• No results found

Catholic ideals in social life

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Catholic ideals in social life"

Copied!
85
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

University of Windsor University of Windsor

Scholarship at UWindsor

Scholarship at UWindsor

Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers

1936

Catholic ideals in social life

Catholic ideals in social life

Mildred Elizabeth Sullivan University of Windsor

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation

Sullivan, Mildred Elizabeth, "Catholic ideals in social life" (1936). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5895.

https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5895

(2)

By

Sister Mary Henrietta

(Mildred Elizabeth Sullivan)

Ho l y n a m e s Co l l e g e

W I N D S O R , O N T A R I O

(3)

UMI Number: EC54072

IN F O R M A T IO N T O U S E R S

T h e quality o f this rep roduction is d e p e n d e n t upon th e quality of th e copy

subm itted. B ro ken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and

pho to g rap h s, print b le e d -th ro u g h , s u b s ta n d a rd m argins, an d im p ro p e r

a lig n m e n t c a n a d v e rs e ly a ffe c t reproduction.

In th e unlikely e v e n t th a t th e a u th o r did not send a c o m p le te m a n u s c rip t

and th e re a re m issing p a g e s , th e s e will b e noted. A lso , if u n au th o rize d

c opyright m a te ria l had to b e re m o v e d , a n o te will in d icate th e d eletio n .

U M I M icro fo rm EC54072 C o p y rig h t2 0 0 9 b y P ro Q u e s t LLC

All rights re s e rv e d . T h is m icroform edition is pro tected a g a in s t u n a u th o rize d copying u n d e r Title 17, U nited S ta te s C o d e .

P ro Q u e s t LLC

7 8 9 E a s t E is e n h o w e r P a rk w a y P .O . Box 1 3 4 6

(4)

which may be se c u re d only lay p e a c e fu l p o l i t i c s , co n g en ial

s o c ia l r e l a t i o n s , and m a te r ia l p r o s p e r ity , founded on r e l i g i o u s

mid e t h i c a l p r in c ip l e s . B ut th e c o n d itio n s upon which th e

h ap p in ess and w elfare o f mankind depend a r e v io la te d by a p o s ta ­

sy from r e l i g i o n , from C h r is tia n m o ra ls, and from c h a r i t y ,

which i s a re p u d ia tio n o f th e d o c tr in e e s ta b lis h e d by C h r is t

and fo s te r e d by th e a u x i l i a r i e s o f t h e Church o f C h r is t.

’’Peace on e a r th t o men of good w l l l i ” So sang th e

a n g e ls in harmony w ith th e message d e liv e re d to th e w orld by

j

C h r is t, th e P rin c e of Peace. And when l e was ab o u t t o le av e

I i s A p o stle s, who were d e s tin e d to c a rry His message t o o th e r s ,

Me s a id : ’’P eace I le a v e you, My peace I g iv e u n to you.” " And

His words o f p a r tin g have re-ech o e d in t h e h e a r ts , o f men down

through th e c e n tu r ie s . The d e s ir e f o r peace i s in h e re n t in

every human being ir r e s p e c tiv e o f r a c e , c o lo u r, c re e d , o r s t a t e

o f c i v i l i s a t i o n . ‘’Whoever d e s ir e s an y th in g d e s ir e s peace” I s

a t r u t h which u n d e r lie s a l l human a c t i v i t i e s and a s p ir a t i o n s ,

say s S a in t Thomas o f Aquln, th e g re a t d o c to r o f m edieval t h e ­

ology and p h ilo so p h y . But t r u e peace f o r th e in d iv id u a l,

fa m ily , o r S ta te w ill be found only where human conduct and

(5)

2

-a re seek in g -above -a l l "th e Kingdom o f God -and l i s j u s t l e e . ”

When P iu s XI ascended th e p ap al th ro n e I n 1922, th e a f t e r -

math o f th e World War en g u lfed th e w o rld , and from t h a t hour t o

t h i s he has sought w ith ard o u r and a s s id u ity to e s t a b l i s h t h e

u n iv e r s a l peace which G h rist bequeathed to H is fo llo w e rs . In

h i s f i r s t E n c y c lic a l L e t t e r , he s e t f o r t h h i s watchword and

motto:. “Pax C h r l s t i In regno C h r is t I , ” which i s th e epitom e

o f C a th o lic I d e a l s . Hever h as h e ceased in h i s e f f o r t s to

promote th e re ig n o f C h r is t and i t s p e a c e , w ith o u t which th e

lo n g in g s o f th e human h e a r t cannot be ad eq u ately s a tia te d * The

Holy F a th e r warned r u l e r s t h a t C h r is t has been excluded from

th e a re n a o f p u b lic a f f a i r s , w ith th e r e s u l t t h a t men c o n sid e r

a u th o r ity to be d e riv e d , not from to d b u t from men, so t h a t i t s

fo u n d atio n s t o t t e r . Of s p e c ia l s ig n i f i c a n c e , th e n , was th e in ­

s t i t u t i o n by P lu s XI o f a f e a s t to honour th e K ingship o f C h r i s t .

The H i s to r i c a l Background

E s ta b lis h in g C h r is tia n Eeaee: The A p o stle s co n tin u ed th e

te a c h in g o f th e M aster*s d o c trin e o f b r o th e rly la v e . The s ic k

and poor were c a re d f o r in th e homes o f th e e a r ly C h r is tia n s

who sh ared w ith them what they p o sse sse d . The E p i s t l e s r e l a t e

th e te a c h in g s and works o f th e A p o stles and d i s c i p l e s o f C h r is t.

With th e d is p e rs io n o f th e Jews throughout th e v a s t Soman Em pire,

(6)

in th e empire f a c i l i t a t e d in te rc o u rs e and a s s i s t e d t h e sp read

o f C h r i s t i a n i t y , b u t fre q u e n t p e rs e c u tio n s lim ite d th e member­

sh ip o f th e in f a n t Church, f o r only th o s e w ith a firm c o n v ic tio n

o f C h r is tia n t r u t h s would r i s k t h e i r l i v e s i n su p p o rt o f t h e i r

b e l i e f . The h ig h te n o r o f t h e i r l i v e s , e x h ib itin g e a r n e s tn e s s ,

z e a l , and h ig h m oral c h a r a c te r , brought th e s e C h r is tia n a in to

Im portant e i v l l p o s itio n s , th u s broadening t h e i r f i e l d of

s o c ia l and c i v i l inflm ence. The haughty Homans u n co n scio u sly

im m ortalized e a r ly C h r is tia n c h a r ity in t h e i r re co rd ed comment:

"See how th e s e C h r is tia n s lo v e one another.*1 Wien C o n stan tin e

made C h r i s t i a n i t y t h e S ta te r e l i g i o n , i t sp re a d r a p id ly .

As th e number o f c o n v e rts from paganism in c re a s e d , th e

Church amassed g r e a t r ic h e s . Many pagan tem ples became C h r is tia n

ch u rc h es. But S a in t Jerome lam ents t h a t as w ealth in c re a s e d ,

to o o f te n th e v i r t u e o f th e members d im in ish ed . The management

o f Church d i s c i p l i n e f e l l t o b ish o p s, who acknowledged th e

Bishop o f Some Bead o f th e Church and s u c c e ss o r o f S a in t P e te r .

The e a r ly C h r is tia n emperors r e ta in e d c e r t a i n powers over ec­

c l e s i a s t i c a l a f f a i r s u n t i l th e f i f t h c e n tu ry , b u t C h r is tia n

obedience in s p ir e d subm ission and f o s te r e d d i s c i p l i n e under

most tr y in g circu m sta n c e s.

The e f f o r t t o re c o n c ile d e e p -ro o te d pagan p r in c ip l e s w ith

C h r is tia n d o c trin e o f te n le d t o h e re sy ; n e v e r th e le s s th e e a r ly

F a th e rs o f th e Church i n combating th e s e d e v ia tio n s from th e

(7)

4

-form al dogma, and l i t u r g y r e ta in e d t o th e p re s e n t day.

J u s t l n l a m For f iv e c e n tu r ie s , th e Papacy was s u b o rd i­

n a te d to th e Emperor o f Rome, b ut th e crum bling o f th e Empire

favoured th e growing a u th o r ity o f th e Pope in s o c i a l a s w e ll a s

r e l ig i o u s m a tte rs . The Emperor, J u s t i n i a n th e t r e a t (A.D. 527-

555) fo s te r e d th e b u ild in g o f I n s t i t u t i o n s o f c h a r ity o f every

k in d and thousands o f C h r is tia n men and women g r a tu ito u s ly

lab o u red in th e i n t e r e s t s o f th e ag ed , th e c r ip p le d , th e b lin d ,

th e h e l p l e s s , th e o rp h an s, and th e p o o r.

