COMMENTARY
Children of Genocide: A Legacy of Lost Dreams
Charles Oberg, MD, FAAP
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
The author has indicated he has no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
D
R JANUSZ KORCZAK was a European pediatrician, educator, and children’s author from the first half of the 20th century. First as a pediatrician and then as a teacher he dedicated his life to impoverished and vul-nerable children. He formed a progressive orphanage and school in Warsaw, Poland, during the 1930s to care for orphaned children of both Jewish and Catholic de-scent. In 1940, after the German invasion of Poland by the Nazis, Dr Korczak was ordered to close the orphan-age. Instead, he moved the 200 to 300 Jewish children for whom he cared into the Warsaw ghetto and at-tempted to establish a safe haven within the turmoil, uncertainty, and fear of the new location. Eventually, the children were ordered to be relocated to the death camp of Treblinka. Despite being a Jew, because of his fame as Poland’s “old doctor” he was encouraged on several occasions to abandon the children and return to the Aryan side of Warsaw. He refused, and on August 6, 1942, he quietly marched with his children to the trains for relocation and eventually to death at the hands of the Nazis.1His story and the fate of these children are but anexample of the many silent others who attempted to protect men, women, and especially children from the ravages of the Holocaust.
This commentary has three overall goals. The first is to encourage us to not think of genocide solely as a historical event such as the Holocaust but, rather, a persistent reality that requires constant vigilance and action as it transitions from our past into the current affairs of the 21st century. Second, to realize that as part of genocidal denial, we frequently forget that the burden of these atrocities is disproportionally placed on children. Finally, as pediatricians, to advocate by being aware, informed, and active in a global effort to halt the killing of innocent children and to help heal the scars for those children and youth who have been ravaged by its effects.
INTERNATIONAL EFFORTS TO DEFINE GENOCIDE AND PROTECT CHILDRENⴕS RIGHTS
The Holocaust was unique in terms of its horrific magnitude. There are always concerns that compari-sons to other episodes of mass killing may draw atten-tion away from those who died during Hitler’s “final solution.” It is inconceivable that his attempt to exter-minate the European Jewry led to the death of almost 6 million persons including 1.5 million children. How-ever, genocide throughout the 20th century remained
one of the most prevalent forms of preventable mor-tality and morbidity for children. Therefore, it is im-portant to examine other episodes of genocide and the resultant mass killing and injuring of children while always acknowledging the sentinel place we must hold for those who perished during World War II. The remainder of this section will highlight several decla-rations and the treaty that arose from the Holocaust, as well as the gradual recognition that children have their own set of inalienable rights.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The impact of genocide took on world recognition after the defeat of Germany in 1945 and the Nuremberg trials that followed. The newly formed United Nations (UN) in 1948 formulated and passed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provided a broad framework for the assurance of basic human rights. The preamble states that “recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of the human family is the foun-dation of freedom, justice and peace in the world” and then articulates 30 articles that delineate what those rights entail. There are 2 rights that are of particular relevance to this discussion: Article 3 proclaims that “[e]veryone has the right to life, liberty and security of person,” and Article 5 states that “[n]o one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment.”2
The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide
The Genocide Treaty, which was passed that same year, went further and outlined the basic definition of geno-cide to which the ratifying countries would agree and
Abbreviations:UN, United Nations; CRC, Convention on the Rights of the Child; ICC, International Criminal Court; YHH, youth-headed household; UNICEF, UN Children’s Fund
Opinions expressed in these commentaries are those of the author and not necessarily those of the American Academy of Pediatrics or its Committees.
www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2007-2208
doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2208
Accepted for publication Aug 21, 2007
Address correspondence to Charles Oberg, MD, FAAP, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S Second St, West Bank Office Building, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454. E-mail: oberg001@umn.edu
delineates the acts that would hence be prohibited. The convention defined genocide as the committing with the intention to destroy in whole or part a national, ethic, racial, or religious group. In addition, any 1 of the fol-lowing 5 acts would constitute genocide regardless of whether they are committed during a time of peace or war and represents a crime under international law.
1. killing members of the group;
2. causing serious bodily harm or mental harm to mem-bers of the group;
3. deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. imposing measures intended to prevent births within that group; and
5. forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
The UN Declaration and Convention on the Rights of the Child
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide established the universally accepted frame-work for human rights but left significant gaps regarding the specific rights of children. This evolutionary process both predated and postdated these seminal works. It began with Eglantyne Jebb, who witnessed and docu-mented the devastating effects of World War I on Euro-pean children. She drafted a set of children’s rights that was later adopted by the League of Nations as the Ge-neva Declaration of the Rights of the Child. In 1952, the UN adopted and reaffirmed the Declaration of the Rights of the Child and directed its members to follow its prin-ciples of protection for all children. The declaration es-poused the basic principle of civil and political as well as economic, societal, and cultural rights for all children. Over the course of the remainder of the 20th century, the UN tried to craft a treaty that would then do more than make a declaration but actually put the specific principles into international law. The General Assembly on November 20, 1989, passed the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). On September 1, 1990, the CRC was put into force, making it the fastest inter-national treaty to move from passage to ratification and implementation by member nations. The CRC estab-lished the responsibility of governments, institutions, citizens, and families for ensuring that the rights of the child are respected and all actions are directed toward achieving the “best interest of the child.”
