• No results found

Implementing Evidence Based Supported Employment for People with Mental Health Problems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Implementing Evidence Based Supported Employment for People with Mental Health Problems"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Implementing Evidence

Based Supported

Employment for People

with Mental Health

Problems

Rachel Perkins

BA, MPhil (Clinical Psychology) PhD, OBE

rachel.e.perkins1@btinternet.com

(2)

We know what works, so why aren’t we

doing it?

1.

Failure to prioritise employment for people with mental health

conditions

2.

A reliance on ‘illness’ models of mental health conditions

3.

Fear and a culture of low expectations: employment not considered

a realistic goal for people with mental health problems

4.

Failure to provide the sort of support we know works

5.

Failure to implement it properly

(3)

1. Failure to prioritise employment for people

with mental health conditions

Employment not seen as a priority for health and social care services - not part

of their ‘core business’ … therefore largely ignored in treatment and support plans English national patient survey 2013

• 27% definitely received help with finding or keeping work • 43% said they would have liked help but did not get it

People with mental health conditions not seen as a priority for ‘welfare to work’

and specialist disability employment programmes for those facing the greatest barriers to work

• 43% of people receiving out of work benefits have mental health problems • Access to Work programme (serves around 30,000 people in total): 3.2% have

a mental health condition

• Work choice programme (serves around 9,000 people in total): less than 1%

serious mental health condition, 12.8% ‘mild to moderate’ mental health condition (depression/anxiety)

(4)

2. A reliance on ‘illness models’ of mental

health conditions

Illness or disability?

If we are to help with mental health conditions to work we can:

• Focus on trying to ‘change the person so they fit in’: treat symptoms and

addiction issues, remedy cognitive deficits, train people in necessary skills, reduce anxiety ...

• Focus on trying to ‘change the world so that it can accommodate the person’

assume that the person’s difficulties are ‘given’ and remove the environmental barriers - social, cultural and physical – that prevent the person from working

Mental health services tend to focus on ‘changing the person so

they fit in’ – treatment and therapy to eliminate problems

It is important to try to treat symptoms BUT many people have mental health and related problems that recur or are ever present … and no amount of treatment reduces

(5)

If people with ongoing or recurring problems then we need a different approach ... and we might have something to learn from the broader disability world and the

Parallels with physical impairment: a social model

of disability

If a person has ongoing (or recurring) impairments then we must look to removing the environmental barriers that stop them working rather than

focusing on eliminating their problems.

The ongoing or recurring cognitive, emotional and behavioural problems of someone with mental health problems are parallel mobility impairments, visual impairments,

hearing impairments etc.

“For most of us, mental health problems are a given ... the real problems exist in the form of barriers in the environment that prevent us from living, working and learning in environments of our choice [the task is] to confront, challenge and change those barriers and to make environments accessible ... environments are

not just physical places but also social and interpersonal environments ...those of us with psychiatric disabilities face many environmental barriers that impede and thwart

our efforts to live independently and gain control over our lives.”

Patricia Deegan, 1992, ‘The Independent Living Movement and People with Psychiatric Disabilities: Taking Back Control over Our Lives’

(6)

A social model of disability makes us think differently about how we

can help people with mental health problems to get and keep

employment

Replace:

‘what are the person’s problems’ and ‘how can we get rid of

these’

With:

‘what are the barriers’

(attitudes, expectations, assumptions –

social, cultural and physical structures)

and ‘how can we get around

these’

What support might they need? (the mental health equivalent of the wheel chair, the assistance dog or sign language interpreter ... )

What adjustments might they need? (the mental health equivalent of the ramp, lift, hearing loop, signs in brail)

How can we break down prejudice and discrimination that stop people being recruited to jobs?

