SIC 2008
SIC 2008
Dr. Julio Pulido
Director Global Reliability and Test Engineering
Developing a Reliability Centre
Developing a Reliability Centre
Culture
Culture
(Reliability Program)
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
To the Global Reliability and Test
Engineering Team at Ingersoll Rand.
Without them…. there will not be any
success.
3
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 3
Climate Control
Stationary
Refrigeration
Transport
Refrigeration
Service &
Aftermarket
Solutions
#1 Worldwide
in
refrigerated
trailers
#1 in remote
display cases –
N.A.
#1 N.A. service
provider
•
Systems are designed based on product Utilization profiles.
•
Refrigeration systems for applications on Trailer, Truck, Marine and
Air Transport.
5
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 5
Agenda
Agenda
z
Understanding the business
z
Reliability Planning
z
Testing Planning
z
How to built the program?
Elements of the program
Processes in the program
Training of the people
z
First 90 days
What is obvious?
What is obvious?
z
Defining Customers requirements
z
Driving customer requirements in to the
product, service or solution.
z
Validation and Verification of customers
requirements
z
Measuring success
z
Having a learning organization
z
Ability to bring technologies and reliable
products to market faster than our competitors
z
Defining Customers requirements
z
Driving customer requirements in to the
product, service or solution.
z
Validation and Verification of customers
requirements
z
Measuring success
z
Having a learning organization
z
Ability to bring technologies and reliable
products to market faster than our competitors
We want a process that can be translated into customer loyalty
7
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 7
Corporate Strategies
Corporate Strategies
Must not be a Panacea
Must not be a Panacea
z
Concurrent Engineering
zSix Sigma
z
Design for Six Sigma
z
Total Quality Management
z
Panacea Cycle
Idea relating to obvious
Cult (Gurus and
Followers).
o
Popular Acclaim
oDisenchantment
oRepudiation
Creating the process culture
Creating the process culture
Let’s define our strategy and culture
z
Are our products Reliable?
z
Do we use the right technology?
z
Do our products have the right
functionalities?
z
Can we deliver reliable products to the
market at the “right” speed?
How do we know?
Do our customers care?
How do we improved it ?
9
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 9
How do we execute /implement
How do we execute /implement
the program
the program
z
We should nurture a learning process
z
The organization must be structure to support the
process
What are the roles of the different
organizations in the design process?
What are the expectations from the different
organizations?
Product Development is not an solely engineering activity…..
It is an organizational responsibility!
Let
Let
’
’
s define Success
s define Success
z
….develop and establish a disciplined approach in product design…..
allowing time to market… that is driven by the voice of the
customer…..improve product quality/reliability by reducing cost of
ownership….resulting into an increase market share
z
….develop and establish a disciplined approach in product design…..
allowing time to market… that is driven by the voice of the
customer…..improve product quality/reliability by reducing cost of
ownership….resulting into an increase market share
Three elements
a) Capture customer wants in a methodic way
b) The organization can translate wants to specifications
by validation and verification of specifications
11
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 11
Impact of Reliability to IR
Impact of Reliability to IR
-
-
CC
CC
Impact of Reliability to
Impact of Reliability to
our customers
our customers
13
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 13
Business Environment
Business Environment
Influence of Globalization
Influence of Globalization
z
Regarding Suppliers
We are moving from compliance to effectiveness.
Objective is not to audit conformance and compliance, but to
assess capability.
Keeping the product from becoming a commodity.
z
Regarding Product vs. Solutions Strategy
The entire development process must be considered
o
Is it a managed process?
o
Is process design incorporated or integrated with product
design?
