• No results found

Vol 6, No 11 (2015)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Vol 6, No 11 (2015)"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Available online throug

ISSN 2229 – 5046

INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS OF H-FUNCTION

OF TWO VARIABLES INVOLVING GENERALIZED M-SERIES

B. SATYANARAYANA

1

, ALEM MEBRAHTU

2

, Y. PRAGATHI KUMAR*

3

1

Department of Mathematics,

Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar-522 510, India.

2

Department of Physics, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia

3

Department of Mathematics, Adigrat university, Adigrat, Ethiopia.

(Received On: 24-09-15; Revised & Accepted On: 05-11-15)

ABSTRACT

T

he object of this paper is to establish some integral transforms involving product of generalized M-series and H-function of two variables. Some special cases have also been derived.

Key words: H-function of two variables, Mellin transform, Laplace transform and Generalized M-series.

1. INTRODUCTION

Recently, the Mellin-Barnes type contour integral of H-function of two variables evaluated by P.C.Srinivas [9]. In the present paper we establish the Mellin transform and Laplace transform of H-function of two variables with generalized M-series.

We shall utilized following formulae in present investigation. The H-function of one variable given by Charles Fox [2]

[ ]

(

,

)

1,

,

,

[ ]

,

,

(

,

)

1,

a

A

x

j

j

p

m n

m n

H x

H

x

H

p q

p q

b

B

j

j

q

=

=

s

L

1

F(s)x

,

i

-1, x

0

2 i

π

ds

=

=

(1.1)

Where

(

)

(1

)

1

1

F(s)

(1

)

(

)

1

1

j j j j

j j j j

m

n

b

B s

a

A s

j

j

q

p

b

B s

a

A s

j

m

j

n

Γ

Γ −

+

=

=

=

Γ − +

Γ

= +

= +

An empty product is interpreted as unity; m,n,p and q are integers satistying 0 ≤ m ≤ q, 0 ≤ n ≤ p; Aj(j = 1,…..,p),

Bj(j = 1,…..,q) are positive numbers and aj(j = 1,..,p), bj(j = 1,…..,q) are complex numbers such that no poles of

Γ(bj-Bjs), j = 1,… ..,m coincide with any pole of Γ(1-aj+Ajs), j = 1,…..,n i.e Aj(bk+N) ≠ Bk(aj-M-1), where

k= 1,…..,m; j = 1,…..,n; M = 0, 1, 2, …...

Corresponding Author: Y. Pragathi Kumar*

3

(2)

The contour L runs from σ-i∞ to σ+i∞, σ be a positive constant such that the points h

,

1,..., ;

1,..., ;

h

b

N

s

h

m N

n

B

+

=

=

=

which are the poles of Γ(bj-Bjs), j = 1,…..,m lie to the right and the points , 1,..., ; 0,1,...

1

= =

− −

= j mn M

a M a s

j j

which are the poles of Γ(1-aj+Ajs), j = 1,…..,n lie to the left of L.

The H-function of two variables given by Prasad and Gupta[6]

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1,

1,

1,

,

: ,

; ,

[ , ]

,

: ,

; ,

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1,

1,

1,

j

a

A

c

C

e

E

x

j

j

P

j

j

p

j

j

u

M N m n g h

H x y

H

P Q p q u v

b

B

d

D

f

F

x

j

j

j

Q

j

j

q

j

j

v

α

σ

γ

δ

β

η

=

1

( )

( ) ( , )

,

1

1

2

2

(2

)

1 2

s t

s

t

s t x y ds dt

i

i

L L

ϕ

ϕ

ψ

π

=

∫ ∫

= −

(1.2) where x , y ≠ 0,

∏ +

= Γ − + =∏+ Γ − ∏

= Γ − ∏= Γ − + =

q

m j

p

n j

s j C j c s

j D j d m

j

n

j

s j C j c s

j D j d

s

1 1

) (

) 1

(

1 1

) 1

( ) (

) ( 1

φ

( )

+

=

=

+

Γ

+

Γ

=

+

Γ

=

Γ

=

v

g

j

u

h

j

t

j

E

j

e

t

j

F

j

f

h

j

t

j

E

j

e

g

j

t

j

F

j

f

t

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

φ

( )

