• No results found

Adjective Deletion for Linguistic Steganography and Secret Sharing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Adjective Deletion for Linguistic Steganography and Secret Sharing"

Copied!
18
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Table 1: Comparing supertags before and after adjective deletion
Table 2: An example of the Google n-gram count method
Figure 1: N-gram count distributions before and after deleting joint
Table 3: Judgement examples given to annotators
+4

References

Related documents

Shipham Village Hall Trust Charity number 270556 Report of the Trustees for the year ended 30 th June 2015.. Page 3 of 3 Report of the Trustees Accounts to 30

Public universities do not have sufficient fund to provide young teachers with scholarships to promote their higher education, without which the teaching and

While at first glance it appears promising that 94% ( n =36) of forces reported offering some form of hate crime training, the context of such training – namely,

Hindawi Publishing Corporation EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking Volume 2009, Article ID 128679, 13 pages doi 10 1155/2009/128679 Research Article

Baseline algorithm retrieves the pre-computed feature terms of the given keyword query from the XML data T and then generate all the possible intended queries based

In this study, 'high' research utili- zation units had the highest aggregated mean unit culture scores (as measured by importance of access to continuing education, work values

From all that has been discussed until now, the hypotheses of this article have been confirmed, i.e., (1 st ) the destruction of forest resources in Brazil and