• No results found

The meeting teleconference will begin shortly

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The meeting teleconference will begin shortly"

Copied!
31
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The meeting teleconference will begin shortly

Listen to the meeting by using your computer or tablet speakers

or by calling

(877) 853 5247

using meeting ID

979 215 700

View the live meeting presentation at

https://sbvmwd.zoom.us/j/979215700

PASSCODE: 3802020

Public comments, suggestions or questions regarding technical issues may be

emailed to

comments@sbvmwd.com

Please use the chat feature in the Zoom toolbar to let the moderator

know that you would like to make a comment during the meeting or use the digital “raise hand” function in Zoom.

Please mute your microphone during the meeting to reduce background noise. Click on the microphone icon to unmute your microphone if needed.

(2)

NOTICE REGARDING (COVID-19)

Before we begin, the record will reflect that pursuant to the provisions

of Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on

March 19, 2020, this meeting will be conducted by teleconference only.

(3)

Call to Order

Board of Directors Workshop - Resources

Thursday, February 4, 2021

Chairperson – Director Hayes

Vice-Chair – Director Harrison

(4)

Introductions

Following the introduction of Directors and District staff, participants may use

this time to state their name and agency/affiliation in order to be included in

the formal record of attendees.

(5)

Public Comment

Any person may address the Board on matters within its jurisdiction.

Please use the chat feature on the Zoom toolbar or digitally raise your

hand to let the moderator know you would like to make a comment.

(6)

Summary of Previous Meeting

(Pg. 3)

(7)

Discussion Item 4.1

(Pg. 7)

Consider Geoscience Proposal to Calculate the Total Volume

in Storage for the Yucaipa Basin and Subbasins

Matt Howard, MS

– Water Resources Senior Project Manager

Staff Recommendation

Staff recommends the Board direct staff to place this item on a future Board of Directors regular meeting agenda for consideration.

(8)
(9)

Task 1: Perform the Total Volume in Storage Calculation on all of the nine (9) Subbasins of the Yucaipa Basin

 The Upper Santa Ana River Integrated

Model (Integrated SAR Model) will be used for this Study

 Two groundwater base elevations will

be evaluated:

1. 1,700 ft bgs which represents the deepest production well in the Yucaipa Basin

2. The top of bedrock representing total groundwater storage

(10)

Task 2: Draft and Final Technical Memorandum

The Technical Memorandum that

summarizes the study methodology and estimated groundwater storage for the Yucaipa Basin and each Subbasin

Task 3: Preparation and attend one meeting to present the results of the Study

Total Cost for Study: $14,158 Schedule: 4 weeks to complete

Total Volume in Groundwater Storage Study

Reference: Moreland, 1970,

(11)

Director Comments and Discussion

Staff Recommendation

Staff recommends the Board direct staff to place this item on a future Board of Directors regular meeting agenda for consideration.

T. Milford Harrison Treasurer Susan Longville Director June Hayes

Vice President BotelloGil J. Director Paul

Kielhold President

(12)

Discussion Item 4.2

(Pg. 14)

Presentation on Water Supply Conditions

Adekunle Ojo, MPA –

Manager of Water Resources

Bob Tincher, PE, MS –

Chief Water Resources Officer/Deputy GM

Staff Recommendation

(13)

AGENDA

I. Setting the Context: Water Supply Portfolio and California’s Hydrology

II. State Water Project Conditions

III. Local Water Supply Conditions

(14)

Water Supply

Portfolio

Reliable Water Supply

• 72% Local Supply

• Storage

• Stormwater Capture • Demand Reduction

• 5% Recycled Water

= 77% of local water supply

• 23% Imported Water Recycled Water 5% Local Supply – Groundwater and Surface 72% SBBA 85% Rialto-Colton 6% Yucaipa 5% Riverside North 4%

(15)

California’s

Hydrology

-Feast or

Famine

- Mediterranean Climate

- Generally warm, dry summers and mild, wet winters

- Climate vary depending on geographic region

- Climate Variability

- Can swing from wet years to dry years and back again

- Precipitation is greater in the northern half; population is greater in the southern half

- Water Year (Oct. 1 – Sep. 30)

- November – March: 75% of

annual precipitation (rain, snow and hail) during these months

- December – February:

Bulk of the precipitation during these 3 months

- Atmospheric Rivers

- E.g. Pineapple Express, Level 3 Storm (Jan 26 -31, 2021)

Atmospheric rivers (a small number of large winter storms) in December, January, and February are responsible for the bulk of precipitation

A handful of atmospheric rivers – or lack thereof – during the winter season can determine if the year is wet or dry

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

(16)

State Water Project

Conditions

(17)

Summary of

SWP Water

Conditions –

as of Feb. 1, 2021

• Initial Table A Allocation

(Nov. – Dec.) = 10%

• Allocation revised in April

or May = median final allocation (2010 – 2020) is 50%

• Oroville at 54% of

historical average; San Luis at 66%

• On the following pages:

• Northern Sierra

Precipitation: 51% of average for this date

• Average Snow Water

Equivalents: 11.8”, 68% of average for this date

(18)
(19)
(20)

