• No results found

Integrated Business Planning

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Integrated Business Planning"

Copied!
27
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Bill Nienburg

Managing Director

Integrated Business Planning Associates, LLC

(Former VP S&OP, Sara Lee Corporation)

[email protected]

1

Integrated Business Planning

Best Practices for Next Generation

(2)

Integrated Business Planning Associates

– S&OP / Integrated Business Planning Consulting – Process & System Development Services

Our Approach…

– Understand your business objectives • Financial and strategic goals

– Understand your data structure

• Product / Customer / Supply Chain Hierarchies • Customer / Consumer Segmentations

• Organizational Structure – Design the process

• Participants, roles & responsibilities • Meeting structure, timing & protocol • Inputs/outputs, data requirements • Planning methodology

– Help you define the right technology

• Support the software search/selection process • Bridge process requirements to configuration – Support culture change necessary to succeed

• Training, concept delivery, resource development – Plan for continuous improvement

Integrated Business Planning Associates

Unlock the Exponential Power of Your Planning Process

TECHNOLOGY Methods &

Approach PROCESS

PEOPLE User Interface/Training Roles & Responsibilities Change Mgmt

Develop a

process

that fits

your

business…

Delivers

broad

cross-functional

value…

With a

financial

and

strategic

focus…

Leading to

improved

bottom-line

results.

Background

(3)

Integrated Business Planning Associates

3

Background

Georgia Tech, Mechanical Engineering 1993

Procter & Gamble (1993-2003)

– Manufacturing Process Engineer

– Capacity Expansion Lead

– Category Supply Planning Lead

• US Facial Tissue Category

• Canadian Paper Products (Tissue/Towel/Facial)

Sara Lee Corporation (2003-2009)

– Director, Supply Planning, US Foods

– Director, Supply Planning Systems Transformation

– VP S&OP, Global System & Process Development

Integrated Business Planning Associates

(4)

Best Practices for the Next

Generation of S&OP

Objectives:

1. Introduce the next-generation of Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) 2. Investigate current best practices for S&OP

3. Show the importance of enabling technology

 Evolution of S&OP

 S&OP Best Practices

 Illustration of Key Concepts in Consensus Planning

 Technology Enabled S&OP

 Case Study: S&OP Revitalization

(5)

5

Sales & Operations Planning

 Collaborative process to generate demand plan

 Demand & supply balanced across resources

 Supply chain constraints identified and mitigation options presented

 What-if scenarios used to analyze risks & opportunities against constraints Demand

Planning Demand Review

Product Supply Review Mgmt Business Review

Consensus Demand Planning Supply ChainSynchronization Alignment & Agreement

Decision / Exception Management

Pre S&OP Meeting Continuous Collaboration Process: Converges for S&OP Consensus Snapshot

(6)

Evolution of S&OP

 In the past, S&OP has been most often identified as a Supply Chain based process

– But it has been toosingularly supply chain focused engage and provide value across functions and drive true business optimization?

S&OP is a managerial tool used for manufacturing planning and control. Its

fundamental objective is to reconcile sales forecasts with production plans in terms of volume. To do so, the S&OP has to coordinate planning efforts among the various departments involved in the process.

S&OP is… the function of setting the overall level of manufacturing output and other activities to best satisfy the current planned levels of sales… primary

purposes is to establish production rates that will achieve management’s objective of maintaining, raising, or lowering inventories or backlogs, while usually

attempting to keep the workforce relatively stable… extending through a planning horizon sufficient to plan the labor, equipment, facilities, material, and finances required to accomplish the production plan… normally prepared with information from marketing, manufacturing, engineering, finance, materials, etc."

(7)

7

Evolution of S&OP

“S&OP is the common and synchronized process for business review and

decision making, to optimize business performance and drive business strategy.”

“Traditional sales and operations planning (S&OP) processes and supporting technologies are no longer sufficient in today’s high-pressured business environment. Sales and Operations Planning has evolved to become Integrated Business Planning. It is a truly cross-functional, multi-dimensional processthat includes all elements of demand, supply and financial analysis in relation to thebusiness goals and strategy.”

