• No results found

Changing Project Management - A Quick Guide

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Changing Project Management - A Quick Guide"

Copied!
23
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Project Management

for Scientists

Project Organization & Control

Christoph U. Keller, [email protected] Sterrekundig Instituut Utrecht

(2)

Outline

•  Recap •  Resource Allocation •  Balancing •  Control Activities •  Change Management

(3)

Where We Are in the Cycle

Initiate Plan Execute

Control Close

•  Project life cycle

•  Linear progression with decision points at boundaries

(4)

What We Have: project Plans

•  (Science) requirements

•  Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

•  Baseline schedule

•  Baseline budget

•  Resource plan (this lecture)

•  Communication plan (future lecture)

•  Risk analysis and mitigation plan (future lecture)

(5)

What We Have: Project Team

•  Enthusiastic and well-informed sponsor

•  Project team with roles, authorities, and

(6)

Resource Allocation

•  After initial resource assignment and scheduling, many resources are used >100%

•  Can be avoided by changing resource assignments and/or changing schedule (leveling)

•  Resource leveling is last step in making realistic schedule

•  Resource leveling: optimize the use of people and equipment assigned to project

•  Some of it can be made automatically

•  Also avoid under-allocation (people become inefficient)

(7)

Project Management Triangle

•  Scope = science

requirements, performance

•  Resources = cost, budget

•  Time (to completion) =

schedule

(8)

Critical Path

•  Consecutive tasks where delay in any of those

tasks delays project as a whole

(9)

Balancing Act

•  Balance project scope against 3 constraints

1.  Time: will not get project done within time

allotted by project (baseline) plan

2.  Money: can deliver desired outcome on

schedule, but it will cost too much

3.  Resources: project cost is ok, but schedule call

for people, equipment that are not available, even though the money is there to hire/buy

•  Balancing required if one or several constraints

(10)

Balancing

•  Balance at project level

•  Make changes that will deliver on time, within budget, and all requirements fulfilled

•  Authority to do that within project

•  Balance project constraints

•  Change requirements, budget, and/or schedule

•  Requires agreement of all stakeholders

•  Balance at sponsor level

•  Choice of which projects to pursue, how to spread limited resources

(11)

Balancing at Project Level

•  Reestimate Project

•  Change Task Assignments

•  Add People to Project

•  Increase Productivity

•  Outsource

(12)

Reestimating Budget

•  Optimist’s choice

•  Potential to reduce pessimistic estimates

•  Positive: legitimately reduced estimates make

project cheaper and/or faster

•  Negative: Wishful thinking since estimates are not better

•  Best: always check estimates, check estimating

assumptions; do not reduce to please; increase facts supporting cost and schedule

(13)

Change Task Assignments

•  Straightforward resource allocation maneuver

•  Add resources to tasks on critical path

•  Positive: reduced project duration at the same cost

•  Negative: Too many cooks as too many people on a

single task work less efficiently, therefore increased cost

•  Best: 3 things to consider when moving resources:

•  Both tasks need the same resource type

•  Critical path may change after resource change

(14)

Add People to Project

•  Obvious approach to reducing the project

duration

•  Either increase number of simultaneous tasks or

number of people per task

•  Positive: reduced project duration

•  Negative: increase in cost of coordination and

communication, requires (rare) qualified resources

•  Best: some tasks are suitable to be done by more

people; other concurrent tasks are very

(15)

Increased Productivity

•  Some people are more productive than others

•  High performers can reduce schedule and cost

•  Positive: highly cost and schedule effective, better results

•  Negative: other projects will suffer and team is often

overqualified

•  Best: mix top and average people

•  Create experts by putting same people on similar tasks

•  Use WBS to identify tasks that benefit most from top

talent

(16)

Outsource project (Parts)

•  Part of project is handed over to outside company

•  Good when required skills are not available within team

•  Positive: greater experience increases productivity, schedule

•  Negative: responsibility move increases risk

•  Best: high risk, high return

•  Find qualified company

•  Clear agreements before work starts using project management approaches

(17)

Overtime

•  Easiest way to add more labor to project

•  More efficient than adding more people

•  Positive: no additional coordination, communication required, less distractions in workplace

•  Negative: overtime costs more, less efficient, burnout

•  Best: overtime is perceived as above and beyond

normal

•  Apply sparingly and show benefits to project •  Only when leading to big paybacks

(18)

Balancing Project Constraints

•  Reduce project scope (reduced low-priority

science)

•  Fixed-phase scheduling (always meet schedule)

•  Fast-tracking (non-traditional task overlapping)

•  Phased product delivery (early, partially useful

product, full product later)

•  Do it twice (quick-and-dirty first, then solid

(19)

Controlling Projects

•  Plan is clear, thought-out, manageable

•  Execution means

•  Work is being done

•  Problems arise

•  Constraints are violated

•  Information deluge

•  Not enough time to get everything done

•  Changes occur

(20)

Control Activities

•  Manage scientific/technical performance

•  Manage cost, schedule, resources

•  Control changes

•  Manage risks and problems

•  Manage project team

(21)

Change Control

•  Every project faces changes in requirements, cost,

schedule, resources

•  If not carefully controlled, project goes out of

control

•  Once approved, requirements, cost, schedule, etc.

become controlled

•  Changes to ‘controlled’ requirements etc. must

(22)

Change Management Process

•  Identify potential change, submit change request

•  Document and analyze change request

•  Evaluate change and impact on project plan

•  Obtain formal approval on change

•  Implement and document change

(23)

Configuration Management

•  Subset of change management

•  Makes sure everybody uses the same version of

documents, plans etc.

•  Configuration management for any project part

where different versions occur during life of project

•  Project control documents

•  Electronic files

References

Related documents

It also builds on previous work ( Moorosi, 2014 ) that analyzed South African women’s construction of leadership identity from a leadership development programme and that called

Castellino, discussed how MALDI IMS technology has taken their research beyond “plasma-centric” studies and allowed for direct mapping of molecular changes in tissue associated

The others (e.g. Playing Videos, adding the shutdown button) are not crucial to the camera project but can be done if you’re also interested in exploring these capabilities.

7 -right shows instead the convergence with respect to M of the error (33) squared for different polynomial approximations, (namely: Total Degree (TD), Hyperbolic Cross (HC) and

[r]

sold at a tax sale to a taxing entity who subsequently resells the property may redeem the property within two (2) years of the date on which the taxing entity’s deed

To avoid unnecessary hazards and possible damage to the Wheel Loader, do not attempt to repair this machine without complying with the instructions in the Repair Manual.. Make

We study the response of the income taxpayers within the 38 municipalities in the metropolitan area of Bern from 2002 to 2011, using a dynamic location choice model exploiting