The essential themes of the UN CRC include the right to the basic needs for optimal growth and development; civil and political rights; and a right to safety and pro-tection. Safety and protection frequently are interpreted as freedom from forced child labor and unsafe working conditions. However, they also have a much broader focus and include safety from child maltreatment, do-mestic violence, and the witnessing of violence in the home and/or the larger communities. They also encom-pass freedom from sexual exploitation and death. The
UN CRC is the first legally binding international docu-ment to recognize the civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights of the child.3
The International Criminal Court
There is a growing awareness that an international re-sponse will be necessary to address acts of genocide, mass murders, and other crimes against humanity. In Rome at the end of the 20th century (July 17, 1998), 120 nations voted to create the International Criminal Court (ICC), and on July 1, 2002, it was ratified by the necessary 60 countries and its jurisdiction began. The ICC is an expansion and institutional formalization of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yu-goslavia (the “Hague tribunal”), which was established by the UN Security Council in 1993 to investigate and prosecute the ethnic cleansing by Bosnian Serbs and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in 1994. The world court was designed to provide an ongoing mechanism for investigating and prosecuting genocide and other crimes against humanity. The United States has not ratified the ICC and refuses to acknowledge its jurisdiction over US matters. However, the US did ab-stain from a veto when the UN Security Council referred the Darfur situation to the ICC for investigation in March 2005, which helped to establish its credibility.4
GENOCIDAL ATROCITIES COMMITTED AGAINST CHILDREN Since the passage of the Declaration on the Rights of the Child and the subsequent Universal Declaration of Hu-man Rights, Convention on the Prevention and Punish-ment of Genocide, and CRC, we must acknowledge that genocide has not been eliminated but has continued to occur throughout the 20th century and into the new millennium. This includes but is not limited to the Ar-menian genocide between 1915 and 1923; the 1971 genocide and famine in Bangladesh; the “killing fields” of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia in 1975–1979; the Rwandan massacre of Tutsis in 1994; the Balkan mass killings in Kosovo in 1998 –1999; and, most recently, in Darfur, Sudan.
Author and journalist Samantha Powers, in her
sem-inal Pulitzer Prize–winning book A Problem From Hell:
America and the Age of Genocide, eloquently speaks to the recurring normative response to these atrocities. As a society we take each independently and lock it in time, defining each by the economic, geopolitical, and socio-demographic parameters of their particular historical sit-uation and then quickly set it aside.5Frequently, it is also
highlight specific examples of the violation of the 5 components of the Genocide Treaty.
Figure 1 provides a schematic of the 5 acts that con-stitute genocide and provides examples on how children have been affected in 5 case studies. Each example pro-vided highlights a particular aspect of genocide commit-ted against children; it is important to remember, as is reflected in the Venn diagram, that there are many similarities that overlap each of these episodes of geno-cide, and the case studies were designed to provide in-sight and nuance to particular aspects that are evident from an examination of each one.