o
What approaches to both process and product verification and
Supplier Engagement Program
Supplier Engagement Program
Suppliers fully integrated into the development process
allows for faster learning process
15
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 15
Barriers to Reliability Programs
Barriers to Reliability Programs
z Internal and external to the organization Resistance to change
Lack of knowledge in Reliability Inadequate training
Management does not support the process Capital resources aren’t there
No adequate staff to work on issues Goals not well defined
No adequate time to address the issue Time to Market
Product development cost Competitors do not do it! No local test facilities
No local experts; Corporation is devoid true leadership A consisted culture is not ingrained in the organization Processes are not object-oriented but completion-oriented. Lack of focus on excellence
Pursuit of the latest panacea
In the future, as the organization matures,
Minimum Reliability Metrics
Minimum Reliability Metrics
z
1) Warranty as % of sales
Good starting point
Correlates cost of quality to revenue Affected by currency fluctuations Affected by Operational Actions
z
2) % of Claims per unit manufacture
The organization has a better knowledge of product reliability Relates directly to customer perception
Correlates to cost of quality
17
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Developing a Reliability Centre CultureDeveloping a Reliability Centre Culture 17
Results _ Achieved with the
Results _ Achieved with the
program
program
Values are modifiedMetrics help to define the Strategy
Forecasting of Future Warranty
Forecasting of Future Warranty
zMakes sense for the following reasons
Cost avoidance of field issues
Prediction of required warranty reserves
Spare Part management
z
Models Used
Nature of product
o
Reparable Vs Non Reparable
Warranty coverage
oFull vs Limited
Replacement Policy
oFull vs limited
Replacement Policy
o Pro-rata vs free
Warranty Dimension
19
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 19
Processes and analysis need to
Processes and analysis need to
be value added
be value added
Reliability Program Strategic
Reliability Program Strategic
Objectives
Objectives
z
Reduce the development cycle
Developing product operational profiles Defining product operational environments
Identification of opportunities in product Warranty Component accelerated life testing
Potential failure mode identification and control Analysis and testing capabilities worldwide
z
Reduce Life Cycle Cost
Reduce product failure during Warranty period
Reduce customer operational cost (life cycle cost minimization)
o
Maximize expected component life
o
Minimize repair time
21
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 21
People Capabilities
People Capabilities
We should treat every action as an opportunity for learning – about
what to do but also, more important, about how to think
Reliability Engineering Vision
Reliability Engineering Vision
Statement
Statement
To provide a product failure-free
experience to the end costumer
23
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 23
Reliability Engineering Mission
Reliability Engineering Mission
Statement
Statement
The Reliability Engineering team derives,
verifies and validates Ingersoll-Rand
Climate Control product life
requirements through reliability
analysis, prototyping and testing.
Reliability Engineering Strategy
Reliability Engineering Strategy
25
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 25
System Reliability Strategy
System Reliability Strategy
Development Process _ Best
Development Process _ Best
Practices Benchmarks (TOOLS)
Practices Benchmarks (TOOLS)
Phase 1 Business Opportunity Phase 2 Concept Feasibility Phase 3 Design & Planning Phase 4 Product Test Process Design Phase 5 Implementation, Verification Phase 6 Launch & Production Voice of the Customer Kano Analysis Klein Analysis QFD Factor Analysis Customer Research Competitor Benchmarking Lessons Learned Requirements Analysis QFD Functionality Map DFMEA Screening DOE TRIZ RBD Pugh Concept Selection PFMEA Modeling, Simulation FEA CFD Statistical Analysis Design Scorecard Design for X Robust Design DFMEA, Maintainability Reliability Modeling (FTA, RBD, Markov) DOE Measurement System Evaluation Design Scorecard HALT, HASS, ESS, SST, ALT Robust Optimization Mfg. Process Map Design Scorecard Numerical Evaluation of Methods Customer Satisfaction (VOC) Control Plan Lessons27
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 27
Creating a a
Creating a a
“
“
Signature Process
Signature Process
”
”
Process Established
Deployment
Process
Functionality
alignment
Learning
BEGINNINBEGINNIN
G
Reliability Centered Culture
Reliability Centered Culture
z
DFSS methodology is
oriented to avoid problems
by eliminating issues that
can occur.
Primary goal is to eliminate manufacturing defects
z
Design for Reliability (DFR)
process oriented to
generate product with long
term specific reliability
levels.
Oriented to reduce issues due to customer’s product
utilization levels.
z
Reliability Centered Culture
(RCC) drives the
organization through
solutions leadership to
warrant solutions with high
availability to customers.
Use reliability concepts to help select innovations that will drive higher product availability
29
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 29
The concept
The concept
The Strategic Approach
z
Design for Reliability
Starts with the Idea phase of the
product development cycle.
Uses physics-of-failure
techniques to design out
potential problems
z
Reliability Verification
Test ensures meeting customer’s
reliability objectives\
o
Process Reliability
o
Design Maturity Testing
z
Analytical Physics
Collects knowledge about
product physics of failure
o
Understanding how customer
use affects product performance
o
Understanding environmental
Design Assessment
Design Assessment
z
The goal is to identify any potential
failure modes that are inherent in a
design early in the design process.
Analytical Tools
Involvement of the entire team in
evaluation and planning (DFMEA,
Hazard Analysis, HALT, ESS).
z
Performed at system or subsystem
level to component level.