(7)

The challenge of working with a mental health condition

are different from those facing people with physical

impairments

Affect a person’s ability to negotiate the social world of work (rather than the

physical one) – therefore need to think about adjustments/supports to access the social world of work

Often fluctuate and it is difficult to know when fluctuations will occur – therefore need

fluctuating adjustments and support

Are not immediately obvious and engender fear because of the myths that surround

them (dangerousness, incompetence etc.) – therefore need to break down myths

Types of adjustment and support people may need less well explored – therefore

need to provide more support to individuals and employers to think about what sort of adjustments and support are needed

But the biggest barriers often lie in the type of support that is

provided, the ways in which health, and employment services work

together and the attitudes and expectations of others…

(8)

3. Fear on the part of the person, mental

health professionals, employment advisers,

employers

that getting a job may worsen your mental health

that you will experience prejudice and discrimination at work

that getting a job and moving off benefits may make you worse off

financially ... and what happens if it does not work out

that they will not be up to the job

that you don’t have the skills to manage their problems – better leave

it to the experts

(9)

3. A culture of low expectations …

on the part of health professionals, employers, employment agencies

and society as a whole … and people with mental health conditions

themselves

It’s a well known fact that people with schizophrenia/addiction problems

cannot work’

Nicola Oliver (2011) a woman with bipolar disorder

describes the barriers she experienced …

My first obstacle was my employer.

Ten days after I disclosed my

disability I was sacked.”

(10)

“My second obstacle was my community psychiatric nurse

. He

was lovely but recommended I consider only low stress jobs and part

time hours; maybe I could stack shelves in a supermarket! I hadn’t

studied for three degrees to stack shelves.

“My third obstacle was my psychiatrist.

She told me that it was

unlikely that I would ever work again.”

Is it any wonder that with these messages from the ‘experts’

...

“My fourth obstacle became my-self.

I became ‘Nicola the bipolar

person’: incompetent, inadequate and worthless.”

I was offered cognitive behavioural therapy to overcome my low

self-esteem, but

the psychologist became my fifth obstacle

. She was

(11)

Many would have given up at this point ... but Nicola was

determined -

despite all the negative messages she continued to

try to get work ....

But employment support agencies were no better ...

I contacted a

[private]

recruitment agent who told me I had a great

CV ... but she quickly became my sixth obstacle.

When I

explained the gap on my CV was due to bipolar disorder I never

heard from her again.”

“The seventh obstacle was the charity

[mental health NGO]

I

approached to help me get into work

... I was told ‘maybe we

should wait until you are a bit better’.

“My final obstacle was a

[Department of Work and Pensions Job

Centre Plus]

disability employment advisor

who was supposed to

help me find work. She wanted to send me on a confidence building

course! I didn’t want training, I wanted a job.”

(12)

If only ...

… someone had helped me reassure my employer I was still

worth employing.

…. they had shown conviction that I could still achieve.

… I had met other employees with bipolar disorder to inspire

me to believe that one day I too could return to work.”

(13)

Breaking the Conspiracy of Low Expectations

and Decreasing Fear

Demonstrating to clinicians, service users and employers that work

is a realistic possibility for people with mental health problems.

Making research evidence accessible but ‘seeing is believing’: need local examples of success, pilot projects, collecting and publicising ‘journey to work’ stories

Not just ‘them out there’

leading by example and employing

people with mental health conditions within services

If staff and service users in mental health services can see people working in their services it increases the belief that employment is possible

Showing clinicians they have an important role.

A critical part of the solution, not ‘a problem’ (as they are sometimes viewed by employment services and employers in the UK)

Increasing consumer demand

Making service users aware of what they should be able to expect in the way of employment support – providing them with the evidence

(14)

Knowing and supporting employers – not just the big ones but the

small ones and the local managers

– Providing an ongoing point of contact for help and advice.

Dispelling myths about welfare benefits and employment

Good benefits advice alongside employment support dispelling inaccurate

‘benefits trap’ myths among clinicians and people with mental health conditions

Not all work is like working in health and social services understanding the

sorts of jobs that are out there in the local area

Breaking down prejudice and discrimination more generally ...

anti-discrimination campaigns like ‘Like Minds Like Mine’ (New Zealand) ‘Time to Change’ (England) ‘See Me’ (Scotland)

But raising expectations and decreasing fear must be

accompanied by the provision of the right kind of

(15)

4. Failure to provide the sort of support we

know works

In the UK there is an enormous investment (personal and

financial) in existing ways of doing things on the part of service

providers, people who use mental health services, politicians and the public

and people with mental health conditions (especially sheltered work and

pre-vocational training)

Many people are ignorant of or disbelieve the evidence

Problem: IPS evidence based supported employment

principles challenge some traditional assumptions that are

commonly held

among professionals, employers, the ‘general

public’ and people with mental health conditions

...