C h r is tia n ity and S la v e ry : S la v ery was th e c u rse of

Roman s o c ie ty and d id more th a n th e b a rb a ria n s to r u in I t a l y .

As soon a s th e Church was f r e e , she concerned h e r s e l f w ith th e

s la v e s in th e Roman v i l l a s . Many were c o n v erted t o C h r i s t i a n i t y

alo n g w ith t h e i r m a ste rs. A ll c a s te d if f e r e n c e s were suppressed*

S lav es might be p r i e s t s o r b ish o p s o r even become Pope o f Rome.

H erein l i e s " th e t r u e so u rce o f a l l modern dem ocracy." (Shahan,

"The Middle A ges", p . 152) Y et s e r v a n ts and m asters le a rn e d

t h e i r re s p e c tiv e d u tie s a s fo rm u lated by S a in t P a u l. The

te a c h in g and p r a c tic e o f th e Church r e s to r e d la b o u r t o i t s

r i g h t f u l p la c e o f honour in th e minds o f men. The C h r is tia n

emperors made laws f o r th e p r o te c tio n o f s la v e s , l i b e r a t e d

th ro u g h th e I n s tru m e n ta lity o f th e Church. S la v e s became s e r f s

and were a tta c h e d t o th e s o i l . G rad u ally th e p r in c ip l e o f

" e q u a lity b e fo re th e d e ity " was a p p lie d , u n t i l s la v e ry slow ly

(8)

C h r ls tla n lz ln g th e Laws* J u s tin ia n a l s o undertook to

a b o lis h gam bling, blasphemy, p e r ju r y , and th e g r e a t e r s o c ia l

crim e s. He r e c a s t th e l a s s o f tome and made them s e rv ic e a b le

f o r a l l tim e . The r i g h t s o f th e moral code s e r e In c o rp o ra te d

In to th e le g a l code so t h a t r e l i g i o n s a s no lo n g e r s e p a r a te from

co n d u ct. The Immortal Dante p r a is e s him a s a " l i v i n g j u s t i c e 11,

who upheld th e sta n d a rd o f o rd e r and e q u ity , and th ereb y

"p laced th e world In so g r e a t peace T hat unto Jan u s was h i s tem ple c lo s e d .11

(Shahan, "The K iddle Ages", p . 104} Everywhere th e poor and th e

low ly and th e humble were c h e rish e d by th e Church in th e name o f

t h a t g r e a t f r i e n d o f a l l "who la b o u r and a re heavy burdened"

—Shose te n d e r y e t p u is s a n t c ry : " I have p i t y cm th e m u ltitu d e "

—s t i l l reso u n d s adown th e a g e s.

M onastlclam: By th e e a r ly in ro a d s of th e b a r b a ria n s ,

Soman In d u stry was e x tin g u ish e d and commerce p a ra ly z e d . The

f e r t i l e lan d s o f I t a l y and F ran ce were l e f t u n c u ltiv a te d , and

f o r e s t s o b l i t e r a t e d th e v i l l a s and p a la c e s o f Old lease. Then

a ro se a n o th e r mighty fo rc e o f th e C a th o lic Church, th e monks o f

S a in t B e n e d ic t. T h e ir r u le was adm irably s u it e d to th e s o c ia l

req u irem en ts o f th e day. I t p r e s c r ib e d e q u a lly t h e la b o u r of

th e f i e l d and th e la b o u r o f th e b r a in , and s o d u rin g th e s i x t h

and sev en th c e n tu ry , a l l iu ro p e b e n e f ite d by th e t o l l o f th e

B en e d ic tin e monks. T h e ir s e ttle m e n ts were In v a ria b ly made In

(9)

6

-b u i l t d itc h e s , -b rid g e d s tre a m s , l a i d n ecessary ro a d s; -by d ra in in g

and I r r i g a t i o n , th ey in c re a se d th e a r e a o f a r a b le la n d ; th ey

b u i l t w a lls , fe n c e s , and granges on every e s t a t e t h a t th ey had

c re a te d o u t o f n o th in g .

From th e s e monks, who counted In t h e i r ra n k s t h e b e s t edu­

c a te d and b e s t bora men o f th e tim e , th e b a rb a ria n p e a sa n ts

le a rn e d th e t r a d i t i o n s of o ld Roman a g r i c u l tu r e . The c le a re d

la n d s were le a s e d perm anently a t a nominal r e n t t o th e p e a s a n ts ,

whose c h ild r e n were k ep t busy In th e k itc h e n and b a rn s o f th e

m onastery.

The m o n a ste rie s became c e n te r s o f consumption and d i s t r i ­

b u tio n . G loth was re q u ire d f o r th e h a b its ; g rap es f o r th e a l t a r ;

s i l v e r and g o ld , iv o ry and wood, e m b ro id e rie s and t a p e s t r i e s were

c o n s ta n tly in demand t o supply th e needs o f new church f u r n i t u r e .

Thus was p la n te d th e seed o f o u r economic system , in which th e r e

should be "an ownership not lim ite d t o a few n o r absorbed by a

communistic S t a t e , but p e rso n a l to th e workers th em selv es. The

a tta in m e n t o f i t should depend upon j u s t i c e , t h r i f t and a b i l i t y ,

a id e d and guarded by C h r is tia n la w s." (H u ssle in , "Dem ocratic

I n d u s tr y " , p . 46) Thus, to o , was p re se rv e d th e le a r n in g o f an

a n c ie n t world f o r a new c i v i l i z a t i o n in which la b o u r was human­

iz e d , s a n c t i f i e d , and d ig n if ie d .

About th e m o n a ste rie s , become c e n tr e s o f In d u s tr y , grew up

(10)

saved a l l th e s o c ia l a r t s and p r o fe s s io n s which th e y had l a b o r l - .

o u sly g a th e re d from th e wreck o f traeeo-Eom an l i f e o r c re a te d anew

amid th e tu rb u le n c e and la w le ssn e ss of b arb arism . The m onastery

In firm ary I s f a t h e r o f th e modern ap o th eeary sh o p . Bvery monas­

te r y became th e home o f th e e d u c a tio n a l v i r t u e s o f economy,

o r d e r, r e g u l a r i t y , d iv is io n o f la b o u r, and f o r e s i g h t , to g e th e r

w ith th e u s e fu l v i r t u e s l i k e p a tie n c e , h u m ility , su b m issio n , and

c h a r i t y . The p r i e s t was f r ie n d o f th e p e o p le , and earn ed t h e i r

g r a t it u d e 11 by an anonymous d ev o tio n d u rin g th e thousand y e a rs

t h a t covered th e infancy o f o u r modern S t a t e s . 1* (Sfaahan, "The

Middle Ages", p . 159)

A u th o rity ; As th e Church n u rsed th e common weal o f th e

dev elo p in g n a tio n s , so a ls o m s she c r e a tin g th e " C h r is tia n Law

o f N a tio n s", th e fo re ru n n e r o f our p re s e n t I n te r n a tio n a l Law.

The common law o f th e gospel and g e n e ra l customs o f C h r is tia n

l i f e and experience c o n s titu te d th e b a s is o f le g a l p ro c e d u re s,

ir a d u a lly th e r e grew up an u n w ritte n code t h a t governed th e

c i v i l i z e d w orld, th e l i f e - g i v i n g c e n tre of which was th e P rin p e

o f P eace, s o l i c i t i n g mankind t o fo llo w Him. The Church c a lle d

men t o obey n o t a human w ill b u t th e d iv in e w i l l o f C h r i s t ,

whose messages were h e ra ld e d th roughout Europe by b ish o p s and

m is s io n a rie s . E u le rs o f every n a tio n q u a ile d b e fo re th e s p i r i t ­

u a l arrow s o f th e s e h o ly men—th e unholy re lin q u is h e d th e e s ­

t a t e s th e y had robbed; th e o rp h a n s' r i g h t s were v in d ic a te d , and

(11)

8

-and l i f e was d e c la re d s a c re d . Canon Law, which com prises th e

r o le s and r e g u la tio n s e s ta b lis h e d by th e a u th o r ity o f th e Church,

to o k form , and th e C hurch’s s p i r i t o f peace p e n e tr a te d every

sphere o f l i f e . The obedience demanded was h a rd and h u m ilia tin g

but i t c le a n se d and com forted th e s o u l and made men G odlike.