+

=

=

+

Γ

+

+

Γ

=

+

+

Γ

=

Γ

=

Q

M

j

P

N

j

t

j

A

s

j

j

a

t

j

B

s

j

j

b

N

j

t

j

A

s

j

j

a

M

j

t

j

B

s

j

j

b

t

s

1

1

1

1

1

1

,

α

β

α

β

ψ

,

where M, N, P, Q, m, n, p, q, g, h, u, v are all non negative integers such that 0 ≤ N ≤ P, Q 0, 0 ≤ m ≤ q, 0 ≤ n ≤ q, 0

≤ g ≤ v, 0 ≤ h ≤ u and αj, βj, Aj, Bj, Cj, Dj, Ej, Fj are all positive. The sequence of parameters (aP), (bQ), (cp), (dq), (eu)

and (fv) are so restricted that none of the poles of the integrand coincide.

The contour L1 lies in the complex s-plane and runs from -i∞ to +i∞ with loops, if necessary, to ensure that the poles

of Γ(dj - Djs), (j = 1, 2, ….. , m), lie to the right of the path; and those of Γ(1 – cj + Cjs), (j = 1, 2,….., n) and

Γ(1 – aj + αjs + Ajt), (j = 1, 2,….., N) lie to the left of the path.

Also the contour L2 lies in the complex t-plane running from -i∞ to +i∞ with loops, if necessary, to ensure that the

poles of Γ(fj - Fjt), (j = 1, 2,….., g), lie to the right of the path; and those of Γ(1 – ej + Ej t), (j = 1, 2,….., h) and

Γ(1 – aj + αj s + Aj t), (j = 1, 2,….., N) lie to the left of the path. All poles of the integrand are simple poles.

The Mellin transform of the function f(x) is defined as

{

( );

}

1

( )

, Re( )

0

0

s

M f x s

x

f x d x

s

=

>

(1.3)

If Laplce transform of f(t) is F(p) and G(s) is Mellin transform of f(t), then

(

)

( )

(

1)

!

0

s

p

F p

G s

s

s

∞ −

=

+

(3)

According Erdelyi [1, p.307]

1

1

( )

( )

2

0

c i

s

s

x

g s x

ds dx

g s

i

c i

π

+ ∞

=

− ∞

(1.5)

The Generalized M-Series is defined by Sharma and Renu[8] as

, ,

1 1

( ,....,

p

; ,....,

q

; )

p q p q

M

M a

a b

b z

α β α β

=

1

0 1

( ) ....(

)

( ) ....( )

(

)

k

k p k

k k q k

a

a

z

b

b

α

k

β

=

=

Γ

+

z,α,β∈ , ℜ(α) > 0 (1.6)

Series is convergent for all z if q ≥ p, it is convergent for |z| < 1 if p = q+1 and divergent if p > q+1. Where p = q+1 and |z| = 1, the series convergent in some case. Let

= =

= q

j j p

j

j b

a

1 1

β

It can be shown that when p = q+1 the series is absolutely convergent for |z| = 1 if ℜ(β) < 0. Conditionally convergent for z = -1 if 0 ≤ ℜ(β) ≤ 1 and divergent for |z|=1 if 1 ≤ ℜ(β).

2. MAIN RESULTS

Theorem 1: Prove that

,

1 1

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1,

1,

1,

,

:

,

;

,

1

2

1 1

2

2

( ,...., ; ,....,

;

)

;

,

:

,

;

,

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1 1

2

2

1,

1,

1,

1

2

l m

l m

a

A

c

C

e

E

j

j

j

P

j

j

p

j

j

p

M N m n m

n

x

M M a

a b

b ax H

s

P Q p q p

q

b

B

d

D

f

F

x

j

j

j

Q

j

j

q

j

j

q

α β

λ

α

σ

γ

δ

β

η

( )

1 1

0

1 1

( ) ( ( ) , ( / ) ) ,

, 1,

1 1 2 1 2

,

( ) 1 2 1 2

( ) ( ( ) , ( / ) ) ,

1,

m l

j j k s k

j j

l m

k

j j

j j

s k

b a k a A A

M m n N n m j j j j P

a

H

P p q Q q p s k

k

a b k b B B

j j j j Q

λ δ

λ

σ

α

σ δ

δ

δ

η

η

γ

λ

δ

α

β

β

σ δ

δ

+

= =

=

= =

 +

+ + + + + +

= + + + +

+

Γ + 

+ + −



2

2

(1

(

)