(16)

The reality:

• very few people move from segregated, sheltered settings and prolonged

‘pre-vocational’ training into open employment

• people learn that they can only work in a safe, sheltered setting and never move

into work

People need ‘water wings’ –

support to keep them afloat in

employment - rather than

‘stepping stones’!

Common assumption:

‘stepping stones’ - people need to

build up their qualifications, skills and confidence in a safe,

sheltered setting they will be able to move on to open

(17)

The reality:

• If you don’t help a person to keep their job when they develop mental health

problems or relapse they are likely to lose their job and have no job to go back to when they are ‘better’

• The longer they are out of work the less likely they are to return: 6 months absence

– 50% return; 12 months absence – 25% return; 2 years absence – 2% return (British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine)

• You don’t have to be fully ‘better’ to work

• If you provide the right kind of employment support while the person is receiving

treatment, they may well be able to stay at work or only take a short period off work

Moving from an ‘illness’ model to a ‘disability’ model means that we look at what kind of support and adjustments a person may need to work with their mental

health problems and/or return to work as quickly as they can

Common assumption:

people need to be fully ‘better’

before they can return to work: we must treat people’s

mental illness before you think about work

(18)

What sort of adjustments and support within

the 8 principles of IPS?

‘Job retention’ is as important as getting a job ... and does not

always mean staying in the same job.

Retention may mean going back to the same job, or a different job with the same employer, or changing your job. Working patterns are changing and we now see people change jobs more

frequently.

Help when the person or their employer needs it ...

help needs to be

there when problems occur (not having to wait for appointments): the role of

telephone support

Help with all the things around work

(like getting up, getting to work etc.) •

Help to sort out problems outside work

that may jeopardise the
(19)

Someone to go in and help the person at work.

Like a ‘job coach’ for

someone with learning disabilities or a sign language interpreter for someone with a

hearing impairment – maybe episodically when the person’s condition fluctuates) or even someone who can work for them if they are not able to (as in Clubhouse’ approach in the USA)?

Peer support.

Often people who have faced similar challenges are the best ones to

provide support AND seeing what others have achieved can increase motivation and self-confidence. For example:

• employing people with lived experience as Employment Specialists

• sharing experience through sharing stories

• ‘job clubs’

• peer mentoring

• peer led support groups

Time limited ‘work experience’ or ‘internships’ in parallel with job

search

and in real employment settings. Can increase the confidence of the
(20)

‘Surviving and Thriving at

Work’

Health and well-being at

work plans ...

‘A Work Health and

Well-being Toolkit’

and

‘Going Back to Work After

a Period of Absence’

Dr Rachel Perkins OBE Published by Disability Rights UK ben.kersey@disabilityrightsUK.org

Managing symptoms and problems

in a work context – a work health and

well-being plan

What the individual and their manager can do:

– Keeping on an even keel at work

– Managing things that you find difficult at work

– Managing ups and downs

– Crisis plans

– Plans for returning to work after a crisis These plans

• Increase confidence of employee and employer

• Offer a way of managing a fluctuating condition at work and planning fluctuating adjustments and supports

(21)

Starting work gradually and building up hours over time

Starting small and building up.

Most people start their working lives in

‘marginal’ jobs (casual work, seasonal work, delivering newspapers etc.) ... but then move on in their careers

Not just jobs but careers ... the importance of mentoring in relation to career development (see RADIATE in UK as an example of peer mentoring)

Not just ‘9 to 5’ .

There are many ways of working ...