Such an a u th o r ity , which was a b le to w ith sta n d th e s e l f i s h

tu r b u le n t te n d e n c ie s of th e f i r s t C h r is tia n em perors, and th e

whims and v a g a rie s o f th e newly C h r is tia n is e d b a r b a ria n s , I s

cap ab le o f coping w ith any c i v i l a u th o r ity . Thus M edieval

a u th o r ity le a rn e d from th e Church th e n a tu r e , scope, and s p i r i t

of a u th o r ity . “I t le a rn e d how to tem per s e v e r ity w ith m ild n ess;

how t o r e s t r a i n th e ard o u r o f J u s tic e by e q u ity and prudence;

how t o I n s i s t on th e w r itte n evidence and t o p re se rv e th e

re c o rd s ; how t o surround J u s tic e w ith due so le m n ity ." (Shahan,

“The Middle Ages", p . 169}

Men were ta u g h t t o look on p u b lic l i f e from a moral p o in t

o f view , a s a t r u s t to be used w ith co n sc ie n c e . P u b lic l i f e in

th e Middle Ages was dominated by “th e sen se o f p e r s o n a lity and

th e sen se o f r e s p o n s i b il i t y " . The end o f human s o c ie ty th e n

seemed tb be n o t th e s e c u rin g of co m fo rts, and th e in c re a s in g

and h o ard in g o f w o rld ly f o r tu n e , b u t a means t o enable men to

know, lo v e , and s e rv e th e M aster h e re on e a r th and be happy

w ith Him h e r e a f t e r .

In sav in g th e Roman Law from d e s tr u c tio n by th e b a rb a ria n

(12)

s p l r i t and th e p r in c ip le s o f s o c ia l a u th o r ity in th e S t a t e .

"The homely re p u b lic a n v i r t u e s o f Old Rome, th e humane and d i s ­

c rim in a tin g s o u l o f Greek p h ilo so p h y , th e t r a d i t i o n o f a golden

age o f e q u a lity and s im p lic ity , a r e lig io u s re s p e c t f o r d i s t r i b u ­

t i v e J u s t i c e , a g r e a t s e n s e o f th e u t i l i t y and lo v e lin e s s of

peace and harmony,—a l l th e s e a r e so many v i s i b l e t r a i t s o f th e

toman law t h a t re n d e r i t a p p lic a b le in a l l tim e s t o a l l man­

k in d ." (Shahan, “The Middle A ges", p . 190)

Prom th e sem i-savages developed p o l i t e in d u s tr io u s n a tio n s ;

f 1*0111 Ig n o ran t b r u t a l w a rrio rs were formed C h r is tia n K nights and

s o l d i e r s ; from th e enemies o f th e f in e a r t s were fash io n e d c

cunning a r t i f i c e r s and c raftsm en ; out o f th e scum o f humanity

b eaten down by th e Roman sword grew gentlem en l i k e Bayard and

l a d i e s l i k e Blanche of C a s t i l e .

The g r e a t amalgamation o f n a tio n s s u b s e rv ie n t t o a common

u n d ersta n d in g o f th e p r in c ip l e s o f l i f e , under one d i r e c t in g

head a t Rome, was made p o s s ib le only by th e supreme in flu e n c e

o f r e l i g i o n . And t h i s o rg an ized worship of God l i e s a t th e

b a s is o f a l l European c i v i l i z a t i o n . The C h r is tia n people b e­

came "bound to g e th e r by t i e s h o l i e r and deep er th a n r a c e , o r

to n g u e ,o r n a t i o n a l i t y , o r human c u ltu r e could c r e a t e —a sen se

o f mutual r e s p o n s i b i l i t y , a p u b lic c o n scien ce, and a p u b lic

w i l l ." (S h a h a n ,T h e K iddle Ages", p . 210)

The g r e a t modern v e r n a c u la rs were th en formed from th e

(13)

1 0

-o f th e Church, wh-ose p -o lic y has ev er been t -o re s p e c t th e n a tu r a l

and t r a d i t i o n a l In every people t o whom she c a r r i e s th e g o sp e l.

Many of th e n a tio n a l e p ic s were made and p re se rv e d in th e monas­

t e r i e s .

“The i n s t i t u t i o n of c h iv a lr y w ith i t s m y stic i d e a l i s a t i o n

o f woman; th e ev er in c re a s in g a u th o r ity and in flu e n c e o f woman

h e r s e l f ; th e honour of s a i n t l y c h a r a c te r ; th e fu n c tio n o f th e

p ilg rim , th e monk, th e p a p a l envoy, a s d iss e m in a to rs o f g e n e ra l

view s and p r in c ip le s ; th e p u b lic a tio n o f g r e a t p ap a l documents

w ith t h e i r le n g th y argum ents; th e m u ltitu d e o f f r i a r s draw ing

t h e i r o f f ic e and a u th o r ity from a c e n t r a l so u rce and upholding

I t s p r e s t i g e a t every v i l l a g e c r o s s ; th e genuine In flu e n c e o f

th e g r e a t f e s t i v a l s ; re n u n c ia tio n o f h ig h o f f i c e and w orldly

com forts; th e fre q u e n t re fo rm a tio n o f manners—a l l th e s e and

o th e r a g e n c ie s were everywhere and a t once a t work, and h elp ed

t o g iv e th e m edieval l i f e t h a t In te n se charm o f m otion, c o lo r

and v a r i e t y 1* t h a t m e rits th e a d m ira tio n o f men in a l l a g e s .

(Shahan, “The Middle Ages**, p . 819)

feu d alism : While th e Church was e s ta b lis h in g th e s p i r i t ­

u a l kingdom of C h r is t in th e known w orld, fe u d a lism was g ra d u a lly

developing from th e tra n sfo rm a tio n of th e s la v e in to th e s e r f .

L and-holding was th e fo u n d atio n on which a l l s o c ia l l i f e depended,

s in c e a l l men were in some way a tta c h e d to th e la n d . The w ealthy

land-ow ners c o n tr o lle d g r e a t e s t a t e s on which th e y r e ta in e d a

(14)

p a id him re n t not in money, but in s e rv ic e a s he re q u ire d :

m i l i t a r y , in tim e o f war; a g r i c u l t u r a l , in tim e o f p eace. The

m edieval manor was s e lf - s u p p o r tin g , and a w ell-co n d u cted e s ta te

was c h a ra c te riz e d by p e a c e fu l In d u s try . la e h fam ily produced

Independently th e n ecessary c lo th in g , food and s h e l t e r r e q u ire d ,

i s th e s e r f was in r e a l i t y a sm a ll p a r tn e r in th e concern and

sh ared i t s p r o f i t s , he was th u s encouraged t o do h i s b e s t work.

And in th o se days th e nobleman and p e a sa n t met on a common

f o o tin g in th e v i l l a g e church.

Peace G u ild s: At an e a r ly d a te , th e freem en banded t o ­

g e th e r , form ing an a s s o c ia tio n c a lle d th e Peace G u ild , th e

o b je c t o f which was to m a in ta in p u b lic peace; to p re se rv e th e

l i f e , honour and p ro p e rty o f in d iv id u a ls ; to se c u re J u s tic e when

feu d s a ro s e . R e lig io u s c h a r ity and brotherhood were dom inant

p r in c ip le s in th e g u ild s t a t u t e s . Honesty was guarded in a

s p e c ia l way, and s t e a l i n g was s e v e re ly punished by th e g u ild

c o u r t. The poor and a f f l i c t e d re c e iv e d s p e c ia l c o n s id e ra tio n ,

and p ilg rim s were given a s s is ta n c e in accom plishing th e f u l f i l ­

ment o f p io u s vows. Everywhere th e same fo rc e s were a t work and

a l l g u ild s promoted th e C h r is tia n id e a l of b ro th e rh o o d , r e l i g i o n ,

m utual h e lp fu ln e s s and s o c ia l f e llo w s h ip among e q u a ls . Thus,

when n ot engaged in work f o r t h e i r o v e r lo rd , th e craftsm en were

f r e e to p r a c t i s e t h e i r v a rio u s t r a d e s . G re a te r freedom gradu­

a l l y developed, u n t i l a man was p e rm itte d to s u b s t i t u t e th e pay­

(15)

1 2

-serfdom i t s e l f passed o ut o f e x is te n c e .