, ( / )

)

, (

,

)

, (1

(

)

, ( / )

)

, (

,

)

1,

1,

1,

1,

2

1

2

1

1

(1

(

)

, ( / )

)

, (

,

)

, (1

(

)

, ( / )

)

, (

,

)

1,

1,

1,

1,

2

1

2

1

1

s

k

s

k

f

F

F

c

C

f

F

F

c

C

j

j

j

n

j

j

n

j

j

j n

p

j

j n

p

s

k

s

k

e

E

E

d

D

e

E

E

d

D

j

j

j

m

j

j

m

j

j

j m

q

j

j m

q

λ

σ δ

λ

σ δ

δ

δ

λ

σ δ

λ

σ δ

δ

δ

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Provided σ > 0, δ > 0, λ is complex number αj - (σ/δ) Aj > 0 for j = 1, 2, - - -, P

βj - (σ/δ) Bj > 0 for j = 1, 2, - - -, Q

|arg γ| < (1/2) π∆1, |arg η| < (1/2) π∆2

where ∆1 =

= = + = = +

+ = = + = =

− + −

+ −

+

− 1 1

1

1 1

1

1 1 1 1

1 1

1 1

m

j

q

m j

n

j

p

n j

j j

j j

Q

M j

j M

j j P

N j

j N

j

j α β β D D C C

α

and

2 =

= = + = = +

+ = =

+ = =

+

+

+

2 2

2

2 2

2

1 1 1 1

1 1

1 1

m

j

q

m j

n

j

p

n j

j j

j j

Q

M j

j M

j j P

N j

j N

j

j

A

B

B

F

F

E

E

A

and

Re

(

1

)

<

0





+

j j

A

a

(4)

Re >0         + j j B b

s δ for j = 1, 2,….., M

Re >0

        + + i i j j D d B b

s δ σ for i = 1, 2,….., m1 ; for j = 1, 2,….., m2

Re

(

1

)

(

1

)

>

0





+

+

i i j j

C

c

E

e

s

δ

σ

for i = 1, 2,….., n1 ; for j = 1, 2,….., n2

Proof: To prove this theorem, take f(x) as

       2 , 1 ) , ( ; 1 , 1 ) , ( : , 1 ) , ; ( 2 , 1 ) , ( ; 1 , 1 ) , ( : , 1 ) , ; ( 2 , 2 ; 1 , 1 : , 2 , 2 ; 1 , 1 : , ) ; ,...., ; ,....,

( 1 1

, q j F j f q j D j d Q j B j j b p j E j e p j C j c P j A j j a x x n m n m N M q p q p Q P H ax b b a a

M l m

m l β α δ η σ γ λ β α in (1.3),

then expression becomes

,

1 1

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1,

1,

1,

,

:

,

;

,

1

2

1 1

2

2

( ,...., ; ,....,

;

)

,

:

,

;

,

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1 1

2

2

1,

1,

1,

1

2

l m

l m

a

A

c

C

e

E

j

j

j

P

j

j

p

j

j

p

M N m n m

n

x

M M a

a b

b ax

H

P Q p q p

q

b

B

d

D

f

F

x

j

j

j

Q

j

j

q

j

j

q

α β λ

α

σ

γ

δ

β

η

(2.2) , 1 1 1 0

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1,

1,

1,

,

:

,

;

,

1

2

1 1

2

2

( ,...., ; ,....,

;

)

,

:

,

;

,

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1 1

2

2

1,

1,

1,

1

2

s

l m

l m

a

A

c

C

e

E

j

j

j

P

j

j

p

j

j

p

M N m n m

n

x

x

M M a

a b

b ax

H

dx

P Q p q p

q

b

B

d

D

f

F

x

j

j

j

Q

j

j

q

j

j

q

α β λ

α

σ

γ

δ

β

η

∞ −

=

By using (1.2) and (1.6) represent H-function in integral form and M-series as series form. Put δt2 = -u, we get

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

=

∫ − + + − − − −                   + Γ 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 , 1 2 ) 1 ( 1 ) 2 ( 1 ) ( ... ... k L k k m k k l k L dx dt du s k t x u x u t u t u t i k a b b a a δ λ σ δ η γ δ ψ δ φ φ π β α

Interchange the order of integration, we get

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

= − − ∞ − + +                           −       − + Γ = 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 , 2 1 ) ( 2 1 1 ) ( ... ... k L u u s k t L t k k m k k l

k u t u x du dx dt

i x t i k a b b a

a σ λ δ

η δ ψ δ φ π γ φ π δ β α

Use result (1.5) and (1.1) to get the result. Change of order of integration is justifiable due to convergence of integrals.

