• No results found

DUI Treatment Program Services

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "DUI Treatment Program Services"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

DUI Treatment

Program

Services

(2)

History of DUI Treatment Services

In 1978 the California Legislature mandated

development of programs that would be designed to:

reduce the high level of recidivism of individuals arrested,

convicted of driving-under-the-influence (DUI); endangering

public safety by individuals consuming alcohol and

drugs/and driving on California streets and highways.

For over 26 years the California Department of Motor

Vehicles (DMV) has conducted annual outcome

studies on the effectiveness of the California DUI

treatment system in reducing recidivism.

The 2014 report from the DMV states that recidivism

rates has declined by 50% for 1

st

and 2

nd

Offenders

(3)

History of DUI Treatment Services

The legislature passed Senate Bill 38 creating a

post-conviction program and assigned the Department of

Alcohol & Drug Programs responsibility for developing

regulations based on state law, i.e. §11836- §11838.11

of the California Health and Safety Code, and

§23161-§23181 of the California Vehicle Codes.

The initial focus of the legislature was on alcohol related

offenses. Over the past thirty-six (36) years, program

services have evolved to focus on any type of DUI

(4)

DUI Programs Effectiveness

In contrast to the past 8 years, the results show that assignment to a DUI program is statistically significantly associated with the 1 year subsequent crash rates of alcohol-or drug reckless offenders arrested in 2011.

The offenders assigned to a DUI program show a 17.2% lower crash rate than those not assigned to the program. Their crash rate (3.28 per 100 drivers) is slightly lower this year when compared to last year’s evaluation (3.47 per 100 drivers).

Year Sanction Group Sample Size

# of Crash involved per 100 Drivers

% effect difference in failure rates

# of DUI incident-involved

% effect difference in failure rate 7/2008 -6/2009 No Program 3205 4.25 -3.80% 3.89 -16.20% (Follow up - 1 year DUI Program 5410 4.08 3.26

Year Sanction Group Sample Size

# of Crash involved per 100 Drivers

% effect difference in failure rates

# of DUI incident-involved

% effect difference in failure rate

2010 No Program 5019 3.94 -11.9 2.65 -1.5

Follow up 1 year DUI Program 9498 3.47 2.61

Year Sanction Group Sample Size

# of Crash involved per 100 Drivers

% effect difference in failure rates

# of DUI incident-involved

% effect difference in failure rate 2011 No Program 4491 3.96 -17.2 3.22 -19.6 Follow up 1 year DUI Program 9632 3.28 2.59

(5)

Subsequent DUI Convictions

At the end of 18 years, 43% of 3rd or more offenders have reoffended, compared to 35% of 2nd

(6)

Dui Statistics Statewide

California State-Wide Arrests from 2006 to 2012

DUI arrest rate per 100,000 licensed drivers: decline of 5.3% in 2012 difference of 8.6% from 2011

(7)

Statewide DUI Arrests

DUI Arrests decreased by 4.1% in 2012, after decreasing

by 8.0% in 2011

DUI arrest rate per 100 licensed drivers was 0.7% in

2012; slightly lower than 0.89% in 2010 & 2011

Percentage of DUI arrests that were felonies (involving

bodily injury or death) increased from 2.6% in 2011 to

2.9% in 2012. Felony DUI arrests continue to constitute a

relatively small percentage of all DUI arrests

(8)

Statewide DUI Arrests

The median age of a DUI arrestee in 2012 was 30 years

73.1% were age 40 or younger

1% of all DUI arrests involved juveniles (under age 18) –

(Age 18 or under - 0.5% in 2011, to 0.4 in 2012) – 21 of

age decreased from 7.8% in 2011 to 7.2% in 2012

(9)

Statewide DUI Arrests

Males comprised 76.5% of all 2012 DUI Arrests

Females has risen from 10.6% in 1989 to 23.5% in 2012

Ethnic Groups:

• Hispanics (44.1% DUI Arrestees)

• Whites (38.6% DUI Arrestees)

• Others (9% DUI Arrestees)

(10)

