• No results found

Summary of marked native vegetation. Offset requirements. Next steps

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Summary of marked native vegetation. Offset requirements. Next steps"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Biodiversity information for applications for permits to remove native vegetation

under clause 52.16 or 52.17 of the Victoria Planning Provisions

Date of issue: 19 February 2016 Time of issue: 10:30:27

Property address

241 MCCARTINS ROAD TURTONS CREEK 3960

Summary of marked native vegetation

Risk-based pathway Moderate

Total extent 0.788 ha

Remnant patches

0.007 ha

Scattered trees 11 trees

Location risk B

See Appendix I for risk-based pathway details

Offset requirements

If a permit is granted to remove the marked native vegetation the permit condition will include the requirement to obtain a native vegetation offset.

The biodiversity assessment tool does not currently calculate offset requirements for moderate and high risk-based pathway applications. Please contact DEPI to determine the offset requirements for your proposal.

Next steps

This proposal to remove native vegetation must meet the application requirements of the moderate risk-based pathway and it will be assessed in the moderate risk-based pathway.

If you wish to remove the marked native vegetation you are required to apply for a permit from your local council.

The Biodiversity assessment report should be submitted with your application for a permit to remove native vegetation you plan to remove, lop or destroy.

The Biodiversity assessment report provides the following information that is required to be provided with your application for a permit to remove native vegetation:

• The location of the site where native vegetation is to be removed.

• The area of the patch of native vegetation and/or the number of any scattered trees to be removed.

Maps or plans containing information set out in the Permitted clearing of native vegetation - Biodiversity assessment

guidelines.

• The risk-based pathway of the application for a permit to remove native vegetation.

Additional information is required when submitting an application for a permit to remove native vegetation. Refer to the Permitted

(2)

Maps of marked native vegetation

Legend

Marked native vegetation

I N - P r o p e r t y boundary 5 10 15 Metres Department of Environment and Primary industries

(3)

Property view of marked native vegetation

Legend

Marked native vegetation -

- Property boundary

o

30 60 90 Metres Department of Environment nd Primary Industries

See Appendix 2 f o r biodiversity information maps

© The State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2013 Obtaining this publication does not guarantee that an application will meet the This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except requirements of clauses 52.16 or 52.17 of the Victoria Planning Provisions or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. theta permit to remove native vegetation will be granted.

Authorised by the Victorian Government, S Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. Notwithstanding anything else contained in this publication, you must ensure that you comply with all relevant laws, legislation, awards or orders and that you For more information contact the DEPt Customer Service Centre 136 186 obtain and comply with all permits, approvals and the like that affect, are

applicable or are necessary to undertake any action to remove, lop or destroy or

Disclaimer otherwise deal with any native vegetation or that apply to matters within the

scope of clauses 52.16 or 52.17 of the Victoria Planning Provisions. This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its

employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any

information in this publication.

Department of

Environment and

•_

Primary Industries

S

(4)

Appendix 1 - Risk-based pathway details

Risk-based pathway Moderate

Total extent 0.788 ha

Remnant patches

0.007 ha

Scattered trees 11 trees

Location risk B

W h y is the risk-based pathway moderate?

The following table explains how the risk-based pathway is determined:

Extent Location A Location B, Location C

<0.5 hectares Low Low High

2: 0.5 hectares and < 1 Low Moderate High

hectares

2: 1 hectares Moderate High High

The marked native vegetation is located, either wholly or partly, within Location B and has a total extent of greater than or equal to 0.5 hectares but less than 1 hectare.

At this location, native vegetation removal of this size may have a significant impact on the habitat of one or more rare or

threatened species. As a result, an application for the removal of this native vegetation must meet the requirements of, and will be assessed in, the moderate risk-based pathway.

For further information on location risk please see Native vegetation location risk map factsheet. For information on the

determination of the risk-based pathway see Permitted clearing o f native vegetation - Biodiversity assessment guidelines.

Have y o u received a planning permit t o remove native vegetation in the last five years?

If you have undertaken any permitted clearing on your property within the last five years, the extent of this past clearing must be included in the total extent of your current permit application. The risk-based pathway for your application requirements and assessment pathway is determined using the combined extent of permitted clearing within the last five years and proposed clearing.

