• No results found

Online Course Syllabus COM310 Interpersonal Communication

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Online Course Syllabus COM310 Interpersonal Communication"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Online Course Syllabus

COM310 Interpersonal Communication

Important Notes:

This document provides an overview of expectations for this online course and is subject to change prior to the term start. Changes may also occur during the term due to faculty or SPS Distance Learning course updates. Some links may only be active once the term starts.

For this course you must check the Regis Bookstore: http://www.efollett.com for the most current online course material information.

Course Description | Prerequisites | General Course Requirements

Required Course Materials | Disclosing Disabilities | Grading Criteria | Assignments

Course Description

The ability to communicate effectively in interpersonal situations helps to achieve, establish and maintain successful relationships. This course emphasizes an understanding of interpersonal communication; its theories and its practical application using models and research. Also included are language and meaning, message coding, verbal and nonverbal skills, effective listening

strategies, and ethical dimensions to assist in reflecting on the circular nature of interpersonal communication.

Prerequisites

None.

Course Goals

COURSE OBJECTIVES / PURPOSES

1. Define interpersonal communication and explain its impacts on human relationships at work, in social settings and at home.

2. Analyze personal style of communication and ways to become a more competent communicator in your interpersonal relationships by applying effective communication skills.

(2)

active listening techniques.

4. Practice and analyze effective communication skills.

5. Write papers that offer unique and cogent thought and perspectives on interpersonal communication topics that are free of grammatical, structural and mechanical errors.

Required Course Materials (top)

Stewart, John, (ed.). (2006). Bridges not walls: A book about interpersonal communication. (9th edition) New York: McGraw-Hill

Hult, Christine A., Huckin, Thomas N., The Brief New Century Handbook, (4th ed.), Allyn & Bacon/ Longman

Optional Reference Text:

Trenholm, S., & Jensen, A. (1996). Interpersonal communication (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Electronic Reserves

Refer to the course content for information regarding articles on Electronic Reserves.ink will open a new browser window.)

General Course Requirements (top)

The following expectations will

be in place for all who take

this course:

Readings:

In order to gain the maximum potential from the learning environment, it is expected that you complete the assigned reading(s) in advance.

Weekly Discussion Questions:

Weekly discussions are an important part of demonstrating communication in the course. Post your initial response to the discussion questions by Wednesday midnight (MT) of each week. Also, reply to at least two students every week by Saturday midnight (MT). Your facilitator will post any

amendments or changes to these requirements in the weekly discussion area. Use a formal writing style (no abbreviations and correct punctuation).

Written Assignments:

(3)

skill for college-level students. Therefore, please carefully revise and edit any papers before

submitting them to the facilitator. Include your name, course number and assignment number in the subject line of your email.

Group Work: Working with a group in the online setting can be challenging. Here are a few helpful suggestions to facilitate communication during group designed discussions.

1. Exchange information containing several methods of communication (phone, fax and e-mail for example) so you are not reliant on course access for conversation and document exchange between group members. This will enable you to keep working in spite of unforeseen technical problems that may arise.

2. Coordinate your efforts early to allow enough time to complete the tasks. You may find that you need to begin group work activities even sooner than you would in a traditional class setting to allow for the possibility of communication glitches.

3. Let the instructor know as soon as possible about obstacles you are encountering or assistance you may need.

Disclosing Disabilities (top)

If you have a documented disability requiring academic adjustments for this class, you should have already contacted the Director of Disability Services at Regis (303-458-4941). The Director will contact your facilitator after reviewing your documentation to determine appropriate, reasonable accommodations. You should not proceed with this course until this process has been completed.

Grading Criteria (top)

Assignment

Week(s)

Percentage Total

Points

Forum Discussions Week 1-8

5 points per

week

40%

40

Assignments

(submitted to the

Assignments Drop

Box)

Week 2, 4, 6 and

8

15 points per

assignment

60%

60

TOTAL

100%

100

Criteria for assessing and grading will be discussed throughout the course. All products will be assessed with an emphasis on depth of understanding and connections made between content of readings and class discussions. (See criteria below).