DUI Arrests Contra Costa County

The 2012 DUI arrests rate per 100 licensed drivers in Contra Costa County

2010 2011 2012

Compared 2010 & 2011

Compared 2011 & 2012

Contra Costa County DUI

Arrests 4464 4305 4315

4% Less Arrests

2% Less Arrests

(11)

Subsequent Crashes

 The *2014 report from the DMV states that crash-involved has declined by

52.8% in 1st Offenders and 57.5% for 2nd Offenders over the last 22 years in

California

 Contra Costa County declined 0.5% for 1st Offenders and 1.6% declined for

2nd Offenders when compared to 2010 & 2011

(12)

The DUI Treatment Services Today

The DUI programs are licensed by the Department of Health Care

Services to provide a less intensive level of outpatient alcohol and other drug treatment services focused on improving public health and safety by reducing and/or eliminating additional DUI offenses.

These services consist of education classes (prevention); individual

and group counseling sessions (intervention); and in some counties individual client involvement in self-help programs to facilitate

(13)

The DUI Treatment Services Today

 Consistent with state regulations DUI treatment is provided by alcohol

and other drug counselors certified under Chapter 8, Division 4, Title 9, California Code of Regulations.

 DUI treatment programs collaborate with the Courts and the

Department of Motor Vehicles to ensure compliance with their summary or formal probation requirements and prepare clients to regain their driver’s license by successfully completing their DUI treatment program.

(14)

The DUI Treatment Services Today

DUI program fees are approved and controlled by the Department of

Health Care Services and DUI Programs are by law, limited to earning a maximum 10% profit/surplus of total DUI revenue.

California’s DUI treatment system is one hundred percent (100%)

self-funded by program fees paid by the client

The DUI treatment programs collect participant fees for providing

program services plus fees to reimburse the State and County for

their monitoring and compliance auditing services as required by state law.

(15)

DUI Program Services

The DUI programs primary goal is to assist participants to

explore their relationships with alcohol/drugs and the

inherent risks involved

The desired result is modified drinking and/or drug use in

high-risk situations such as driving

DUI programs provide counseling and education to assist in

reducing the recidivism rate of DUI offenders

(16)

Program Activity Structures

Wet Reckless Program:

Blood Alcohol Content under .08 ►12 hours of education

3-Month First Offender Program – 37.5% Education, 62.5% Counseling Blood Alcohol Content .08 and above

►12 Hours of education

►10 Hours of group counseling

►3 individual sessions (face-to-face)

►Eight additional hours of program services,

consisting of educational sessions, group counseling sessions, or a combination of the two

(17)

Program Activity Structures

6-Month First Offender Program - 26.7% Education, 73.3% Counseling Blood Alcohol Content .15 - .19

►12 hours of education

►28 hours of group counseling

►Minimum of 4 individual sessions

►Four additional hours of program services,

consisting of educational sessions, group counseling sessions, face-to-face interviews or a combination of the three

(18)

Program

Activity Structures

9-Month First Offender Program -19.1% education, 80.9% counseling Blood Alcohol Content .20 and above

►12 hours of education

►44 hours of group counseling

►Minimum of 5 individual sessions

►Four additional hours of program services, consisting of educational sessions, group counseling sessions, face-to- face interviews or a combination of the three

(19)

Program Activity Structures

18-Month Multiple Offender Program – 15.4% Education, 84.6% Counseling

2 or more DUI’s in a 10 year period

The first 12 months of the 18 month program: ►12 hours of education

►52 hours of group counseling

►1 individual session every other week

►The last 6 months of the 18-Month program includes up to 6 hours of services

30-Month Multiple Offender Program -7.9% education, 92.1% counseling 3 or more DUI Offenses in a 10 year period –Not available in San Mateo County

(20)

Statewide Program Completion Rate

The average DUI program completion rate across the state

for all program over the past 11 years was 81.5%.

(21)

DUI Statistics Statewide

The State Justice Department reported in 1/1/2014:

►California Population in 2013 was 37,691,912

►DUI Arrests was 214,828 = 0.0057% of California

population (Not all DUI Arrests are convicted)

Contra Costa County had 3263 DUI Convictions in 2011

compared to 2010, which convicted 3243 cases

(22)

Alcohol Related Crashes

Of the total number of crash fatalities, the percentage of

alcohol-involved fatalities increased from 38.5% in 2011 to

39.0% in 2012, after declining for 3 consecutive years.

