• No results found

Dewatering

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Dewatering"

Copied!
71
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Dewatering

Prof. Jie Han, Ph.D., PE

The University of Kansas

(2)

Outline of Presentation

• Introduction

• Applications

• Design

(3)
(4)

Purposes for Dewatering

 For construction excavations or permanent

structures that are below the water table and are not waterproof or are waterproof but are

not designed to resist the hydrostatic pressure

 Permanent dewatering systems are far less

commonly used than temporary or construction dewatering systems

(5)

Permanent Highway Below

Groundwater Table

(6)

Common Dewatering Methods

 Sumps, trenches, and pumps  Well points

(7)

Sumps, Trenches, and Pumps

 Handle minor amount of water inflow

 The height of groundwater above the excavation

bottom is relatively small (5ft or less)

 The surrounding soil is relatively impermeable

(8)
(9)

Wet Excavations

 Sump pumps are frequently used to remove surface

water and a small infiltration of groundwater

 Sumps and connecting interceptor ditches should be

located well outside the footing area and below the bottom of footing so the groundwater is not allowed to disturb the foundation bearing surface

 In granular soils, it is important that fine particles not

be carried away by pumping. The sump(s) may be lined with a filter material to prevent or minimize loss of fines

(10)

Dewatering Open Excavation by

Ditch and Sump

(11)

Well Point Method

 Multiple closely spaced wells connected by pipes

to a strong pump

 Multiple lines or stages of well points are required

for excavations more than 15 to 20 ft below the groundwater table

(12)
(13)

Well Point Installation

(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)

Staged Ring Well Point System

(18)

Effect of Foundation Depth and

Impermeable Stratum

(19)

Deep Wells with Submersible Pumps

 Pumps are placed at the bottom of the wells and

the water is discharged through a pipe connected to the pump and run up through the well hole to a suitable discharge point

 They are more powerful than well points, require

a wider spacing and fewer well holes

(20)

Deep Well

 Bore a hole with rotary boring method

 Insert a temporary outer casing if necessary

 Place a perforated well liner  Plug the well bottom

 Place layers of filter material around the casing

(21)

Deep Wells with Submersible Pumps

(22)
(23)

Inappropriate Recharging

(24)
(25)

Applicability of Dewatering Systems

(26)
(27)

Permanent Groundwater Control

System

(28)
(29)

Buoyancy Effects on Underground

Structure

(30)

Recharge Groundwater to Prevent

Settlement

(31)

Sand Drains for Dewatering A Slope

(32)

Grout Curtain or Cutoff Trench

around An Excavation

(33)
(34)

Design Input Parameters

 Most important input parameters for selecting

and designing a dewatering system:

- the height of the groundwater above the base of the excavation

- the permeability of the ground surrounding the excavation

(35)

Depth of Required Groundwater Lowering

 The water level should be lowered to about 2 to

5 ft below the base of the excavation

(36)

Methods for Permeability

 Empirical formulas

 Laboratory permeability tests  Borehole packer tests

 Field pump tests

Accuracy

(37)

Darcy’s Law

Average velocity of flow

L

h

k

ki

v

=

=

Rate (quantity) of flow

A

L

h

k

kiA

q

=

=

Actual velocity of flow

n

v

(38)

Typical Permeability of Soils

Soil or rock formation Range of k (cm/s)

Gravel 1 - 5

Clean sand 10-3 - 10-2

Clean sand and gravel mixtures Medium to coarse sand

Very fine to fine sand Silty sand Homogeneous clays Shale Sandstone Limestone 10-3 - 10-1 Fractured rocks 10-2 - 10-1 10-4 - 10-3 10-5 - 10-2 10-9 - 10-7 10-11 - 10-7 10-8 - 10-4 10-7 - 10-4 10-6 - 10-2

(39)

Permeability

vs.

Effective

Grain Size

Army TM 5-818-5

Effective Grain Size (D10) of Soil, mm

C oe ffi c ie nt of H or iz onta l pe rme a bi li ty of S oi l (k h ) x10 -4 cm /sec

Note: kh based on field pumping tests

(40)

h

Q

A

Soil

L

Constant Head Test

hAt QL k =

(41)

Falling Head Test

Soil

A

Valve

h

1

h

2

At t=t

1

At t=t

2

dh

a

L





=

2 1

h

h

t

A

aL

k

ln

(42)

Field Pumping Test

h2 h1 r2 r1 r dr dh h Phreatic level before pumping Phreatic level after pumping Test well Observation wells Impermeable layer q

(43)

Observation

Wells

(44)

Permeability from Field Pumping Test

Permeability

(

2

)

2 2 1 2 1

h

h

r

r

q

k

π

=

ln

(45)

Dupuit-Thiem Approximation for Single Well

h0 hs r0 Influence range, R r hw Phreatic level

before pumping Phreatic levelafter pumping

Impermeable layer Q Original GWL s

(

)

(

)

(

(

0

)

)

2 w 2 0 2 w 2 r / R log h H k 366 . 1 r / R ln h H k Q = π − = − H y

(

)

k r / r ln Q h y2 2w 0 π = −

(46)

Height of Free Discharge Surface

(

)

H h H C hs 2 0 − =

(47)

Influence Range

(

H h

)

k ' C R = − w Sichardt (1928) C = 3000 for wells

or 1500 to 2000 for single line well points H, hw in meters and k in m/s

(48)