-“Technology Strategies for Integrated Business Planning”, June 2006

“The broader strategic mandate for S&OP is key to superior returns. S&OP leaders are aggressively

converting S&OP from an operations level demand-and-supply balancing process to the mechanism of choice for integrated business planning and strategy deployment

(8)

Integrated Business Planning

 Cross functional alignment and synchronization

 Plan consolidation across execution/tactical/strategic planning horizons  Facilitates demand sensing & shaping for margin optimization

 Integration with financial planning processes

 Attribute based planning; supports market & customer segmentation  Technology enabled process facilitation and data management

Demand

Planning Demand Review

Product Supply Review Mgmt Business Review

Consensus Demand Planning Supply ChainSynchronization Alignment & Agreement

Decision / Exception Management

Pre S&OP Meeting Continuous Collaboration Process: Converges for S&OP Consensus Snapshot

(9)

9

Integrated Business

Planning / S&OP Model

Demand

Planning Demand Review

Product Supply Review Mgmt Business Review Innovation

Strategy Business Plan

Business Strategy

Consensus Demand Planning Supply ChainSynchronization Alignment & Agreement .Decision / Exception Management

Pre S&OP Meeting Pricing & Trade Strategy Customer & Consumer Strategy Procurement Strategy

Continuous Collaboration Process: Converges for S&OP Consensus Snapshot

(10)

Critical for

Challenging Economy

Linking together…

– Promotion Plans – Sales Trends – New Products – Marketing Efforts – Financial Management

Will lead to better

reaction/decisions for:

– Production Planning – Labor Management – Procurement

– Financial Management

Actions to Take to Weather a Recession*

“Build demand-driven capabilities”

 A good long-term forecast is the foundation of strong buy-side strategies.

Strengthen price management capabilities”

 Strong price management must be closely aligned to trade promotion efforts.

“Make every dollar spent on trade promotions count”

 Understand the effect of trade funds on margin not only the increases in volume

“Actively manage the product portfolio”

 Historic demand will not be a good predictor of future demand; so focus on product rationalization efforts, streamline complexity and sense portfolio changes.

Focus on maintaining a balance”

 Don’t react too suddenly to market issues and throw the supply chain out of balance

(11)

Integrated Business Planning Associates

11

Best Practice Capabilities

Executive S&OP

– Compare Base Plan vs. What-If Scenario(s)

– Financial/Profitability Evaluation

– Dynamic Dashboards / Presentation Reports

– Control Demand Building Blocks

– Time-Phased Adjustments to Key Assumptions

– Support Views of Product/Customer/Consumer Segmentation

– Include Trend, Marketing Share, other Macro Economic Data

– Ability to Monitor Performance vs. Business Strategy

(12)

Consensus Demand Planning

Integrated Business Planning:

Consensus Demand Planning

Demand Planning Trade Planning

Supply Chain Execution Market Execution Top Down Planning

Updated Financial & Strategic Assumptions Financial Forecasting

“To realize it’s full potential, S&OP must evolve to facilitate alignment and

coordination across a complex and multi-functional business landscape”

Innovation Objectives/Goals

(13)

13

Incorporating Multiple

Sources of Input

NPD Research NPD Authorizations Promotion

Calendars AOP/ OL Targets

Media Campaigns Trade Marketing Programs LRP Targets Promo Analysis

Issues

• Lack of strong tool to handle complexity, integrate all sources of information

• Not a clear strategy for how to manage each input, where it belongs, how it should evolve

Result: confusion & frustration, only partial planning, inaccuracy Statistical Forecasts Macro-Economic Trends Base vs. Lift

(14)

Incorporating Multiple

Sources of Input

Bottom UP

Bottom Up

Top Down

+

Bottom Up

Top Down

+

Goals

+

Provide a clear structure that manages where bottom-up forecasts, versus top down plans, versus goals and targets reside in the overall forecast.

Execution Tactical Strategic

Potentially unrealistic goals, or top down plans that are not fully developed, cause poor coordination / inaccurate forecasting when added to the execution horizon

Goals

Goals

(15)

15

Incorporating Multiple

Sources of Input

Marketing & Innovation Customer Marketing and Sales Initiatives

Statistical Demand Modeling Goals/Expectations

Promotional Planning / NPD Authorizations

Bottom Up

(

only

!)

Bottom Up

Top Down

+

Bottom Up

Top Down

+

Goals

+

NPD Research NPD KAM Authorizations KAM Promotion Calendars AOP/LE Targets Media Campaigns Trade Marketing Programs LRP Targets Statistical Models Statistical Models Statistical Models Promo AnalysisAnalysisPromo

Each input should flow into it’s proper time horizon and level of detail, allowing

full planning of the entire IPB planning horizon using all various/valuable sources of information.

