• No results found

Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Meaningful Use

Performance Measures Report

Donna St Cyr, James Croft,

JoAnne Hawkins

Data Networks Corporation

Contractors for U.S. Indian Health

Service

(2)

Goals

At the end of this session, participants should be

able to

:

• Understand which reports are available to run for

Eligible Professionals (EP)

• Understand which reports are available to run for

Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals

(EHs/CAHs)

• Be familiar with attestation and exclusion questions

• Run MU Performance Measure Report for EPs

(3)

APCM v2.0 P4

Eligible Professionals

Eligible Hospitals

Stage 1, 2014

13 Core Objectives

5 of 9 Menu Set

9 CQMs* (3 across 6 domains)

Stage 1, 2014

11 Core Objectives

5 of 10 Menu Set

16 CQMs* (3 across 6 domains)

Stage 2, 2014

17 Core Objectives

3 of 6 Menu Objectives

9 CQMs* (3 across 6 domains)

Stage 2, 2014

16 Core Objectives

3 of 6 Menu Objectives

16 CQMs* (3 across 6 domains)

(4)

Enhancements

• Additional reporting period selections

• Respond to attestation and exclusion

questions for multiple providers

• Summary output changes

• Ability to run EH reports by observation or

ED method

(5)

2014/2015 Performance Measure Reports

******************************************** ** PCC Management Reports ** ** Meaningful Use Performance Reports ** ********************************************

IHS PCC Suite Version 2.0

2013 DEMO HOSPITAL

S111 Meaningful Use 2011 Stage 1 Performance Reports ... S113 Meaningful Use 2013 Stage 1 Performance Reports ...

S114 Meaningful Use 2014/2015 Stage 1 Performance Rpts ...

S214 Meaningful Use 2014/2015 Stage 2 Performance Rpts ...

(6)

2014/2015 Stage 1 MU Reports

********************************************

** PCC Management Reports ** ** Meaningful Use Performance Reports ** ** 2014/2015 Stage 1 Performance Reports ** ********************************************

IHS Performance Measure Reports Version 2.0 (Patch 4)

2013 DEMO HOSPITAL

M14P 2014/2015 Stage 1 MU Performance Report - EPs

PL14 2014/2015 Stage 1 MU Patient Lists - EPs

M14H 2014/2015 Stage 1 MU Performance Report - Hospitals HL14 2014/2015 Stage 1 MU Patient List - Hospitals

(7)

2014/2015 Stage 2 MU Reports

********************************************

** PCC Management Reports ** ** Meaningful Use Performance Reports ** ** 2014/2015 Stage 2 Performance Reports ** ********************************************

IHS Performance Measure Reports Version 2.0 (Patch 4)

2013 DEMO HOSPITAL

M24P 2014/2015 Stage 2 MU Performance Report - EPs PL24 2014/2015 Stage 2 MU Patient Lists - EPs

M24H 2014/2015 Stage 2 MU Performance Report - Hospitals HL24 2014/2015 Stage 2 MU Patient List - Hospitals

(8)

Reporting Period Selections

Select one of the following:

1 Quarter: January 1 - March 31

2 Quarter: April 1 - June 30

3 Quarter: July 1 - September 30

4 Quarter: October 1 - December 31

5 User Defined 90-Day Report

6 User Defined Date Range

Select Report Period: (1-6):

Select one of the following:

1 Quarter: October 1 - December 31

2 Quarter: January 1 - March 31

3 Quarter: April 1 - June 30

4 Quarter: July 1 - September 30

5 User Defined 90-Day Report

6 User Defined Date Range

Select Report Period: (1-6):

(9)

Attestation and Exclusions

Attestation

1.

Clinical Decision Support (EP

and EH)

2.

Drug to Drug – Drug to Allergy

interaction checks (EP and EH)

3.

Protect Electronic Health

Information (EP and EH)

4.

Patient List (EP and EH)

5.

Summary of Care (EP and EH)

6.

Immunization (EP and EH)

7.

Syndromic Surveillance EP and

EH)

8.

Specialized Registry (EP)

9.

Reportable Lab Results (EH)

Exclusion

1.

Patient Electronic Access (EP

and EH)

2.

e-Prescribing (EP)

3.

Vital Signs (EP)

4.

Secure Messaging (EP)

5.

Summary of Care (EP)

(10)

Ability to Respond for Multiple Providers

For Example:

Clinical Decision Support Rule Attestations: Five clinical decision support interventions related to four clinical quality measures and high-priority health conditions within your scope of practice were implemented at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR reporting period.

• Do all selected providers included in this report attest to this? YES//

Were drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks turned on for the entire EHR reporting period?

• Do all selected providers included in this report attest to this? YES//

Note: This will not work for the Vital Signs measure. Each question will have

to be answered for each provider individually.

(11)

Hospital Report

Observation Method vs. All ED Method

• Ability to report based on different denominator

method

Select one of the following:

E All Emergency Department

O Observation Method

(12)

Observation Services Method

vs. ED Method

The all emergency department method:

• Includes all patients admitted to the inpatient

department (POS 21) either directly or through the

emergency department and all patients receiving

services in the emergency department (POS 23)

The observation services method:

• Includes all patients admitted to the inpatient

department (POS 21) either directly or through the

emergency department and patients who initially

present to the emergency department (POS 23) and

receive observation services

• Note: Patients who receive observation services under both

the outpatient department (POS 22) and emergency

department (POS 23) are included in the denominator under

this method.

(13)

ED Denominator vs. Observation

ED Method denominator:

1.

A hospitalization, defined as Service Category of H

2.

An emergency department visit defined as clinic code of

Emergency Department-30 and a Service Category of A

Observation Method denominator:

1.

A hospitalization, defined as Service Category of H

(14)

Performance Measure Report

*** IHS 2014/2015 Stage 2 Meaningful Use Performance Measure Report for EPs *** Provider Name: FORM, BENNY P

Report Period: Mar 12, 2014 to Mar 12, 2014

--- STAGE 2 2014/2015 EP MEANINGFUL USE PERFORMANCE REPORT SUMMARY MENU SET MEASURES (EPs must meet 3 out of 5)

--- Current Excl

Performance Measures Target Rate Num Den Met

---

1. Syndromic Surveillance*+ Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes

2. Electronic Notes >30% 0.00% 0 0 N/A

3. Imaging Results >10% 0.00% 0 0 Yes 4. Family Health History >20% 0.00% 0 0 No

5. Report to Specialized Reg*+ Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes

* Indicates Public Health Performance Measure.

(15)
(16)

References

Related documents

etc.) will be responded to most completely. Examples: If the person wants to become more future-oriented, make the future bigger, brighter, and more immediately in front of them.

In order to minimise the diversion of existing underground networking and the influence of the heavy traffic during the construction of underground pipe lines

The result of the research indicates that the implementation of talent management in PT PLN (Persero) TJBB APP Cawang consists of three dimensions; recruiting

(TPDS) is also playing an important role in this achievement [11]. Ward et al. [12] proved that the real success of Japanese manufacturers’ is not derived from their

AFC Home Warranty is an administrator and contract provider for service warranty contracts and extended service programs wishes to engage the (Dealer) listed above as an

5 Maintain Active Medication Allergy List One entry recorded as structured data None 80%2. 6 Record Smoking Status Patients age 13 and older

A clinician’s performance under MIPS will be based on the reporting of quality measures and activities related to four performance categories: Quality, Resource Use,

AIM Response: