• No results found

Elite x vs. Surface Pro 4 Performance Test

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Elite x vs. Surface Pro 4 Performance Test"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Elite x2 1012

vs.

Surface Pro 4

Performance Test

Intel Core M vs. Core I Configurations

(2)

Executive Summary

Elite x2 demonstrates

on par or better

performance than Surface Pro 4 for

office productivity tasks

Elite x2 battery lasts

1.5 hours longer

than Surface Pro 4 in a typical work day

Fanless design means

100% silent

operation

and improved long term

reliability

(3)

Performance Test with PC Mark 8

Office Productivity | Web Applications | Operating Noise

PCMark08 Benchmarks:

Work – Conventional

Work – Accelerated

Home – Conventional

Home – Accelerated

Storage

(4)

System Setup (m5 vs i5)

Microsoft Surface Pro 4 – Core i5

HP Elite x2 1012 – Core m5

Win10 Pro 64-bit

Samsung 512 SSD

Core-m5 [email protected]

4GB RAM

Intel HD Graphics 515 (UMA)

Win10 Pro 64-bit

Samsung NVMe 256 SSD

Core-i5 6300U @2.4Ghz

8GB RAM

Intel HD Graphics 520 (UMA)

(5)

Elite x2 Core m5 Productivity Highlights

For many common tasks such as Office productivity, Email,

and Web Applications, the Intel Core M has similar

performance to Core I at 30% of the power consumption

Up to

than Surface Pro 4

when running PCMark Benchmark

faster

8.2%

100%

silent

operation. No moving parts means

better long term reliability

1.5

hrs

Up to

longer

battery life than Surface Pro 4

in a typical work day

(6)

Test Results vs. SP4 - Complete

Virtually

PCMark08 Test*

Elite x2 1012 Core-m5

Surface Pro 4 Core-i5

% difference

Work – Conventional

2766

2605

6.2% better

Work – Accelerated

3917

3621

8.2% better

Home – Conventional

2477

2394

3.5% better

Home – Accelerated

2898

2792

3.8% better

Storage

4920

4967

On Par

*Higher Score is Better

Cinebench Test*

Elite x2 1012 Core-m5

Surface Pro 4 Core-i5

% difference

Open GL (Graphics)

37. 11 fps

39.54 fps

6.1% worse

CPU

225

303

25.7% slower

*Pure CPU / GPU Benchmark

Battery Life Test

Elite x2 1012 Core-m5

Surface Pro 4 Core-i5

% difference

Battery Size

40whr

38.2whr

4.7% larger

Video Playback

9hr 20min

8hr 44min

6.8% longer

Mobile Mark 2014

10hr 23min

8hrs 40min

19.8% longer

Noise and Temp. Test

Elite x2 1012 Core-m5

Surface Pro 4 Core-i5

% difference

Steady State TDP*

5.5W

10.5W

47.6% less

A-Cover Temp

44.5C

44.8C

On Par

Glass Temp

41.7C

44.0C

5.2% cooler

Fan Noise

0db (silent)

37.5db

100% quieter

(7)

System Setup (m7 vs. i5)

Microsoft Surface Pro 4 – Core i5

HP Elite x2 1012 – Core m7

Win10 Pro 64-bit

Samsung 512 SSD

Core-m7 [email protected]

8GB RAM

Intel HD Graphics 515 (UMA)

Win10 Pro 64-bit

Samsung NVMe 256 SSD

Core-i5 6300U @2.4Ghz

8GB RAM

Intel HD Graphics 520 (UMA)

(8)

Elite x2 Core m7 Productivity Highlights

For many common tasks such as Office productivity, Email,

and Web Applications, the Intel Core M has similar

performance to Core I at 30% of the power consumption

Up to

than Surface Pro 4

when running PCMark Benchmark

faster

14%

100%

silent

operation. No moving parts means

better long term reliability

1.5

hrs

Up to

longer

battery life than Surface Pro 4

in a typical work day

(9)

Test Results vs. SP4 - Complete

Virtually

PCMark08 Test*

Elite x2 1012 Core-m7

Surface Pro 4 Core-i5

% difference

Work – Conventional

2953

2605

13.4% better

Work – Accelerated

4150

3621

14.6% better

Home – Conventional

2615

2394

9.2% better

Home – Accelerated

2888

2792

3.4% better

Storage

4975

4967

On Par

*Higher Score is Better

Cinebench Test*

Elite x2 1012 Core-m7

Surface Pro 4 Core-i5

% difference

Open GL (Graphics)

34.99 fps

39.54 fps

11.5% worse

CPU

256

303

15.5% slower

*Pure CPU / GPU Benchmark

Battery Life Test

Elite x2 1012 Core-m7

Surface Pro 4 Core-i5

% difference

Battery Size

40whr

38.2whr

4.7% larger

Video Playback

9hr 20min

8hr 44min

6.8% longer

Mobile Mark 2014

10hr 23min

8hrs 40min

19.8% longer

Noise and Temp. Test

Elite x2 1012 Core-m7

Surface Pro 4 Core-i5

% difference

Steady State TDP*

5.5W

10.5W

47.6% less

A-Cover Temp

44.5C

44.8C

On Par

Glass Temp

41.7C

44.0C

5.2% cooler

Fan Noise

0db (silent)