Khmer Rouge in Cambodia: The Disproportionate Targeting of Children
The Yale Cambodian Genocide Project estimated that 1.7 million persons died as a result of the Khmer Rouge’s
killing fields between 1975 and 1979.6Children were a
particular target of the Khmer Rouge. The regime min-imized the importance of the family and at times even banned family contact. Children were separated from their families, brainwashed, and inundated with propa-ganda designed to have them embrace the revolution. However, not all children were recruited. Children who were from families of the intellectual elite and/or of a different ethnicity such as Chinese, Vietnamese, and Muslim Chams were executed. The intent of the Khmer Rouge was to eliminate all “class enemies” or those who were not considered to be “true Cambodians.” These enemies included anyone from the cities or those who were considered educated (defined by anyone who had completed the seventh grade). These children were oc-casionally killed by the children who had been recruited,
resulting in the killing of children by children. Second, as a result of the collectivization and creation of rural com-munes for agricultural production, children died dispro-portionately as a result of overwork, exhaustion, and starvation while attempting to meet the agricultural quotas set by the regime. Finally, there was the dispro-portionate killing of children and youth at concentration camps such as Tuol Sleng, a former high school in Phnom Penh that was converted into Security Prison 21. In a recent study at the end of the 20th century, then-Cambodians who had survived the killing fields were asked about how many had lost sons and daugh-ters during the time of Pol Pot. From a total of 400 respondents there were 554 child deaths reported, aver-aging⬎1 child per survey respondent; illness accounted
for a majority of the deaths among ⬍6-year-olds, and
violence was the cause of death for those who wereⱕ6
years of age.7
Children of Darfur: To Inflict Bodily and/or Mental Harm
It is now estimated by the UN that up to 3 million Darfur children are in harm’s way. The attacks by the Jan-jaweed (“devil on a horse”) on villages have resulted in the mass displacement of Sudanese to internal displace-ment and/or refugee camps in Chad. It has been esti-mated by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) that 1.8 million children have been internally displaced and/or
traveled externally to refugee camps.8 Once displaced,
children continue to be particularly vulnerable. This dis-placement exacerbates malnutrition, acute and chronic disease, and the emotional trauma of lost loved ones, confinement, and the ongoing fear of attack by armed militias. The genocide includes a “strategy of systematic FIGURE 1
and deliberate starvation” of those who are trying to survive in displacement camps within Darfur’s borders.9
It has been estimated that up to 20% of children
younger than 5 years are experiencing malnutrition.10
There are 20 million persons who lack access to basic sanitation and 17 million, many of them children, lack access to potable water. It is estimated that the mortality rate of those who are younger than 5 years is now at 10%, with malaria, respiratory infections, and diarrheal disease killing⬎100 000 children annually.11
Rwanda’s Orphans: Adversely Affecting Life’s Basic Survival Needs
The Rwandan massacre of 1994 resulted in the loss of many children, similar to the loss of life during the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia under Pol Pot. How-ever, a unique situation has emerged from this African country: the large number of children who have lost parents. A recent UNICEF report revealed that 80% of Rwandan children interviewed had lost at least 1 family member. It is estimated that immediately after the geno-cide there were 90 000 to 115 000 orphans, and by 1996, more than 5000 children were being cared for in
52 orphanages throughout Rwanda.12 In addition, a
large percentage of children and youth found them-selves living together on the streets and/or in YHHs. In 1998, UNICEF reported that there were up to 300 000 children living in child-headed households.13By the
re-moval of adults, the children are forced to live in insular poverty, where basic human rights are ignored or are difficult to obtain. The right to economic and social justice is denied because of their inability to achieve basic human needs such as adequate food and shelter and barriers to obtaining a necessary primary education. These issues adversely affect their growth and develop-ment. A recent study revealed that a majority of young children living in YHHs are in fair or poor health and that depression and social isolation are frequent symptoms.14
Bangladesh Gendercide: Violence Against Women
The partition of the south Asian continent resulted in a predominantly Hindu India and Muslim Pakistan in 1947–1948. However, the Pakistan nation was geo-graphically separated into a west and east Pakistan sep-arated by the northern region of India and by ethnic and language differences. The government was based in west Pakistan. After a major flood of east Pakistan in August of 1970, the west Pakistan relief efforts were viewed as inadequate and poorly administered. Many in Europe and the United States recall the Concert for Bangladesh that George Harrison and Ravi Shankar sponsored in 1971 for famine relief. The famine indeed was secondary to the natural disaster flood of 1970. However, famine and war frequently go hand in hand, and the famine was accentuated by a west Pakistan response to east Paki-stan’s call for greater autonomy, which led to a repres-sive response by the government that escalated into a “root-to-branch” effort to eliminate the Bengalese resis-tance. There was mass killing of men and women. How-ever, it was the “gendercide” and the systematic
large-scale sexual violence toward women that characterized this genocidal event. It was not only characterized by the gang rape of Bengalese girls and women but also the brutal physical violence that often resulted in their dis-figurement and/or death.15In addition, the intent of the
violence was also to decimate the reproductive health of an ethnic group. It must be remembered that in the Muslim faith, virginity is sanctified, and there is a strong prohibition against premarital sex. The exploitation and violation of Bengalese women was an effort to eliminate future births of subsequent generations.