Merchant Q u llds: In th e e a r l i e s t lab o u r g u ild , c a lle d th e

m erchant g u ild , each craftsm an was lik e w is e a m erchant. He manu­

f a c tu re d h i s wares and p e rs o n a lly s o ld them in h i s own sh o p , in

th e m arket, o r a t th e f a i r . He purchased th e raw m a te r ia l o f h i s

t r a d e , and th u s a system o f tr a d e developed. The merchant g u ild

was a p r o te c tio n a g a in s t th e fe u d a l lo r d , and s p e c ia l c h a r t e r s

s h ie ld e d th e guildsm en from u n lic e n se d co m p e titio n o f non-members

and f o r e ig n e r s . U nlike tr a d in g m onopolies o f our day , which

c o n c e n tra te t r a d e in th e hands o f a few , th e s e g u ild s sought to

u n ite a l l e l i g i b l e m erchants and craftsm en o f th e town. In f a c t ,

th e town developed and p ro sp ered alo n g w ith th e g u ild .

A nother o b je c t o f th e g u ild m s t o s e t a f a i r p r ic e on

goods t h a t would s a t i s f y consumer and tradesm an a l i k e . Heavy

f in e s were imposed f o r c h e a tin g , and f o r p o o r work; m oreover,

no in d iv id u a l o r group could monopolize any p ro d u c t, f e n l u s

c o n s is te d not in accum ulating f o rtu n e b u t in p ro d u cin g th e

most p e r f e c t a r t i c l e f o r th e consumer. The s o c ia l j u s t i c e o f

th e Middle Ages looked upon u n f a i r co m p e titio n a s d e s p ic a b le ,

every man b e in g given a f a i r chance in h i s own rank o f s o c ie ty .

B esides a f f e c t i n g tra d e and commerce, th e g u ild s e x e rc ise d

s e v e ra l im portant c i v i c f u n c tio n s . The s u p e rv is io n o f s a n ita r y

c o n d itio n s , th e c a re o f l e p e r s , defence o f th e town, a s s is ta n c e

in tim e of f lo o d , shipw reck, f i r e , ro b b e ry , and tem porary p e c u n i­

(16)

m erchant g u ild o f a town. The g u ild tre a s u r y alw ays r e ta in e d

s u f f i c i e n t money t o p rovide f o r o ld a g e , im poverished b r e th re n ,

and a l l c a s e s o f emergency. The fundam ental id e a l o f th e g u ild

was t o h e lp one a n o th e r whenever and however a s s is ta n c e might

be re q u ire d . In th e minds of th e s e sim ple gulldsm en, r e l ig i o n

was not m erely th e h u m anltarianlsm o f th e C h r is tia n S o c i a l i s t .

I t Im plied com pliance w ith f a i t h , dogma, and e x te r n a l w orship,

a s w ell a s te n d e r s o li c i t u d e f o r th e tem poral needs o f th e

n eighbour. "The sc ie n c e o f p h ila n th ro p y was n ev er a g a in t o

re a c h th e development i t a t t a i n e d in th e K iddle Ages, b u t i t

was in s p ire d by r e l i g i o n and t h e r e f o r e became c h a r ity because

done in th e name o f C h r is t." (H u ssle in , "Dem ocratic In d u s try " ,

p . 141) Many a s o c ia l e v i l was s c i e n t i f i c a l l y a v e rte d by

C h r is tia n lo v e . E n tru ste d w ith a l l t h a t concerned t h e s o c ia l

improvement o f th e town, t h e merchant g u ild l e g i s l a t e d w ith

th e aim o f p la c in g s o c ia l I n t e r e s t s above e l a s s o r in d iv id u a l

i n t e r e s t s . T h is , in d e e d , i s th e supreme id e a l t o be a t t a i n e d in

a l l s o c ia l o rg a n iz a tio n and l e g i s l a t i o n .

A r ts and C r a f ts : No modem s o c ia l movement a ro u se s th e

I n t e r e s t o f men more th a n t h a t o f th e a r t s and c r a f t s . I t te n d s

t o l i f t th e working man up above th e mere machine he might be­

come th ro u g h monotonous o ccu p atio n a t h i s t r a d e . I t r e q u i r e s a

workman " to u se h i s i n t e l l e c t in th e d e s ig n in g , h i s t a s t e in th e

arrangem ent, and h i s a r t i s a n s k i l l f o r th e ex e c u tio n o f b e a u tif u l

(17)

1 4

-p . 124) The movement w ill do more to so lv e th e -problem of

s o c ia l u n rest, th an s o c ia l a g i t a t i o n which to o o fte n r a i s e s hopes

t h a t a re d e s tin e d t o be u n re a liz e d to th e g r e a te r d isap p o in tm en t

o f th e la b o u rin g nan . But a s o lu tio n could be found in g iv in g

men such an I n t e r e s t In t h e i r l i f e work, t h a t t h e i r c h ie f

p le a s u re would be found In t h e i r o c c u p a tio n , t o which th e y would

d a lly r e tu r n anxious t o accom plish what f a tig u e and tim e fo rc e d

them t o lea v e u n fin is h e d on th e p rev io u s day.

The men who worked on th e C a th e d ra ls of th e t h i r t e e n t h

c e n tu ry co u ld d i r e c t th e a r t i s a n s o f to -d a y to th e h a p p in e ss

th ey se e k . Every man who worked around a c a th e d ra l had th e oppor­

t u n i t y of g iv in g e x p ressio n t o th e b e s t t h a t was in him. "Every

p o rtio n o f th e C a th e d ra l was to be made a s b e a u tif u l a s th e mind

o f man could co n ceiv e, h i s t a s t e could p la n and h i s hands could

a c h ie v e ." ( l a l s h , "The T h ir te e n th , The G re a te s t of C e n tu rie s " ,

p . 125) Thus th e c a r p e n te r ex p ressed h im se lf in th e woodwork,

and th e b lack sm ith dem onstrated h i s s k i l l in th e h in g e s and la tc h

f o r th e door. Each man was In r e a l i t y a d e s ig n e r and an ex ec u to r

o f th e work a ssig n ed t o him. The sen se o f co m p etitio n must have

s t i r r e d th o se men t o th e d ep th s o f t h e i r s o u ld , y e t th e y were

not In sp ire d by a h e a r t l e s s r i v a l r y t h a t c ru sh e s when I t su c c e e d s,

b ut th e y were Inflam ed w ith a d e s ir e to do th e b e s t p o s s ib le w ith ­

o ut b e l i t t l i n g th e e f f o r t s o f o th ers,. Those men tu rn e d w ith c o n f i­

dence t o to d f o r Whose g lo ry th ey lab o u red ; and th ey found a Joy

(18)

town and fellow -townsm en. To forw ard a r t and a r c h i t e c t u r e ,

te c h n ic a l sc h o o ls developed around th e c a th e d r a ls .

E d u catio n : In th e Middle Ages, th e p e a san t was g iv en l i t t l e

o r no b o o k -le a rn in g . Medieval e d u c a tio n was in th e hands of th e

e c c l e s i a s t i c s , and th e sc h o o ls were o r ig i n a l l y founded f o r th o se

who Intended to devote t h e i r l i v e s to th e Church i n t e r e s t s . By

th e end o f th e tw e lf th c e n tu ry , p r o fe s s o r s formed a g u ild to

which was given th e name " u n iv e r s ity " . t r e a t c e n tr e s o f le a r n in g

f lo u r is h e d everyw here, and were g e n e ra lly connected w ith c a th e d r a ls ,

m o n a ste rie s and g u ild s . Both s tu d e n ts and m a ste rs were s u b je c t to

g u ild a u th o r ity . These e a r ly C ath o lic U n iv e r s itie s were in th e

s t r i c t e s t se n se p o p u la r and d em ocratic i n s t i t u t i o n s . In a l l edu­

c a tio n a l m a tte r s , th e r e was u n iv e r s a l confidence in th e judgment

and j u s t i c e o f th e Papacy from th e n in th cen tu ry t o th e tim e o f

th e c o u n te r-re fo rm a tio n in th e s ix te e n th .

To a s s i s t th e poor in o b ta in in g th e b e n e f its of le a r n in g ,

th e Church ( i n th e T hird L ateran C ouncil A.B. 1179) p re s c rib e d

t h a t a b e n e fic e be assig n ed in every c a th e d ra l church t o a sc h o o l­

m a ste r, who would te a c h th e poor c l e r i c s and s c h o la rs f r e e of

ch arg e. ‘Thus began th e System o f f r e e p u b lic s c h o o ls . 11 The de­

mocracy o f le a rn in g a s o f in d u s try was th e n a tu r a l r e s u l t o f th e

gen u in ely dem ocratic s p i r i t of th e C a th o lic Church which h a s nev er

changed s in c e th e U a llle a n fish erm an was made th e lo c k on which

C h ris t c o n s tru c te d i t . ” (H u ssle in , ’'D em ocratic I n d u s tr y " , p . 245)

(19)

- 16

-o f te a c h in g everyb-ody t -o read and w r i te , b u t I t was a tr a in i n g

o f th e f a c u l t i e s so t h a t th e In d iv id u a l n ig h t e x p re ss what was

b e s t in him. l e t th e age produced a D ante, th e most u n iv e r s a l

o f p o e ts , whose "D lvina ConuaedlaH i s more th a n a m ag n ifice n t

poem, o r th e opening o f a n a tio n a l l i t e r a t u r e , i t I s one o f th o s e

r a r e and solemn monuments o f th e m in d 's power which measure and

a t t e s t to what i t can a t t a i n .