The percentage of drug-involved fatalities increased from

25.0% to 27.3% during the same period.

10.5% of crash injuries in 2012 were alcohol-involved,

relatively unchanged from 10.6% in 2011.

(23)

Alcohol Related Crashes

40.8% of alcohol and drug-involved drivers do not have a record of

any conviction in connection with their involvement in a fatal/injury crash. In 44.4% of these non-convicted cases, the crash report

indicated that the drivers had been drinking and that their ability was impaired

Drugs involved crash fatalities increased substantially, by 15.4%, in

2012, after an increase of 1.9% in 2011, which is an increase of 28.0% in the past decade.

Alcohol-Involved crash fatalities increased slightly by 7.3% in 2012,

following an increase of 1.6% in 2011. The last 2 years of increases followed 4 consecutive years (from 2007-2010) of declines in the number of alcohol-involved crash fatalities.

(24)

Alcohol Related Crashes

Majorities of drug-involved and drug and alcohol-involved

drivers in fatal/injury crashes are not convicted for DUI

associated with the crash and do not have a prior DUI or

alcohol and drug-related reckless driving conviction within 10

years on their records

About three-fourth (75.9%) of drivers in alcohol and drug

involved fatal crashes had no prior DUI or alcohol or

drug-related driving conviction. In contrast, almost two-third

(63.2%) of drivers in alcohol and drug involved injury crashes

had at least one prior DUI or alcohol or drug-related reckless

driving conviction.

(25)
(26)

DUI Conviction Data For 2010-2011

The data reflects that it takes 181 days from the DUI arrest date to the court conviction date; a decrease of 5 days less from 2010 data

2010

2011

Court Location

MISD FELONY

Under

21 DUI

ALCOHOL

RECKLESS

VIOLATION TO

CONVICTIONS Court Location

MISD FELONY

Under

21 DUI

ALCOHOL

RECKLESS

VIOLATION TO

CONVICTIONS

Contra Costa County Wide

22

37 0

2

326

Contra Costa County Wide

34

36

0

0

202

Martinez Court

23

0

0

6

201

Martinez Court

14

0

1

5

172

Concord Court

9

2

0

2

173

Concord Court

8

1

12

0

100

Richmond Court

662

12 0 144

134

Richmond Court

603

15

9

127

156

Pittsburg Court

918

20 0 139

187

Pittsburg Court

937

25 12

188

238

Walnut Creek Court

1609

38 0 289

200

Walnut Creek Court

1517

30

9

269

164

Totals

3243

109 0 582

186

Totals

3113

107 43

589

181

(27)

Court Ordered to DUI Programs

90.7% of First Offenders were assigned by courts to DUI Programs, along with 88.0% of second offenders, 76.2% of third offenders , and 40.8% of fourth-or more DUI offenders.

By statute, DUI offenders must complete specified DUI programs (Blood Alcohol Content determined which program length to complete) in order to be eligible for license reinstatement.

(28)

DUI Convictions in 2011 for Contra Costa County

2011 Sanctions #DUI Totals Probation Jail %

FOP DUI Programs

MOP DUI Programs

Contra Costa 1st 16 81.3% 87.5% 18.8% 6.3%

County Wide 2nd 15 73.3% 66.7% 0.0% 20.0%

3rd 7 85.7% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0%

4th 32 78.1% 68.8% 0.0% 15.6%

Totals 70 78.6% 67.1% 4.3% 12.9%

Martinez Court 1st 14 7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 0.0%

2nd 1 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Totals 15 6.7% 13.3% 13.3% 0.0%

Concord Court 1st 17 29.4% 29.4% 17.6% 5.9%

2nd 3 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 66.7%

4th 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Totals 21 38.1% 42.9% 14.3% 14.3%