Forchheimer Equation for Multiwells

(

)

n 2 1 2 2 x ... x x ln ) n / 1 ( R ln y H k Q − − π = Forchheimer (1930) x1 Well 1 Well 2 Well 3 Point P x2 x 3 a

(

)

a ln R ln y H k Q 2 2 − − π =

(49)

0 1 2 3 4 5 R/H 0 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.0 hs/H hs h0 h Q H R y Army TM 5-818-5

Height of

Free

Discharge

Surface

(50)

Estimation of Flow Rate

– Darcy’s Law

r0 h0 H H-h0 R

(

)(

)(

)

0 0 0 0 r R r R h H h H k 571 . 1 Q − + + − =

(51)

Estimation of Flow Rate

– Well Formulas

r0 h0 H H-h0 R

(

0

)

2 0 2 r / R log h H k 366 . 1 Q = − Cedergren (1967)

(52)

Estimation of Flow Rate

– Flow Nets

r0 h0 H H-h0 R

(

)(

)

d f 0 0 n n r R h H k 14 . 3 Q = − + Flow net

nf = number of flow channels nd = number of head drops

(53)

Capacities of Common Deep Well

Pumps

Mansur and Kaufman (1962) Min. i.d. of well

pump can enter (in.)

Preferred min. i.d. of well (in.) Approximate max. capacity (gal/min) 4 5 5/8 6 8 10 12 14 16 5 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 90 160 450 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 3,000

(54)

Rate of Flow into A Pumped Well

or Well Point

Approximate formula 0 0 44 kr h Q = k = permeability, ft/min

r0 = effective radius of the well, ft h0 = depth of immersion of well, ft

(55)

Typical Well Point Spacing in Granular Soils

(56)
(57)

Spacing of Deep Wells

 The spacing of deep wells required equals to the perimeter of the excavation divided by the

number of wells required  Sichardt recommended:

(58)
(59)

Head vs. Discharge for Pump

(60)
(61)

Bottom Stability of Excavation

(62)

Settlement of Adjacent Structures

' vo ' vo c 0 log C e 1 H σ σ ∆ + σ + = δ w hγ ∆ = σ ∆

(63)
(64)

Plan View &

Cross-Section

(65)

Design Requirement

Lower the groundwater table to 5ft below the bottom of the excavation

(66)

Equivalent Radius and Influence Range

Equivalent radius of excavation

ft 357 ft 500 ft 800 r0 = π × =

Height of water level in well

(

)

(

)

ft 1130 m 340 10 7 . 4 3 . 0 85 140 3000 k h H ' C R w 5 = = × × × − × = − = − Influence range h0 = 160 – 70 – 5 = 85 ft

(67)

Rate of Flow in Wells

Using Darcy’s law

Single well formula

(

)

(

)

(

(

)

)

min / gal 2350 min / ft 313 357 / 1130 log 85 140 00925 . 0 37 . 1 r / R log h H k 37 . 1 Q 3 2 2 0 2 0 2 = = − × × = − =

(

)(

)(

)

(

)(

)(

)

min / gal 2592 min / ft 346 357 1130 357 1130 85 140 85 140 00925 . 0 57 . 1 r R r R h H h H k 571 . 1 Q 3 0 0 0 0 = = − + + − × × = − + + − =

(68)

Flow Rate into Wells using Flow Net

(

)(

)

min / gal 1782 min / ft 238 30 3 ) 357 1130 ( ) 85 140 ( 00925 . 0 14 . 3 n n r R h H k 14 . 3 Q 3 d f 0 0 = = + × − × × = + − = R=1500’

(69)

Pump Test

A pump test indicates that the field permeability k = 9.2 x 10-4 cm/sec and the radius of influence

R = 2200ft. The new solutions based on the pump Test results are

Method Darcy’s law Well formula Flow net

(70)
(71)

Multiple Wells

(

)

(

)

min / gal 290 min / ft 7 . 38 357 ln 2200 ln 85 140 00181 . 0 14 . 3 a ln R ln y H k Q 3 2 2 2 2 = = − − × × = − − π =

290/8 = 36.3 gal/min per well Deep well size:

4” dia. for 36.6 gal/min

Discharge pump:

6” dia. Pump for 290 gal/min Header pipe:

References

Related documents

• Follow up with your employer each reporting period to ensure your hours are reported on a regular basis?. • Discuss your progress with

The uniaxial compressive strengths and tensile strengths of individual shale samples after four hours exposure to water, 2.85x10 -3 M cationic surfactant

The provision of fermented cassava peel using local microorganisms has a very significant effect (P <0.01) on the quality content of local rams meat in terms of protein content

Online community: A group of people using social media tools and sites on the Internet OpenID: Is a single sign-on system that allows Internet users to log on to many different.

Using text mining of first-opinion electronic medical records from seven veterinary practices around the UK, Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard modelling, we were able to

Goldfish care Planning your aquarium 4-5 Aquarium 6-7 Equipment 8-11 Decorating the aquarium 12-15 Getting started 16-17 Adding fish to the aquarium 18-19 Choosing and

Proprietary Schools are referred to as those classified nonpublic, which sell or offer for sale mostly post- secondary instruction which leads to an occupation..

4.1 The Select Committee is asked to consider the proposed development of the Customer Service Function, the recommended service delivery option and the investment required8. It