“A Place for Everything and Everything in its Place”

Top Down

Goals

Goals

Execution: 0 to “X” months Tactical: “Y” months Strategic: “Z” months

(16)

Planning Horizon

Management

Marketing Programs & Innovation Sales/Trade Programs & Initiatives

Goals & Objectives

Promotional Planning / New Product Authorizations

Statistical Demand Forecasting / Base Business Adjust

S&OP manages this flow…

By separately handling the various levels and sources of input, with the

right level of detail over the right time horizon, we can drive

(17)

17

S&OP Structure

Level,

Multi-Dimensional

 Determine right combination of levels across multiple hierarchies at which to conduct S&OP  Planning inputs/adjustments should populate throughout the data structure

 Attributes should be defined to provide various functional specific views/analysis

UPC Code Product Number T ransac tion Hier ar chy A ll Natio nal Accou nt Parent / All Other Child Ship-to Door • Brand • Consumer Segmentations • Procurement Groupings A tt ribu tes Bus Unit Category Promoted Group • Key Account • Market • Channel Plant Operating Department Resource n/a n/a • Resource Groupings Regio n Source Plant Warehouse Distribution Center Ship-from n/a • Storage Characteristics

Product Customer Distribution Manufacturing

A ll A ll A ll

(18)

S&OP Enabling Technology

 S&OP technology assists with data management, reporting and process facilitation

S&OP Functionality

Explore / analyze data by product and customer

Understand constraints

Understand financialsChange assumptionsLive P&L modeling

Top down planning

Scenario modeling

Work flow / process facilitation

Close functionality gaps

Statistical forecastingCapacity/sourcing modelsAccount planning Light Sup/Dmd Planning Light Acct Planning

ERP

P&L

S&OP Application

Collaboration * Consensus * Analysis * Review

BI

S&OP Business Planning Process

CRM

SCM

(19)

19

Case Study:

S&OP Challenges

Data structure mismatches

Not adding significant cross functional value

Tools are too limiting and inflexible (and slow)

Inconsistent approaches

Lacking critical functionality for account planning, demand planning

Lack of focus on profitability / financials

Disconnects with downstream planning (manufacturing, procurement, labor,

etc)

Poor linkage between S&OP and weekly/tactical processes

Objective

: Design a collaborative consensus planning process, generate a

base forecast to cover the full traditional S&OP horizon, and provide

additional functionality to support account planning activity by the sales

function

(20)

Enabling Technology

2. Demand Planning

Manage: Stat Forecast, Baseline Forecast •Kilo, Units, Euro

•By S&OP Family or Material 3. Marketing

Manage: NDP, Cannibalization, Promotions

•Kilo, Euro

•By Material (and Key Account)

1. Financial Controlling

Manage: Price, Fixed & Variable Cost, Stales, Kilo Conversion •By SOP Family or Material

4. Account Planning

Manage: Key Account Plan, Promos and Discounts •Euro, Kilo, Units

•By S&OP Family & Key Account

5. Consensus S&OP

Manage: Goals, Total Forecast & Financial Estimates

•Euro, Kilo

•By S&OP Family or Key Account

Calculate Revenue, Cost, Kilos

Disaggregate Per Account Calc Forecast Profit

Consolidate Plans Workflow Process Support Reporting Analysis Monthly Reporting Weekly Reporting

(21)

21

Enabling Technology

Data is always up-to-date, default plan is pre-prepared

Process management/accountability is workflow assisted

Reporting provides analytical and management tracking capability

Results in an efficient and organized process that provides a complete plan

Week Three Period Close Week Two Week One Preparation Manage History & Events Demand Planning Prepare Updated Assumptions Finance New Product & Promo Forecast Marketing Prepare Base Forecast Demand

Planning Review & Adjust Key Account Plans Sales Mgmt Business Review Business Leadership Team Demand Consensus & Review Sales * Marketing * Demand Planning

(22)

Enabling Technology

“Rough Cut Financial Planning”… real time visibility to profitability

Historical Data

Actual Sales(Kgs, Units, €)

> Previous Years, YTD

Prior Plan of Recordw/ Metrics

Plan Building Blocks

Statistical Fcst, DP, Sales Plans, Consumer Promo, Innovation

Integrated Bus Plan

Trade Spend

Gross Sales

Net Sales

Cost of Goods

Gross Profit

Assumptions

Actual Spend(€)

Calculated Default Rate(%)

Calculated Defaults (pricing, etc)