Richmond Court 1st 427 97.7% 95.3% 86.2% 2.8%

2nd 147 98.6% 98.6% 8.8% 72.8%

3rd 42 95.2% 100.0% 2.4% 47.6%

4th 11 90.9% 100.0% 0.0% 54.5%

Totals 627 97.6% 96.5% 60.9% 23.1%

Pittsburg Court 1st 661 97.6% 96.1% 92.4% 1.5%

2nd 234 99.6% 98.3% 6.8% 88.0%

3rd 62 98.4% 100.0% 0.0% 90.3%

4th 17 88.2% 100.0% 0.0% 64.7%

Totals 974 97.9% 96.9% 64.4% 29.1%

Walnut Creek Court 1st 1148 98.5% 93.5% 92.1% 240.0%

2nd 304 99.0% 97.7% 5.9% 90.5% 3rd 79 97.5% 97.5% 1.3% 93.7% 4th 25 92.0% 100.0% 0.0% 72.0%

(29)

BAC Counts

The median blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of a

convicted DUI offender, as reported by law enforcement on

Administrative Per Se (APS) forms, was 0.15% in 2010,

same as in the last 6 years, yet almost double the

California illegal per se BAC limit of 0.98%

(30)

Facts on Alcohol Consumption

In 2012:

87.6% of people ages 18 or older reported that they drank alcohol at some point in their lifetime;

71% reported that they drank in the past year;

56.3% reported that they drank in the past month.

24.6% of people age 18 or order reported that they engaged in binge drinking in the past month-(pattern of drinking that brings BAC level to 0.08)

7.1% reported that they engaged in heavy drinking in the past month (5 or more drinks on the same occasion on each of 5 or more days)

10,322 deaths (31%) of overall driving fatalities were related to Alcohol-impaired driving)

Nearly 88,999 people (approximately 62,000 men & 26,000 female) die from alcohol related causes annually, making it the 3rd leading preventable cause of death in the

(31)

DUI Program Summary

DUI Programs are

:

 Alcohol and drug outpatient treatment and education services;

 1st stage treatment program; primary gate keeper

 Intervention;

 Continuum of care;

 Totally self-funded;

 Effective at reducing recidivism; and

 Protect public safety

The offenders assigned to a DUI program show a 17.2% lower crash rate

(32)

Contra Costa County DUI Summary

Statewide DUI Arrests decreased by 4.1% in 2012; Contra Costa

County DUI arrests are down 2%

Contra Costa County declined 0.5% for 1st Offenders and 1.6%

declined for 2nd Offenders when compared to 2010 & 2011

Statewide takes 72 days from arrest date to conviction dates; Contra

Costa County takes 181 days from arrest date to conviction date

7 less crashes/fatalities in Contra Costa County in 2011 compared to

(33)

Presentation Resources

Health and Safety Code Section 11836-11838.11

State Justice Department

Alcohol Alert – Drunk Driving Statistics

2014 Annual Report of the California DUI Management

Information System

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

Administration

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism

Department of Health Care Services (Driving-Under-the

(34)

References

Related documents

All teachers and support staff undertake induction on taking up a post and this includes a meeting with the SENDCO to explain the systems and structures in place around the

The present findings are based on the practical aspects, and the authors believe that providing useful information about the coaching behaviors to the T &L coaches can

If the received Offset Value equals ‘0’ while the received Payload bytes of the previous SOME/IP segments is greater than ‘0’, the SOME/IP TP module shall perform the

levage Moteur hydraulique à cylindrée variable, treuil de marque Liebherr avec réducteur planétaire à frein d‘arrêt à lamelles intégrées, en circuit hydraulique

To further examine the functional properties of low-frequency genes, we generated cell lines stably expressing the mutant or wildtype variant of four genes and performed

Award-winning design and company branding Beautiful, intuitive website development Digital solutions for long term success.. What

Finally, the investigated interaction (Road x Section, Figure 3) resulted significant for native and alien species: the testing of Road x Section interaction showed that, on

Straipsnyje, remiantis 15–16 metų merginų apklausos ir skaitomiausių žurnalų vaizdo analize, aptariamas spausdintinės žiniasklaidos poveikis merginų