L i t e r a t u r e ; L a tin was u n iv e r s a lly known and L a tin hymns

e x e rte d an u p l i f t i n g and c u l t u r a l in flu e n c e on th e masses. These

hymns a r e among th e g r e a te s t poems e v er w r itte n . They were th e

e x p re ssio n of th e r e l ig i o u s s e n tim e n ts t h a t a r i s e In th e s o u l

under v a ry in g circu m stan ces—Joy, sorrow , fe rv o u r and e c s ta s y .

The D ies I r a e i s reg ard ed by modern L a tin s c h o la rs t o be a trium ph

o f L a tin l i t e r a t u r e . The famous S ta b a t M ater o f Jacapone da Todi

h as been c o n sid e re d by some c r i t i c s a s q u ite a s b e a u t i f u l a s th e

D ies I r a e in p o e tic e x p re ss io n , though below i t a s p o e try because

o f th e l e s s e r su b lim ity o f i t s s u b je c t. Even d is tin g u is h e d p ro ­

f e s s o r s o f philosophy and th eo lo g y o c c a s io n a lly in d u lg ed them selves

in th e p r iv ile g e of w ritin g L a tin hymns and, what i s more s u r ­

p r is i n g , succeeded in making p o e try o f a v ery h ig h o r d e r. Among

th e s e a r e S t. Bonaventure, th e F ra n c isc a n , and S t . Thomas of

Aquin, th e Dominican. S t . B onaventure*s hymns on th e P a ssio n and

G ross o f C h ris t re p re s e n t what h a s been most b e a u t i f u ll y sung on

th e s e s u b je c ts in a l l th e a g e s. S t . Thomas' p o e tic work c e n te r s

(20)

so devoted t h a t th e com position o f th e o f f ic e f o r I t s f e a s t was

co n fid ed t o him by th e Pope. Doctor James J . Walsh pays t r i b u t e

to th e genius o f S t . Thomas o f Aquin In th e fo llo w in g words:

* I t h a s Indeed been c o n sid e re d alm ost m irac u lo u s, t h a t

t h i s pro fo u n d est of th in k e r s sh o u ld have been a b le t o a t t a i n

w ith in th e bounds o f rhyme and rhythm , th e a c c u ra te e x p re ssio n

o f some of th e most i n t r i c a t e th e o lo g ic a l th o u g h ts t h a t have e v er

been ex p ressed , and y e t should have accom plished h i s purpose w ith

a c l a r i t y o f language, a s im p lic ity and d ir e c tn e s s o f w ords, a

p o e tic sympathy o f f e e l i n g , and an u t t e r d e v o tio n , t h a t make h i s

hymns g r e a t l i t e r a t u r e in th e b e s t se n se o f th e w ord.”

Music: The music o f th e c e n tu ry i s a s g r e a t a trium ph a s

any o th e r f e a tu r e o f i t s accom plishm ent. The g e n e ra tio n t h a t

produced c a th e d r a ls gave t o th e w orld t h a t most s u it a b l e m usical

form f o r c o n g re g a tio n a l s in g in g , th e G regorian c h a n t, which

reached th e acme o f i t s development in th e t h i r t e e n t h c e n tu ry .

And t h e C a th o lic Church, a f t e r having t r i e d modem m usic, i s r e ­

tu rn in g to t h i s m edieval m usical mode f o r d e v o tio n a l e x p re ssio n .

The Church music gave b i r t h t o th e p o p u lar music o f th e tim e w ith

i t s " g le e songs* and " fo lk m usic*, and in s p ir e d tro u b a d o u r p o e ts

who chanted th e leg en d s t o p e a s a n ts d ep riv ed o f books.

P rose: The v a s t w ealth o f p ro se l i t e r a t u r e in c lu d e s th e

p h ilo so p h ic and th e o lo g ic p ro se o f S a in t Thomas A quinas, V incent

o f B eauvais, th e e n c y c lo p e d is t, and John Duns S co tu s; th e numerous

(21)

1 8

-and l i t e r a r y -and s c i e n t i f i c works o f a l l d e s c r ip tio n . The energy

and c u ltu r e o f th e p e rio d o u s t have been e x c e p tio n a l, s in c e t h i s

g r e a t s to r e o f l i t e r a r y p ro d u c tio n s was l e f t t o f u tu r e g e n e ra tio n s

one hundred and f i f t y y e a rs b e fo re p r in tin g was in v e n te d .

Mystery P la y s : Nor d id th e Church f o rg e t t o p ro v id e a

so u rce of amusement, a form o f drama, t h a t M s been p o p u la r in

a l l a g e s. The m ystery p la y s were s y s te m a tic a lly o rg an ized to

c e le b r a te r e l ig i o u s f e s t i v a l s in an a p p ro p ria te manner. As no

p r i n t i n g p r e s s e x is te d , and books could n o t e a s ily be o b ta in e d

by th e m asses, th e s e p la y s pro v id ed an en jo y ab le means o f edu­

c a tin g th e p e o p le . About th e b i b l i c a l n a r r a t i v e s was woven a

th re a d o f humour t h a t enhanced th e i n t e r e s t . A ll th e town people

were engaged in th e n ec e ssa ry p re p a ra tio n f o r th e p ro d u c tio n o f

th e plays* This provided a d iv e rs io n from th e r o u tin e o f t h e i r

r e g u la r l i v e s . The e le v a te d th o u g h ts in s p ir e d must have p rev en ted

much debasing d is s ip a tio n among th e p o o re r c la s s e s .

The Bookmen: Medieval books had to be made by hand, th e

parchment u se d , b in d in g , c u ttin g o f s h e e t s , copying o f s c r i p t ,

were a l l hand work. I t was p a r t o f th e l i f e in every m onastery

t o make books, and f o r s e v e ra l h o u rs d a lly th e monks lab o u red in

th e s c rip to riu m , where m an u sc rip ts were c a r e f u lly c o p ied , l a t e r ,

s c r ib e s were found w herever e d u ca tio n was c a r r ie d on. The number

o f books was n o t l a r g e , but th e y were works o f a r t in every

p a r t i c u l a r . C lo se ly a l l i e d to th e work o f th e s c r i b e m s t h a t o f

(22)

e e n tu ry a re amongst th e most b e a u tif u l examples o f m edieval a r t

i n e x is te n c e . Men a p p re c ia te d th e books f o r t h e i r v a lu e and

b e a u ty .

L ib r a r ie s : The L ib r a r ie s were connected w ith a m onastery

o r u n i v e r s i t y . Reading and stu d y was an im portant p a r t o f a monk’s

l i f e , i’he books were k ep t in g r e a t cupboards in t h e c l o i s t e r , b u t

a s th e number in c re a s e d , s p e c ia l rooms were s e t a p a r t where th ey

were s to r e d . A fte r th e fo u rte e n th c e n tu ry , th e u n i v e r s i t i e s used

s e p a ra te b u ild in g s a s l i b r a r i e s .

Kings and p rin c e s began c o l l e c t i n g books and th u s was l a i d

th e fo u n d a tio n o f th e g re a t l i b r a r i e s o f Europe. The p r o f e s s o r s

a t Sorbonne bequeathed t o th e l i b r a r y w hatever books th ey c o l­

l e c t e d , so in tim e i t became th e b e s t l i b r a r y in Europe. Manu­

s c r i p t s were borrowed from o th e r l i b r a r i e s and were co p ied by t h e

s c r i b e s , o r d u p lic a te c o p ie s were made and exchanged t o a v o id th e

r i s k e n ta ile d in th e Journey from p la c e to p la c e . I n 1212, th e

d io cesan c o u n c il o f F a r ls a d v ise d r e l ig i o u s to len d books, and t h e

p r a c tic e in c re a se d and promoted t h e sp read o f le a r n in g , from th e

e a r l i e s t tim e s , books on m sdleine were c o lle c te d a t th e H otel

b le u , th e g re a t h o s p ita l o f P a r i s . I t p o ssessed t h e f i r s t h o s p i­

t a l l i b r a r y .