Local Water Supply

Conditions

(21)

-225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 19 30 -31 19 32 -33 19 34 -3 5 19 36 -37 19 38 -39 19 40 -4 1 19 42 -4 3 19 44 -4 5 19 46 -4 7 19 48 -4 9 19 50 -51 19 52 -53 19 54 -55 19 56 -57 19 58 -59 1960 -61 1962 -63 1964 -6 5 1966 -67 1968 -69 1970 -71 1972 -73 1974 -75 1976 -77 1978 -79 19 80 -81 19 82 -83 19 84 -85 19 86 -87 19 88-89 1990 -91 1992 -93 1994 -9 5 1996 -97 1998 -99 200 0-01 20 02 -03 20 04 -05 200 6-07 20 08 -09 201 0-11 201 2-13 20 14 -15 201 6-17 20 18 -19 20 20 -21 Cu m ul at iv e D ep ar tu re f ro m S af e Y iel d P er io d A vg (i n. ) A ver ag e A nn ua l P reci pi ta ti on (i n. ) Water Year

Average of Lytle Creek / Big Bear (SAR) / Mill Creek - Precip Data Safe Yield Period Avg (1934-1960)

Historic Average (1931-Present) Cumulative Departure from Safe Yield Period Avg

30

(22)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

October November December January February March April May June July August September

CU M U LA TI V E D A ILY /M O N TH LY P RE CI PI TA TI O N (I N CH ES )

WATER YEAR (OCTOBER - SEPTEMBER)

San Bernardino Basin Area Three Station Precipitation Index

Historic Average (1931-Present) Safe Yield Average(1934 - 1960) 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 1992-1993 (Wettest) 76.9% 2001-2002 (Driest) 7” 2017-18, 14.61” 2018-19 (Wet) 37.38” 2019-2020, 27.82” 2020-2021, 8.16”

(23)

4,867,998 2,275,438 1,528,121 722,000 56,000 822,002 520,562 782,879 419,000 39,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 San Bernardino

Basin Yucaipa Basin Rialto-ColtonBasin Riverside Basin Arlington Basin

Total Usable Groundwater Storage

(24)

Storage – a

regional

asset

200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 19 72 19 73 19 74 19 75 19 76 19 77 19 78 19 79 19 80 19 81 19 82 19 83 19 84 19 85 19 86 19 87 19 88 19 89 19 90 19 91 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 06 20 07 20 08 20 09 20 10 20 11 20 12 20 13 20 14 20 15 20 16 20 17 20 18 20 19 20 20 (ACR E -F EET )

SWP Deliveries into Valley District Service Area,

1972-current

Current Cumulative Total: 971,897 Acre-Feet

(25)

0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 19 35 19 38 19 41 19 44 19 47 19 50 19 53 19 56 19 59 19 62 19 65 19 68 19 71 19 74 19 77 19 80 19 83 19 86 19 89 19 92 19 95 19 98 20 01 20 04 20 07 20 10 20 13 20 16 20 19

San Bernardino Basin Usable Storage (in acre-feet)

Usable Storage: 5,690,000 acre-feet (constrained by liquefaction potential)

(26)

2021 Water Supply

Planning –

Options and

Opportunities

(27)

5% 25% 60% 30% 5% 10% 10% 20% 15% 10% 10% 10% 50% 80% 65% 35% 5% 20% 60% 85% 35% 75% 20% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

SWP TABLE ALLOCATION HISTORY 2010 - 2020

INITIAL MEDIAN - 10%

FINAL MEDIAN - 50%

SWP Table A Allocations Initial SWP Table A Allocations Final

(28)
(29)

Director Comments and Discussion

Staff Recommendation

Receive and file.

T. Milford Harrison Treasurer Susan Longville Director June Hayes

Vice President BotelloGil J. Director Paul

Kielhold President

(30)
(31)
https://sbvmwd.zoom.us/j/979215700 https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2016/1127/ofr20161127.pdf

References

Related documents

The current estimate for year-end net income is $21.9 million, but ranges from $25.6 million to $18.4 million. The expected projection includes overall higher operating

JUDICIAL CTR., AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND MANAGING FEE LITIGATION (2d ed. Alpine Pharmacy, Inc. 1973) (“[F]ew would dispute the basic proposition that one whose labors produce

The Contractor and its personnel shall comply with all British Library security procedures, and must comply with all instructions issued by British Library security staff when

Staff will provide an overview of the proposed agenda items for the July 1, 2021 Board of Directors meeting for review and feedback from the Executive Committee.. The Draft

2 STICHTING EUROPEAN GRID INITIATIVE EGI.eu NE 3 European Molecular Biology Laboratory EMBL DE 4 ATOS  Atos NE 5 T‐Systems International GMBH T‐Systems DE 6

There are seals designed for both good and evil, for the various spirits, angels, demons, and devils which rule the other world, for protection, power, and

If a writing that is a public record as provided above, and that relates to an agenda item for an open session of a regular meeting of the Board of Directors, is distributed less

Maximum KE is independent of incident light (graph a) and depends only upon its frequency (graph b). For a given metal surface and frequency of incident radiation, photoelectric