• No results found

Managed Long Term Care and Support Services

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Managed Long Term Care and Support Services"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Opportunities and Threats 

Managed

 

Long

 

Term

 

Care

 

and

 

Support

 

Services

Growing Aged, Blind 

and Disabled 

Population

Increased cost of 

delivering institutional 

and community based 

long‐term care services

Financial Alignment 

Demonstrations

Authority in the Affordable Care Act allows CMS to test capitated and 

managed fee‐for‐services financial alignment models and seeks to 

improve care and control costs for dually eligible Medicare and Medicaid 

(2)

 Virginia was one of the first states to be approved for a capitated 

financial alignment demonstration (Managed Long Term & Acute 

Care).

 Dual Eligibles often have complex health care needs with multiple 

chronic disease, low income, inadequate housing and transportation.

 The current delivery system is fragmented, and Medicare and Medicaid 

often work at cross purposes and impede care coordination. 

 Medicaid and Medicare have overlapping and sometimes conflicting 

benefits and requirements. 

 Our goals were to create a seamless, integrated service delivery system, 

align Medicare and Medicaid rules, improve accountability, produce 

savings AND improve long‐term and health care services for a very 

vulnerable population.

Managed

 

Long

 

Term

 

Care

 

and

 

Support

 

Services

 Virginia’s capitated demonstration, Commonwealth 

Coordinate Care, launched in April 2014 – expires 

December 2017.

 Provider meetings occurred on a regular basis   Phase in periods were established

 Prior to the launch extensive review occurred

 Health plans were selected

 Networks “were established”

 Three way contracts between the health plans, Virginia  Medicaid and Medicare were signed.

(3)

Early

 

Challenges

 Overly ambitious timeline for implementation

 Program details were still under construction as  enrollment started

 Confusion among beneficiaries

 Some beneficiaries opted in and out of the program multiple 

times in one day

 Passive enrollment was done with incomplete logic data

 Confusion among providers

 Letters of intent to participate are not the same as a contract

 Credentialing must occur and is a long drawn out process

 Welcome letters identify you have been credentialed and are 

in network

Early

 

Challenges

 Managed Care Plans lacked experience working with long‐ term care providers

 Managed Care Plan contracts did not fit community based  care

 Unanticipated difficulties with maintaining continuity of  care due to beneficiary opting in and out

 Low enrollment

 Medicaid beneficiaries could not be located

 Poor health literacy, English as a second language,  cognitive impairments, etc. 

(4)

 Information exchange systems had not been tested

 Providers did not have real‐time enrollment information

 Beneficiaries did not know their status and failed to re‐ enroll in Medicare Part D

 Co‐pays who is on first what is on second

 Plan hopping by beneficiaries did not allow for 

meaningful health assessment, care plan development 

or coordinated services

 Case management was nonexistent

Early

 

Challenges

 Health plans faced significant challenges in developing 

provider networks

 Long term care and support service providers had 

limited experience with managed care and vice a versa

 Managed care has it’s own language

 Managed care organizations are large   Dreaded telephone tree and website

 Consumer directed care presents challenges

(5)

Early

 

Challenges

 Prompt payment was a challenge due to

 Transition from API to NPI

 Clearing house processing “new” to some

 Paper CMS 1500 for many waiver providers delayed  payment

 Billing p0rtles did not exist

 Unclean claims result in non payment

 Authorization process in general terms worked well

Continuing

 

Challenges

 Continued concern regarding the lack of care 

coordination

 Transition protections mask network inadequacies

 Increased administrative cost in back office 

 Billing

 Contract maintenance

 Chasing unclean claims

 VAHC is moving forward with language that would require all 

claims to be settled in 30 days – placing the burden on the 

(6)

 What range of services does the provider offer?

 What assurances can a provider offer that the right people,  with the right training will show up at the right time?

 What quality metrics can a provider offer?

 How reliable are the caregivers? How is reliability  measured?

 Pricing. How will prices be negotiated?

 Providers are likely to see utilization pressure

 Be prepared to drive and demonstrate your outcomes  (prove value and cost‐effectiveness)

What

 

providers

 

need

 

to

 

know

 How will consumers be moved into managed care? All at one time or will the 

transition occur in phases?

 Will all providers continue to provide care during the transition period?  Non 

par provider reimbursement?

 Will providers be required to provide any new or different information during 

the transition period?

 Will care continue at current levels during the transition period?

 Will providers be expected to take on new Medicaid consumers during the 

transition period? 

 What are the reporting requirements during the transition?

 Describe when and how consumers can switch payers (process and frequency)  How will the claims process change?

 Where will claims be sent? State? Health plan?

(7)

Audits

 How often will the audits occur?

 Define the conflict resolution process under the 

Medicaid managed care contract

 Who, at the health plan, serves as the “tie‐breaker” 

when conflicting information is provided?

What

 

is

 

Quality

 How is quality defined by the health plan? State? 

Whose definition wins?

 Important to understand how parameters around 

quality can lead to an issue of conflicting information 

and the necessity of a tie breaker

 Define the conflict resolution process under the 

Medicaid managed care contract

 Who, at the health plan, serves as the “tie‐breaker” 

(8)

 What is the timeframe for submitting a claim? 

 What is the timeframe for getting a claim paid?

 Health plans require “clean claims”—what does that mean?

 Who will communicate with consumers? Multiple  communications coming from multiple sources can be  confusing and frustrating for consumers

 Describe the appeals process

 Identify any reporting requirements that will be placed on  providers by the health plan

 What information has to be reported? When? By what  method?

Opportunities

 Have a list of managed care contacts

 Hold meetings   Collaboration

 Identify best practices

 Don’t be afraid to ask for things

 Help identify ways to improve care, reduce care, and 

provide exceptional services

 Create an environment where your organization is a 

(9)

Contact

 

Information

Marcia Tetterton, MS, CAE Executive Director

Virginia Association for Home Care and Hospice 3761 Westerre Parkway, Suite B

Richmond, VA 23233 804-285-8636

Fax 804-288-3303 www.vahc.org

References

Related documents

Seniors in Nevada who receive services as a patient in a skilled nursing facility, intermediate care facility, or hospital for 30 days or more and are determined by Medicaid to

December Continue personal care, consumer directed personal assistance program, long term home health care program, home health over 120 days, adult day health care program

To increase research capacity, through increasing the number of research publications, research projects and the amount of funding gained for research Implementation of the

Among TKIs, one of the most explored chemical template is the pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (PP) heterocyclic core, which proved to be a useful scaffold for the

As shown in Figure 3-2, connect the TX and RX receptacles of two adjacent OD.RING modules with optical fiber cables to configure the primary ring.. Communication data flows from TX

Assurance Coordination and Management Unit (QACMU) of the METARGEM/MoNE will be strengthened; Provincial Quality Coordination and Implementation Units in the pilot provinces and

Comparative static analysis results show that the feature of the optimal EITC program is sensitive to the change of income distribution, suggesting that if beneficiaries

It includes discussion about the Acrobat family of products and supporting technologies, introduces the various aspects of the Acrobat SDK and its uses, discusses