Argentina’s “Lost Children”: The Illegal Transference of Children
A military coup led to the overthrow of Argentina’s government and President Isabel Peron in 1976 and was replaced by a dictatorship that governed from 1976 to 1983. During this regime it is estimated that up to 30 000 Argentineans “disappeared” because of their political be-liefs and presumed threat to the new military dictator-ship.16One of the most unethical and atrocious aspects of
these killings was that women who were pregnant were allowed to complete their pregnancies before their exe-cutions; their infants were given up for illegal adoptions to military families, in essence to be raised by the insti-tution that murdered their parents. There has been an international call for Argentina to provide a fuller ac-count of these missing children. It is important to note that Jorge Videla, who led the coup and became Argen-tina’s de facto president from 1976 to 1981, was arrested in connection with human rights abuses under the mil-itary dictatorship. He was imprisoned in 1985 but was then pardoned by President Carols Menem in 1990. However, he was rearrested in 1998, specifically in re-lation to the seizure and illegal adoption of 5 children to military families. A group of women in 1977 formed the Abuelas (Grandmothers) de Plaza de Mayo, who
con-tinue to search for ⬎200 of these “lost children” who
disappeared with their parents after being taken into custody by members of the police or military security forces.17
CONCLUSIONS
to support our colleagues who are participating in relief efforts, such as those working with Doctors Without Borders. Finally, as physicians, we no longer need to travel the world to influence the health of international children. Many families and children have emigrated to our communities from both developed and developing countries, so we must remain vigilant in our awareness of international events. Most specifically, we must assist those children who have survived genocide as they struggle to restore their health and rediscover their dreams.
REFERENCES
1. Lifton BJ. The King of Children: The Life and Death of Janusz Korczak. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2005
2. United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Avail-able at: www.un.org/Overview/rights.html. Accessed July 23, 2007
3. LeBlanc LJ. The Convention on the Rights of the Child: United Nations Lawmaking on Human Rights. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press; 1995
4. Robertson G.Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice. New York, NY: New Press; 2006
5. Powers S.A Problem From Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. New York, NY: Harper Perennial; 2003:505
6. Genocide Studies Program. The Cambodian genocide program. Available at: www.yale.edu/cgp/index.html. Accessed August 18, 2007
7. Zimmer A, Knodel J, Kim KS, Puch S. The legacy of the Khmer
Rouge period and its aftermath: the case of Cambodia’s elderly. Available at: http://iussp2005.princeton.edu/download.aspx? submissionId⫽50258. Accessed July 23, 2007
8. Steidle B.The Devil Came on Horseback: Bearing Witness to the Genocide in Darfur. New York, NY: Public Affairs; 2007 9. Flint J, De Waal A.Darfur:A Short History of a Long War. New
York, NY: Zed Books, Ltd; 2005:113
10. United Nations Children’s Fund. Child alert Darfur. Available at: www.unicef.org/childalert/darfur/Child%20Alert%20Darfur. pdf. Accessed December 7, 2007
11. United Nations Children’s Fund. Darfur overview. Available at: www.unicef.org/infobycountry/sudan㛭darfuroverview.html. Ac-cessed July 23, 2007
12. Geltman P, Stover E. Genocide and the plight of children in Rwanda.JAMA.1997;277(4):289 –292, 293–294
13. United Nations Children’s Fund.The State of the World’s Children 2005: Children Under Threat. New York, NY: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2004
14. Boris NW, Thurman TR, Snider L, Spenser E, Brown L. Infants and young children in youth-headed households in Rwanda: implication of emerging data.Infant Ment Health J.2006;27(6): 584 – 602
15. Jones A.Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge Press; 2006
16. US Department of State. Argentina country report on human rights practices for 1998. Available at: www.state.gov/www/ global/human㛭rights/1998㛭hrp㛭report/argentin.html. Accessed July 23, 2007
17. Taylor D. Making a spectacle: the mothers of the Plaza de Mayo.J Assoc Res Mothering.2001;3(2):97–109
AMERICAN BOARD OF PEDIATRICS
Candidates Who Passed the Certifying Examination in Neurodevelopmental Disabil-ities on September 28, 2007. Certificates valid through December 31, 2017.
Roula Choueiri, MD
Diane Auguste Cullinane, MD Maria Luisa Escolar, MD Richard I. Grossberg, MD Carol Reinhardt Hassler, MD Abigail F. Klemsz, MD Laura J. McGuinn, MD Mikhail Mirer, MD Gisela Negrin, MD Garey H. Noritz, MD Ada E. Pimentel, MD Pixie J. Plummer, MD
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-2208
2008;121;611
Pediatrics
Charles Oberg
Children of Genocide: A Legacy of Lost Dreams
Services
Updated Information &
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/121/3/611 including high resolution figures, can be found at:
References
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/121/3/611#BIBL This article cites 3 articles, 0 of which you can access for free at:
Subspecialty Collections
alth_sub
http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/international_child_he International Child Health
following collection(s):
This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
Permissions & Licensing
http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml in its entirety can be found online at:
Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or
Reprints
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-2208
2008;121;611
Pediatrics
Charles Oberg
Children of Genocide: A Legacy of Lost Dreams
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/121/3/611
located on the World Wide Web at:
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1073-0397.