(5)

Appendix 2 - Biodiversity information maps

Marked native vegetation and the Native vegetation location risk map

I

Legend Marked native vegetation

N - Property boundary

0 6 12 18

Native vegetation location risk metres

Location Location B

J

Location A Department of Environment and Primary Industries r c p o t t 5

(6)

I

Description:

Grows on fertile, well-drained loamy soils on a range of geologies and elevation levels. I t is largely restricted to protected sites In gullies and on southern aspects of hills and mountains where rainfall is high and cloud cover at ground level is frequent. Characterised by a tall eucalypt overstorey to 30 m tail with scattered understorey trees over a tall broad-leaved shrubby understorey and a moist, shaded, fern-rich ground layer that is usually dominated by tree-ferns.

Large trees:

Species DBH(cm) #/ha

Eucalyptus spp. 90 cm 20 ha

Tree Canopy Cover:

%cover Character Species Common Name

40% Eucalyptus regnans Mountain Ash

Eucalyptus globu/uss.l. Blue Gum

Eucalyptus do//qua Messrnate Stringybark

Understorey:

Life form #Spp %Cover LF code

Immature Canopy Tree 5% IT Understorey Tree or Large Shrub 4 30% T

Medium Shrub 3 15% MS

Medium Herb 3 5% MH

Large Tufted Gramlnold 1 5% LTG Large Non-tufted Graminoid 1 10% LNG

Ground Fern 4 20% GF

Tree Fern 2 20% TRF

Epiphyte 2 1% EP

Scrambler or Climber 2 5% SC Bryophytes/Lichens na 20% BL

LF Code Species typical o f a t least part of EVC range Common Name

T Q/ea,iaargop/,yI/a Musk Daisy-bush

T Acacia dealbata Silver Wattle

T Pomaderns aspera Hazel Pomaderris

T Bedford/a arbo,escens Blanket-leaf

MS Cc'prosma quadrifIda Prickly Currant-bush

MS Hedycarya angustifolia Austral Mulberry

MS Oleana lirata Snowy Daisy-bush

MM Austra/Iria pus//Ia ssp. muel/eri Shade Nettle

MM Sa,nL'ucus gaudic/,audiana White Elderberry

MM Hydrocoty/e hkta Hairy Pennywort

MM Wob hederacea sensu Willis (1972) Ivy-leaf Violet

LTG Leoidaspeyina elatius Tall Sword-sedge

LNG Tetrrnr/ienajuncea Forest Wire-grass

GF Po/ystichum prol/feruin Mother Shield-fern

GF Grammltis bi/laidlerol Common Finger-fern

GF Asplenium bulbifenim ssp. grad/I/mum Mother Spleenwort

GF Pterkiium escu/entum Austral Bracken

TRF Cyatbea austra/is Rough Tree-fern

TRF Dickson/a antarctica Soft Tree-fern

EP Microsorum pustulatum ssp. pustu/atum Kangaroo Fern

EP field/a austrahs Fieldia

Sc aemt,saristata Mountain Clematis

SC Pandorea paridorana Wonga Vine

(7)

Recruitment: Continuous Organic Litter: 50 % cover Logs: 30 m/0.1 ha. Weediness:

LF Code Typical Weed Species Common Name Invasive Impact

MS Rubus Iruticosus spp. agg. Blackberry high high

published by the Victorian Government Department of St inability and Environment October2005 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainabulity and Environment 2005

This publication is copyright Reproduction and the making available of this material for personal, In-house or non-commercial purposes is authorised, on condition that • the copyright owner is acknowledged;

• no official connection is claimed;

• the material is made available without charge or a t cost; and

• the material is not subject to Inaccurate, misleading or derogatory treatment

Requests for permission to reproduce or communicate this material in any way not permitted by this licence (or by the fair dealing provisions of the CopyWghtAct 1968) should be directed to the Nominated officer, Copi1ght, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, VIctoria, 3002.

For more information contact: Customer Service Centre, 136 186

This publication may be of assistance t o you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore declaims all liability for any error, kiss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication

References

Related documents

The purpose of this literature review was to provide a body of evidence to support the research question that guided this study: What strategies do Scottish nonprofit mental

The dinner-home-visit provided social interactions between teacher, student, and parent, not often experienced, to increase communication and provide educators with

ED ELC EDD

For it's made clear to us from the opening  pages that the main issue here has something to do with the relationship of Artie and his father, that, in a

Keywords: luxury consumption motivation, attached foreign emotional value, fashion difference perception, price fairness perception, the match degree between country

Reports will identify patient name, account number, date of service, type of service received, total charges, co-payments, third party payments, amount of indigent care write

Prior to being in India, Manish was a Quantitative Equity Trader in Tokyo, with Merrill Lynch Prop Desk for over 4 years where he played a vital role in development and

In any case in which any individual has violated or is suspected to have violated this Policy, the Pittsburgh Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates Senior Privacy Official, the