37.5db

100% quieter

(10)

System Setup (m7 vs. i7)

Microsoft Surface Pro 4 – Core i7

HP Elite x2 1012 – Core m7

Win10 Pro 64-bit

Samsung 512 SSD

Core-m7 [email protected]

8GB RAM

Intel HD Graphics 515 (UMA)

Win10 Pro 64-bit

Samsung NVMe 256 SSD

Core-i7 6650U @2.2Ghz

8GB RAM

Intel Iris Graphics 540

(11)

Elite x2 Core m7 Productivity Highlights

For many common tasks such as Office productivity, Email,

and Web Applications, the Intel Core M has similar

performance to Core I at 30% of the power consumption

Up to

than Surface Pro 4

when running PCMark Benchmark

faster

7%

100%

silent

operation. No moving parts means

better long term reliability

2.5

hrs

Up to

longer

battery life than Surface Pro 4

in a typical work day

(12)

Test Results vs. SP4 - Complete

Virtually

PCMark08 Test*

Elite x2 1012 Core-m7

Surface Pro 4 Core-i7

% difference

Work – Conventional

2953

2759

7.0% better

Work – Accelerated

4150

3913

6.1% better

Home – Conventional

2615

2625

On Par

Home – Accelerated

2888

3228

10% worse

Storage

4975

4966

On Par

*Higher Score is Better

Cinebench Test*

Elite x2 1012 Core-m7

Surface Pro 4 Core-i7

% difference

Open GL (Graphics)

34.99 fps

56.23 fps

37.8% worse

CPU

256

314

18.5% slower

*Pure CPU / GPU Benchmark

Battery Life Test

Elite x2 1012 Core-m7

Surface Pro 4 Core-i7

% difference

Battery Size

40whr

38.2whr

4.7% larger

Video Playback

9hr 20min

6hr 36min

41.4% longer

Mobile Mark 2014

10hr 23min

7hr 27min

39.4% longer

Noise and Temp. Test

Elite x2 1012 Core-m7

Surface Pro 4 Core-i7

% difference

Steady State TDP*

5.5W

15W

63.3% less

A-Cover Temp

44.5C

46C

3.2%cooler

Glass Temp

41.7C

44.3C

5.9% cooler

Fan Noise

0db (silent)

35db

100% quieter

(13)

Fanless Design = Reliability

no thermal openings. no moving parts. zero noise

Beyond Numbers

Processor Thermal openings

Processor Fan

8.05mm

8.45mm

noise

air flow

dust

(14)

* MIL STD 810G is not intended to demonstrate fitness for U.S. Department of Defense contract requirements or for military use. Test results are not a guarantee of future performance under these test conditions. Damage under the MIL

STD test conditions or any accidental damage requires an optional HP Accidental Damage Protection Care Pack

Machined Aluminum

Kickstand tested for

reliability and

durability in HP’s

total test process

HP Total Test Process

1.

115,000 hours of testing

2.

50,000 test steps

3.

Layered Testing Approach

Connector fatigue

Flexural Resistance

System Acoustics

Electrostatic Discharge

Electro Magnetic Interference

Keyboard system test

Mechanical Shock

Post-test Evaluation

Operational Vibration

Package Vibration

4.

End of Line Testing

1.

Humidity

2.

High Temperature

3.

Low Temperature

4.

Altitude

5.

Temperature Shock

6.

Dust

7.

Sand

8.

Freeze/Thaw

9.

Explosive Atmosphere

10.

Drop

11.

Vibration

12.

Shock

MIL-STD 810G Tests

*

Tested to premium industry standards. Tested to HP’s own exacting standards.

(15)

Serviceability

HP Business Tablets offer the security and convenience of IT serviceability for key components for customers enrolled in

the HP Self-Maintainer program

Serviceable Components Include:

1. WLAN

2. WWAN

3. Storage

4. System Board

5. Battery

6. LCD/Touch Module

7. Kickstand

8. Chassis and other components*

*Subject to change. Serviceable by HP Support, HP Certified Technicians, HP Authorized Service Providers or

participants in the HP Self-Maintainer Program. See hp.com/partners/SMprogram for more details.

References

Related documents

The positive result of this test is layer formation, due to the presence of the aqueous zinc, chloride, and hydronium layer, and the organic alkyl halide layer.. Benzyl alcohol is

Here, Bratu’s problem is treated as an eigenvalue problem and approximate solution is obtained using modified Adomian decomposition method.. In this paper attention

The Wind River hypervisor used on either Intel single-core or multi-core processors provides a high performance solution for consolidating hardware while keeping applications

The design degrees of freedom used by Luyben and Luyben (1995) in their heuristic design were one for production rate (F 0A ), four for product purities (x D2,B , x D2,D , x B3,D ,

If the computer was created by installing an agent as part of a security product installation, you should uninstall the collectors and agent from the computer before you delete

Data binding can also mean that if an outer representation of the data in an element changes, then the underlying data can be automatically updated to reflect the change..

As part of the APPROACH (Analysis and Perspectives of integrated working in Primary Care Organisations And Care Homes) study ( Goodman et al., 2013b , Gage et al., 2012 ) this

  Curbing  Excess  Capacity  and  Redundant  Construction  of  Several   Industries  and  Promoting  Healthy  Development  of