(4)

Grading Scale: 100-95% = A. 90-94% = A-. 85-89% = B. 80-84% = B-. 75-79% = C. 70-74% = C-. 65-69% = D. 60-64% = D-. 60% - below = F

ACADEMIC HONESTY

Academic honesty is at the very foundation of teaching and learning. Since trust is so important, the sanctions for presenting the work of others as your own are severe. The handbook and the Regis University Bulletin describe the university policy in detail. You may not use the same paper for two courses; however you may discuss extension of a previous topic as a new paper with the instructor. In courses, presenting the work of others as your own or using the same paper for two courses can lead to "F" grades and recommendation for expulsion from the program. If you are unsure how to document information please ask for help.

Written Assignment Grading Criteria

The following is a description of the standards for written assignments:

"5" grade: An "A" paper shows appropriate answers to the assignments and understanding of the course concepts. Reasoned arguments are supported by evidence. The paper shows evidence of reading and critical thinking about the topic. The assignment flows smoothly. Standard English grammar, spelling and punctuation are used throughout. APA style is used appropriately.

"4" grade: A "B" paper also shows appropriate answers to the topic. It differs from the "A" paper by showing less critical thinking and connection with the course concepts. The paper may flow less smoothly and there may be minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, or citation style.

"3" grade: A "C" paper indicates difficulties in one or more of the following areas: content and critical thinking lacking, difficulty in writing clearly, problems with using standard English, and/or serious problems with APA citation style.

"2" grade: A "D" paper shows a predominance of the problems associated with a "C" paper.

"1" grade: A "F" paper lacks quality and master level work in all areas above. Any paper not turned in will carry a "F" grade.

The 15--point assignment will be evaluated based on this proportion:

1. Completeness: Responding to the details of identified tasks and expressing ideas with

support (from text and other resources) = 5

2. Organization: Lively and clear introduction with a purpose statement, logical main ideas,

and a tidy conclusion that brings together all your points = 5

(5)

Online Course Assignments COM310

(top)

Week

Topic

Reading

Assignments

Other

Activities

One

Interpersonal

Communication

• Chapter 1 in

the text

• Week by

week, week 1

• Forum

Activities

Two

Self Awareness

and self

disclosure

• Chapters 2

&3 in the text.

• Week by

week, week 2

• Forum

Activities

• Written

Assignment

Three

Are you listening? • Chapter 4 in

the text

• Week by

week, week 3

• Forum

Activities

Four

Relationships:

Boost or Bust

• Chapters 6

& 10 in the

text

• Week by

week, week 4

• Forum

Activities

• Written

Assignment

Five

Friends, Family

and Intimates

• Chapters 7

& 8 in the text

• Week by

week, week 5

• Forum

Activities

Six

Gender and

Culture; Barriers

and Bridges

• Chapter 11

in the text

• Week by

week, week 6

• Forum

Activities

• Written

Assignment

(6)

Seven

Computer

Mediated

Communication

VS. Face to Face

• Chapters 12

& 13 in your

text

• Week by

week, week 7

• Forum

Activities

Eight

Future Directions • Chapters

14, 15 & 16

• Week by

week, week 8

• Forum

Activities

• Written

Assignment

Online Course Evaluation

Complete the online course evaluation form located at the bottom of the course content. (top)

Please contact techsupport@regis.edu if you need technical assistance or to report any problems. © 2006 Regis University. All Rights Reserved.

References

Related documents

Retirement plan participants can get guidance and signals about strategies for using their funds in retirement from their benefit plan architecture and communications, from general

university reform claims that strategic manage- ment has been strengthened in the universities, while the role of university per- sonnel has remained weak. Two major strategy

The output characteristic (Fig. 6-1) for a water-gated PBTTT film is close to ideal, with very little hysteresis and a low threshold between 0V and 0.1V. The responses of PBTTT

[r]

[r]

[r]

In this review, the research carried out using various ion-exchange resin-like adsorbents including modified clays, lignocellulosic biomasses, chitosan and its derivatives, microbial

While in Table 3 we present a pooled specification, to increase the chances for the added variables to exert a significant impact, in unreported regressions we repeat the