Stress levels must simulate
environmental application and
stress level of usage.
31
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 31
Development Phase
Development Phase
z
Demonstrate
level of product
Reliability
z
Provide
statistical
significant Test
Plans (Balance
Reliability with
add-on cost)
z
Provide plan to
guide Test
Engineers
Product
Product
Reliability Cycle
Reliability Cycle
We can reduce our exposure during product launch using Reliability
Techniques.
Improve customer’s product availability by using Reliability Centered Maintenance
Techniques and designing Maintainability into the product
We can accelerate our development process (internal and suppliers) by creating technically sound validation
processes (ALT) and Robust Design Techniques
Reliability Techniques can be used to develop EXPERT/ SMART
Systems. Defining critical design variables, we
can help manufacturing in controlling Quality.
33
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra
33
33The Building Blocks
The Building Blocks
FRACAS Warranty Analysis (opportunities) (Projects / PIP) Audit Program Q &R Field Test support
Service Repair Metrics (MTTR, System Availability)
Periodic Customers Surveys (30, 90 and 180
days)
Maintainability and PM requirements Tracking of Field
Failure Modes (Database)
Reliability and Test Strategy
Reliability and Test Strategy
z
Testing of lower-level components and sub-assemblies is less
expensive and can be more effective in exploring the limitations
of the design than testing at the level of the complete system
z
Leverage regional test equipment and capabilities to support
global product development, productivity and sourcing initiatives
z
Develop component, sub-system and system test parameters for
accelerated life testing based on operational profiles
z
Develop product operational profiles to identify and control
potential failure modes
z
Reduce customer operational costs by maximizing component
expected life
35
Product Development Process
Product Development Process
(NPD)
(NPD)
z
Reliability process needs to be fully integrated.
37
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 37
Project scope based on
Project scope based on
Risk
Risk
Development Tasks
Development Tasks
39
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 39
TEST ENGINEERING STANDARD
TEST ENGINEERING STANDARD
OPERATING PROCEDURE (TESOP)
OPERATING PROCEDURE (TESOP)
Knowledge based Product
Knowledge based Product
Development
Development
z
Knowledge Based product Development
Test First and then Design
Customer Interest in Engineering job not only
sales and Marketing
Capture the knowledge develop during the
process
41
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 41
Reliability Analysis
Reliability Analysis
Non destructive Evaluations
Non destructive Evaluations
Non destructive testing
z
Equipment is high fidelity
Modal
Radiography
Ultrasonic
Etc…
z
History of applications
Health Monitoring
z
Integrated sensing
z
Equipment with less fidelity.
z
Less subjective
43
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 43
Health Monitoring
Health Monitoring
z
Commercial
applications are
driving the need for
health monitoring
technology.
Reliability
Centered
Maintenance
(Condition-based
maintenance)
z
Monitoring is based
on customer product
utilization.
Design Based on Historical Data
Design Based on Historical Data
45
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 45
Analysis vs. Testing
Analysis vs. Testing
z Analytical tools guide the testing optimization
process.
z Optimization analysis
improve the cost and speed of the development
process.
z Improve Testing effectiveness using
Accelerated life testing or Stress Step Testing, Highly Accelerated Stress
Screening
z Electronic DOE using Monte Carlo Simulation
How to Start?... First 90 Days
How to Start?... First 90 Days
z Promote Yourself
Make a mental break from your old job
z Accelerate Your learning
Markets, products, technologies, systems, structures
z Match Strategy to situation
Challenges and Opportunities
z Secure early wins
ID opportunities and Create Value
z Negotiate Success
Productive Working relationship
z Achieve Alignment
Organizational Architect
Your organization in alignment with peers organizations.
z Build your team
Right and Smart people
Smarter than you!!... Engagement and Empowerment.. It is ok to make mistakes
z Create coalitions
47
6° Simpósio Internacional de Confiabilidade - SIC 2008 Título da Palestra 47
Biographical Sketch
Biographical Sketch
z
Julio Pulido, Ph.D., MSc, MBA
Director Global Reliability and Test Engineering
He is responsible for Reliability and Test activities at IR – CC (Thermo
King, Hussman, Krack and Koxka) engineering laboratories around the
Globe. The test capabilities are oriented to R&D Activities,
Development Testing, and Product Reliability validation.
Dr. Pulido is also responsible for implementing the Reliability
Engineering program at IR – Climate Control and insuring regulatory
and compliance requirements for Climate Control products.
Thank You