Theorem 2:

,

1 1

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1,

1,

1,

,

:

,

;

,

1

2

1 1

2

2

( ,...., ; ,....,

;

)

;

,

:

,

;

,

(

;

,

)

: (

,

)

; (

,

)

1 1

2

2

1,

1,

1,

1

2

l m

l m

a

A

c

C

e

E

j

j

j

P

j

j

p

j

j

p

M N m n m

n

x

L M a

a b

b ax

H

s

P Q p q p

q

b

B

d

D

f

F

x

j

j

j

Q

j

j

q

j

j

q

α β λ

α

σ

γ

δ

β

η

      − + + + − + + + − + + + + + + + + + Γ + + − =

∞ = + + − = = ∞ = = = , , 1 ) ) / ( , ) 1 ( ( , , 1 ) ) / ( , ) 1 ( ( 2 1 , 2 1 2 1 , 2 1 ) ( ) ( ) ( ! ) ( 1 0 ) 1 ( 1 1 0 1 1 Q j B j j B k s j b P j A j j A k s j a m n N n m M p q Q q p P H k a k b k a s p a b k k s k m j j l j j s s l j j m j j δ σ β δ λ δ σ α δ λ γ δ σ η η β α δ δ λ       + + + + − − + + − − + + + + − − + + − − 1 , 1 1 ) , ( , 2 , 1 ) ) / ( , ) 1 ( 1 ( , 1 , 1 ) , ( , 2 , 1 ) ) / ( , ) 1 ( 1 ( 1 , 1 1 ) , ( , 2 , 1 ) ) / ( , ) 1 ( 1 ( , 1 , 1 ) , ( , 2 , 1 ) ) / ( , ) 1 ( 1 ( 2 2 q m j D j d q m j E j E k s j e m j D j d m j E j E k s j e p n j C j c p n j F j F k s j f n j C j c n j F j F k s j f δ σ δ λ δ σ δ λ δ σ δ λ δ σ δ λ

(5)

3. SPECIAL CASES (i) Take

( ) ( )

αP = AP =

( ) ( )

BQ = bQ =

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

Cp1 = Dq1 = Ep2 = Fq2 =1

We get Mellin and Laplace transforms of G-function of two variables with Generalized M-series

(ii) Put M = N = P = Q = 0 in (2.1) and (2.3), we get

,

1 2

1 1 2 2

1 1

1 1 2 2

1 2

(

,

)

(

,

)

1,

1,

,

,

( ,...., ; ,....,

;

)

;

,

(

,

)

,

(

,

)

1,

1,

l m l m

c

C

e

E

j

j

p

j

j

p

x

x

m n

m n

M M a

a b

b ax

H

H

s

p q

d

D

p q

f

F

j

j

q

j

j

q

σ δ

α β

λ

γ

η

(3.1)

,

1 2

1 1 2 2

1 1

1 1 2 2

1 2

(

,

)

(

,

)

1,

1,

,

,

( ,...., ; ,....,

;

)

;

,

(

,

)

,

(

,

)

1,

1,

l m l m

c

C

e

E

j

j

p

j

j

p

x

x

m n

m n

M M a

a b

b ax

H

H

s

p q

d

D

p q

f

F

j

j

q

j

j

q

σ δ

α β

λ

γ

η

      + − − + − − − + + + + + Γ + + =

∞ = + − = = = = , 1 , 1 ) , ( , 2 , 1 ) ) / ( , ) ( 1 ( , 1 , 1 ) , ( , 2 , 1 ) ) / ( , ) ( 1 ( 2 1 , 2 1 2 1 , 2 1 ) ( ) ( ) ( 1 0 ) ( 1 1 1 1 m j D j d q j E j E k s j e n j C j c p j F j F k s j f m n n m p q q p H k a k b k a a b k k s k m j j l j j l j j m j j δ σ δ λ δ σ δ λ γ δ σ η η β α δ δ λ      + + 1 , 1 1 ) , ( 1 , 1 1 ) , ( q m j D j d p n j C j c , 1 2