C ity H o s p ita ls : Bf h i l e th e t h i r t e e n t h c e n tu ry was engaged

In s o lv in g th e problems o f t h e h ig h e r e d u c a tio n and o f te c h n ic a l

ed u catio n f o r th e m asses, and was occupied w ith th e q u e s tio n s o f

(23)

2 d

-and more d i r e c t l y s o c ia l -and h u m an itarian works were not neg­

l e c t e d .'1 (Walsh, “The T h ir te e n th , The t r e a t e s t o f C e n tu rie s " ,

p . 337)

C h r is tia n c h a r ity le d people to open t h e i r h o rn s to c a re

f o r th e s ic k s tr a n g e r w ith a sen se o f human duty more b in d in g

th a n In th e modem w orld, and w ith a s o li c i t u d e n ot u n d ersto o d

In our c o ld e r age. But a s numbers of s ic k and In ju re d In c rea sed

t h e i r c a re became a problem o f deep im po rtan ce, and a movement

began which h a s proved t o be o f f a r- re a c h in g p r a c t i c a l benevo­

le n c e . Pope Innocent I I I (1204) e s ta b lis h e d th e m other c i t y

h o s p it a l a t Rome* Bishops o f many c e n tr e s In th e C h r is tia n is e d

c o u n tr ie s were in s p ir e d by t h e in flu e n c e and enthusiasm o f t h e

pope, who had humbled em perors and deposed k in g s , and y e t could

tu r n an eye o f sympathy tow ards th e poor and s i c k , and se e k th e

h e l p l e s s and n e g le c te d on th e s t r e e t s , and save fo rsa k e n c h ild r e n

from d e a th in th e w a te rs.

i t th e same tim e , L e p ro s e rie s were e re c te d where le p e r s

might re c e iv e ad eq u ate and s a n ita r y a t t e n t i o n , and be is o l a t e d

t o p re v e n t th e sp read o f th e d is e a s e . i s a r e s u l t o f t h i s s e g re ­

g a tio n , le p ro sy d isa p p e are d w ith in th e n ext th r e e c e n tu r ie s ,

le s s o n s in s a n it a t i o n and p ro p h y la x is , given t o th e world in th e

t h i r t e e n t h c e n tu ry , a r e only now b e a rin g f r u i t , because d u rin g

th e in te rv e n in g c e n tu r ie s la c k o f knowledge l e d t o ignorance o f

t h e i r Importance and advantage.

(24)

o f r e l ig i o u s c o n g re g a tio n s, which would be devoted t o th e c a re

o f th e s ic k and th e ransoming of c a p tiv e s tak e n by th e S aracen s.

The s e l f - s a c r i f i c i n g s p i r i t o f th e s e r e l ig i o u s was e q u a lle d by

t h e i r z e a l in a ro u sin g an i n t e r e s t in poor c a p tiv e s . I t was in

t h i s p e rio d t h a t th e r e l ig i o u s h a b i t s worn by women o r ig in a te d .

The co v erin g o f th e head was In tro d u ced to p rev e n t sp re a d o f

d is e a s e . And s tr a n g e ly enough th e custom h a s been adopted f o r

n u rse s and d o c to rs in th e o p e ra tin g rooms o f our modern h o s p i t a l s .

S o c ia l L ife P r io r t o th e Reform ation

From a stu d y o f th e r e c o rd s , w i l l s , and h o m ilie s o f th e

p e rio d , v a lu a b le in fo rm atio n re g a rd in g s o c ia l r e l a t i o n s may be

g lean ed . A l i v e l y f a i t h In flu en c e d every d e t a i l o f l i f e and

bound to g e th e r th e s o c ia l and s u p e rn a tu ra l I n t e r e s t s o f men.

B i l l s , in d ic a tin g t h a t th e home and e s t a t e p assed from g en er­

a tio n s from f a t h e r to so n , b e a r w itn e ss to th e s tr e n g th o f th e

fam ily s p i r i t , so weakened in p re s e n t s o c ie ty . C h a rita b le i n s t i ­

t u t i o n s and th e church were endowed by th e w ealth y , because s o c ia l

a c t i v i t i e s g a th e re d about th e s e I n s t i t u t i o n s . R e lig io u s o rd e rs

ca red f o r th e s i c k , p o o r, and a f f l i c t e d ; conducted in n s f o r

t r a v e l e r s ; and perform ed th e s e r v ic e s now d e le g a te d to l e d Cross

W orkers. ^'hey were b ut t r u s t e e s o f th e accum ulated w ealth o f

o th e r s , and as in d iv id u a ls th e y enjoyed no lu x u ry .

T ra v e l and communication were o f te n e s s e n t i a l t o th e s p i r i t ­

(25)

2 2

-t o c o n s -tru c -t and r e p a i r roads and b r id g e s , and -t o b u ild h o s p i-t a l s

and ch u rch es, th e church c o n sid e red c o n tr ib u tio n s f o r t h i s p u r­

pose to be a form o f alms b e n e f itin g th e s o u l o f th e donor. S a in t

Thomas A quinas, who h a s expounded th e te a c h in g o f th e Church r e ­

g a rd in g s o c ia l l i f e , proved t h a t ’’A lm sgiving i s a p r e c e p t," s in c e

th e p re c e p t o f b r o th e rly lo v e im p lie s ’’w e ll-d o in g ’’ t o th e helg h b o r

when he i s in need. And S a in t P au l sa y s: "Bear ye one a n o th e r ’s

b u rd e n s.” (S a l. V I, 2)

" In P i e r s Plowman” (1 3 9 8 ), W illiam Langland v iv id ly p ic tu re d

th e s o c ia l c o n d itio n s o f th e ag e. While he re c o g n ise d th e e v i l s ,

he never l o s t f a i t h in Sod n o r r e s p e c t f o r r e l i g i o n . The Black

Death t h a t d e v a s ta te d Europe, r e s u l t e d in u n iv e r s a l s u f f e r in g and

p o v e rty . Although th e "Plowman" c r i t i c i z e s o f f i c i a l s , le g a l and

e c c l e s i a s t i c , who abused o f t h e i r r i g h t s o f p o s it i o n , y e t he i n ­

s i s t s on th e s o c ia l d u t i e s , and r e g a rd s t h a t r e l i g i o n v a in which

I s not m an ifested in good w orks. Like Erasmus and S a in t Thom s

More, Langland had v is io n s o f l o f t i e r t h i n g s , and b ew ailed th e

abuses he beheld around him. As K. S . S palding remarks in h i s book,

"C h ap ters in S o c ia l H is to ry ” , p . 226: "Such a s to r y co u ld have

been w r itte n only f o r a people whose r e l i g i o n was in tim a te ly bound

up w ith t h e i r c i v i c , s o c i a l , and workaday l i v e s . "

Monopolies and Usury: U n fo rtu n a te ly , a s th e g u ild s were

b ein g p e r fe c te d , t h e r e g ra d u a lly a ro se a c l a s s o f m erchants who un­

sc ru p u lo u sly s e iz e d a monopoly on c e r t a i n goods o f exchange, which

(26)

s p l r l t o f greed and © raving f o r w ealth developed, and th e ex­

trem es o f w ealth and po v erty became s e p a ra te d by a l a s t i n g

b a r r i e r . The poor were d e sp ise d and downtrodden w hile th e r ic h

gained In power and a rro g a n c e . Trade and commerce came t o be

co n sid e red a s d is g r a c e f u l and d ish o n e s t b u sin e s s owing to abuses

In tro d u ced by w ealthy t r a d e r s . M oreover, th e I n te r n a tio n a l

tr a d e r e s u l t i n g from th e C rusades, Involved exchanging and lo a n in g

o f money. Money-changers soon e s ta b lis h e d th e s o c ia l d is o r d e r o f

u s u ry . ''Woe to th e day when th e r e i n s f e l l In to hands o f w e a lth ,

and gold began to b e g e t e v e r more and more gold.19 w rote

Wimpheling. A b i t t e r f e e lin g f o r th e u su rio u s Jews s e iz e d th e

h ig h and th e low, and th ey were banished from many c i t i e s , th e

innocent s u f f e r in g w ith th e g u i l t y . The Popes o f th e age In t u r n

sought to r e s t r a i n th e rag e o f C h ristism r u l e r s a g a in s t th e Jew ish

p o p u lace. To re p la c e th e u s u rio u s system w ith a J u s t method of

le n d in g and borrow ing money, banks were e s ta b lis h e d , and th e Church

favoured and encouraged th e movement.

