“Wimpy” pneumococcus
Drug-resistant S. pneumoniae
(DRSP)
Penicillin, erythromycin, macrolides, etc.
Risk Factors for DRSP
• Age > 65 years old • Chronic disease
▪Heart, lung, renal, liver
• Diabetes mellitus • Alcoholism
• Malignancy (active) • Immunosuppression
• Antibiotics in the last 3 months
Treatment CAP
Outpatient, healthy, noDRSP risk factors Doxycycline or macrolide
CAP: A Practical Approach
Macrolide = azithro, clarithro, erythro
Treatment CAP
Outpatient,DRSP risk factors
Oral fluoroquinolone OR
Oral -lactam + doxy or macrolide
CAP: A Practical Approach
● Oral fluoroquinolone: moxi, gemi, levofloxacin
● -lactam: High-dose amoxicillin (1mg PO tid) Augmentin (875mg PO bid)
UCSF Outpatient CAP
• Patients with no co-morbidities and not recently exposed to antibacterials:
First choice: doxycycline Second choice: azithromycin Third choice: clarithromycin • “High risk” (DRSP risk factors):
First choice: respiratory fluoroquinolone
Second choice: combination B-lactam + doxycycline
CAP: A Practical Approach
Treatment CAP
Inpatient, non-ICU Fluoroquinolone OR -lactam + macrolide
CAP: A Practical Approach
Inpatient, ICU IV -lactam + macrolide + vancomycin OR
IV -lactam + fluoroquinolone
“Guideline Concordant Abx”
Benefits• Frei CR, et al. Am J Med. 2006;119:865 - Retrospective study of 631 pts with CAP - Early switch to orals, shorter LOS, lower mortality • Mortensen EM, et al. Am J Med. 2006;119:859.
- Retrospective study of 787 pts with CAP - Decreased mortality at 48 hours
• Mortensen EM, et al. Am J Med. 2004;117:726-31 - Improved 30-day mortality
CAP: A Practical Approach CAP: A Practical Approach
“Guideline Concordant Abx”
Benefits• Arnold FW, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1515. - Retrospective study of 1725 pts with CAP; - Shorter LOS, mortality 10% lower (NNT = 10) • Mccabe C, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1525.
- Retrospective study of > 50,000 with CAP - Decreased mortality by 30%
• Asadi L, et al. Respir Med. 2012;106:451.
- Retrospective study of 2973 outpatients with CAP - Decreased mortality by 77%
Duration of therapy?
• Meta-analysis of 15 RCTs, 2796 patients with mild to moderate CAP
• Compared short-course (< 7 days) with longer courses.
• Looked at clinical failure, bacterial eradication, and mortality.
CAP: A Practical Approach
Li JZ, et al. Am J Med. 2007;120:783.
Duration of therapy?
• No difference in clinical failure • No difference in bacterial eradication • No difference in mortality
• In subgroup analysis, trend toward favorable efficacy with short-course.
CAP: A Practical Approach
Duration of therapy
• Minimum of 5 days
▪ If afebrile for 48-72
• For most, 7 days total
CAP: A Practical Approach
Follow-up CXR?
• Standard practice?
• Prior ATS guidelines said yes, recent guidelines do not address
• CXR resolution:
▪At 28 days, ~ 50% had not resolved
• Can consider in “high-risk” patients ▪Significant smoking history, etc.
▪Probably should wait > 3 months
CAP: A Practical Approach Bruns AH. CID. 2007;45:983..
CAP: A Practical Approach
Pneumovax
• Updated meta-analysis of 18 RCTs (~64,000 pts) and 7 non-RCTs (~62,000 pts) trials,
• Only high-quality studies
Relative Risk All-cause pneumonia 0.70(0.45-1.12) All-cause mortality 0.90 (0.74-1.09) ** No difference for elderly or chronic illness
Moberly S, et al. Cochrane. 2013; 1:CD000422
Pneumovax - Efficacy
• Four different trials looking at benefits of pneumovax in patients hospitalized with CAP.
• Compared vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated • Looked at impact on ICU admission,
inpatient mortality, inpatient complications, and LOS.
Pneumovax - Efficacy
CAP: A Practical Approach
Variable Outcome ICU admission Decreased Inpt complications Decreased
LOS Decreased
Inpt mortality Decreased
Pneumovax - Efficacy
• Pneumococcal vaccine likely prevents invasive pneumococcal disease.
• Probably reduces death, ICU admission, complications, and LOS in patients hospitalized with CAP.
CAP: A Practical Approach
Pneumovax - Who
• Patients > 65 years old
• Patients < 65 with chronic medical conditions • Respiratory: COPD, asthma
• Cardiovascular disease
• Metabolic diseases: diabetes, renal failure, liver failure
• Immunocompromised (HIV, malignancy, etc.) • Residing in long-term care facilities
CAP: A Practical Approach
Influenza Vaccine - Efficacy
• Adults aged < 65 years
• Prevents influenza illness in ~ 70-90%
• Adults aged > 65 years
• Prevents influenza illness in ~ 30-70%
CAP: A Practical Approach ACIP Recs. MMWR2003;52:1.
Influenza Vaccine - Efficacy
CAP: A Practical Approach Gross PA, et al. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:518-27.
Hospitalization Risk Reduction
Resp. Illness 56%* Hospitalization 50%*
Pneumonia 53%*
All cause death 68%*
(NNT = 118) * All p values < 0.001
Influenza Vaccine - Efficacy
CAP: A Practical Approach Nichol KL, et al. N Engl J Med2007;357:1373. (Oct 4, 2007)
Hospitalization Risk Reduction
Hospitalization
for pna/flu 27%*
All cause death 48%*
* All p values < 0.001
Smoking Cessation Counseling
• Should provide it to all of our patients that smoke
• Some evidence that tobacco is a risk factor for pneumonia
CAP: A Practical Approach
Proton Pump Inhibitors
• Gulmez, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2007.-- Current use of PPI: CAP OR = 1.5 -- Recent start: CAP OR = 5.0 • Sarkar, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2008.
-- Recent PPI start: CAP OR = 3.8 • Herzig, et al. JAMA. 2009.
-- 52% of hosp pts got PPI, HAP OR = 1.3 • Eurich, et al. Am J Med. 2010.
-- Rates recurrent CAP after CAP admit -- Starting PPI: OR 2.1% (7% abs risk)
Anti-psychotics
• Knol W, et al. JAGS. 2009.-- Recent anti-psychotic start (1 wk); OR 4.3** • Trifiro, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2010.
-- Population based study, 2000 patients. Current Use Risk of pneumonia
Typical anti-psychotic OR = 2.6 (1.4-4.6)
Atypical OR = 1.8 (1.2-5.3)
CAP: A Practical Approach
Take-Home Points
• Etiology: No predictors for “typical” or “atypical” – need to treat both • Etiology: Recognize CA-MRSA as a cause for
severe CAP
• Diagnosis: Do not routinely get blood or sputum cultures in outpt CAP
CAP: A Practical Approach
Take-home Points
• Treatment: doxycycline or macrolide for healthy outpatient with no DRSP risk-factors
• Treatment: fluoroquinolone or -lactam + macrolide/doxy for outpt with DRSP risk factors
• Prevention: pneumovax, flu vax, smoking, avoid PPIs