Adjusted Trade Assumption

( Key Account, Product Family)

Time Phased Adjustments

Projected Net Sales (€)

Net Sales Bridge Analysis Actual Net Sales History (€)

Base Net Price (€/Kg)

Actual Cost (Fixed & Variable) Actual Yield

Projected Costs (Stnd, Real) Time Phased Adjustments

Gross Production

Actual Gross Profit (€)

(23)

23

Expected Benefits

Forecast by sku / key account

 Updated information for procurement planning  Improved portfolio management capability

Improved accuracy & alignment

 Improved cross functional coordination & execution

Planning in both volume & value

 Better & faster decision making

 Crucial tool for management during economic crisis

Productivity gains

 Reduction of manual tasks

Over 125 linked/complex spreadsheets eliminated  More time to analyze the business, prepare for decisions

Long term visibility

 Streamlined AOP & Outlook process  Improved risk assessment and mitigation

(24)

Objective of S&OP

Utilize business levers to influence future demand for the

optimal (most profitable) plan

• Customer initiatives / trade investment

• Consumer activation (media, consumer promotions, etc) • Pricing

• Commodity / cost structure response • Innovation & commercialization

Identify capacity constraints and manage sourcing to formulate

the

most profitable demand response

(25)

25

Companies with Best in Class S&OP Processes Have a 2.5X-6X

Advantage in Key Performance Improvements

23% 33% 40% 23% 26% 18% 48% 73% 77% 84% 83% 81% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Customer Retention (%) Finished goods days of inventory Complete Order Fill Rate (%) Average Forecast Accuracy at the Product Family Level Gross Margin (% of revenue) Logistics costs as a % of sales % a c h ie v in g m e tr ic i m p ro v e m e n t in p a s t 2 y e a rs All Others BIC

Performance Impact

(26)

Keys to Success

Difference Makers

Ensure top management support across each functionFocus on change management

Apply simplifying concepts to manage the complexityEmploy a continuous improvement approach

Ensure alignment/synchronization with master data

Incorporate cross-functional data structures and hierarchiesEnable attribute based planning approaches

Integrate with finance to drive fastest adoption

Position the S&OP process as a strategic decision making processLink S&OP cycle to established business review process

Establish well defined process facilitation / workflow stepsInputs should be specific, tangible and actionable

(27)

27

Integrated Business Planning Associates, LLC

 Sales & Operations Planning Consulting

 Process & System Development Services

Bill Nienburg, Managing Director

[email protected] www.ibp2.com

+1-630-881-5002

Integrated Business Planning Associates

Unlock the Exponential Power of Your Planning Process

TECHNOLOGY Methods &

Approach PROCESS

PEOPLE User Interface/Training Roles &

Responsibilities

Change Mgmt

Develop a process that fits your business…

Delivers broad cross-functional value…

With a financial and strategic focus…

Leading to improved bottom-line results.

References

Related documents

pA OL bbcL OL Oi uq J 4OL 2GI bGLPb2 WOLC JIJJbOLWIJtJA tPG GLJcL qicLGIJcG2 EU PtGWCUt C02t2 CLO22 biut M!w r o ptcwcut cot Lcqnc!u bLoqacfEAEfA. iu CI!CL MOLI( (QLA uq pqpcu itc

Encouraged by the high efficiency of the initial assembly reactions, we decided to investigate if the method was suf- ficiently robust and efficient for the generation of libraries

Usporedba zakašnjenja paljenja za dvije radne točke između FTM modela i QDIM modela na 3000 min -1 .... Usporedba zakašnjenja paljenja za dvije radne točke između FTM modela i

If librarians and other professionals who provide academic support demonstrate that we care about the students’ suc- cess, will the rate of attrition decline?” I concluded that as

For the synthesis of terephthalic acid modified epoxy acrylate resin , Bisphenol A type epoxy resin (from Elkay Chemicals), Hydroquinone, Triethylamine (TEA, from Acros

The evaluation of quantitative risk analysis is applied to railway tunnel (case study), whose geometric configuration, infrastructures and typical fire make it particularly

David Reed, “Oneness Pentecostalism: Problems and Possibili- ties for Pentecostal Theology,” Journal of Pentecostal Theology 11 (1997): 73-93; “Aspects of the Origins of

Name of the Candidate Particulars of IP Relation ship Cate gory Eligibility Criteria Course Applied Eligibi lity Remarks Name of IP Insura nce Date of Birth Age as