The Mendicant F r i a r s : The te a c h in g o f th e Church re g a rd in g

money q u e s tio n s would have been I n e f f e c tiv e w ith o u t th e power o f

example. As th e monks o f S a in t B enedict ta u g h t t h e wandering

n a tio n s o f Europe th e C h r is tia n id e a l o f la b o u r, so when th e

C h r is tia n n a tio n s became wedded t o w ealth and lu x u ry , i t was S a in t

F ra n c is o f A s s is i (1181-1226) who won th e h e a r t s o f th e people

from th e greed and p le a s u re of th e w orld. H is s p i r i t i s e n t i r e l y

(27)

2 4

-modern l i f e . He b elie v e d t h a t h ap p in ess c o n s is ts In com plete

freedom from u n s a ti s f i e d d e s i r e s . To him duty was s e l f - d e n i a l ,

n o t s e lf - s e e k in g under any p r e t e x t . H is supreme id e a l was

li v i n g th e g o sp e l. The C h r is tia n p eo p les o f th e t h i r t e e n t h

c e n tu ry , in d eed , b e lie v e d th e g o sp e l; but th e m a jo rity f a i l e d

t o u n d erstan d and t o p r a c t i s e i t , and th e chasm between t h e o r e t i c a l

and p r a c t i c a l f a i t h became w ider and w ider in a l l ra n k s o f s o c ie ty .

S a in t F r a n c is , who fo rg o t h im se lf to th in k o f o t h e r s , i s a s f a r a s

p o s s ib le from th e in d iv id u a lism p re v a le n t to -d a y . Matthew Arnold

s a id o f h is work: ”He tra n sfo rm ed monachism by u p ro o tin g th e

s ta tio n a r y monk, d e liv e r in g him from th e bondage o f p r o p e rty ,

and sending him a s a m endicant f r i a r , t o be a s tr a n g e r in th e

most crowded h a u n ts of men, t o co n so le them and t o do them good.

P overty and s u f f e r in g a r e th e c o n d itio n o f th e m u ltitu d e , th e

Immense m a jo rity o f mankind; and i t was tow ards t h i s p eo p le t h a t

h i s s o u l y e a rn e d .” (Walsh, ”The T h ir te e n th , The S r e a te s t of

C e n tu rie s” , p . 256) He s tr ip p e d h im se lf l i t e r a l l y o f e v e ry th in g

and liv e d a l i f e of po v erty in im ita tio n of C h r i s t . Me urged

h i s fo llo w e rs t o preach by t h e i r example, and th u s le a d men back

t o th e s im p lic ity and th e p u r ity o f th e i d e a l s s e t f o r t h in th e

g o s p e l. P ro fe s s o r Sm. James o f H arvard w rote: ”The p re v a le n t

f e a r o f po v erty among th e ed u cated c l a s s e s i s th e w orst m oral

d is e a s e from which our c i v i l i z a t i o n s u f f e r s . ” ( F e ld e r, ”I d e a l s

o f S t . F ra n c is ” , p . v l i ) Men o f I d e a ls a r e u s u a lly men o f working

(28)

and Bonaventure s a i l e d S a in t F ra n c is " F a th e r11, and D ante, V o lta ,

G alvani and Ampere were members o f h i s T h ird Order founded f o r

s e c u la r s . R e lig io u s women fo llo w in g h i s example belong t o t h e

o rd e r he founded w ith S a in t C la ir e a s th e fo u n d re ss.

About th e same tim e in t h e w e st, S a in t Dominic founded an

o rd e r o f mendicant f r i a r s , who a ls o championed s t r i c t p o v e rty ,

b u t among th e Dominicans le a rn in g was t o re p la c e th e s im p lic ity

which S a in t F ra n c is d e s ir e d f o r h i s so n s. The m o n a ste rie s o f

th e s e two g r e a t o rd e rs a t t r a c t e d g e n tle s p i r i t s , and have In a l l

ages been homes of le a r n in g and o f p i e t y , where u n s e lf is h men

le a r n to th in k l e s s o f th em selv es and more o f t h e i r la b o u r.

The more th a n human I n t e l l e c t u a l acumen of Thom s o f Aquin

won f o r him th e t i t l e o f " A n g e lic a l D octor", and h i s suprem ely

u n s e lf is h c h a r a c te r m erited from t h e Church t h e t i t l e o f " S a in t" .

Pope Leo X III I n s i s te d t h a t t h i s g r e a t Dominican be th e s ta n d a rd

o f te a c h in g In philosophy and th e o lo g y , a s he c o n sid e re d him to

have l a i d th e fo u n d atio n s to n e o f C h r is tia n A p o lo g e tic s. H is

c o -o rd in a tio n o f s e c u la r and r e l i g i o u s knowledge s a t i s f i e s th e

human mind b e t t e r th a n any o th e r system o f p h ilo so p h ic th o u g h t.

The g e n e ra tio n s o f th e t h i r t e e n t h c e n tu ry fa c e d s o c ia l

problem s more s e rio u s th an o u r s , f o r th e common p eo p le had no

r i g h t s a t I t s b e g in n in g , y e t sec u re d them w ith such s a t i s f a c t i o n

a s to la y th e fo u n d atio n o f th e modern l i b e r t y . In h i s tre a tm e n t

(29)

2 6

-« l t h th@ I n d iv id u a l, S a in t Thomas a tta in e d th e trium ph o f h i s

work In E th ic s . Pope Leo s a id : 11 Domestic and c i v i l s o c ie ty ,

even, which, as a l l s e a , I s exposed t o g r e a t danger from th e

p lag u e o f p e rv e rs e o p in io n s , would c e r t a i n l y enjoy a f a r more

p e a c e fu l and a s e c u re r e x is te n c e I f more wholesome d o c tr in e were

ta u g h t in th e academ ies and sc h o o ls —one more in conform ity w ith

t h e te a c h in g o f th e Church, such a s i s c o n ta in e d in th e works of

S a in t Thomas A quinas.

"F or th e te a c h in g s of S a in t Thomas on th e t r u e meaning o f

l i b e r t y —which a t t h i s tim e i s running in to l i c e n s e - o n th e d iv in e

o r ig i n o f a l l a u th o r ity , on laws and t h e i r f o r c e , on t h e p a te r n a l

and J u s t r u le of p r in c e s , on obedience t o th e h ig h e r pow ers, on

m utual c h a r ity one tow ards a n o th e r—on a l l o f th e s e and k in d re d

s u b je c ts , have v ery g re a t and in v in c ib le fo rc e to o v e rtu rn th o s e

p r in c ip le s o f th e new o rd e r which was w ell known t o be dangerous

t o th e p ea c e fu l o rd e r of th in g s and t o p u b lic s a f e t y . ” (Walsh,

“The T h ir te e n th , The G re a te s t o f C e n tu rie s ” , p . 279)

D e stru c tio n o f th e Peace of C h r is t

And Medieval U nity

I . The R enaissance

A fte r th e C rusades, an e x tra o rd in a ry en thusiasm f o r a n tiq u ity

s e t In . I t was accompanied by b o u n d less freedom o f o p in io n , and a

(30)

I n tro d u c tio n o f th e breakdown in C h r is tia n M orals: The

R enaissance f i r s t appeared in th e A rt a t F lo re n c e , where beauty

o f form was p r e f e r r e d to pure C h r is tia n i n s p i r a t i o n . T h is le d

t o a r e tu r n to n a tu re in q u e st o f b e a u ty , which in I t s e l f was

not condemned by th e Church. The p a ssio n f o r l i t e r a t u r e ,

quickened and v i v i f i e d by th e recovery o f b u rle d c l a s s i c B a rb ie s,

in to x ic a te d th e g e n e ra tio n , and o fte n le d to lic e n s e s o f an ob­

je c tio n a b le n a tu r e . The in v e n tio n o f th e p r in t i n g p r e s s o ffe re d

a means t o d isse m in a te th e new ly-found knowledge. L i t e r a tu r e

never a t t a i n e d such a degree o f o b s c e n ity . The most hideous

v le e s o f a n tiq u ity were g l o r i f i e d , and con seq u en tly most infamous

v ic e s reig n ed w ithout concealm ent. In th e days of i t s triu m p h ,

th e R enaissance s a c r i f i c e d duty and looked up t o b e au ty . Some

o f th e h ig h e st d i g n i t a r i e s o f th e Church l o s t a l l se n se o f

C h r is tia n I d e a ls , and many became s ta in e d by pagan v ic e s .