– working from home

– working part time (maybe only a few hours/days per week)

– self-employment

Matching the job and the person

Adjustments in the workplace, for example:

– Additional supervision/feedback

– A mentor among other employees

– Adjustments in duties – relief from some ‘non-central’ parts of the job

– Written instructions

– Somewhere quiet to work ... or somewhere to go if it is all getting too much

– Working particular hours (e.g. only mornings/evenings)

(22)

5. Failure to implement IPS properly

With IPS the higher the fidelity to the model the better the outcomes –

it is important to ensure that all 8 principles are met

Many existing UK services say ‘we are already doing MOST of those things’

but …

For example:

• Do we really have a ‘can do’ attitude?

• Are employment workers really integrated into clinical teams – there at assessment and

review meetings, writing in the same notes ...?

• Are we still ‘selecting’ who we help on the basis of our judgements about

‘employability’?

• How good are we at ‘job-finding’? Do we really know our local employers? How good

are we at supporting them?

(23)

6. Lack of joined up working at national and

local level

If people with mental health conditions are to receive the support they need to access and prosper in employment then we must

address all of a person’s need

(health, social, employment etc.) and

joined up working is essential

across:

• mental health (primary care, secondary mental health services, specialist)

• social care services

• generic welfare to work programmes, apprenticeship and internship programmes and

initiatives for young people

• specialist disability employment programmes

• employers

• welfare benefits systems

Too often in the UK

• Confused and contradictory policies and approaches that are wasteful of resources • Confused customers and clients who are receiving contradictory messages: one

(24)

In the UK there are signs that things are improving

(probably driven by the ever increasing welfare bill):

• Employment is a central part of mental health strategy: employment outcomes for

people with mental health problems are a ‘key performance indicator’ for mental health and social services

• Review of DWP disability employment programmes is specifically addressing the

needs of people with mental health

• Changes in welfare benefit system – Universal Credit

… but link up at local level very patchy

We need to get better at

Sharing expertise in local networks. Health/social services professionals can’t

become employment experts – employers and employment advisors can’t become mental health/addictions experts ... but they can use each other’s expertise

Better joined up working around individuals. Ensuring that health

treatment/social care plans and employment action plans offer consistent messages and complement each other

IPS can facilitate this – linking not only with employers but employment services and helping people to navigate these

(25)

Implementing ‘Individual Placement with Support’ evidence based

supported employment ...

International evidence

Keys to developing high fidelity services (Bond 2009

)

1. The state authorities provide resources and leadership

2. Technical assistance centres provide training and monitoring

3. Discontinue old ways of doing things (e.g. close down pre-vocational training programmes)

4. Conduct ‘fidelity reviews’

5. Effective leadership at every level with a ‘can do’ attitude

6. Count the things you want to change like employer contacts, jobs 7. Hire the right people

8. Establish close integration with mental health treatment teams ... this is harder when clinical treatment and employment support are provided by different agencies

(26)

But most of all we must raise our expectations

“The greater danger for most of us lies not in

setting our aim too high and falling short, but in

setting our aim too low and achieving our mark.”

“... grant that I may always desire more than I can

accomplish.”

Michelangelo (1475-1564)

“There’s a better life out there ... If you just

sit back, then you won’t make it – but you

can make it if you want to. You’ve got to be

real with yourself. The power is you.”

References

Related documents

Financial compensation following interruption to the business as a result of an insured loss under Section 1 caused by accidental loss destruction or damage

Second, to shed light on whether the effectiveness of board structure in controlling agency problems depends on ownership concentration and large shareholders’ identity, we

Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to: uncertainties related to the Perrigo Proposal, including as to the timing of the offer

• Spurring the use of cloud computing. Governments have a role to play in further spurring the use of cloud computing, for instance, through removing unnecessary legal and regulatory

Fill in your USER ACCOUNT INFORMATION so Ariba Discovery can send you new business leads and messages from buyers by email.. Remember to add Ariba Discovery to your email

Click the Team Members tab from the Customer Overview Screen to view a list of all customer team members and any Microsoft or partner team members who have been added to the site

Karen & John Arnold Beaver Creek Metro District Beaver Creek Resort Company Judy & Howard Berkowitz Bloomberg Philanthropies Marlene & John Boll Kathy & Bjorn

Treatment Advice by Mobile Alerts (TAMA) is an IVR system developed to provide healthcare information services to people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) who are also the