1 1 2 2

1 1

1 1 2 2

1 2

(

,

)

(

,

)

1,

1,

,

,

( ,...., ; ,....,

;

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

,

)

1,

1,

l m l m

c

C

e

E

j

j

p

j

j

p

x

x

m n

m n

L M a

a b

b ax

H

H

p q

d

D

p q

f

F

j

j

q

j

j

q

σ δ

α β

λ

γ

η

(3.2)

      + + − − + + − − − + + + + + Γ + + − =

∞ = + + − = = ∞ = = = , 2 , 1 ) ) / ( , ) 1 ( 1 ( , 2 , 1 ) ) / ( , ) 1 ( 1 ( 2 1 , 2 1 2 1 , 2 1 ) ( ) ( ) ( ! ) ( 1 0 ) 1 ( 1 1 0 1 1 q j E j E k s j e p j F j F k s j f m n n m p q q p H k a k b k a s p a b k k s k m j j l j j s s l j j m j j δ σ δ λ δ σ δ λ γ δ σ η η β α δ δ λ      + + 1 , 1 1 ) , ( , 1 , 1 ) , ( 1 , 1 1 ) , ( , 1 , 1 ) , ( q m j D j d m j D j d p n j C j c n j C j c

(iii) For β = 1 in (2.1) and (2.3), we get Mellin and Laplace transform of H-function of two variables with generalized M-series by M. Sharma [7]

(iv) For l = m = 0 in (2.1) and (2.3), we get Mellin and Laplace transform of H-function of two variables involving Mittag-Leffler function , ( )

λ β α ax E

[4]

(v) Take α = β = 1 in (2.1) and (2.3), we get Mellin the Laplace transform of H-function of two variables involving generalized hypergeometric function [3]

(vi) Put l = 0, m = 1 and b1 = 1 in (2.1) and (2.3), we get Mellin and Laplace transform of H-function of two variables

involving Wright function W(axλ

;α,β) [5].

CONCLUSION

(6)

REFERENCES

1. Erdely A., Tables of Integral Transforms, Vol I, Mc Graw Hill Book Co., New York.

2. Fox C., The G- and H-functions as symmetrical Fourier kernel, Trans. Amar. Math. Soc. 98(1961), 395-429. 3. Mathai A M., Saxena R K and Haubold H J., The H-function, Theory and applications, Springer (2009). 4. Mittag G M-Leffler., Sur la nouvelle function Eα(x), C.R.Acad.Sci., Paris (ser.II) 137 (1903), 554-558. 5. Podlubny I., Fractional differential equations, Acad.Press, San Diego-N.york etc. (1999).

6. Prasad,Y.N and Gupta, R.K., Vijnana Parishad Anusandhan Patrika,19(1976),39-45.

7. Sharma M., Fractional integration and fractional differentiation of M-series, ract. calc. Appl. Anal.II, no.2 (2008),187-192.

8. Sharma M and Renu Jain, A notes on generalized M-series as special function of fractional calculus, Fract.Calc.Appl.Anal.4, no.12 (2009), 449-452.

9. Srinivas.P.C., On Special Functions, Integral transforms and Integral equations, Ph.D Thesis, Kannur University. India.

Source of support: Nil, Conflict of interest: None Declared

References

Related documents

The United Kingdom (UK) Department of Health (1997) identified four further groups of older deafblind people: 1) Those living with sight impairment who subsequently acquire

Since the denatured states of membrane proteins are constrained by the lipid environment, the enzymes that identify and help degrade them confront a difficult task compared

Conclusion: Our work demonstrates a novel function for CFTR as a regulator of pancreatic beta-cell insulin secretion and exocytosis, and put forward a role for CFTR as regulator of

Universities and colleges set their own criteria for accepting credits based on AP and IB test scores and if the student score is high enough, the student will receive credit for

Non-expert scientists are frequently involved in research requiring data acquisition over large geographic areas. Despite mutual benefits for such “citizen science”, barriers

This study therefore recommend that Ministry of Labour and Social Protection through the Department of Children Services in the study area should organize for

The importance of this research arises from this point, as it aims to cover the gap by analyzing this relationship between logistics performance indicator and its

The relationships between fish length and weight and otolith length for the 14 species were calculated using least squares regression equations to predict the standard