Humanism: "To r a i s e th e humanity w ith in o n e s e lf t o th e

h ig h e s t degree o f i n t e n s i t y , t o know a l l , t o ex p erien ce a l l , —such

i s th e m oral law o f humanism; a law t h a t I s i n m arvellous concord

w ith th e a s p ir a tio n s and la c k o f s c ru p le s to which th e p o l i t i c a l

and s o c i a l c o n d itio n s gave r i s e i n t h e I t a l y o f th e f i f t e e n t h

c e n tu r y .11 (A. B a u d r l l l a r t , 11 The C a th o lic Church” , p . 16) Y l l l a r l

(31)

-as-a c t i v i t y accompanied by m oral decay.'* In F ran ce, Babel& is aw­

a i t e d a l l t h a t g l o r i f i e s human p e r s o n a lity w ith i t s p r id e , and

i t s d e s ir e f o r th e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f every i n s t i n c t by p le a s u re in

a l l I t s form s.

A ttach on F a ith : R e v e la tio n proved t o be an o b s ta c le t o

th e r e ig n of re a so n , hence began th e a t t a c h on th e te a c h in g s of

C h r i s t i a n i t y , idileh some h u m anists t r e a t e d w ith d is d a in . R id i­

c u le was heaped on t h a t essence o f C ath o licism : th e p r in c ip l e

of a u th o r ity and th e m o rtify in g o f t h e s e n s e s . S c h o la stic is m

was mocked and th e fo u n d a tio n s o f C a th o lic th eo lo g y w ere a tta c k e d .

The monks were n e c e s s a r ily d e sp ise d s in c e they re p re s e n te d th e

C h r is tia n id e a l of re n u n c ia tio n . In h i s com parison o f th e human­

i s t s w ith th e monks whom th e y r i d i c u l e d , A. B r a n d r l l l a r t sa y s:

(p. 21) "The hum anists pushed in d iv id u a lism even t o th e d e n ia l

o f a l l dependence and a l l bonds; th e monks, by t h e i r vow of

obedience and co n sta n cy , fought and overcame independence. The

hum anists e x a lte d p rid e and w it; th e monks opposed them w ith

h u m ility and v o lu n ta ry abasem ent. The h u m anists g l o r i f i e d r ic h e s ;

th e monks took a vow o f p o v e rty . The hum anists J u s t i f i e d s e n su a l

p le a s u re ; th e monks m o rtif ie d t h e i r f l e s h w ith penance and

c h a s t i t y . " As th e f a i t h o f th e people f o r th e tim e b ein g had be­

come weakened, in iq u ity became ram pant in I t a l y .

E c c l e s i a s t i c a l S upport o f Hum anists: l e t a hum anist was

(32)

might even ascend th e p u lp it and d e liv e r a f u n e ra l o r a tio n o r a

m arriage sermon. This exaggerated fav o u r ended in th e dow nfall

o f th e h u m an ists. Soon th ey became greedy f o r g o ld , and p uffed

up w ith p r id e . Youths were -exposed to scandalous e x c e s se s , and

t o I n f i d e l i t y th ey soon added im m orality. U nconsciously th e

Church d i g n i t a r i e s sup p o rted th e h u m an istic movement by e n t e r ­

t a in in g a t t h e i r voluptuous c o u rts th o se people o f semi-pagan

le a n in g s , who c a s t sco rn on a l l t h a t remained d e a r t o th e p e o p le .

The Paganism o f Humanism; Soon th e n a tio n a l c u ltu r e was

th re a te n e d . The f r e e and spontaneous use o f I n t e l l e c t , supposedly

b u t f r e s h ly awakened, le d to an ap p eal to th e pagan a n c ie n ts , f o r

th e s o lu tio n o f th e g r e a t problems which C h r is tia n ity had so lv ed

f o r p reced in g g e n e ra tio n s . The Renaissance i s opposed to th e

s p i r i t of C h r is tia n ity in i t s r e tu r n to th e s p i r i t o f pagan an­

t i q u i t y . T his i t i s t h a t p la c e s th e I t a l i a n R enaissance a t th e

a n tip o d e s o f C h r i s t i a n i t y . The C h r is tia n concept o f l i f e i s based

on th e id e a o f a f a l l e n n a tu re t h a t i s c o rru p t and reduced to

fe e b le n e s s ; on th e id e a o f s in and th e n e c e s s ity o f d iv in e h e lp

to av o id s i n , w hile th e a n c ie n t pagan concept o f l i f e i s based

on th e d e i f ic a t io n o f n a tu re i t s e l f , p h y s ic a l and human. C h r i s t i ­

a n ity p la c e s th e s u p e rn a tu ra l o rd e r above th e n a t u r a l , and humanism

ta k e s no account o f th e s u p e rn a tu ra l o rd e r. Bor pagans, fo llo w in g

n a tu re i s th e means to th e f i n a l good, s in c e f o r them th e r e i s

n o th in g above n a tu re and re a so n . Too many hum anists in flu e n c e d

(33)

3 0

-n a tu r e , i t s power a-nd e f fic a c y a s a mea-ns t o a l l e-nds.

Humanism o u ts id e I t a l y : Germany, England and P rance were

o rg an ise d S t a t e s w ith le g itim a te governing powers and a u th o r ity

worthy o f r e s p e c t . f h e masses were n e ith e r dem oralized n o r un­

c h r i s t i a n iz e d a s in I t a l y , 'th e re fo re th e R enaissance movement

in th e s e c o u n tr ie s d id n ot te n d t o paganism h u t le d t o C h r is tia n

refo rm s. In Germany, reform ing z e a l s c a tte r e d l i b r a r i e s and

em ptied u n i v e r s i t i e s , u n t i l i t s fu ry was s p e n t. The s p i r i t o f

P u rita n ism in England had no a f f i n i t y w ith c l a s s i c c u l t u r e . At

i t s to u c h , th e world o f a r t , d ram atic p o e try , p a in tin g , and human­

ism in l i f e and o u ts id e o f sch oolbooks, f e l l in to d u s t. In P ra n c e ,

R a b e la is (1490-1553) t r e a t e d th e C h r is tia n r e l i g i o n a s a creed

outw orn, and f e l l back upon a k in d o f l i b e r a l P lato n ism ; he would

le a v e men to t h e i r i n s t i n c t s and th e Joy o f l i f e . Montaigne

(1533-1592) w rote e ssa y s tin g e d w ith s c e p tic is m and disen ch an tm en t.

These two w r ite r s opened in France th e a n t l - e h r l s t i a n war which

h a s l a s t e d , w ith growing v io le n c e down t o o u r tim e .

R e s u lts : Thus freedom o f th o u g h t in s e c u la r m a tte rs le d to

independence in r e l i g i o n . C r itic is m o f th e c le rg y in c re a s e d , and

h eresy to o k r o o t and f lo u r is h e d . I n h i s bock, "R enaissance and

R eform ation", Edward M. lulm e sa y s: (p . 70) "The in s is te n c e upon

in d iv id u a lity was th e g r e a te s t of th e many f a c t o r s t h a t gave r i s e

to th e R enaissance. I t causes men t o q u e stio n th e a u th o r ity o f

e x te r n a l c o n tr o l, and in s p ir e d them t o develop t h e i r l a t e n t

References

Related documents

BioMed CentralVirology Journal ss Open AcceResearch Attenuation and efficacy of human parainfluenza virus type 1 (HPIV1) vaccine candidates containing stabilized mutations in the P/C and

Neural Models of Selectional Preferences for Implicit Semantic Role Labeling Minh Le and Antske Fokkens Computational Lexicology and Terminology Lab Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,

BioMed CentralVirology Journal ss Open AcceResearch Purification of infectious human herpesvirus 6A virions and association of host cell proteins Maria Hammarstedt?1, Jenny Ahlqvist?2,

Distribution of Valency Complements in Czech Complex Predicates Between Verb and Noun V?clava Kettnerov? and Eduard Bej?ek Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and

Results: U937 human monocytic cells were infected with the Us3 and ICP4 deletion herpes simplex virus (d120), its parental virus HSV-1 (KOS), the Us3 deletion virus (R7041), its

Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with influenza, clinical significance, and pathophysiology of human influenza viruses in faecal samples what do we know? REVIEW Open

RESEARCH Open Access Early monitoring of the human polyomavirus BK replication and sequencing analysis in a cohort of adult kidney transplant patients treated with basiliximab

BioMed CentralBMC Proceedings ss Open AcceProceedings The feasibility of oligogenic combined segregation and linkage analysis in CEPH pedigrees E Warwick Daw*1,2,3,4 and Robert Yu1